Determination of Grain Yield and Agricultural Traits of Some Oat Cultivars at Different Locations

Year 2023, , 350 - 355, 01.07.2023

Hüseyin Güngör , Mehmet Fatih Çakır , Ziya Dumlupınar

https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1256346

Abstract

This research was carried out during the 2016-2017 and 2017-2018 growing seasons at Edirne, Kırklareli, and Tekirdağ locations with the aim of determining some agricultural and quality traits of nine registered oat cultivars. The experiments were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications. According to the results of the examined traits, plant height ranged from 101.5 to 132.4 cm, vegetative period from 125.1 to 138.9 days, thousand kernel weight from 26.6 to 40.0 g, test weight from 46.2 to 53.2 kg hl-1, protein content from 12.5% to 15.1%, and grain yield from 4011 to 5321 kg ha-1. According to the biplot analysis, PC1 and PC2 (accounting for 69.3% and 18.3% of the total variation, respectively) constituted 87.6% of the total variation. The angle value between the vectors of grain yield and protein content, thousand kernel weight, and test weight was narrow, indicating a high positive relationship between these traits, whereas the angle between the vectors of grain yield and plant height and vegetative period was wide, indicating a negative relationship between these traits. According to the correlation analysis, grain yield had a positive and significant relationship with test weight (r=0.594**), protein content (r=0.431**), and thousand kernel weight (r=0.350**), and a negative and significant relationship with a vegetative period (r=-0.360**) and plant height (r=-0.047**). According to the biplot analysis, cultivars Kahraman, Kırklar, Kehlibar and Somun Yıldızı were found outstanding genotypes in terms of grain yield.

Keywords

Oat, Grain yield, Yield components, Principal Component Analysis, Correlation Analysis

References

• Albayrak S, Ekiz H. 2004. Determination of characters regarding to hay yield using correlation and path analysis in some perennial forage crops. J Agri Sci, 10(3): 250-257.
• Batalova GA, Shevchenko SN, Tulyakova MV, Rusakova II, Zheleznikova VA, Lisitsyn EM. 2016. Breeding of naked oats having high-quality grain. Russian Agri Sci, 42(6):407-410.
• Butt MS, Tahir-Nadeem M, Khan MKI, Shabir R, Butt MS. 2008. Oat: unique among the cereals. European J nutrition, 47(2): 68-79. DOI: 10.1007/s00394-008-0698-7
• Dumlupinar Z, Dokuyucu T, Akkaya A. 2011. Identification of Turkish oat landraces (Avena sativa L.) based on avenin proteins by SDS-PAGE technique. Turkish J Field Crops, 16(1): 76-83.
• Dumlupinar Z, Kara R, Dokuyucu T, Akkaya A. 2012. Correlation and path analysis of grain and yield components of some Turkish oat genotypes. Pak J Bot, 44 (1): 321-325.
• Dumlupinar Z, Ercan K, Tekin A, Herek S, Kurt A, Kekec E, Olgun MF, Dokuyucu T, Akkaya A. 2016. Performance of local oat lines in Kahramanmaraş. KSU J Nat Sci, 19(4): 438-444.
• Dumlupinar Z, Tekin A, Herek S, Tanrıkulu A, Dokuyucu T, Akkaya A. 2017. Evaluating some Turkish originated oat genotypes for some agronomic traits. TURJAF, 5(7): 763-772.
• Erol S, Carpici EB. 2020. Determination with correlation and path analysis of relationships between yield and yield components in Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) genotypes collected from the Bursa. J Agri Fac Bursa Uludag Univ, 35(1): 75-84.
• FAO 2023. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. URL:http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data (accessed date: 30 January 2023).
• Finnan J, Burke B, Spink J. 2019. The effect of nitrogen timing and rate on radiation interception, grain yield and grain quality in autumn sown oats. Field Crops Res, 231: 130–140.
• Gautam SK, Verma AK, Vishwakarma SR. 2006. Genetic variability and association of morpho-physiological characters in oat (Avena sativa L.). Farm Sci J, 15(1): 82-83.
• Gungor H, Dokuyucu T, Dumlupinar Z, Akkaya A. 2017. Determination of relationships between grain yield and some agronomic traits by correlation and path analysis in oat (Avena spp.). J Tekirdag Agri Fac, 14(01): 61-68.
• Halil SD, Uzun A. 2019. Seed yield and some quality characteristics of oat (Avena sativa L.) genotypes growing at Bursa ecological conditions. J Agri Fac Bursa Uludag Univ, 33(2): 293-305.
• Hocaoglu O, Akcura M, Ceri S. 2022. Evaluating grain yields and agronomic traits of selected oat cultivars and naked oat genotypes in Marmara region. Turkish J Agri Nat Sci, 9(3): 771-778.
• Hoffmann LA. 1995. World production and use of oats. In: Welch RW, editor. The oat crop production and utilization. Chapman and Hall, London, UK, pp: 34-61.
• Jing P, Hu X. 2012. Nutraceutical properties and health benefits of oats. Cereals and pulses: Nutra Proper Health Benef, 21-36.
• JMP®. 2020. Version 15.1. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2020.
• Kara R, Dumlupinar Z, Hısır Y, Dokuyucu T, Akkaya A. 2007. Evaluation of oat varieties in terms of grain yield and yield components in Kahramanmaraş conditions. VII. Field Crops Congress, 25-27 June 2007, Erzurum, Türkiye, pp: 121-125.
• Kahraman T, Avci R, Yildirim M. 2021. Determination of grain yield, yield components and quality traits of oat genotypes (Avena sativa L.). KSU J Agric Nat, 24(5): 1003-1010.
• Kahraman T, Orhun E, Baytekin, H. 2022. Evaluation of Oat (Avena sativa L.) Genotypes for green forage, hay yield and some quality parameters in Trakya-Marmara region. KSU J Agric Nat, 25(Suppl 2): 462-470.
• Kececioglu Y, Kara R, Dokuyucu T. 2021. Determination of genetic differences and improvements of some oat genotypes in terms of morphological and Agri characteristics. Turkish J Agri Nat Sci, 8(1): 103-115. DOI:10.30910/turkjans.816927.
• Levene H. 1960. Robust tests for equality of variances. In: Olkin I, editor. Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, California, USA, pp: 278–292.
• Locatelli AB, Federizzi LC, Milach SCK, McElroy AR. 2008. Flowering time in oat: genotype characterization for photoperiod and vernelization response. Field Crops Res, 106: 242-247.
• Mut Z, Akay H, Erbas Köse, ÖD. 2018. Grain yield, quality traits and grain yield stability of local oat cultivars. J Soil Sci Plant Nutri, 18(1): 269-281.
• Naneli I, Sakin MA. 2017. Determination of yield and quality parameters of some oat varieties (Avena sativa L.) in different locations. J Central Res Instit Field Crops, 26(Special Issue): 37-44.
• Rodehutscord M, Ruckert C, Maurer HP, Schenkel H, Schipprack W, Knudsen KEB, Schollenberger M, Laux M, Eklund M, Siegert W, Mosenthin R. 2016. Variation in chemical composition and physical characteristics of cereal grains from different genotypes. Archiv Anim Nutri, 70(2): 87–107.
• Sari N, Imamoglu A. 2011. Determination of improved oat lines suitable for Menemen ecologial conditions. J AARI, 21(1): 16-25.
• Sari N, Unay A. 2015. Determining characteristic affecting grain yield of oats (Avena sativa L.). J Central Res Instit Fields Crops, 24(2): 115-123.
• Sahin M, Ceri S, Gocmen AA, Aydogan S, Hamzaoglu S, Demir B. 2019. Investigation of relationships between yield and technological properties of winter oat (Avena sativa spp.) Genotypes. J Bahri Dagdas Crop Res, 8 (1): 34-42.
• TUIK 2023. Turkish Statistical Institute. URL:https://www.tuik.gov.tr (accessed date: January 30, 2023).
• Vasiljevic S, Banasik OJ. 1980. Quality testing methods for durum wheat and its products. Department of Cereal Chemistry and Technology, Fargo, North Dakota: North Dakota State University, pp: 134.
• Williams P, El-Haramein JF, Nakkoul H, Rihawi S. 1988. Crop quality evaluation methods and guidelines. Syria: International Center for Agricultural Research in The Dry Areas (ICARDA), Syria, Sam, pp: 145.
• Yan W, Kang M. 2003. GGE biplot analysis: A graphical tool breeders. Geneticists and Agronomists. CRC Press, Boca Raton, UK, pp: 286.
• Yan W, Tinker NA. 2006. Biplot analysis of multi-environment trial data: principles and applications. Can J Plant Sci, 86: 623-645.