COMPARING THE JUSTICE AND DEVELOPMENT PARTY WITH THE POLITICAL EXPERIENCE OF THE MUSLIM BROTHERS IN EGYPT

Year 2016, Volume: 5 Issue: 9, 0 - 0, 01.01.2016

Hakan Köni Ensar Nişancı

Abstract

Development Party (JDP) with the Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) of Egypt. The article explores significant similarities between two parties and traces them in common political and economic background conditions. These two conservative parties share in their style of politics characterized as pragmatist, pluralist, gradualist, multilateral, and internationalist with their common goals to bring solutions to decades old solution-waiting economic and political problems of the countries shortly identified as economic underdevelopment, unemployment, poverty, lack or violation of basic human rights and liberties. For the same purpose, the parties share in their support for democracy, human rights, rule of law and economic rationalism. The parties differ in their view to the role of religion in public life, however, for while JDP is characterized as a secularist party of liberal type, the FJP is known with the goal to Islamize the Egyptian political system much as permitted by democratic norms

Keywords

Justice and Development Party, Freedom and Justice Party, Liberal

References

• REFERENCES
• Akdoğan,Yalçın (2006). The meaning of conservative democratic political identity. In M. Hakan Yavuz (Ed), The emergence of a new Turkey: Democracy and the AK Party (pp. 49-65). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
• Atasoy, Seymen (2011). The Turkish example: A model for change in the Middle East. Middle East Policy, 18(3), 86-100.
• Aydoğan, Esenay (2004). 1980’den günümüze Türkiye’de enflasyon serüveni (The journey of inflation in Turkey from 1980s to the day). Yönetim ve Ekonomi 11/1, 91-110.
• Brown, Nathan J. (January 2012). When victory becomes an option: Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood confronts success. Carnegie Papers. Washington: Carnegie Endowment, pp. 1-24.
• Dağı, İhsan (2006). The Justice and Development Party: Identity, politics and discourse of human rights in the search for security and legitimacy. In M. Hakan Yavuz (ed), The emergence of a new Turkey: Democracy and the AK Party (pp. 88-106). Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
• International Crisis Group (2008). Egypt’s Muslim Brothers: Confrontation or integration? Middle East and North Africa Report, 76, 1-32.
• Kaddorah, Emad Y. (2010). The Turkish model: Acceptability and apprehension. Insight Turkey, 12(4), 113-129.
• Karagöl, Erdal Tanas (2013). AK Parti Dönemi Türkiye Ekonomisi (Turkish Economy During the JDP Government). Ankara: SETA, 1-100.
• Köni, Hakan (April 2013). Regime opposition as a source of party change: The case of the Turkish religious right. International Journal of Business and Social Sciences, 4(4), 215-224.
• Köni, Hakan (May 2014). Globalisation as an agent of party ideological change: The case of the Turkish religious right. Al-Sabah Paper Series XI. Durham, UK, pp. 1-23.
• Köni, Hakan and Gürbüz Özdemir (June 2014). 11 years of JDP Government: Facts and prospects. Balkan Journal of Social Sciences, 3(6), 76-96.
• Munson, Ziad (2001). Islamic mobilisation: Social movement theory and the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood. The Sociological Quarterly, 42(4), 447-510.
• Saed, Atef (Summer 2012). The paradox of transition to ‘democracy’ under military rule. Social Research, 79(2), 397-434.
• Sallam, Hesham (30 June 2013). Obsessed with Turkish models in Egypt. Jadaliyya.
• Vacherot, Damien (2008). The over-institutionalization of the Turkish state apparatus: An obstacle to the consolidation of democracy in Turkey. Colgate University: Institute of Philosophy, Politics and Economics Research Paper, 1-73.