Petrorhagia (Ser.) Link taksonlarının polen mikromorfolojisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de yayılış gösteren Petrorhagia (Ser.) Link (Caryophyllaceae) cinsine ait türlerin polen yapıları mikromorfolojik yöntemle, taramalı elektron mikroskobu (SEM) kullanılarak incelenmiştir. Cins Ülkemizde 4 türü endemik olmak üzere 12 türle temsil edilmektedir. Bu çalışmada incelenen türler ve endemizm durumları: Petrorhagia lycica (P.H.Davis) P.W.Ball. & Heywood (endemik), P. cretica (L.) P.W.Ball & Heywood, P. alpina (Hablitz) P.W.Ball. & Heywood subsp. alpina, P. alpina (Hablitz) P.W.Ball. & Heywood subsp. olympica (Boiss.) P.W.Ball. & Heywood, P. saxifraga (L.) Link, P. pamphylica (Boiss. & Balansa) P.W.Ball. & Heywood (endemik), P. peroninii (Boiss.) P.W.Ball. & Heywood (endemik), P. prolifera (L.) P.W.Ball. & Heywood, P. dubia (Raf.) G.López & Romo. Genellikle taşlık alanlar, tarla ve yol kenarları gibi habitatlarda yayılış gösteren cinsin türleri 2003-2007 yılları arasında proje kapsamında toplanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda Petrorhagia cinsi polen şeklinin sferoid olduğu ve türlerin tamamında polenlerin porlu (poliporat) yapıda oldukları bulunmuştur. Ancak türler arasında; polen büyüklükleri, por sayıları, polen ve operkulum ornemantasyonları farklılıklar göstermektedir.

Keywords

• Caryophyllaceae
• Petrorhagia (Ser.) Link
• polen
• mikromorfoloji
• SEM

Pollen micromorphology of Petrorhagia (Ser.) Link taxa

Abstract

In this study, the pollen structure of species belonging to the genus Petrorhagia (Ser.) Link (Caryophyllaceae) in Turkey with micromorphological method which is scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were examined. The genus is represented by 12 species, 4 of which are endemic. Species examined in this study and their endemism status: Petrorhagia lycica (P.H.Davis) P.W.Ball. & Heywood (endemic), P. cretica (L.) P.W.Ball & Heywood, P. alpina (Hablitz) P.W.Ball. & Heywood subsp. alpina, P. alpina (Hablitz) P.W.Ball. & Heywood subsp. olympica (Boiss.) P.W.Ball. & Heywood, P. saxifraga (L.) Link, P. pamphylica (Boiss. & Balansa) P.W.Ball. & Heywood (endemic), P. peroninii (Boiss.) P.W.Ball. & Heywood (endemic), P. prolifera (L.) P.W.Ball. & Heywood, P. dubia (Raf.) G.López & Romo. Petrorhagia species, which generally spread in habitats such as stony areas, fields and road sides, were collected in the project between 2003-2007. As a result of the study, it was found that the pollen shape of the genus was spheroid and the pollen species were porous in all species. However, among the species; pollen sizes, number of pores, pollen and operculum ornamentations show differences.

Keywords

• Caryophyllaceae
• Petrorhagia (Ser.) Link
• pollen
• micromorphology
• SEM

References

1. Williams, F. N. (1890). Synopsis of the genus Tunica. Journal of Botany, 28, 193-199.
2. Ball, P. W. & Heywood, V. H. (1964). A revision of the genus Petrorhagia. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History) Botany, 3(4), 121-172.
3. Tutin, T. G. (1980). Flora Europaea, Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Davis, P. H. (1957). New Turkish Species of Tunica, Velezia and Potentilla. Notes Royal Botanic Garden, 22, 166.
5. Polunin, O. (1987). Flowers of Greece and the Balkans, a field guide (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Davis, P. H. (Ed.) (1967). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol 2. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
7. Davis, P. H., Mill, R. R. & Tan, K. (Eds.) (1988). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Vol 10. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
8. Güner, A., Aslan, S., Ekim, T., Vural, M. & Babaç, M. T. (Eds.) (2012). Türkiye bitkileri listesi (Damarlı bitkiler). İstanbul: Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi ve Flora Araştırmaları Derneği Yayını.

9. Dönmez, A. A., Ağar, O. T., Uğurlu, Z., Mutlu, B. & Horasan, Ö. (2013). Taxonomic and biogeographic contributions to some genera of Caryophyllaceae family in Turkey. Hacettepe Journal of Biology & Chemistry, 41(2), 103-113.
10. Bittrich, V. (1993). Caryophyllaceae. In K. Kubitzki, J. G. Rohwer & V. Bittrich (Eds.), The families and genera of vascular plants, Vol 2 - Flowering plants dicotyledons: Magnoliid, Hamamelid and Caryophyllid families (pp. 206-236). Germany: Springer.
11. Chanda, S. (1962). On the pollen morphology of some Scandinavian Caryophyllaceae. Grana Palynologica, 3, 67-89.
12. Yıldız, K. (2001). Pollen morphology of Caryophyllaceae species from Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 33(4), 329-355.
13. Candau, P. (1980). Palinologia en Caryophyllaceae del sur de Espana -subfamilia Silenoideae. Lagascalia, 9, 137-147.
14. Aktaş, K., Altan, Y., Özdemir, C., Baran, P. & Garnatje, T. (2010). Comparative polen morphology of Turkish species of Petrorhagia (Caryophyllaceae) and its systematic implications. Biologia, 65(3), 444-450. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-010-0038-2
15. Pınar, M. & Oybak, E. (1997). Pollen morphology of Turkish Bolanthus (Ser.) Reichb. (Caryophyllaceae). Hacettepe Bulletin of Natural Science and Engineering (A), 26, 1-9.
16. Sahreen, S., Khan, M. A., Meo, A. A. & Jabeen, A. (2008). Studies on the pollen morphology of the genus Dianthus (Caryophyllaceae) from Pakistan. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 1(1), 89-98.
17. Kızılpınar, İ., Özüdoğru, B., Özmen, E., Erik, S. & Doğan, C. (2010). Morphological, palynological and ecological features of Dianthus engleri Hausskn. & Bornm. Hacettepe Journal of Biology and Chemistry, 38(2), 139-147.
18. Mačukanović Jocić, M. P., Jarić, S. V. & Mladenović, M. A. (2015). Palynomorphological study of Dianthus petraeus Waldst. et Kit. (Caryophyllaceae). Archives of Biological Sciences, Belgrade, 67(3), 973-980. https://doi.org/10.2298/ABS150116060M
19. Ataşlar, E., Potoğlu Erkara, İ. & Tokur, S. (2009). Pollen morphology of some Gypsophila L. (Caryophyllaceae) species and its taxonomic value. Turkish Journal Botany, 33(5), 335-351.
20. Külköylüoğlu, G., Yıldız, K. & Minareci, E. (2009). Minuartia anatolica var. anatolica ve M. pestalozzae türleri üzerine morfolojik, karyolojik ve palinolojik bir çalışma. Biyoloji Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi, 2(2), 49-57.
21. Kaplan, A. (2008). Pollen morphology of some Paronychia species (Caryophyllaceae) from Turkey. Biologia, 63(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11756-008-0016-0
22. Arkan, O. & İnceoğlu, Ö. (1992). Türkiye’nin bazı Saponaria L. taksonlarının polen morfolojisi. Doğa–Tr. Journal of Botany, 16, 253-272.
23. Ataşlar, E. (2004). Morphological and anatomical investigations on the Saponaria kotschyi Boiss. (Caryophyllaceae). Turkish Journal Botany, 28, 193-199.
24. Erdir, M. & Ataşlar, E. (2019, April 28). Pollen structure of Saponaria L. (Caryophyllaceae) in Turkey. Paper presented at the Internatioanl Marmara Science and Social Sciences Congress Spring-2019 Turkey, Science Symposium Proceeding, Vol 2, 2325-2331. ISBN: 978-605-69509-0-2.
25. Smissen, R. D. & Garnock-Jones, P. J. (2002). Relationships, classification and evolution of Scleranthus (Caryophyllaceae) as inferred from analysis of morphological characters. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 140, 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00081.x
26. Sahreen, S., Khan, M. A., Meo, A. A. & Jabeen, A. (2008). Pollen morphology of the genus Silene (Sileneae- Caryophyllaceae) from Pakistan. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 1(2), 74-85.
27. Yıldız, K. (1996). Pollen morphology of some Silene L. (Caryophyllaceae) taxa distributed in northwest Anatolia. Turkish Journal Botany, 20, 231-241.
28. Yıldız, K. (2006). Morphological and palynological investigation on Silene gigantea L. var. gigantea and Silene behen L. (Caryophyllaceae) distributed in western Anatolia and northern Cyprus. Turkish Journal Botany, 30, 105-119.
29. Yıldız, K. & Minareci, E. (2008). Morphological, anatomical, palynological and cytological investigation on Silene urvillei Schott. (Caryophyllaceae). Journal of Applied Biological Sciences, 2(2), 41-46.
30. Yıldız, K., Çırpıcı, A. & Dadandı, M. Y. (2010). Pollen morphology of Silene taxa (Caryophyllaceae) in four sections from Turkey. Phytologia Balcanica, 16(1), 85-95.
31. Atasagun, B., Aksoy, A. & Martin, E. (2016). Anatomical, palynological and karyological remarks of Silene brevicalyx and Silene ozyurtii (Caryophyllaceae). Phytotaxa, 270(2), 116-126. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.270.2.4
32. Eröz Poyraz, İ. & Ataşlar, E. (2010). Pollen and seed morphology of Velezia L. (Caryophyllaceae) genus in Turkey. Turkish Journal Botany, 34(3), 179-190.
33. Bridson, D. & Forman, L. (1999). The herbarium handbook. Kew: Kew Publishing, Royal Botanic Gardens, 334 pp.
34. Faegri, K. & Iversen, J. (1975). Textbook of pollen analysis (3th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
35. Tejaswini (2002). Variability of pollen grain features: a plant strategy to maximize reproductive fitness in two species of Dianthus? Sexual Plant Reproduction, 14(6), 347-353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-002-0130-z
36. Jürgens, A., Witt, T. & Gottsberger, G. (2012). Pollen grain size variation in Caryophylloideae: a mixed strategy for pollen deposition along styles with long stigmatic areas? Plant Systematics and Evolution, 298(1), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-011-0518-z