Research Article

A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data

Volume: 3 Number: 4 October 1, 2020
EN

A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data

Abstract

In recent years, point cloud data generated with RGB-D cameras, 3D lasers, and 3D LiDARs have been employed frequently in robotic applications. In indoor environments, RGB-D cameras, which have short-range and can only describe the vicinity of the robots, generally are opted due to their low cost. On the other hand, 3D lasers and LiDARs can capture long-range measurements and generally are used in outdoor applications. In this study, we deal with the segmentation of indoor planar surfaces such as wall, floor, and ceiling via point cloud data. The segmentation methods, which are situated in Point Cloud Library (PCL) were executed with 3D laser point cloud data. The experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of these methods with the publicly available Fukuoka indoor laser dataset, which has point clouds with different noise levels. The test results were compared in terms of segmentation accuracy and the time elapsed for segmentation. Besides, the general characteristics of each method were discussed. In this way, we revealed the positive and negative aspects of these methods for researchers that plan to apply them to 3D laser point cloud data.

Keywords

References

  1. Anil EB, Tang P, Akinci B, Huber D. 2013. Deviation analysis method for the assessment of the quality of the as-is Building Information Models generated from point cloud data. Aut in Construc, 35: 507-516.
  2. Besl PJ, Jain RC. 1988. Segmentation through variable-order surface fitting. IEEE Transact on Pat Analy Machine Intel, 10(2): 167-192.
  3. Cadena C, Košecka J. 2015. Semantic parsing for priming object detection in indoors RGB-D scenes. Int J Robotics Res, 34(4-5): 582-597.
  4. Egger J, Colen RR, Freisleben B, Nimsky C. 2012. Manual refinement system for graph-based segmentation results in the medical domain. J Medic Sys, 36(5): 2829-2839.
  5. Ferraz A, Bretar F, Jacquemoud S, Gonçalves G, Pereira L. 2010. 3D segmentation of forest structure using a mean-shift based algorithm. IEEE Int Conference on Image Processing, 1413-1416.
  6. Fischler MA, Bolles RC. 1981. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun of the ACM, 24(6): 381-395.
  7. Grilli E, Menna F, Remondino F. 2017. A review of point clouds segmentation and classification algorithms. The Intl Archives of Phot, Remote Sensing and Spatial Inf Sci, 42: 339.
  8. Himmelsbach M, Hundelshausen FV, Wuensche HJ. 2010. Fast segmentation of 3D point clouds for ground vehicles. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 560-565.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

October 1, 2020

Submission Date

May 11, 2020

Acceptance Date

July 20, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2020 Volume: 3 Number: 4

APA
Eruyar, E. E., Yılmaz, M., Yılmaz, B., Akbulut, O., Turgut, K., & Kaleci, B. (2020). A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.735705
AMA
1.Eruyar EE, Yılmaz M, Yılmaz B, Akbulut O, Turgut K, Kaleci B. A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2020;3(4):128-137. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.735705
Chicago
Eruyar, Eyüp Eymen, Metehan Yılmaz, Berat Yılmaz, Onur Akbulut, Kaya Turgut, and Burak Kaleci. 2020. “A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 3 (4): 128-37. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.735705.
EndNote
Eruyar EE, Yılmaz M, Yılmaz B, Akbulut O, Turgut K, Kaleci B (October 1, 2020) A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 3 4 128–137.
IEEE
[1]E. E. Eruyar, M. Yılmaz, B. Yılmaz, O. Akbulut, K. Turgut, and B. Kaleci, “A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data”, BSJ Eng. Sci., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 128–137, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.735705.
ISNAD
Eruyar, Eyüp Eymen - Yılmaz, Metehan - Yılmaz, Berat - Akbulut, Onur - Turgut, Kaya - Kaleci, Burak. “A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 3/4 (October 1, 2020): 128-137. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.735705.
JAMA
1.Eruyar EE, Yılmaz M, Yılmaz B, Akbulut O, Turgut K, Kaleci B. A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2020;3:128–137.
MLA
Eruyar, Eyüp Eymen, et al. “A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 3, no. 4, Oct. 2020, pp. 128-37, doi:10.34248/bsengineering.735705.
Vancouver
1.Eyüp Eymen Eruyar, Metehan Yılmaz, Berat Yılmaz, Onur Akbulut, Kaya Turgut, Burak Kaleci. A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2020 Oct. 1;3(4):128-37. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.735705

Cited By

                            24890