ADOLESAN DÖNEM BASKETBOLCULARDA MEVKİLERE GÖRE YAPISAL VE MOTORİK ÖZELLİKLERİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Yıl 2008, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 3, 174 - 181, 01.12.2008

Özhan Bavlı

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı; adolesan dönemdeki basketbolcuların yapısal motorik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi ve bu özelliklerin mevkilere göre karşılaştırılmasıdır. Çalışmaya yaşları 13-19 arasında, 79 lisanslı basketbol oyuncusu 26 gard, 30 forvet ve 23 pivot gönüllü olarak katılmıştır. Yapısal özelliklerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla sporcuların boy, kilo ve deri altı yağ ölçümleri alınmıştır. Motorik özelliklerin belirlenmesi için ise; 30 m sürat, dikey sıçrama, esneklik ve bacak-kol kuvveti ölçümleri yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, pivot oyuncuların gard ve forvet oyuncularına göre istatistiksel anlamda daha uzun boylu P=0,001 ve daha kilolu P=0,000 oldukları belirlenmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra; gardların forvet ve pivotlara göre daha esnek oldukları belirlenmiştir P=0,007 . Ayrıca, istatistiksel anlamda bir fark olmamasıyla birlikte gard ve forvetlerin pivotlara göre daha süratli olduğu 4,46±0,3 , gardların diğer oyunculara göre dikey sıçrama değerlerinin daha yüksek olduğu 33,4±5,1 , bunun yanı sıra pivotların kol kuvveti 108,9±16,7 ve bacak kuvveti 131,8±30,3 değerlerinin diğer oyunculara göre daha yüksek olduğu saptanmıştır. Bu çalışma sonucunda adolesan dönem basketbolcularda farklı pozisyonların farklı yapısal özellikler içerdiğini ancak bu sporcuların benzer biyomotorik özelliklere sahip oldukları belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Spor, basketbol, biyomotorik özellik, adolesan

COMPARİSON THE STRUCTURAL AND BİOMOTORİCAL FEATURES OF ADOLESCENT BASKETBALL PLAYERS ACCORDİNG TO PLAYİNG POSİTİON

Öz

The aim of this study was to describe structural and biomotorical features of adolescent basketball players and to evaluate wheter players in different positional roles have different structural and biomotorical features. 79 adolescent basketball players, between 13-19 ages, 26 guard, 30 forward and 23 center participated in the study. For structural analysis; skinfold thickness, body height and body wieght were measured. For biomotorical analysis; 30 m sprint, vertical jump, flexibility, arm and leg strength were measured. As a result; centers were significantly taller P=0,001 and heavier P=0,000 than guards and forwards. There was no significantly differences on player’s age, sport experience age, BMI Body mass index and body fat percentage’s values. Besides; gards were significiantly more flexible than forwards and centers P=0,007 . Though there was no significant differences, it is found that gards showed better sprint 4,46± 0,3 and vertical jump performance 33,4±5,1 than the other players. Besides pivots showed better leg 131,8±30,3 and arm strength 108,9±16,7 performance than the other players. In conclusion this study showed that, different playing positions had different structural features but, adolescent basketball players had similar biomotor performance

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sport, basketball, biomotorical feature, adolescent

Kaynakça

• Hoffman J.R., Maresh C.M., (2000), Physiology of basketball. In: Garrett W.E., Kirkendall D.T. (eds). Exercise and sport sciences reviews. Lippincot Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia p:733,1999
• Chandler J., (1986) Goals and activities for athletic conditioning for basketball. NCSA J. 7:34-36
• Gillam G.M., (1985), Identification of anthropometric and physiological characteristics relative to participation in college basketball NCSA J. 7:34-36
• McInnes S.E., Carlson J.S., Jones C.J., McKenna M.J., (1995) The physiological load imposed on basketball players during competition. J.Sports Sci..13:387-97
• Jordane F., Martin J., (1995) Basket performance. Paris: Edition Amphora
• Crisafulli A. et al, (2002) External mechanical work versus oxidative energy consumption ratio during a basketball field test. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 42:409-417
• Krause J., (1991) Basketball skills and drills. Champaign, IL: Human kinetics
• Yuhasz M.S., (1986) The effects of sports training on body fat in man with prediction of optimal body weight. Urbans, Monois: University of Ilinois
• Keyserling W.M., Herrin G.D., Chaffin D.B., (1978) An analysis of selected work musle strength. Proceedig of human factors society 22nd annual meeting, Detroit
• Ostojic S.M., Mazic S., Dikic N., (2006) Profiling in basketball: Physical and physiological characteristics of elite basketball players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 20:(4): 740-744
• Sallet P. et al, (2005) Physiological differences in professional basketball players as a function of playing position and level of play. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness. 45:3: 291
• Parr R.B. et al, (1978) Professional basketball players: Athletic profiles. Phys. Sportsmed. 6:77-84
• Soares J. et al, (1986) Physical fitness characteristics of Brazilian national basketball team as related to game functions. In: Perspectives in Kinathropometry.. Day J.A.P., ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics p:127-133
• Latin R.W., Berk K., Baechle T., (1994) Physical and performance characteristics of NCAA division I male basketball players. J. Strength Cond. Res. 8:214-218
• Apostolidis N et al. (2004), Physiological and technical characteristics of elite young basketball players. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 43:157-163
• Hoffman J.R. et al, (1996) Relationship between athletic performance tests and playing time in elite college basketball players. J Strength Cond res:1067-71