Palynomorphological Studies on some Asperula and Galium (Rubiaceae) Taxa

Year 2020, Volume: 9 Issue: 2, 689 - 696, 15.06.2020

Birol Başer , Serap Akdeniz Murat Kurşat

https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.652353

Cited By: 2

Abstract

In this research, the genera Asperula L., Galium L.; Asperula xylorrhiza Nábelek (siirt belumotu), Asperula orientalis Boiss. & Hohen. (gökçe belumotu), Asperula arvensis L. (tarla belumotu), Galium humifusum M.Bieb. (çimen iplikçiği), Galium consanguineum Boiss. (altın iplikçik), Galium incanum L. subsp. elatius (Boiss.) Ehrend.(gür iplikçik), Galium consanguineum Boiss. (altın iplikçik), Galium mite Boiss. & Hohen. (süpürge iplikçiği), Galium spurium L. subsp. spurium (arsız iplikçik) of the family Rubiaceae, have been studied in terms of palynological properties. Examples of these taxa were collected in the field studies. 9 taxa light microscopy (IM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) belonging to this family were studied. As a result of this study some common traits of the taxa found out such as pollen the tectum is perforated, apertures type is zonocolpate.

Keywords

Asperula, Galium, Rubicaceae, Pollen morphology

References

• [1] Ruhsam M., Govaerts R.H.A., Davis A.P. 2008. Nomenclatural changes in preparation for a World Rubiaceae checklist. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 157(1):115 – 124.
• [2] Seçmen Ö., Gemci Y., Leblebici E., Görk G., Bekat L. 1995. Tohumlu Bitkiler Sistematiği, Ege Üniv. Fen Fak. Kitaplar Serisi, No: 116, İzmir.
• [3] Davis P.H. 1982. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands Volume 7. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 722-767.
• [4] Davis P.H., Mill R.R., Tan K. 1988. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands Volume 10, suppl. 1, Edinburgh Univ. Press. Edinburgh.
• [5] Özhatay N. 2000. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands Volume 11, suppl. 2, Edinburgh Univ. Press. Edinburgh.
• [6] Güner A., Aslan S., Ekim T., Vural M., Babaç M.T. 2012. Türkiye Bitkileri Listesi (Damarlı Bitkiler). Flora Araştırmaları Derneği ve Nezahat Gökyiğit Botanik Bahçesi Yayını, İstanbul.
• [7] Erdtman G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy angiosperms, Chronica Botanica Co., Waltham, Massachusettes.
• [8] Erdtman G. 1971. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy: Angiosperms. Hafner, New York.
• [9] Bremekamp C.E.B. 1952. The African species of Oldenlandia L. sensu Hiern et K. Schuman. Verh. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., Afd. Natuurk., Tweed Sect., 48: 1–297.
• [10] Lobreau-Callen D. 1978. L’aperture composê des Rubiaceae.–Extr. Ann. Mines Belg. 2:167–173.
• [11] Van Campo M. 1978. La face interne de l’exine. – Rev. Palaeobot. Palynol. 26: 301–311.
• [12] Muller J. 1981. Fossil Pollen records of Extant angiosperms. – Bot. Rev. (Lancaster) 47: 1–142.
• [13] Huysmans S., Dessein S., Smets E., Robbrecht E., 2003. Pollen morphology of NW European representatives confirms the monophyly of Rubieae (Rubiaceae). Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 127: 219-240.
• [14] Dessein S., Huysmans S., Robbrecht E., Smets E. 2002a. Pollen of African Spermacoce Species (Rubiaceae) morphology and evolutionary aspects. – Grana 41: 69–89.
• [15] Dessein S., Ochoterena H., De Block H., Lens F., Robbrecht E., Schols P., Smets E., Vinckier S., Huysmans S. 2005. Palynological characters and their phylogenetic signal in Rubiaceae. – Bot. Rev. 71(3): 354–414.
• [16] Verellen J., Dessein S., Razafimandimbison S.G., Smets E., Huysmans S. 2007. Pollen morphology of the tribes Naucleeae and Hymenodictyeae (Rubiaceae–Cinchonoideae) and its phylogenetic significance. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 153, 329–341.
• [17] Perveen A., Qaiser M. 2007. Pollen flora of Pakistan-Liv Rubiaceae Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39: 999–1015.
• [18] Abdel Khalik K., Abd El-Ghani M.M., Elkordy A. 2007. A palynological study of Galium L. (Rubiaceae) in Egypt and its systematic implication. Article in Feddes Repertorium·December, 317: 311- 326.
• [19] Wodehouse R.P. 1935. Pollen Grains. M.C. Graw, Hill N.Y.
• [20] Hesse M., Halbritter H., Zetter R., Weber M., Buchner R., Frosch-Radivo A., Ulrich S. 2009. Pollen Terminology, An illustrated handbook. Pp. 15-23. Springer-Verlag/Wien, Austria.
• [21] Punt W., Blackmore S., Nilsson S., Le Thomas A. 1994. Glossary of Pollen and Spore Terminology, pp. 1-246. LPP Foundation, Utrecht.
• [22] Punt W., Hoen P.P., Blackmore S., Nilsson S., Le Thomas A. 2007. Glossary of Pollen and SporeTerminology, Rev Palaeobot Palynol. 143: 1-81.
• [23] Utzschneider R. 1947. Der Fruchtknotenbau der Rubiaceeen mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Cinchonoideen. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Munich.
• [24] Robbrecht E. 1982. Pollen morphology of the tribes Anthospermeae and Paederieae (Rubiaceae) in relation to taxonomy. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Bel., 52: 349-366.
• [25] Qauser M., Perveen A. 1997. A Palynological survey of the flora of Pakistan, In M. Ozturk, O. Secmen and G. Gork (Eds.), Proceedings of Int. Symp. On Plant life of southwest Asia and Central Asia.
• [26] Minareci E., Yıldız K., Çırpıcı A. 2010. Comparative morphological and palynological study on poorly known Asperula serotina and its closest relative A. purpurea subsp. apiculata. Scientific Research and Essays 5: 2472–2479.
• [27] Minareci E., Yıldız K. 2010. Asperula pseudochlorantha var. antalyensis comb. et stat. nov. (Rubiaceae) Ann. Bot. Fennici 47: 121–128.