In the current era of bombing population of the world staple food is the requirement; however, in the advanced countries yield is though a prime objective but quality is also a dire need. Studying the effect of different levels of Phosphorous and Sulphur on grain yield and protein content of wheat, a randomized complete block design with split plot arrangements were conducted at New Developmental Farm NDF of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University, Peshawar, Pakistan, during Rabi 2010-11 following four replications. Phosphorus 0, 30, 60 and 90 kg ha-1 was used as main plot and Sulphur 0, 10, 20 and 30 kg ha-1 as subplot factor. A subplot size of 1.8×4 m having six rows, 30 cm apart and 4 m long was used. Wheat cultivated variety Saleem-2000 was sown at the rate of 120 kg ha-1. Half of the N fertilizer was applied as basal dose in the form of urea and the remaining half was applied with first irrigation after three weeks of sowing. Ammonium Sulphate was used as source of Sulphur S and single super phosphate SSP as a source of Phosphorous P . Data were recorded on various quantitative and quality parameters of which yield was of prime importance. Spikes m-2 increased with increase in Phosphorous application rate. Grains spike-1increased to 48 with increased Phosphorous level 90 kg ha-1 . Thousand grain weight, grain and biological yield of wheat increased significantly with increase in both “P” and “S” levels, however, the interaction of P×S showed no significant effect on them. Higher 1000-grains weight 46.2 g , grain yield 4263 kg ha-1 and biological yield 8334 kg ha-1 were obtained at “P” treatment of 90 kg ha-1 as compared to 42.6 g, 3329 kg ha-1 and 7303 kg ha-1, respectively, in plots where “P” was not applied. Similarly higher 1000-grain weight 44.78 g , grain yield 4070 kg ha-1 and biological yield 8075 kg ha-1 were recorded at 30 kg ha-1 “S” as compared with 43.98 g, 3624 kg ha-1 and 7544 kg ha-1, respectively, in plots where “S” was not applied. Similarly, protein content increased to 9.9% by increasing the level of “S” to 30 kg ha-1 as compared with 9.2% in plots where “S” was not applied. It was concluded that “P” and “S” affected grain and biological yield significantly and thus “P” and “S” at the rates of 90 and 30 kg ha-1, respectively, are recommended for higher yield in wheat. This study revealed that the current findings might be applicable to wheat crop around the world for enhancing yield and protein quality
| Primary Language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication Date | December 15, 2012 |
| IZ | https://izlik.org/JA77TF76WG |
| Published in Issue | Year 2012 Volume: 5 Issue: 3 |
❖ Indexes
Additional Web of Science Indexes: Zoological Record, TR Dizin, Medical Reads (RRS), CrossRef;10.46309/biodicon.
❖ Libraries
Aberystwyth University; All libraries; Bath University; Birmingham University; Cardiff University; City University London; CONSER (Not UK Holdings); Edinburgh University; Essex University;Eskisehir Technical University Library, Exeter University; EZB Electronic Journals Library; Feng Chia University Library; GAZİ Gazi University Library; Glasgow University; HEC-National Digital Library; Hull University; Imperial College London; Kaohsiung Medical University Library; ANKOS; Anadolu University Library; Lancaster University; Libros PDF; Liverpool University; London Metropolitan University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Manchester University; National Cheng Kung University Library; National ILAN University Library; Nottingham University; Open University; Oxford University; Queen Mary, University of London; Robert Gordon University; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sheffield Hallam University; Sheffield University; Shih Hsin University Library; Smithsonian Institution Libraries; Southampton University; Stirling University; Strathclyde University; Sussex University; The National Agricultural Library (NAL); The Ohio Library and Information NetWork; Trinity College Dublin; University of Washington Libraries; Vaughan Memorial Library; York University.
❖ Articles published in the journal “Biological Diversity and Conservation” are freely accessible. No article processing charge (APC) is charged.
❖ Additional Web of Science Indexes: Zoological Record
❖ This journal is a member of CrossRef;10.46309/biodicon.
❖ For published articles and full details about the journal, please visit http://www.biodicon.com; https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/yayin/biodicon.
❖ Correspondence Address:: Prof. Ersin YÜCEL, Sazova Mahallesi, Ziraat Caddesi, No.277 F Blok, 26005 Tepebaşı-Eskişehir/Türkiye
❖ E-mail: biodicon@gmail.com;
❖ Web Address: http://www.biodicon.com; https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/biodicon
❖ Biological Diversity and Conservation
❖ ISSN 1308-5301 Print; ISSN 1308-8084 Online
❖ Publication Start Date 2008
❖ © Copyright by Biological Diversity and Conservation/Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma; Available online at www.biodicon.com. All rights reserved.
. ❖ Publisher: ERSİN YÜCEL (https://www.ersinyucel.com.tr)
❖ This Journal is published three times a year. It is printed in Eskişehir, Türkiye.
❖ The authors are solely responsible for the articles published in this Journal .
❖ Editör-in Chief : Prof.Dr. Ersin YÜCEL, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-7578