Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Assessment of Ergonomic Risk Factors for Sustainable Agricultural Practices Based on Picture Fuzzy Lodeci-Artasi Approach

Year 2025, Volume: 14 Issue: 3, 1891 - 1920, 30.09.2025
https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1737223

Abstract

The implementation of proactive risk management from an occupational health and safety (OHS) perspective is of paramount importance in ensuring sustainable production and enhancing work efficiency among employees. This paper aims to develop an innovative occupational health and safety risk assessment (OHSRA) model for workers exposed to ergonomic risks during agricultural harvesting operations. The approach to achieving this objective is through the implementation and validation of two innovative methodologies: the LOgarithmic DEcomposition Of Criteria Importance (LODECI) and Alternative Ranking Technique based on Adaptive Standardized Intervals (ARTASI) methods. This study utilized an integrated approach, incorporating LODECI's weighting method and ARTASI's prioritization technique, based on picture fuzzy sets which employs Fine-Kinney risk parameters, to prioritize ergonomic risk factors affecting work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). The validation of the proposed model is conducted through a sensitivity and comparative analysis. The research findings indicated that the five most significant hazards in harvesting operations are 〖ERH〗_11 (Land of harvesting area), 〖ERH〗_2 (Repetitive motion), 〖ERH〗_4 (Standing for a long time), 〖ERH〗_12 (Work stress) and 〖ERH〗_9 (Unsuitable climatic conditions), respectively. In finally concluding the paper, discussion is provided of potential future research directions.

Ethical Statement

The study is complied with research and publication ethics.

Thanks

This article is derived from Veysel TATAR’s Ph.D.’s Dissertation at Istanbul Ticaret University, Industrial Engineering Doctorate’s Program. The author would like to express his gratitude to late doctoral thesis advisor, Prof. Dr. Osman YAZICIOĞLU, for his valuable contributions.

References

  • Q.-Y. Chen, H.-C. Liu, J.-H. Wang, and H. Shi, “New model for occupational health and safety risk assessment based on Fermatean fuzzy linguistic sets and CoCoSo approach,” Applied Soft Computing, vol. 126, p. 109262, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109262.
  • M. Gul and M. F. Ak, “A comparative outline for quantifying risk ratings in occupational health and safety risk assessment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 196, pp. 653–664, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.106.
  • World Health Organization (WHO), “Musculoskeletal health,” Jul. 14, 2022. Accessed: Jul. 7, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/musculoskeletal-conditions
  • D. S. F. de Souza, J. M. N. da Silva, J. V. de O. Santos, M. S. B. Alcântara, and M. G. L. Torres, “Influence of risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders on an inner population of northeastern Brazil,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 86, p. 103198, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103198.
  • J. M. N. da Silva, L. G. M. Bispo, W. K. dos S. Leite, E. M. de A. Vieira, A. H. S. Lisboa, and R. de S. Teixeira, “Assessing the link between occupational risk factors, work-related musculoskeletal disorders and quality of work life: An analysis using PLS-SEM,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 104, p. 103658, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2024.103658.
  • B. Zhang, X. Yin, J. Li, and R. Tong, “Incorporating ergonomic and psychosocial stressors: A comprehensive model for assessing miners’ work-related musculoskeletal disorders,” Safety Science, vol. 176, p. 106564, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106564.
  • K. A. Akbar, P. Try, P. Viwattanakulvanid, and K. Kallawicha, “Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among farmers in the Southeast Asia region: A systematic review,” Safety and Health at Work, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 243–249, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2023.05.001.
  • T.-H.-Y. Nguyen, M. Bertin, J. Bodin, N. Fouquet, N. Bonvallot, and Y. Roquelaure, “Multiple exposures and coexposures to occupational hazards among agricultural workers: A systematic review of observational studies,” Safety and Health at Work, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 239–248, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.04.002.
  • S. Mohamaddan et al., “Investigation of oil palm harvesting tools design and technique on work-related musculoskeletal disorders of the upper body,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 86, p. 103226, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2021.103226.
  • A. Thetkathuek, P. Meepradit, and T. Sa-ngiamsak, “A cross-sectional study of musculoskeletal symptoms and risk factors in Cambodian fruit farm workers in Eastern Region, Thailand,” Safety and Health at Work, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 192–202, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2017.06.009.
  • F. A. Fathallah, “Musculoskeletal disorders in labor-intensive agriculture,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 738–743, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.03.003.
  • D. Kee and R. Haslam, “Prevalence of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in agriculture workers in Korea and preventative interventions,” Work, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 763–775, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.3233/WOR-193038.
  • S. R. Kirkhorn, G. Earle-Richardson, and R. J. Banks, “Ergonomic risks and musculoskeletal disorders in production agriculture: Recommendations for effective research to practice,” Journal of Agromedicine, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 281–299, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1080/1059924x.2010.488618.
  • A. Dianat, D. Afshari, N. Sarmasti, M. S. Sangdeh, and R. Azaddel, “Work posture, working conditions and musculoskeletal outcomes in agricultural workers,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 77, p. 102941, May 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102941.
  • A. Mazloumi and B. Kouhnavard, “Investigation of observational techniques ergonomic risk assessment of work-related musculoskeletal disorders among farmers—A systematic review,” Journal of Agromedicine, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 616–639, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1080/1059924x.2024.2436447.
  • M. J. J. Law et al., “REBA assessment of patient transfer work using sliding board and motorized patient transfer device,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 90, p. 103322, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103322.
  • N. R. Kodle, S. P. Bhosle, and V. B. Pansare, “Ergonomic risk assessment of tasks performed by workers in granite and marble units using ergonomics tool’s REBA,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 72, pp. 1903–1916, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.10.153.
  • C. K. Brazil, T. A. Pottorff, M. Miller, and M. J. Rys, “Using the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment to examine the effect of the new Hotel Housekeeping California Standard,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 106, p. 103868, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103868.
  • S. De-Benavides-Jiménez, M. Gómez-Galán, J.-C. Rubio-Romero, M. Díaz-Pérez, and Á.-J. Callejón-Ferre, “Physical load assessment of greenhouse cucumber farmers using OWAS and RULA methods,” Safety Science, vol. 187, p. 106838, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106838.
  • C. Brandl, A. Mertens, and C. M. Schlick, “Effect of sampling interval on the reliability of ergonomic analysis using the Ovako working posture analysing system (OWAS),” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 57, pp. 68–73, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2016.11.013.
  • S. Oliv, E. Gustafsson, A. N. Baloch, M. Hagberg, and H. Sandén, “The Quick Exposure Check (QEC)—Inter-rater reliability in total score and individual items,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 76, pp. 32–37, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.11.005.
  • L. Tiacci and M. Mimmi, “Integrating ergonomic risks evaluation through OCRA index and balancing/sequencing decisions for mixed model stochastic asynchronous assembly lines,” Omega, vol. 78, pp. 112–138, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2017.08.011.
  • D. Kee and W. Karwowski, “LUBA: An assessment technique for postural loading on the upper body based on joint motion discomfort and maximum holding time,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 357–366, Aug. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0003-6870(01)00006-0.
  • K. Koppiahraj, S. Bathrinath, and S. Saravanasankar, “A fuzzy VIKOR approach for selection of ergonomic assessment method,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 45, pp. 640–645, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.725.
  • B. Rathore, A. K. Pundir, R. Iqbal, and R. Gupta, “Development of fuzzy based ergonomic-value stream mapping (E-VSM) tool: A case study in Indian glass artware industry,” Production Planning & Control, vol. 34, no. 16, pp. 1618–1638, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2022.2035447.
  • A. Ramaswamy Govindan and X. Li, “Fuzzy logic-based decision support system for automating ergonomics risk assessments,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 96, p. 103459, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2023.103459.
  • C. Zhao, Q. Q. Li, C. Harris Adamson, and A. Nemati, “A fuzzy logic approach to improve the sensitivity of the rapid entire body assessment method,” International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 419–430, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1080/10803548.2024.2445980.
  • B. C. Cuong and V. Kreinovich, “Picture fuzzy sets—A new concept for computational intelligence problems,” in Proc. 2013 World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies (WICT), Dec. 2013, pp. 1–6. Accessed: Jul. 7, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/WICT.2013.7113099
  • K. T. Atanassov, “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 87–96, Aug. 1986, doi: 10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3.
  • W. Wang, X. Liu, and Y. Qin, “A fuzzy Fine-Kinney-based risk evaluation approach with extended MULTIMOORA method based on Choquet integral,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 125, pp. 111–123, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2018.08.019.
  • M. Gul, B. Guven, and A. F. Guneri, “A new Fine-Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation,” Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, vol. 53, pp. 3–16, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2017.08.014.
  • M. Gul, S. Mete, F. Serin, and E. Celik, Fine–Kinney-Based Fuzzy Multi-criteria Occupational Risk Assessment: Approaches, Case Studies and Python Applications. Springer Nature, 2021a.
  • W. Wang, X. Han, W. Ding, Q. Wu, X. Chen, and M. Deveci, “A Fermatean fuzzy Fine–Kinney for occupational risk evaluation using extensible MARCOS with prospect theory,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 117, p. 105518, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105518.
  • Y. Wang, W. Wang, M. Deveci, and X. Yu, “An integrated interval-valued spherical fuzzy Choquet integral based decision making model for prioritizing risk in Fine-Kinney,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 127, p. 107437, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107437.
  • O. Pala, “Assessment of the social progress on European Union by logarithmic decomposition of criteria importance,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 238, p. 121846, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121846.
  • D. Pamucar, V. Simic, Ö. F. Görçün, and H. Küçükönder, “Selection of the best Big Data platform using COBRAC-ARTASI methodology with adaptive standardized intervals,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 239, p. 122312, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122312.
  • M. Gul and E. Celik, “Fuzzy rule-based Fine–Kinney risk assessment approach for rail transportation systems,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 1786–1812, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1080/10807039.2017.1422975.
  • A. Karasan, E. Ilbahar, S. Cebi, and C. Kahraman, “A new risk assessment approach: Safety and Critical Effect Analysis (SCEA) and its extension with Pythagorean fuzzy sets,” Safety Science, vol. 108, pp. 173–187, May 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2018.04.031.
  • M.-È. Chiasson, D. Imbeau, J. Major, K. Aubry, and A. Delisle, “Influence of musculoskeletal pain on workers’ ergonomic risk-factor assessments,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 49, pp. 1–7, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.12.011.
  • M. MassirisFernández, J. Á. Fernández, J. M. Bajo, and C. A. Delrieux, “Ergonomic risk assessment based on computer vision and machine learning,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 149, p. 106816, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106816.
  • M. J. Jorgensen, A. Martinez, and N. A. Hakansson, “Comparison of multi-task ergonomic assessment methods for risk of upper extremity and low back musculoskeletal disorders,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 119, p. 104313, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104313.
  • M. J. J. Law et al., “REBA assessment of patient transfer work using sliding board and motorized patient transfer device,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 90, p. 103322, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2022.103322.
  • B. Ipaki, J. F. M. Molenbroek, Z. Merrikhpour, and S. A. Faregh, “Applying the quick exposure check in the workstation design process, physical and virtual prototype assessment,” Work, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 569–586, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3233/WOR-220503.
  • A. Cimino, M. G. Gnoni, F. Longo, and L. Nicoletti, “A risk assessment framework based on ergonomic methods and AHP for prioritizing interventions to prevent container terminal operator’s musculoskeletal disorders,” Safety Science, vol. 159, p. 106017, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2022.106017.
  • S. De-Benavides-Jiménez, M. Gómez-Galán, J.-C. Rubio-Romero, M. Díaz-Pérez, and Á.-J. Callejón-Ferre, “Physical load assessment of greenhouse cucumber farmers using OWAS and RULA methods,” Safety Science, vol. 187, p. 106838, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106838.
  • L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–353, Jun. 1965, doi: 10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X.
  • V. Simić, D. Lazarević, and M. Dobrodolac, “Picture fuzzy WASPAS method for selecting last-mile delivery mode: A case study of Belgrade,” European Transport Research Review, vol. 13, no. 1, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1186/s12544-021-00501-6.
  • V. Tatar and B. Ayvaz, “Assessment of environmental performance of ports utilizing an integrated LBWA–MARCOS decision-making approach based on picture fuzzy sets,” in Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 622–629. Accessed: Jul. 7, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70018-7_69
  • A. Tarafdar, A. Shaikh, M. N. Ali, and A. Haldar, “An integrated fuzzy decision-making framework for autonomous mobile robot selection: Balancing subjective and objective measures with fuzzy TOPSIS and picture fuzzy CoCoSo approach,” Journal of the Operational Research Society, pp. 1–27, Apr. 2025, doi: 10.1080/01605682.2025.2486705.
  • G. F. Kinney and A. D. Wiruth, Practical Risk Analysis for Safety Management. 1976.
  • M. Gul, E. Celik, and E. Akyuz, “A hybrid risk-based approach for maritime applications: The case of ballast tank maintenance,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1389–1403, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.1080/10807039.2017.1317204.
  • E. Ilbahar, A. Karaşan, S. Cebi, and C. Kahraman, “A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system,” Safety Science, vol. 103, pp. 124–136, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.025.
  • J. Tang, X. Liu, and W. Wang, “A hybrid risk prioritization method based on generalized TODIM and BWM for Fine-Kinney under interval type-2 fuzzy environment,” Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 954–979, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1080/10807039.2020.1789840.
  • S. Seker, “A novel risk assessment approach using a hybrid method based on Fine–Kinney and extended MCDM methods under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment,” International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, vol. 21, no. 05, pp. 1591–1616, May 2022, doi: 10.1142/S0219622022500250.
  • Y. Chen, X. Yu, and Z. Yang, “A fuzzy decision support system for risk prioritization in Fine-Kinney-based occupational risk analysis,” Journal of Soft Computing and Decision Analytics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2025, doi: 10.31181/jscda31202545.
  • W. Wang, L. Ding, X. Liu, and S. Liu, “An interval 2-tuple linguistic Fine-Kinney model for risk analysis based on extended ORESTE method with cumulative prospect theory,” Information Fusion, vol. 78, pp. 40–56, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.09.008.
  • X. Peng and Z. Luo, “Decision-making model for China’s stock market bubble warning: The CoCoSo with picture fuzzy information,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 54, no. 8, pp. 5675–5697, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10462-021-09954-6.
  • Q. Mao, J. Fan, and Y. Gao, “An investment framework for hydro-wind-photovoltaic-hydrogen hybrid power system based on the improved picture fuzzy regret-PROMETHEE model,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 106, pp. 565–585, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.505.
  • E. Haktanır and C. Kahraman, “A novel picture fuzzy CRITIC & REGIME methodology: Wearable health technology application,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 113, p. 104942, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2022.104942.
  • M. Gul, S. Mete, F. Serin, and E. Celik, “Fine–Kinney-based occupational risk assessment using intuitionistic fuzzy TODIM,” in Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021b, pp. 69–89. Accessed: Jul. 7, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52148-6_5
  • J. Dul et al., “A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: Developing the discipline and profession,” Ergonomics, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 377–395, Feb. 2012, doi: 10.1080/00140139.2012.661087.
  • M. MassirisFernández, J. Á. Fernández, J. M. Bajo, and C. A. Delrieux, “Ergonomic risk assessment based on computer vision and machine learning,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 149, p. 106816, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106816.
  • E. M. Eatough, J. D. Way, and C.-H. Chang, “Understanding the link between psychosocial work stressors and work-related musculoskeletal complaints,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 554–563, May 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.08.009.
  • H.-C. Liu, Y. Cheng, and J.-J. Ho, “Associations of ergonomic and psychosocial work hazards with musculoskeletal disorders of specific body parts: A study of general employees in Taiwan,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 76, p. 102935, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2020.102935.
  • J. Oakman, W. Macdonald, and N. Kinsman, “Barriers to more effective prevention of work-related musculoskeletal and mental health disorders,” Applied Ergonomics, vol. 75, pp. 184–192, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2018.10.007.
There are 65 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Fuzzy Computation
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Veysel Tatar 0000-0003-4285-6854

Publication Date September 30, 2025
Submission Date July 8, 2025
Acceptance Date September 30, 2025
Published in Issue Year 2025 Volume: 14 Issue: 3

Cite

IEEE V. Tatar, “Assessment of Ergonomic Risk Factors for Sustainable Agricultural Practices Based on Picture Fuzzy Lodeci-Artasi Approach”, Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1891–1920, 2025, doi: 10.17798/bitlisfen.1737223.

Bitlis Eren University
Journal of Science Editor
Bitlis Eren University Graduate Institute
Bes Minare Mah. Ahmet Eren Bulvari, Merkez Kampus, 13000 BITLIS