BibTex RIS Cite

Epipelik, Epifitik ve Epilitik İndikatör Alg Türlerinin belirlenmesi; Sarısu Çayı Antalya örnekleme alanı

Year 2018, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 174 - 179, 15.12.2018

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Olimpos dağlarından doğan ve Antalya körfezine dökülen Sarısu Çayındaki kirlilik indikatörü ve ekonomik önemi olabilecek alg türlerini belirlemek ve karşılaştırma yapmak amacıyla yapılmıştır. Sarısu çayında epirhitral bölgeden potamal bölgeye kadar 3 istasyondan örnekler Numuneler epipelik, epifitik, epilitik olmak üzere farklı habitatlardan toplanmıştır. Sarısu çayında beş divisio ya ait toplam 72 alg taksonu tespit edilmiştir. Belirlenen divisiolarından en yaygın ve dominat olanı %54,1 ile Bacillariophytadır. Diğer divisyolar ise sırasıyla, Chlorphyta %25,2 Cyanobacteria %14,2 Euglenophyta 2,8 ve Dinophyta %2,8 olarak bulunmuştur. Kirlilik indikatörü olarak Cymbella, Gomphonema, Nitzschia, Oscillatoria, Phormidium ve Euglema cinslerine ait türler tespit edilmiştir

References

  • APHA, AWWA, WEF (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water (21st 411 ed.). American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation New York, Washington DC.
  • Atıcı, T. and Akıska, S. (2005). Pollution and Algae of Ankara Stream. G.U. Journal of Science, 18 (1):51-59.
  • Atıcı, T., (1997). Sakarya Nehri Kirliliği ve Algler, Ekoloji Çevre Dergisi, 24, pp. 28-32.
  • Atıcı, T. and U. Abel, U. (2016). Indicator Algae of Adrasan Stream (Antalya) Turkey, Sinop Uni J Nat Sci 1(2): 135 - 149.
  • Atıcı, T. ve Yıldız, K. (1996). Diatoms of Sakarya River, Tr. J. of Botany, 20, 119-134.
  • Bellinger, EG. and Sigee, DC. (2015). Freshwater Algae: Identification, Enumeration and Use as Bioindicators, 2st ed. Wiley- Blackwell, UK.
  • Cox, EJ. (1996). Identification of freshwater diatoms from live material. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Çiçek, N.L. ve Ertan, Ö.O. (2012). Köprüçay Nehri Epilitik Alg Çeşitliliğinin Bazı Fizikokimyasal Değişkenlerle İlişkisi. Eğirdir Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1): 22-41.
  • Dixit, SS., Smoll, JP. and Kingson, JC. (1992). Diatomes: Powerful indicators of environmetal change, Environment Science Tecnology, 26, 23- 32.
  • Gerrath, JF. and Denny, P. (1980). Freshwater Algae of Siera leone III. Cyanopyta, Chrysophyta, Xantophyta, Chloromonadophyta, Cryptophyta, Dinophyta, Nova Hedwigia, 33: 933-947.
  • Graham, LE., Graham JM. and Wilcox LW. (2009). Algae, Benjamin Cummings Press. California University.
  • Guiry, MD. and Guiry, GM. (2016). AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org; (Erişim Tarihi: 08.12.2016).
  • Hellawell, JM. (1986). Biological indicators of freshwater pollution and environmental management, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers.
  • Huber, PG. (1982). Das Phytoplankton des Süsswasers 8.Teil, 1.Halfte, Conjugatophyceae, Zygnematales and Desmidiales, E.Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.
  • John, DM., Whitton, BA. and Brook, AJ. (2002). The freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles, 2th ed, Cambridge University Press.
  • Kalyoncu, H., Barlas, M. and Yorulmaz, B. (2008). Aksu Çayı'nda (Isparta-Antalya) Epilitik Alg Çeşitliliği ve Akarsuyun Fizikokimyasal Yapısı Arasındaki İlişki, Ekoloji, 17, 66, 15-22.
  • Korshikov, OA. (1987). The Freshwater Algae of the Ukrainian S.S.R, V. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh and Koeltz, Scýentific Books.
  • Lee, RE. (2008). Phycology, 4 th.ed. Cambridge, UK.
  • Prescott, GW. (1987). Algae of Western Greats Lakes Area, Brown company publisher. ISBN 0-697-04522-8.
  • Rimet, F., Cauchie, HM., Hoffmann, L. and Ector, L. (2005). Response of diatom indices to simulated water quality improvements in a river. J Appl Phycol, 17, 119-128.
  • Rimet,, F. (2012). Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia. 683:1–24.
  • Round, FE. (1984). The Ecology of Algae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Round, FE. (1993). A Reviev and Methods for the Use of Epilitic Diatoms for the Detecting and Monitoring Changes in River Water Quality, HMSO, London.
  • Sládeček, V. (1973). System of water quality from the biological point of view. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol, vol. 7, no. I-IV, p. 1-218.
  • Sládeček, V. (1986). Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol, 14, 555-566.
  • Smol, JP. and Stoermer, EF. (2010). The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences, 2th ed, Cambridge University Press.
  • Solak, CN. and Ács, É. (2011). Water qualıty monıtorıng in European and Turkish rivers using diatoms. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 11(2): 329-337.
  • Tütkiye Algleri, http://turkiyealgleri.omu.edu.tr/; searched on 09.12.2016.
  • Van Dam H, Mertens, A. and Sinkeldam JA, (1994). A coded checklist ve ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Neth J Aquat Ecol, 28, 117-133.
  • Wehr JD, Sheath RG and Kociolek JP, 2003. Freshwater Algae of North America: Ecology and Classification, Michigan, Elsevier.
  • www.googleearth.com (Erişim tarihi: 18.11.2016)
  • Yavuz, O. Çetin, K. (2000). Cip Çayı (Elazığ - Türkiye) Pelajik Bölge Algleri ve Mevsimsel Değişimleri. F. Ü. Fen ve Müh. Dergisi 12 (2), 25 – 39.
  • Yıldız, K. and Özkıran, Ü. (1991). Kızılırmak Nehri Diatomeleri. Doğa TR. J. of Botany 15, 166-188.
  • Zhuzbayeva, A. and Atıcı, T. (2016). Algae and water qualities of Badam Dam Reservoir (Kazakhstan). Biological Diversity and Conservation, 9(2), (34-43).

Determination of Epipelic, Epiphytic and Epilitic Indicator Algae; Sarısu Creek Antalya sampling area

Year 2018, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 174 - 179, 15.12.2018

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to determine and compare the varieties of indicator algae that may be of economic importance in Sarısu Creek which is born from Olympos Mountains and poured into Antalya Bay. Samples from 3 stations from epirhitral region to potamal area in Sarısu Creek samples were collected from different habitats including epilithic, epiphytic and epipelic. In the Sarisu Creek, a total of 72 algal taxa are identified. It is observed that Bacillariophyta division with 54,1%, is the most represented group, while Chlorophyta 25,2%, Cyanobacteria 14,2%, Euglenophyta 2,8% and Dinophyta 2,8% are also recorded, respectively. Species belonging to Cymbella, Gomphonema, Nitzschia, Oscillatoria, Phormidium and Euglema species were determined as pollution indicators

References

  • APHA, AWWA, WEF (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water (21st 411 ed.). American Water Works Association and Water Environment Federation New York, Washington DC.
  • Atıcı, T. and Akıska, S. (2005). Pollution and Algae of Ankara Stream. G.U. Journal of Science, 18 (1):51-59.
  • Atıcı, T., (1997). Sakarya Nehri Kirliliği ve Algler, Ekoloji Çevre Dergisi, 24, pp. 28-32.
  • Atıcı, T. and U. Abel, U. (2016). Indicator Algae of Adrasan Stream (Antalya) Turkey, Sinop Uni J Nat Sci 1(2): 135 - 149.
  • Atıcı, T. ve Yıldız, K. (1996). Diatoms of Sakarya River, Tr. J. of Botany, 20, 119-134.
  • Bellinger, EG. and Sigee, DC. (2015). Freshwater Algae: Identification, Enumeration and Use as Bioindicators, 2st ed. Wiley- Blackwell, UK.
  • Cox, EJ. (1996). Identification of freshwater diatoms from live material. Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Çiçek, N.L. ve Ertan, Ö.O. (2012). Köprüçay Nehri Epilitik Alg Çeşitliliğinin Bazı Fizikokimyasal Değişkenlerle İlişkisi. Eğirdir Su Ürünleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1): 22-41.
  • Dixit, SS., Smoll, JP. and Kingson, JC. (1992). Diatomes: Powerful indicators of environmetal change, Environment Science Tecnology, 26, 23- 32.
  • Gerrath, JF. and Denny, P. (1980). Freshwater Algae of Siera leone III. Cyanopyta, Chrysophyta, Xantophyta, Chloromonadophyta, Cryptophyta, Dinophyta, Nova Hedwigia, 33: 933-947.
  • Graham, LE., Graham JM. and Wilcox LW. (2009). Algae, Benjamin Cummings Press. California University.
  • Guiry, MD. and Guiry, GM. (2016). AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. http://www.algaebase.org; (Erişim Tarihi: 08.12.2016).
  • Hellawell, JM. (1986). Biological indicators of freshwater pollution and environmental management, Elsevier Applied Science Publishers.
  • Huber, PG. (1982). Das Phytoplankton des Süsswasers 8.Teil, 1.Halfte, Conjugatophyceae, Zygnematales and Desmidiales, E.Schweizerbart’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart.
  • John, DM., Whitton, BA. and Brook, AJ. (2002). The freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles, 2th ed, Cambridge University Press.
  • Kalyoncu, H., Barlas, M. and Yorulmaz, B. (2008). Aksu Çayı'nda (Isparta-Antalya) Epilitik Alg Çeşitliliği ve Akarsuyun Fizikokimyasal Yapısı Arasındaki İlişki, Ekoloji, 17, 66, 15-22.
  • Korshikov, OA. (1987). The Freshwater Algae of the Ukrainian S.S.R, V. Bishen Singh Mahendra Pal Singh and Koeltz, Scýentific Books.
  • Lee, RE. (2008). Phycology, 4 th.ed. Cambridge, UK.
  • Prescott, GW. (1987). Algae of Western Greats Lakes Area, Brown company publisher. ISBN 0-697-04522-8.
  • Rimet, F., Cauchie, HM., Hoffmann, L. and Ector, L. (2005). Response of diatom indices to simulated water quality improvements in a river. J Appl Phycol, 17, 119-128.
  • Rimet,, F. (2012). Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia. 683:1–24.
  • Round, FE. (1984). The Ecology of Algae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Round, FE. (1993). A Reviev and Methods for the Use of Epilitic Diatoms for the Detecting and Monitoring Changes in River Water Quality, HMSO, London.
  • Sládeček, V. (1973). System of water quality from the biological point of view. Arch Hydrobiol Beih Ergebn Limnol, vol. 7, no. I-IV, p. 1-218.
  • Sládeček, V. (1986). Diatoms as indicators of organic pollution. Acta Hydrochim Hydrobiol, 14, 555-566.
  • Smol, JP. and Stoermer, EF. (2010). The Diatoms: Applications for the Environmental and Earth Sciences, 2th ed, Cambridge University Press.
  • Solak, CN. and Ács, É. (2011). Water qualıty monıtorıng in European and Turkish rivers using diatoms. Turkish Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 11(2): 329-337.
  • Tütkiye Algleri, http://turkiyealgleri.omu.edu.tr/; searched on 09.12.2016.
  • Van Dam H, Mertens, A. and Sinkeldam JA, (1994). A coded checklist ve ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from the Netherlands. Neth J Aquat Ecol, 28, 117-133.
  • Wehr JD, Sheath RG and Kociolek JP, 2003. Freshwater Algae of North America: Ecology and Classification, Michigan, Elsevier.
  • www.googleearth.com (Erişim tarihi: 18.11.2016)
  • Yavuz, O. Çetin, K. (2000). Cip Çayı (Elazığ - Türkiye) Pelajik Bölge Algleri ve Mevsimsel Değişimleri. F. Ü. Fen ve Müh. Dergisi 12 (2), 25 – 39.
  • Yıldız, K. and Özkıran, Ü. (1991). Kızılırmak Nehri Diatomeleri. Doğa TR. J. of Botany 15, 166-188.
  • Zhuzbayeva, A. and Atıcı, T. (2016). Algae and water qualities of Badam Dam Reservoir (Kazakhstan). Biological Diversity and Conservation, 9(2), (34-43).
There are 34 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Tahir Atıcı This is me

Tuğba Taflı This is me

Cüneyt Solak This is me

Publication Date December 15, 2018
Published in Issue Year 2018 Volume: 11 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Atıcı, T., Taflı, T., & Solak, C. (2018). Epipelik, Epifitik ve Epilitik İndikatör Alg Türlerinin belirlenmesi; Sarısu Çayı Antalya örnekleme alanı. Biological Diversity and Conservation, 11(3), 174-179.

❖  Abstracted-Indexed in
Web of Science {Zoological Records Indexed] Clavariate Analytic, Medical Reads (RRS), CrossRef;10.46309/biodicon.

❖ Libraries
Aberystwyth University; All libraries; Bath University; Birmingham University; Cardiff University; City University London; CONSER (Not UK Holdings); Edinburgh University; Essex University; Exeter University; Eskişehir Technical University Library; EZB Electronic Journals Library; Feng Chia University Library; GAZİ Gazi University Library; Glasgow University; HEC-National Digital Library; Hull University; Imperial College London; Kaohsinug Medical University Library; ANKOS; Anadolu University Library; Lancaster University; Libros PDF; Liverpool University; London Metropolitan University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Manchester University; National Cheng Kung University Library; National ILAN University Library; Nottingham University; Open University; Oxford University; Queen Mary,University of London;Robert Gordon University; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sheffield Hallam University; Sheffield University; Shih Hsin University Library; Smithsonian Institution Libraries; Southampton University; Stirling University; Strathclyde University; Sussex University; The National Agricultural Library (NAL); The Ohio Library and Information NetWork; Trinity College Dublin; University of Washington Libraries; Vaughan Memorial Library; York University..

❖ The article processing is free.

❖ Web of Science-Clarivate Analytics, Zoological Record
❖ This journal is a CrossRef;10.46309/biodicon. member

❖ Please visit ” http:// www.biodicon.com“ ; "https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/biodicon"   for instructions about articles and all of the details about journal


❖  Correspondance Adres: Prof. Ersin YÜCEL, Sazova Mahallesi, Ziraat Caddesi, No.277 F Blok, 26005 Tepebaşı-Eskişehir/Türkiye
E-posta / E-mail: biodicon@gmail.com;
Web Address: http://www.biodicon.com;   https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/biodicon
❖ Biological Diversity and Conservation/ Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma
❖ ISSN 1308-5301 Print; ISSN 1308-8084 Online
❖ Start Date Published 2008
© Copyright by Biological Diversity and Conservation/Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma-Available online at www.biodicon.com/All rights reserved
Publisher : ERSİN YÜCEL (https://www.ersinyucel.com.tr/)
❖ This journal is published three numbers in a year. Printed in Eskişehir/Türkiye.
❖ All sorts of responsibilities of the articles published in this journal are belonging to the authors
Editör / Editor-In-Chief : Prof.Dr. Ersin YÜCEL, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8274-7578