Investigation of Antimicrobial Activities and Antidiabetic Effect of Sumac Shrups (Rhus Coriaria L.) in Different Region

Year 2020, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 85 - 90, 13.03.2020

Sevim Çiftçi Yegin Duygu Odabaş Alver

https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.583338

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the antimicrobial activity and antidiabetic effect of sumac sours collected from different regions. Rhus coriaria, is the only species of rhus in Turkey. It shows spread in different regions in Turkey. Particularly, it is used as sour in Anatolia. Sumac sour is usually consumed in south provinces in Turkey. 

In the study, three Gram (-), three Gram (+) and 1 yeast strains obtained from the culture collection of the Microbiology Laboratory of Ordu University were used. The antimicrobial effects of samples were investigated by using agar disc diffusion method. Antidiabetic effect was investigated with a-amylase and a-glucosidaseinhibition assays.  

In result of the study, almost all samples formed zones ranging from 31.5 to 6 mm against bacteria and yeast, but Antep, Hatay sumac syrup samples did not create againstCandida albicansand Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, respectively.

Consequently, sumac syrups were determined to be an effective antimicrobial activity.In addition, we can say that there are antidiabetic effects of sumac syrup samples in Mersin, Hatay and Antep, respectively.

Keywords

Antidiabetic effect, Antimicrobial activity, Sumac syrup

The Investigation of Antimicrobial Activities and Hypoglycemic Effect of Sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) Syrups in Different Region

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, farklı yörelere ait sumak ekşilerinin antimikrobiyal aktivitesi ve antidiyabetik etkisinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Rhus coriaria, Rhus cinsinin yurdumuzda yetişen tek türüdür. Türkiye’ de farklı bölgelerde yayılım göstermektedir. Sumak, ekşilik verici olarak kullanılan bir baharattır. Ülkemizin güney illerinde çoğunlukla tüketilir.

ÇalışmadaOrdu Üniversitesi Biyoloji Bölümü Mikrobiyoloji laboratuvarı kültür koleksiyonundanelde edilenüç Gram (-), üç Gram (+) ve bir maya suşu kullanılmıştır.Agar disk difüzyon metodu ile örneklerin antimikrobiyal aktivitesi incelenmiştir. a-amilaz ve a-glikozidaz inhibisyonunun ölçülmesi ile antidiyabetik etkisi belirlenmiştir. 

Çalışmamızda hemen hemen tüm örneklerin bakteriler ve mayaya karşı 31,5 ile 6 mm arasında değişen zonlar oluşturduğu gözlenmiştir. Antep örneği Candida albicansve Hatay örneği Candida albicansile Staphylococcus aureus’a karşı zon oluşturmamıştır. Sumak ekşisi örnekleri etkin antidiyabetik özellik göstermediler.

Sonuç olarak, sumak ekşisinin etkili bir antimikrobiyal aktiviteye sahip olduğunu söyleyebiliriz. Ayrıca sumak ekşisi örneklerini Mersin, Hatay, Antep şeklinde sıralayarak antidiyabetik etkisi olduğunu belirtebiliriz. 

Keywords

Antimikrobiyal aktivite, Antidiyabetik etki, Sumak ekşisi

References

• 1. Kırbağ S., Zengin F. 2006. Elazığ yöresindeki bazı tıbbi bitkilerin antimikrobiyal aktiviteleri, Journal of Agriculturel Science, 16 (2): 77-80.
• 2. Yücel E., Tapırdamaz A., Yücel Şengül İ., Yılmaz G., Ak A. 2011. Determining the usage ways and nutrient contents of some wild plants around kisecik town (Karaman/Turkey). Biological Diversity and Conservation, 4 (3): 71-82.
• 21. Giancarlo S., Rosa L.M., Nadjafi F., Francesco M. 2006. Hypoglycaemic activity of two spices extracts: Rhus coriaria L. and Bunium persicum Boiss. Natural Product Research, 20: 882-886.
• 4. Kırbağ S., Bağcı E. 2000. Piceae abies (L.) Karst.ve Picea orientalis (L.) link uçucu yağlarının antimikrobiyal aktivitesi üzerine bir araştırma. Journal of Quafqaz University, 3 (1): 183-190.
• 5. Naz S., Siddiqi R., Ahmad S., Rasool S.A., Sayeed S.A. 2007. Antibacterial activity directed isolation of compounds from Punica granatum. Journal of Food Sciences, 72: 341-345.
• 6. Durmuş R.N., Şahin E., Bireller S. 2016. Gestasyonel dı̇yabette hı̇poglı̇semı̇k etkı̇lı̇ bı̇tkı̇lerı̇n kullanımı. Deneysel Tıp Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6 (11): 3-16.
• 7. Karaman Ö., Elgin Cebe G. 2016. Dı̇yabet ve Türkı̇ye’de antı̇dı̇yabetı̇k olarak kullanılan bı̇tkı̇ler. Journal of Faculty of Pharmacy of Ankara University, 40 (3): 47-61.
• 8. Dorman H.J.D., Deans S.G. 2000. Antimicrobial agents from plants antibacterial activitiy of plant volatile oils. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 88: 308-316.
• 9. Koneman E.W., Allen S.D., Janda W.M., Schreckenberger P.C., Winn W.C. 1997. Color Atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Pub.
• 10. Bernfeld P. 1955. Methods in Enzymology. New York: Academic Press.
• 11. Güder A. 2016. Influence of total anthocyanins from bitter melon (Momordica charantia Linn.) as antidiabetic and radical scavenging agents. Iran Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 15 (1): 301-309.
• 12. McCue P., Kwon Y.I., Shetty K. 2005. Anti-amylase, anti-glucosidase and anti-angiotensin I-converting enzyme potential of selected foods. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 29: 278-294.
• 13. Tokuşoğlu Ö. 2016. High Hydrostatic pressure (HHP) processing strategies on antioxidant phenolic bioactives in foods and beverages. Journal of Food Biochemistry, 66 (4): 243-251.
• 14. Dığrak M., Alma M.H., Ilçim A. 2001. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of Turkish medicinal plants. Pharmaceutical Biology, 39 (5): 346-350.
• 15. Nasar-Abbas S.M., Kadir Halkman A. 2004.
Antimicrobial effect of water extract of sumac (Rhus coriaria L.) on the growth of some food borne bacteria including pathogens. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 97: 63-69.
• 16. Ibrahim F.Y., El-Shehawy S.M. 2013. The Antimicrobial and antioxidant effects of aquous thyme and sumac extracts in refregirated minced beef meat. International Journal of Product Development, 18 (1): 23-35.
• 17. Tiryaki Gündüz G., Aktuğ Gönül Ş., Karapinar M. 2010. Efficacy of sumac and oregano in the inactivation of Salmonella typhimurium on tomatoes, International Journal of Food Microbiology, 141: 39-44.
• 18. Durmuş D., Türer C.Ç. 2018. Effects of polyphenolic compounds from phytochemicals on periodontium. Journal of Biotechnology and Strategic Health Research, 2 (3): 138-145.
• 19. Ünver A., Özcan M.M. 2010. Fatty acid composition of seed and pericarp of sumach (Rhus coriaria L.) grown wild in different regions of Turkey. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 8 (1): 31-33.
• 20. Rayne S., Mazza G. 2007. Biological activities of extracts from sumac (Rhus spp.): A review. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 62 (4): 165-75.
• 22. Mohammadi S., Montasser Kouhsari S., Monavar Feshani A. 2010. Antidiabetic properties of the ethanolic extract of Rhus coriaria fruits in rats. DARU Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18 (4): 270-275.