Poplar and poplar hybrid in the green zone of Astana, Kazakhstan

Year 2017, Supplement 2, 16 - 19, 15.08.2017

D. N. Sarsekova K, Maıssupova

https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/22.12.849

Abstract

In the present day, the legal framework and economic conditions in the Republic of Kazakhstan correspond to successfully implement the project of industrial plantations of forest by different country. Soil-orographic and climatic conditions also have not critical differences from the leaders countries of forest plantation. As shown practice, the moratorium on logging does not correct the low forest cover of the country. The various categories of land, that not using in agricultural necessary to use suitable for forest growing. The industrial plantation projects should be carried out on a large scale at the national level. In view of the above, in arrangement purposes for the organization of plantation forest growing in the country are determined by the following priority areas: a Defining of tree species range and a list of goals and objectives for forest plantations, b Selection and systematization of knowledge and technological standards for plantation forest with the definition of the category of land allocating. The subject of this study is Kazakhstan’s poplar and poplar hybrid, which is growing in the forestry "Batys" RSE "Zhasyl Aimak" Akmola region. Type of forest plantations is composed of six-rows. The width of the rows is 24 m, spaces between of scenes are 12 m, between rows is 4 m. Scheme of offset: 4 - main breeds, accompanying breed as well as shrub. Planting was carried out with deep-root grafts, the distance between seats in a row: the main breed - 1.5 m, accompanying breed -1 m. Density of planting makes up 2500 pcs/ha. Biometric indicators of woody plants were measured: height, current increment in height, diameter at height of breast and diameter of root collar, diameter of crown along and across the row. The aim is to study the status of available crops of poplar and using of biomicrofertilizer "Ekstasol" and growth stimulator “Karpansil”. When processing biomicrofertilizer "Ekstasol", preservation for all test variants of Kazakhstan Poplar was higher than the control and were as follows: for a period of soaking for 30 minutes - 75.5%, while soaking for 60 minutes - 85.8%, in control - 65.0%. The growth were significantly higher in two variants than in control: 48,5 t = + 4,5 , 52,8 t = + 6,0 , 38,0 cm. Stimulant karpansil was tested at term of soaking is 30 minutes, which had a positive impact on growth, although statistically significant differences were not observed. There were significant differences were in growth and reached 6.8 cm

Keywords

Poplar, hybrid, plantation, biomicrofertilizing, stimulant

References

• Anuchin, N.P. 1983. Forest inventory – Textbook for High Schools. Moscow, Forest Industry: 552 (in Russian).
• Besschetnov, P.P. 1969. Poplar (culture and breeding). Alma-Ata: Kainar, p 120-145.
• Dillen S.Y., Djomo S.N., Al Afas N., Vanbeveren S., Ceulemans, R. 2013. Biomass yield and energy balance of a short rotation poplar coppice with multiple clones on degraded land during 16 years. B I O M A S S and B I O E N E R GY 5 6 p.1 5 7-1 6 5.
• Marron, N., Delay, D., Petit, J.M., Dreyer, E., Kahlem, G., Delmotte, F.M., Brignolas F. 2 0 0 2. Physiological raits of two Populus×euramericana clones, Luisa Avanzo and Dorskamp, during a water stress and re-watering cycle. Tree Physiol 22:849–858. doi:10.1093/treephys/22.12.849
• Monclus R, Dreyer E, Villar M, Delmotte FM, Delay D, Petit JM, Barbaroux C, Thiec D, Brechet C, Brignolas F (2006) Impact of drought on productivity and water use efficiency in 29 genotypes of Populus deltoides×Populus nigra. New Phytol 169:765–777. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01630.x
• Sarsekova D., Zasada M. 2014. Productivity of the selected poplar cultivars in the plantation conditions in South- Eastern Kazakhstan. Sylwan 158 (6): 453−462.
• Yer, E. N., Baloglu, M. C., Ziplar, G., Ayan, S., Unver, T. 2016. Drought responsive Hsp70 gene analysis in Populus at genome wide-level. Plant Molecular Biology Reports. 34 (2) 483–500. DOI: 10.1007/s11105-015-0933-3.