Editöre Mektup
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Kolesistektomi Sonrası Biliyer Kaçak Gelişen Hastalarda Biliyer Stent ve Nazobiliyer Drenin Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 75 - 76, 25.04.2025
https://doi.org/10.33716/bmedj.1575211

Öz

Dear Editor,
We are writing to express our appreciation for the recent publication in the Balıkesir Medical Journal Research titled " Comparison of Biliary Stent and Nasobiliary Drain in Patients with Biliary Leak After Cholecystectomy " by Ayte et al (Ayta et al., 2024). This study is valuable in terms of comparing the two main treatment modalities used in the treatment of biliary leakage.
In the managment of the biliary leakage, nasobiliary tubes and biliary stent placement are widely used. The goal of the both endoscopic treatment is to reduce intra-biliary pressure and allow for fistula closure (Pioche & Ponchon, 2013). Among these modalities, the advantage of nasobiliary drainage is to allows for frequent contrast evaluation to monitor the efficiency of the treatment and to determine the exact duration of therapy required. However, the nosebiliary stent is a serious discomfort for patients, since the distal end of the nasobiliary tube is in the nasal cavity. In addition, patients may experience difficulties with feeding (Elmi & Silverman, 2005).
In this research, authors reported that both biliary stent and nasobiliary drainage were effective methods in the treatment of biliary leakage. However, in the nasobiliary drainage group, the lenght of hospital stay was longer. In addition, in the biliary stent group, the rate of ERCP related complication was lower. In the light of these findings, biliary stents can be safely used as an alternative to nasobiliary drainage in the treatment of biliary leakage due to their equal efficacy, less complication rate and hospitalization lenght. While the findings of this study are encouraging, the limited patient population from a single center indicates that further studies with larger cohorts would provide more generalizable data. Overall, we congratulate the authors for their contribution to advancing knowledge on the management of biliary leak.

Kaynakça

  • Ayte, M. R., and Yüksel, İ. (2024). Comparison of Biliary Stent and Nasobiliary Drain in Patients with Biliary Leak After Cholecystectomy. Balıkesir Medical Journal, 7(3), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.33716/bmedj.1403519
  • Pioche, M., and Ponchon, T. (2013). Management of bile duct leaks. Journal of Visceral Surgery, 150(3 Suppl), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.05.004
  • Elmi, F., & Silverman, W. B. (2005). Nasobiliary tube management of postcholecystectomy bile leaks. Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 39(5), 441-444. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mcg.0000159215.62666.d6

Comparison of Biliary Stent and Nasobiliary Drain in Patients with Biliary Leak After Cholecystectomy

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 75 - 76, 25.04.2025
https://doi.org/10.33716/bmedj.1575211

Öz

Dear Editor,
We are writing to express our appreciation for the recent publication in the Balıkesir Medical Journal Research titled " Comparison of Biliary Stent and Nasobiliary Drain in Patients with Biliary Leak After Cholecystectomy " by Ayte et al (Ayta et al., 2024). This study is valuable in terms of comparing the two main treatment modalities used in the treatment of biliary leakage.
In the managment of the biliary leakage, nasobiliary tubes and biliary stent placement are widely used. The goal of the both endoscopic treatment is to reduce intra-biliary pressure and allow for fistula closure (Pioche & Ponchon, 2013). Among these modalities, the advantage of nasobiliary drainage is to allows for frequent contrast evaluation to monitor the efficiency of the treatment and to determine the exact duration of therapy required. However, the nosebiliary stent is a serious discomfort for patients, since the distal end of the nasobiliary tube is in the nasal cavity. In addition, patients may experience difficulties with feeding (Elmi & Silverman, 2005).
In this research, authors reported that both biliary stent and nasobiliary drainage were effective methods in the treatment of biliary leakage. However, in the nasobiliary drainage group, the lenght of hospital stay was longer. In addition, in the biliary stent group, the rate of ERCP related complication was lower. In the light of these findings, biliary stents can be safely used as an alternative to nasobiliary drainage in the treatment of biliary leakage due to their equal efficacy, less complication rate and hospitalization lenght. While the findings of this study are encouraging, the limited patient population from a single center indicates that further studies with larger cohorts would provide more generalizable data. Overall, we congratulate the authors for their contribution to advancing knowledge on the management of biliary leak.

Kaynakça

  • Ayte, M. R., and Yüksel, İ. (2024). Comparison of Biliary Stent and Nasobiliary Drain in Patients with Biliary Leak After Cholecystectomy. Balıkesir Medical Journal, 7(3), 95-103. https://doi.org/10.33716/bmedj.1403519
  • Pioche, M., and Ponchon, T. (2013). Management of bile duct leaks. Journal of Visceral Surgery, 150(3 Suppl), 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2013.05.004
  • Elmi, F., & Silverman, W. B. (2005). Nasobiliary tube management of postcholecystectomy bile leaks. Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 39(5), 441-444. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mcg.0000159215.62666.d6
Toplam 3 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Gastroenteroloji ve Hepatoloji
Bölüm EDİTÖRE MEKTUP
Yazarlar

İbrahim Ethem Güven 0000-0002-7436-6414

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 24 Nisan 2025
Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Nisan 2025
Gönderilme Tarihi 28 Ekim 2024
Kabul Tarihi 1 Ocak 2025
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2025 Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Güven, İ. E. (2025). Comparison of Biliary Stent and Nasobiliary Drain in Patients with Biliary Leak After Cholecystectomy. Balıkesir Medical Journal, 9(1), 75-76. https://doi.org/10.33716/bmedj.1575211