Geometric initialization: A strategy for accelerating the Simplex method
Abstract
Keywords
Ethical Statement
References
- V. Klee and G. J. Minty, “How good is the simplex algorithm?,” in Inequalities III, O. Shisha, Ed. New York: Academic Press, 1972, pp. 159–175.
- R. J. Vanderbei, Linear Programming: Foundations and Extensions, 2nd ed. New York: Springer, 2001.
- K.-H. Borgwardt, “The average number of steps required by the simplex method is polynomial,” Zeitschrift für Operations Research, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 157–177, 1982.
- J. Hall and Q. Huangfu, “A high performance dual revised simplex solver,” in Parallel Processing and Applied Mathematics, R. Wyrzykowski, J. Dongarra, K. Karczewski, and J. Waśniewski, Eds. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2012, pp. 143–151.
- J. B. E. Etoa, “New optimal pivot rule for the simplex algorithm,” Advances in Pure Mathematics, vol. 6, pp. 647–658, 2016, doi: 10.4236/apm.2016.610054.
- N. Ploskas and N. Samaras, “Pivoting rules for the revised simplex algorithm,” Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research, vol. 24, pp. 321–332, 2014, doi: 10.2298/YJOR140228016P.
- H. Nabli, “An overview on the simplex algorithm,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 479–489, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2009.01.013.
- T. Illés and T. Terlaky, “Pivot versus interior point methods: Pros and cons,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 170–190, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00061-9.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Mathematical Optimisation
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Ahmet Ağaoğlu
*
0000-0001-8139-618X
Türkiye
Publication Date
June 30, 2026
Submission Date
October 15, 2025
Acceptance Date
April 24, 2026
Published in Issue
Year 2026 Volume: 15 Number: 2