Determination of The Water Quality With Some Parameters in Elazig Keban Dam Lake Pertek Region

Year 2019, , 561 - 568, 28.06.2019

Murat Topal

https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.475277

Cited By: 3

Abstract

In
this study, surface water samples from Keban Dam Lake Pertek Region were taken
during the summer of 2018 and compared with the water quality parameters given
in the ground water quality regulation. According to the obtained data, pH
8,7-8,84, temperature between 20.1-27.5^oC, EC 264-398 µS/cm,
nitrate concentrations between 1.1-1.34 mg/L, BOD₅ concentrations
2.3-3.6 mg/L and COD concentrations were determined to be between 25.2-33 mg/L.
As a result, the surface waters taken from the Pertek region of Keban Dam Lake
were found to be water in Class-1 quality in terms of pH, temperature, EC,
Nitrate, BOD₅ concentrations, and water from Class-2 quality in
terms of COD. 

Keywords

Water quality, Lake, Ground water, Pertek, Elazig

Elazığ Keban Baraj Gölü Pertek Bölgesi Su Kalitesinin Bazı Parametrelerle Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, Keban Baraj Gölü Pertek Bölgesinden
yerüstü su numuneleri 2018 yılı yaz mevsimi boyunca alındı ve yerüstü su
kalitesi yönetmeliğinde verilen su kalite parametreleriyle karşılaştırıldı.
Elde edilen verilere göre pH 8,7-8,84 arasında, sıcaklık 20,1-27,5^oC
arasında, Eİ 264-398 µS/cm arasında, nitrat konsantrasyonları 1,1-1,34 mg/L
arasında, BOİ5 konsantrasyonları 2,3-3,6 mg/L arasında ve KOİ konsantrasyonları
25,2-33 mg/L arasında değerler aldığı belirlendi. Sonuç olarak, Keban Baraj
Gölü Pertek bölgesinden alınan yerüstü sularının pH, sıcaklık, Eİ, Nitrat, BOİ₅
konsantrasyonları açısından Sınıf-1 kalitesinde su olduğu, KOİ açısından ise
Sınıf-2 kalitesinden su olduğu tespit edildi. 

Keywords

Su kalitesi, Göl, Yerüstü suları, Pertek, Elazığ

References

• 1. Singh A. 2012. Optimal allocation of resources for the maximization of net agricultural return. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 138 (9): 830-836.
• 2. Ali S.A., Tedone L., Mastro G.D. 2015. Optimization of the Environmental Performance of Rainfed Durum Wheat by Adjusting the Management Practices, Journal of Cleaner Production, 87: 105-118.
• 3. Liu J., Li Y.P., Huang G.H., Zhuang X.W., Fu H.Y. 2017. Assessment of Uncertainty Effects on Crop Planning and Irrigation Water Supply Using a Monte Carlo Simulation Based Dual-Interval Stochastic Programming Method, Journal of Cleaner Production, 149: 945-967.
• 4. Pfister S., Bayer, P. 2015. Monthly Water Stress: Spatially and Temporally Explicit Consumptive Water Footprint of Global Crop Production, Journal of Cleaner Production, 73: 52-62.
• 5. Das B., Singh A., Panda S.N., Yasuda H. 2015. Optimal Land and Water Resources Allocation Policies for Sustainable Irrigated Agriculture. Land Policy, 42: 527-537.
• 6. Morillo J.G., Díaz J.A.R., Camacho E., Montesinos P. 2015. Linking Water Footprint Accounting with Irrigation Management in High Value Crops, Jornal of Cleaner Production, 87: 594-602.
• 7. FAO, 2015. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/about/what-we-do/so1/en/. (Erişim tarihi: 1 Mayıs 2016).
• 8. Mishra A.K., Kumar B., Dutta J. 2016. Prediction of Hydraulic Conductivity of Soil Bentonite Mixture Using Hybrid-ANN Approach, Journal of Environmental Informatics, 27: 98-105.
• 9. FAO, 2006. Agricultural Outlook 2006–2015. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations ftp://ftp.fao.org/docrep/fao/009/a0621e/a0621e00.pdf. (Erişim tarihi: 1 Mayıs 2016).
• 10. García-Garizábal I., Causapé J., Merchán D. 2017. Evaluation of Alternatives for Flood Irrigation and Water Usage in Spain Under Mediterranean Climate, CATENA, 55: 127-134.
• 11. IPCC, 2007. In: Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K., Reisinger, A. (Eds.), Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution ofWorking Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva. 220 p.
• 12. IPCC, 2008. Climate Change and Water. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 120 p.
• 13. EEA, 2012. Water resources in Europe in the context of vulnerability. State of Water Assessment. EEA Report no. 11/2012. European Environmental Agency (EEA), Copenhagen. 100 p.
• 14. Iglesias A., Garrote L., Diz A., Schlickenrieder J., Martin-Carrasco F. 2011. Re-Thinking Water Policy Priorities in the Mediterranean Region in View of Climate Change, Environmental Science and Policy, 14: 744–757.
• 15. Nunes J.P., Jacinto R., Keizer J.J. 2017. Combined Impacts of Climate and Socio-Economic Scenarios on Irrigation Water Availability for A Dry Mediterranean Reservoir, Science of The Total Environment, 584–585: 219-233.
• 16. Collins M., Knutti R., Arblaster J., Dufresne J.L., Fichefet T., Friedlingstein P., Gao X., Gutowski W.J., Johns T., Krinner G., Shongwe M., Tebaldi C., Weaver A.J., Wehner M. 2013. Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Stocker, T.F., Qin, D Plattner, G-K, Tignor M., Allen S.K., Boschung J., Nauels A., Xia Y., Bex, V., Midgley P.M. (Eds.), Climate Change. 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 1136 p.
• 17. García-Ruiz J.M., López-Moreno II., Vicente-Serrano S.M., Lasanta-Martínez T., Beguería S. 2011. Mediterranean Water Resources in A Global Change Scenario, Earth Science Reviews, 105: 121–139.
• 18. Kovats R.S.S., Valentini R., Bouwer L.M.L.M., Georgopoulou E., Jacob D., Martin E., Rounsevell M., Soussana J-F.J-F. 2014. Europe. In: Barros V.R., Field C.B., Dokken D.J., Mastrandrea M.D., Mach K.J., Bilir T.E., Chatterjee M., Ebi K.L., Estrada Y.O., Genova R.C., Girma B., Kissel E.S., Levy A.N., MacCracken S., Mastrandrea P.R., White L.L. (Eds.), Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New York, 1326 p.
• 19. YSKY, 2010. Yerüstü Su Kalitesi Yönetmeliği, 30.11.2012 Tarih ve 28483 sayılı Resmi Gazete.
• 20. Tunç Dede Ö., Sezer M. 2017. Aksu Çayı Su Kalitesinin Belirlenmesinde Kanada Su Kalitesi İndeks (CWQI) Modelinin Uygulanması, Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 32 (3): 909-917.
• 21. Tepe Y., Ateş A., Mutlu E., Töre Y. 2006. Hasan Çayı (Erzin-Hatay) Su Kalitesi Özellikleri ve Aylık Değişimleri, E.Ü. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 23: 149-154.
• 22. Taş B. 2011. Gaga Gölü (Ordu, Türkiye) Su Kalitesinin İncelenmesi, Karadeniz Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 1(3): 43-61.