Research Article

Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction

Volume: 8 Number: 3 May 15, 2025
EN TR

Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction

Abstract

Diabetes mellitus is a significant global health concern that profoundly affects individuals' lives and imposes a considerable burden on healthcare systems. Enhanced predictive capabilities can lead to timely interventions, ultimately improving patient outcomes and alleviating the strain on healthcare resources. Thus, accurate and timely prediction of diabetes mellitus is crucial for reducing mortality rates and minimizing complications within healthcare frameworks. This study addresses the correlation between type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and key attributes that differentiate diabetic from non-diabetic cases, utilizing various machine learning-based classification methods. For this reason, this work employed a large, open-source dataset obtained from Kaggle. To my knowledge, this is the first study utilizing such a dataset that specifically focuses on predicting T2DM in patients aged 35 years or older, according to the American Diabetes Association (ADA). To identify key features associated with T2DM for use as input to each supervised classifier, the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) feature selection algorithm was applied to the dataset. In this analysis, the performance of each supervised classifier with feature selection was evaluated and compared using various metrics, including accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision (positive predictive value, PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1 score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). The results of the analysis reveal that an ensemble method employing boosted trees (EBT) classifier surpasses the other models, recording the highest macro-average values for accuracy (95.9%), PPV (97.7%), NPV (97.7%), and F1 score (89.7%), along with the superior area under the curve (AUC) of 95.57% for both diabetes and non-diabetes cases. The study suggests that machine learning classifiers can serve as a reliable tool for the precise prediction of T2DM, thereby enhancing clinical decision-making processes for healthcare practitioners.

Keywords

Ethical Statement

Ethics committee approval was not required for this study because of there was no study on animals or humans. The study employed an open-source dataset.

References

  1. American Diabetes Association. 2021. URL: https://diabetes.org/newsroom/latest-ada-annual-standards-of-care-includes-changes-to-diabetes-screening-first-line-therapy-pregnancy-technology (accessed date: January 6, 2025)
  2. Anderson RP, Jin R, Grunkemeier GL. 2003. Understanding logistic regression analysis in clinical reports: an introduction. Ann Thorac Surg, 75(3): 753–757.
  3. Bhat SS, Banu M, Ansari GA, Selvam V. 2023. A risk assessment and prediction framework for diabetes mellitus using machine learning algorithms. Healthc Anal, 4: 100273.
  4. Borse SP, Chhipa AS, Sharma V, Singh DP, Nivsarkar M 2021. Management of type 2 diabetes: current strategies, unfocussed aspects, challenges, and alternatives. Med Princ Pract, 30(2): 109–121.
  5. Cano-Cano F, Gómez-Jaramillo L, Ramos-García P, Arroba AI, Aguilar-Diosdado M. 2022. IL-1β implications in type 1 diabetes mellitus progression: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med, 11(5): 1303.
  6. Carrillo-Larco RM, Guzman-Vilca WC, Xu X, Bernabe-Ortiz A. 2024. Mean age and body mass index at type 2 diabetes diagnosis: pooled analysis of 56 health surveys across income groups and world regions. Diabet Med, 41(2): e15174.
  7. Chandra MA, Bedi SS. 2018. Survey on SVM and their application in image classification. Int J Inf Technol, 13(5): 1–11.
  8. Costa-Cordella S, Luyten P, Cohen D, Mena F, Fonagy P. 2021. Mentalizing in mothers and children with type 1 diabetes. Dev Psychopathol, 33(1): 216–225.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Biomedical Diagnosis, Electrical Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

May 15, 2025

Submission Date

January 12, 2025

Acceptance Date

April 22, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 8 Number: 3

APA
Kurt, O. (2025). Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 8(3), 875-884. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1618267
AMA
1.Kurt O. Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2025;8(3):875-884. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1618267
Chicago
Kurt, Onur. 2025. “Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 8 (3): 875-84. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1618267.
EndNote
Kurt O (May 1, 2025) Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 8 3 875–884.
IEEE
[1]O. Kurt, “Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 875–884, May 2025, doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.1618267.
ISNAD
Kurt, Onur. “Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 8/3 (May 1, 2025): 875-884. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1618267.
JAMA
1.Kurt O. Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2025;8:875–884.
MLA
Kurt, Onur. “Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 8, no. 3, May 2025, pp. 875-84, doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1618267.
Vancouver
1.Onur Kurt. Performance Evaluation of Supervised Machine Learning Classifiers for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Prediction. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2025 May 1;8(3):875-84. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.1618267

                            24890