Plant diversity of Ulugöl Natural Park Ordu/Turkey

Year 2015, Volume: 8 Issue: 3, 120 - 127, 15.12.2015

Ebru Şahin Yalçın Tuğba Bayrak Özbucak

Abstract

This study consists of the plant diversity of the Ulugöl which is 36 st Natural Park of Turkey. The research area is situated south of center Gölköy town of Ordu province in the A6 square. Approximately 310 plant specimens collected from the research area between 2010 and 2011. At the end of the study 98 genera, 124 species, belonging to 42 families have been determined. The distribution of the taxa phytogeographical regions are as follows; Euro-Siberian elements 44 35,4% , Irano-Turanien elements 4 3,2% Mediterranean elements 2 1,6% , Euxine 21 16,9% , Hyrcano-Euxine 3 2,4% , Cosmopolitan 1 0,8 % and Multiregionals 51 41,4% . When life forms of the plant taxa determined in the research area are checked, it can be seen in the following ratios: Hemicryptophytes 83 66,9% , Therophytes 19 15% , Geophytes 9 7,2% , Phanerophytes 9 7,2% , Chameophytes 3 2,4% and Hydrophytes 1 0,8% . Species appraised according to IUCN Red Data Categories IUCN, 2001 include 3 2,4% CR Critically Edangered taxon, 4 3,2% EN Endangered taxon, 4 3,2% VU Vulnerable taxon, 1 0,84% NT Near Threaneted taxon and 46 37% LC Least Concern taxon. 2 plants are endemic in the area

Keywords

Ulugöl Natural Park, plant diversity, IUCN red data categories, Ordu, Turkey

Ulugöl Tabiat Parkı Gölköy/Ordu ’nın bitki çeşitliliği

Abstract

Bu çalışma Türkiye’nin 36. Tabiat Parkı olan Ulugöl’ün bitki çeşitliliğinden oluşmaktadır. Araştırma alanı A6 karesinde yer alan Ordu İli’nin güneyinde bulunan Gölköy ilçesindedir. Araştırma alanından 2010-2011 yılları arasında yaklaşık 310 bitki örneği toplanmıştır. Çalışmanın sonucunda, 42 familyaya ait 98 cins, 124 tür belirlenmiştir. Toplanan taksonların fitocoğrafik bölgelere dağılım oranları; Avrupa-Sibirya Elementi 44 35,4% , İran-Turan Elementi 4 3,2% , Akdeniz Elementi 2 1,6% , Öksin Elementi 21 16,9% , Hirkan-Öksin Elementi 3 2,4% , Kozmopolit 1 0,8% ve birden fazla bölgesi olanlar 51 41,4% şeklindedir. Araştırma alnında belirlenen taksonların hayat formları aşağıdaki oranlarda belirlendi; Hemikriptofitler 83 66,9% , Terofitler 19 15,3% , Geofitler 9 7,2% , Fanerofitler 9 7,2% , Kamefitler 3 2,4% ve Hidrofitler 1 0,8% şeklindedir. Türlerin tehlike kategorilerine IUCN 2001 göre dağılımları ise; 3 2,4% CR Çok tehlikede , 4 3,2% EN Tehlikede , 4 3,2% VU Zarar görebilir taxon, 1 0,84% NT Tehlike altına girebilir ve 46 37% LC En az endişe verici takson şeklinde olup alanda bulunan taksonların 2tanesi endemiktir

Keywords

Ulugöl Tabiat Parkı, bitki çeşitliliği, IUCN risk kategorileri Ordu, Türkiye

References

• Adamson, 1939. The classification of life- forms of plants. Botanical Review. 5. 546-561.
• Akman, Y. 2011. Climate and Biyoilkim (Bioclimatology Methods and Turkey Climates) Palme Publications. Ankara, 212.
• Akman, Y., Ketenoğlu, O. 1986. The Climate and Vegetation of Turkey. In: I. C. Hedge (Ed.), Proceedingsof the Royal Society of Edinburgh.89B, 123.
• Altay, V., Serin, M., Yarcı, C., Severoğlu, Z. 2012. Phytoecological andPhytosociological Investigations of the Vegetation of Golcuk (Kocaeli/Turkey). Ekoloji. 21/84. 74-89.
• Anonymous, 2011. Meteoroloji İl Müdürlüğü, Ordu.
• Anonymous, 2006. Ordu Provincial Directorate of Environment and Forestry, Ulugöl Nature Park Long Term Development Plan, Analytical Studies Report.
• Avcı, 2005. Evaluation of Aspects Turkey of Plant Diversity and Endemism. In: Avcı S, Turoğlu H (eds), NationalGeography Congress (2005) (In Memory of Prof. Dr. İsmail Yalçınlar, September 29th-30th 2005), Notification Book. İstanbul,73-85.
• Böcük, H., Türe, C., Ketenoğlu, O. 2009. Plant diversity and conservation of the north east Phrygia region under the impact of land degradation and deserfacition (Central Anatolia/Turkey). Pak. Journal of Botany. 41/5. 2305- 2321.
• Brummitt, R.K., Powell, C.E. 2001. Authors of Plant Names. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, U.K. Chapman, H.D., Pratt, P.F. 1973. Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. University of California Press. Riverside.
• Chapman H.D., Pratt P.F., 1973. Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. University of California Press, Riverside.
• Çetik, A. 1985. Vegetation of Turkey I: Vegetation and ecology of Central Anatolia.Selçuk University Publications 7, Faculty of Science Publications. 1, Konya.
• Davis, P.H. (Ed.) 1965-1985. Flora of Turkey and The East Aegean Islands. Vol: I-IX, Edinburgh University Press, UK.
• Davis, P.H., R.R. Mill and K. Tan, 1988. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 0,Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
• Ekim, T., Koyuncu, M., Vural, M., Duman, H., Aytaç, Z., Adıgüzel, N. 2000. RedData Book of Turkish Plants (Pteridophyta ve Spermatophyta), TTKD and Van 100.Yıl University Publications.Ankara.
• Eminağaoğlu Ö, Kutbay H.G, Özkan Z.C, Ergü, A. 2008. Flora of the Camili Biosphere Reserve Area (Borçka, Artvin, Turkey), Turkish Journal of Botany. 32:43-90.
• Floret, C., Galan, M.J., Lefloch’h, E., Orshan, G., Romane, F. 1990. Growth forms and phenomorphology traits along an environmental gradient: tools for studying vegetation. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1. 71-80.
• Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T, Başer KHC (Eds.) (2000). Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands (supplement), Vol. 11.Edinburgh Univ Press, Edinburgh.
• Harris, A.T., Asner G.P., Miller, M.E. 2003. Changes in vegetation structure after long term grazing in pinyon-juniper ecosystems: Integrating imaging spectroscopy and field studies, Ecosystems. 6/4. 368-383.
• Işık, K. 2011. Rare and Endemic Species: Why are they prone extinction?. Turkish Journal of Botany., Vol: 35. 411- 417.
• IUCN, 2001. Species Survival Commission, IUCN Red List Categories, approved by the 51st meeting of the IUCN Council. Gland, Switzerland.
• Keshet, M., Danin, A., Orshan, G. 1990. Distribution of ecomorphological types alongenvironmental gradients in Israel: 1 Renewal bud location and leaf attributes. Ecology Mediter. 16. 151-161.
• Korkmaz, H, Engin, A. 2001. The Flora of The Boyabat (Sinop) Dam and Its Environs, Turkish Journal of Botany. 25:397-435.
• Köse, Y.B., Ocak, A. 2004. The Flora of the Northern Part of the Emirdağ Mountains.Turkish Journal of Botany. Vol: 28. 369-390.
• Kutbay, H.G., Kılınç, M., Karaer, F. 1995. The Flora of Nebyan Mountain (Samsun/Bafra).Turkish Journal of Botany. 19. 345-371.
• Kürschner, W.M, Stulen, I., Wagner, F., Kuiper, P.J.C. 2008. Comparison of palaeobotanical observations with experimental data on the leaf anatomy of durmast oak [Quercus petraea (Fagaceae)] in response to environmental change. Annals of Botany. 81. 657–664.
• Özgül, M., Öztaş, T. 2002.Overgrazing Effect on Rangeland Soil Properties. International Conference on Sustainable Land Use and Management, Çanakkale,Turkey.
• Şenel, F., Başköse, İ., Tuğ, G.N. 2014. Contributions to the flora of the region between Alucra-Espiye- Yağlıdere(Giresun/Turkey) within the prepontic zone. Biological Diversity and Conservation. 7/3, 58-73.
• Türe, C. 2003. General information about the flora and vegetation. Our city Eskişehir, (ed): Erdoğan M, Eskişehir Chamber and Commerce Publication, No:16, pp. 58-64, Eskişehir, 90.