Year 2011, Volume 4 , Issue 2, Pages 149 - 154 2011-08-15

Türkiye’nin Doğu Akdeniz Bölgesindeki Korunmuş Quercus coccifera Makiliğinin Biryofitleri: Hayat Formları, Habitatları, Substratları arasındaki ilişkiler
The bryophytes in the protected Quercus coccifera macchia in East Mediterranean Region of Turkey: their life-form, habitat and substratum relations

Atabay DÜZENLİ [1] , Recep KARA [2] , Tülay EZER [3] , Necattin TÜRKMEN [4]


Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin Doğu Akdeniz bölgesinde yaklaşık 40 yıldır korunan Quercus coccifera makisi içerisindeki biryofit florası çalışıldı. Araştırma boyunca Bryophyta bölümünün Hepaticae sınıfından 8 familyaya ait 9 takson ve Bryopsida sınıfından 10 familyaya ait 47 takson olmak üzere toplam 56 takson kaydedilmiştir. Bu taksonlar ait 9 farklı mikrohabitat ve 8 çeşit hayat formu tanımlandı. Ayrıca çalışma alanında kıyaslamalı iklimsel ve floristik gözlemlere dayanarak mikrohabitat ayrımları, hayat formu, nem istekleri ve substrat özelliklerine göre biryofitlerin maki içerindeki durumları tespit edildi
In the study, the bryophytes flora in the Quercus coccifera macchia protected for approximately 40 years in east Mediterranean part of Turkey was studied. During the floristic surveys, 9 species of 8 families belonging to Hepaticopsida and 47 taxa of 10 families belonging to Bryopsida in total 56 taxa was recorded. Eight different life-form types and nine different microhabitats belonging to these taxa were determined. Additionally the states leaning on the comparisons of the field observations and climatologic conditions of the bryophytes in the study area was determined according to microhabitat differentiations, life-form types, moisture desires, and substrata characteristics
  • Bates, J.W. 1998. Is “life-form” a useful concept in bryophyte ecology? Oikos. 82. 223-237.
  • Canellas, I., San Miguel A. 2000. Biomass of root and shoot systems of Quercus coccifera shrublands in Eastern Spain. Annals of Forest Science. 57. 803-810.
  • Davies, C.E., Moss D. 2002. EUNIS Habitat Classification. Final Report to the European Topic Centre on Nature Protection and Biodiversity, European Environment Agency. 125 pp.
  • Dierben, K. 2001. Distribution, ecological amplitude and pytosociological characterization of European bryophytes. Bryophytorum Bibliotheca. Berlin.
  • During, H.J. 1979. Life strategies of Bryophytes: a preliminary review. Lindbergia. 5.2-18.
  • Ezer, T., Kara, R., Düzenli, A. 2010. Musa Dağındaki Epifitik Vejetasyonu Oluşturan Biryofitlerin Yaşam Stratejileri. Biological Diversity and Conservation (BioDiCon). Volume 3/3. 75-84.
  • Frey, W., Kürschner, H. 1991. Morfologische und anatomische Anpassungen der Arten in terrestrichen Bryophytengesellschaften entlang eines ökologischen Gradienten in der Judaischen Wüste. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie. 112. 529-552.
  • Hebrard, J.P. 1976. Contribution a l’etude de la vegetation muscinale de quelques formations du maquis corse. Reviev Bryology et Lichenology. 42 (2). 693-709.
  • Hebrard, J.P. 1977. Contribution a l etude de la vegetation muscinale du complexe des maquis en Corse: les maquis degrades a Ericacees et les talus siliceux limitrophes. Doc. Phytosociol. (Lille) 1. 143-158.
  • Hebrard, J.P. 1980. Contribution a l etude de la vegetation muscinale de quelques formations du maquis corse: les pelouses seches ou humides sur silice. Bull. Soc. Linn. Provence, 32. 15-45.
  • Hebrard, J.P. 1981. Contribution a l’etude de la vegetation bryophytique des forets de Quercus ilex, de Quercus suber et des maquis bas a Rosmarinus officinalis das le Cap Corse. Lejeunia n.s. 106. 1-20.
  • Hill, M.O., Bell, N., Bruggeman-Nannenga, M.A., Brugues, M., Cano, M.J., Enroth, J., Flatberg, K.I., Frahm, J.P., Gallego, M.T., Garilleti, R., Guerra, J., Hedenas, L., Holyoak, D.T., Hyvonen, J., Ignatov, M., Lara, S.F., Mazimpaka, V., Munoz, J., Soderstrom, L. 2009. Bryological Monograph An annotated checklist of the mosses of Europe and Macaronesia, Journal of Bryology, 28. 198-267.
  • Işık, L., Gemici, Y. 1994. Observations about the variations depending on rock on the macchia and phrygana vegetation in the west Anatolia. Turkish Journal of Botany. 18 (2). 73-80.
  • Kürschner, H., Tonguç Ö., Yayıntaş, A. 1998. Life strategies in epiphytic bryophyte communities of the Southwest Anatolian Liquidambar orientalis forests. Nova Hedwigia 66 (34). 435-450.
  • Kürschner, H. 1999. Life strategies of epiphytic bryophytes in Mediterranean Pinus woodlands and Platanus orientalis alluvial forests of Turkey. Cryptogamie, Bryology. 20(1). 17-33. H sg Ms X sg X hg X hl Ms X sl X sp X h sg Microhabitats
Primary Language en
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Author: Atabay DÜZENLİ
Institution: Çukurova University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, 01330 Adana, Turkey.

Author: Recep KARA
Institution: Niğde University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, 51100, Niğde, Turkey.

Author: Tülay EZER
Institution: Niğde University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, 51100, Niğde, Turkey.

Author: Necattin TÜRKMEN
Institution: Çukurova University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, 01330 Adana, Turkey.

Dates

Application Date : May 7, 2021
Acceptance Date : May 7, 2021
Publication Date : August 15, 2011

APA Düzenli, A , Kara, R , Ezer, T , Türkmen, N . (2011). The bryophytes in the protected Quercus coccifera macchia in East Mediterranean Region of Turkey: their life-form, habitat and substratum relations . Biyolojik Çeşitlilik ve Koruma , 4 (2) , 149-154 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/biodicon/issue/55890/765883