-

Abstract

In this review article, some of insecticide group’s impact on the of eggs, larvae and adults of Chrysopidae family has been investigated qualitatively. According to the light of literature informations, Fenoxycarb has been founded an ovicidal effect. High concentrations of Buprofezin Diafenthiuron observed to be toxic to larvae. It was found that Acetamiprid and Thiamerthoxam have toxic effectly insecticides even low concentrations. Azadirachtin insecticide has a negative effective on the cessationing eggs, Lufenuron has effected as mortalityinducing on the newborn larvae. Spinosad and cypermethrin adversely affected to the development time of the egg

Keywords

• Chrysopidae, Selective insecticides effect, Carbamate, Acetamiprid, Organophorous insecticide, Biocontrol agent

Çeşitli İnsektisit Gruplarının Chrysopidae Schneider 1851 Familyasına Ait Bazı Böcekler Üzerindeki Etkisi

Abstract

Bu derleme makalede bazı insektisit gruplarının Chrysopidae familyası türlerinin yumurta, larva ve erginleri üzerindeki etkisi kalitatif olarak araştırılmıştır. Literatür bilgilerine göre fenoksikarbın ovisidal etkisinin bulunduğu saptanmıştır. Diafenthiuron ve Buprofezin insektisitleri larvalarda yüksek konsantrasyonlarda toksik etki göstermiştir. Acetamiprid ve Thiamerthoxam’ın düşük konsantrasyonlarda dahi toksik etkisinin bulunduğu gözlenmiştir. Azadirachtin yumurta bırakmada negatif etkili bir insektisit olurken, Lufenuron yeni doğan larvalarında mortaliteyi indükleyici etki yapmıştır. Spinosad ve Cypermethrin ise yumurta gelişim zamanını olumsuz yönde etkilemiştir.

Keywords

• Chrysopidae, Selektif insektisit etkisi, Karbamat, Acetamiprid, Organofosforlu insektisitler, Biyokontrol Ajanı

References

1. Porcel M., Ruano F., Cotes B., Peña A., Campos M. 2013. Agricultural Management Systems Affect the Green Lacewing Community (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in Olive Orchards in Southern Spain. Environmental Entomology, 42 (1): 97-106.
2. McEwen P., New TR., Whittington A.E. 2001. Lacewings in the crop Environments. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 546 pp.
3. Oswald J.D., 2007. Digital Library, Texas Tamu, ABD, (Erişim Tarihi: 20.01.2013).
4. Bozdoğan H., Bahadıroğlu C., Toroğlu S. 2012. Altıngözlü Böcekler (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), Genel Özellikleri ve Biyolojik Mücadelede Önemi. Nevşehir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 1: 51-57.
5. Wu G., Jiang S.R., Miyata T. 2004. Seasonal changes of Methamidophos susceptibility and biochemical properties in Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) and its parasitoid Cotesia plutellae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 97: 1689-1698.
6. Wu G., Miyata T. 2005. Susceptibilities to methamidophos and enzymatic characteristics in 18 species of pest insects and their natural enemies in crucifer vegetable crops. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 82: 79-93.
7. Isman M.B. 1997. Neem and other botanical insecticides: barriers to commercialization. Phytoparasitica, 25: 339-344.
8. Toews M.D., Subramanyam B. 2004. Survival of stored-product insect natural enemies in spinosad treated wheat. J. Econ. Entomol., 97: 1174-1180.

9. Headley J.C., Hoy M.A. 1987. Benefit/cost analysis of an integrated mite management program for almonds. J. Econ. Entomol., 80: 555-559.
10. Whitten MJ., Hoy M.A. 1999. Genetic improvement and other genetic considerations for improving the efficacy and success rate of biological control. In: Bellows, T.S., Fisher, T.W. (eds). Handsbook of Biological Control. Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 271-296.
11. Stern V.M., Smith R.F., Van Den Bosch R., Hagen, K.S. 1959. The integrated control concept. Hilgardia, 29: 81-101.
12. Van den Bosch R., Hagen K.S. 1966. Predaceous and parasitic artropods in California cotton fields. California Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull., 820, 32 pp.
13. Pree D.J., Archibald D.E., Morrison R.K. 1989. Resistance to insecticides in the common green lacewings, Ch. carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) in southern Ontario. J. Econ. Ent., 82: 29-34.
14. Pathan A.K., Sayyed A.H. Aslam M., Liu T.X., Razaq M., Gillani W.A. 2010. Resistance to pyrethroids and organophosphates increased fitness and predation potential of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 103: 823-834.
15. Dutton A., Klein, H., Romeis, J., Bigler F. 2002. Uptake of Bt-toxin by herbivores feeding on transgenic maize and consequences for the predator Chrysoperla carnea. Ecological Entomology, 27: 441-447.
16. Liu T., Chen T. 2001. Effects of the insect growth regulator fenoxycarb on immature Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Florida Entomologist, 84: 628-633.
17. Nasreen A., Mustafa, G., Ashfaq M. 2005. Mortality of Chrysoperla carnea (Stephens) (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae) after exposure to some insecticides; laboratory studies. South Pacific Studies, 26 (1): 1-6.
18. Mizell F., Schiffhauer E. 1990. Effects of pesticides on pecan aphid predators Chrysoperla rufilabris (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), Hippodamia convergens, Cycloneda sanguinea (L.), Olla v-nigrum (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), and Aphelinus perpallidus (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae). J. of Economic Entomology, 83 (5): 1806- 1812.
19. Krishnamoorthy A., Mani M. 1982. Feeding potential and development of Chrysopa scelestes Banks on Heliothis armigera (Hubner) under laboratory conditions. Entomon., 7: 385-388.
20. Balasubramani V., Swamiappan M. 1997. Persistent toxicity of some insecticides to the green lacewing Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). J. Ecotox. Environ. Monitor., 7 (3): 197-200.
21. Bashir N.H.H., Crowder L.A. 1983. Mechanisms of permethrin tolerance in the common green lacewing (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). J. of Economic Entomology, 76: 407-409.
22. Gammon D.W. 1980. Pyrethroid resistance in a strain of Spodoptera littoralis correlated with decreased sensitivity of the CNS in vitro. Pestic. Physiol., 13: 53-62.
23. Ishaaya I., Casida J.E. 1981. Pyretlrroid esterase(s) may contribute to natural pyretlrroid tolerance of larvae of the common green lacewing (Neuroptera, Chrysopidae). Environ. Entomol., 10: 681-684.
24. Bozsik A., Francis F., Gaspar C., Haubruge E. 2002. Effect of some insecticides on acetylcholinesterase from beneficial insects: Coccinella septempunctata, Chrysoperla carnea and Forficula auricularia. Mededelingen Faculteit Landbouwkundige en Toegepaste Biologische Wetenschappen Universiteit Gent., 67: 671-677.
25. Medina P., Smagghe G., Budia F., Tirry L., Vinuela E. 2003. Toxicity and Absorption of Azadirachtin, Diflubenzuron, Pyriproxyfen, and Tebufenozide after topical Application in Predatory Larvae of Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae). Environ. Entomol., 32 (1): 196-203.
26. Dhadialla T.S., Carlson G.R., Le D.P. 1998. New inseticides with ecdysteroidal and juvenile hormone activity. Annual Review of Entomology, 43: 545-569.
27. Carlson G.R. 2000. Tebufenozide a novel caterpillar control agent with unusually high target selectivity. Anastas, P. T., L. G. Heine, and T.C. Williamson, editors. Green chemical synthesis and processes. 8-17. ACS Symposium Series 767. Washington, DC.
28. Rimoldi F, Schneider M.I., Ronco A.E. 2008. Susceptibility of Chrysoperla externa Eggs (Neuroptera: Chrisopidae) to Conventional and Biorational Insecticides. Environmental Entomology, 37 (5): 1252-1257.
29. Bueno A.F., Freitas S. 2004. Effects of the insecticides abamectin and lufenuron on eggs and larvae of Chrysoperla externa under laboratory conditions. BioControl, 49: 277-283, 2004., Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.
30. Maroufpoor M., Safaralizadeh M.H., Pourmirza A.A., Allahvaisy S., Ghasemzadeh S. 2010. Lethal effects of spinosad on Chrysoperla carnea larvae (Neuroptera: Chrisopidae) under laboratory conditions. J. of Plant Protection Research, 50: 179-183.