Araştırma Makalesi

A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data

Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4 1 Ekim 2020
PDF İndir
EN

A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data

Öz

In recent years, point cloud data generated with RGB-D cameras, 3D lasers, and 3D LiDARs have been employed frequently in robotic applications. In indoor environments, RGB-D cameras, which have short-range and can only describe the vicinity of the robots, generally are opted due to their low cost. On the other hand, 3D lasers and LiDARs can capture long-range measurements and generally are used in outdoor applications. In this study, we deal with the segmentation of indoor planar surfaces such as wall, floor, and ceiling via point cloud data. The segmentation methods, which are situated in Point Cloud Library (PCL) were executed with 3D laser point cloud data. The experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance of these methods with the publicly available Fukuoka indoor laser dataset, which has point clouds with different noise levels. The test results were compared in terms of segmentation accuracy and the time elapsed for segmentation. Besides, the general characteristics of each method were discussed. In this way, we revealed the positive and negative aspects of these methods for researchers that plan to apply them to 3D laser point cloud data.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Anil EB, Tang P, Akinci B, Huber D. 2013. Deviation analysis method for the assessment of the quality of the as-is Building Information Models generated from point cloud data. Aut in Construc, 35: 507-516.
  2. Besl PJ, Jain RC. 1988. Segmentation through variable-order surface fitting. IEEE Transact on Pat Analy Machine Intel, 10(2): 167-192.
  3. Cadena C, Košecka J. 2015. Semantic parsing for priming object detection in indoors RGB-D scenes. Int J Robotics Res, 34(4-5): 582-597.
  4. Egger J, Colen RR, Freisleben B, Nimsky C. 2012. Manual refinement system for graph-based segmentation results in the medical domain. J Medic Sys, 36(5): 2829-2839.
  5. Ferraz A, Bretar F, Jacquemoud S, Gonçalves G, Pereira L. 2010. 3D segmentation of forest structure using a mean-shift based algorithm. IEEE Int Conference on Image Processing, 1413-1416.
  6. Fischler MA, Bolles RC. 1981. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun of the ACM, 24(6): 381-395.
  7. Grilli E, Menna F, Remondino F. 2017. A review of point clouds segmentation and classification algorithms. The Intl Archives of Phot, Remote Sensing and Spatial Inf Sci, 42: 339.
  8. Himmelsbach M, Hundelshausen FV, Wuensche HJ. 2010. Fast segmentation of 3D point clouds for ground vehicles. IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 560-565.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mühendislik

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

1 Ekim 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

11 Mayıs 2020

Kabul Tarihi

20 Temmuz 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 3 Sayı: 4

Kaynak Göster

APA
Eruyar, E. E., Yılmaz, M., Yılmaz, B., Akbulut, O., Turgut, K., & Kaleci, B. (2020). A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, 3(4), 128-137. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.735705
AMA
1.Eruyar EE, Yılmaz M, Yılmaz B, Akbulut O, Turgut K, Kaleci B. A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2020;3(4):128-137. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.735705
Chicago
Eruyar, Eyüp Eymen, Metehan Yılmaz, Berat Yılmaz, Onur Akbulut, Kaya Turgut, ve Burak Kaleci. 2020. “A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 3 (4): 128-37. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.735705.
EndNote
Eruyar EE, Yılmaz M, Yılmaz B, Akbulut O, Turgut K, Kaleci B (01 Ekim 2020) A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 3 4 128–137.
IEEE
[1]E. E. Eruyar, M. Yılmaz, B. Yılmaz, O. Akbulut, K. Turgut, ve B. Kaleci, “A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data”, BSJ Eng. Sci., c. 3, sy 4, ss. 128–137, Eki. 2020, doi: 10.34248/bsengineering.735705.
ISNAD
Eruyar, Eyüp Eymen - Yılmaz, Metehan - Yılmaz, Berat - Akbulut, Onur - Turgut, Kaya - Kaleci, Burak. “A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science 3/4 (01 Ekim 2020): 128-137. https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.735705.
JAMA
1.Eruyar EE, Yılmaz M, Yılmaz B, Akbulut O, Turgut K, Kaleci B. A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data. BSJ Eng. Sci. 2020;3:128–137.
MLA
Eruyar, Eyüp Eymen, vd. “A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data”. Black Sea Journal of Engineering and Science, c. 3, sy 4, Ekim 2020, ss. 128-37, doi:10.34248/bsengineering.735705.
Vancouver
1.Eyüp Eymen Eruyar, Metehan Yılmaz, Berat Yılmaz, Onur Akbulut, Kaya Turgut, Burak Kaleci. A Comparative Study for Indoor Planar Surface Segmentation via 3D Laser Point Cloud Data. BSJ Eng. Sci. 01 Ekim 2020;3(4):128-37. doi:10.34248/bsengineering.735705

Cited By

                           24890