Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis

Oğuz Arslan; Aslı Ergenekon Arslan; Merve Şentürk Acar

doi:10.35193/bseufbd.561668

Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis

Abstract

In this study, taking the different parameters into account, different designs of b-type ORC power plant have analytically conducted. In the designs, Simav geothermal resources have been taken into consideration as the source of the plant. Then, the best design has been determined using EATWOS in the viewpoint of the working conditions. As a conclusion, the available models of b1-type, b2-type and b3-type were determined as Model 12, Model 10 and Model 31, respectively for energy efficiency, net yearly electricity generation and integrated-based values. Amongst these, the best model was determined as Model 10 with the design parameters of 353.15 K, 413.15 K, 295.15 K, 656.37 MWh and 18.08 for T_1b, T_2d, T_2c, E_net and η, respectively.

Keywords

EATWOS,Geothermal Energy,B-Type ORC

References

[1] Atici K.B., Ulucan, A. (2009). Enerji Projelerinin Değerlendirilmesi Sürecinde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yaklaşımları ve Türkiye Uygulamaları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 27, Sayı 1, 161-186 (in Turkish).
[2] Yıldırım, B.F., Önder, E. (2015). İşletmeciler, Mühendisler ve Yöneticiler için Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri. Dora Yayınevi, 2. Baskı, Bursa (in Turkish).
[3] Arslan, A. E., Güven, Ö.Z., (2018). Veri Zarflama Analizi ile Üniversite Etkinliklerinin Belirlenmesine Yönelik Bir Çalışma: Türkiye Örneği. Uluslararası Afro-Avrasya Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(6), 86-105.
[4] Arslan, A. E., Acar, M. S., Arslan O., (2018). Data Envelopıng Based Effectiveness Analysis of Integrated Geothermal System: Simav Case Study. International Congress on Afro - Eurasian Research IV, 27-29 April 2018.
[5] Huang, W., Eling, M., (2013). An efficiency comparison of the non-life insurance industry in the BRIC countries. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 577-591.
[6] Kundakcı, N., (2018). Effıciency Evaluation of State Universities in Turkey wıth EATWOS Method. International Congress on Afro - Eurasian Research IV, 27-29 April 2018.
[7] Özbek, A., (2015). Efficiency Analysis of Non-Governmental Organizations Based in Turkey. International Business Research, 8(9), 1-11.
[8] Zhou, P., Ang, B.W., Poh, K.L. (2006). Decision Analysis in Energy and Environmental Modeling: an Update. Energy, 31, 2604–2622.

[9] Peters, M. L., Zelewski, S. (2006). Efficiency analysis under consideration of satisficing levels for output quantities. In Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the Production and Operations Management Society (POMS), April 28-May 01, Boston, USA.
[10] Özbek, Aşır, (2016), Madencilik Sektöründe Yer Alan Şirketlerin Eatwos İle Karşılaştırılması. Uluslararası Katılımlı 16. Üretim Araştırmaları Sempozyumu, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi, 12-14 Ekim 2016, İstanbul.
[11] Özbek, A., (2017). Çok Ölçütlü Karar Verme Yöntemleriyle Hayırsever Kuruluşlarında Verimlilik Analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 18, No: 2, 99-114.
[12] Soni, V., Singh, S. P., Devinder K. B., (2016). Precise decisions in Indian energy sector by imprecise evaluation. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, Volume 10, Issue 1.
[13] Bansal, A. K., Singh, R., Issar, S., Varkey, J., (2014). Evaluation of Vendors Ranking By EATWOS Approach. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 11(3), 290-311.
[14] Peters, M. L., Zelewski. S., (2016). Benefits and Risks of Satisficing Levels for Input and Output Quantities in Efficiency Analyses from A Corporate Social Responsibility Perspective. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Vol. 5, No. 12, 94-101.
[15] Peters, M. L., Zelewski S., (2018). Some Thoughts on Operationalizing The Concept of Sufficiency in Efficiency Analysis. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, Vol. 7, No. 1, 63-71.
[16] Arslan, O., (2008). Simav-Eynal Jeotermal Kaynaklarının Hassas Değerlendirilmesi: Entegre sistem tasarım ve enerji-ekserji analzileri. Eskisehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi. Doktora Tezi.
[17] Arslan, O., Yetik, O., (2014). ANN modeling of an ORC-binary geothermal power plant: simav case study. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 36 (4), 418-428.
[18] Arslan, O., Ozgur, M.A., Kose, R., (2012). Electricity generation ability of the Simav geothermal field: A technoeconomic approach. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 34 (12), 1130-1144.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Oğuz Arslan ^*
0000-0001-8233-831X
Türkiye

Aslı Ergenekon Arslan
0000-0001-8052-8566
Türkiye

Merve Şentürk Acar
0000-0003-1442-4560
Türkiye

Publication Date

June 28, 2019

Submission Date

May 8, 2019

Acceptance Date

May 16, 2019

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 6 Number: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.561668

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA76ME84HE

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Arslan, O., Ergenekon Arslan, A., & Şentürk Acar, M. (2019). Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.561668

AMA

1.Arslan O, Ergenekon Arslan A, Şentürk Acar M. Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;6(1):29-48. doi:10.35193/bseufbd.561668

Chicago

Arslan, Oğuz, Aslı Ergenekon Arslan, and Merve Şentürk Acar. 2019. “Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of B-Type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis”. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 6 (1): 29-48. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.561668.

EndNote

Arslan O, Ergenekon Arslan A, Şentürk Acar M (June 1, 2019) Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 6 1 29–48.

IEEE

[1]O. Arslan, A. Ergenekon Arslan, and M. Şentürk Acar, “Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis”, Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 29–48, June 2019, doi: 10.35193/bseufbd.561668.

ISNAD

Arslan, Oğuz - Ergenekon Arslan, Aslı - Şentürk Acar, Merve. “Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of B-Type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis”. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 6/1 (June 1, 2019): 29-48. https://doi.org/10.35193/bseufbd.561668.

JAMA

1.Arslan O, Ergenekon Arslan A, Şentürk Acar M. Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019;6:29–48.

MLA

Arslan, Oğuz, et al. “Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of B-Type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis”. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 1, June 2019, pp. 29-48, doi:10.35193/bseufbd.561668.

Vancouver

1.Oğuz Arslan, Aslı Ergenekon Arslan, Merve Şentürk Acar. Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2019 Jun. 1;6(1):29-48. doi:10.35193/bseufbd.561668

Cited By

Efficiency analysis technique with input and output satisficing approach based on Type-2 Neutrosophic Fuzzy Sets: A case study of container shipping companies

Expert Systems with Applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119596

Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis

Multi-Criteria Making-Decision Modeling of b-type ORC-Binary Geothermal Power Plant: EATWOS Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

References

Details

Primary Language

Subjects

Journal Section

Authors

Publication Date

Submission Date

Acceptance Date

Published in Issue

DOI

IZ

Cite

Cited By

Efficiency analysis technique with input and output satisficing approach based on Type-2 Neutrosophic Fuzzy Sets: A case study of container shipping companies

Thermodynamic and thermoeconomic analyses and energetic and exergetic optimization of a turbojet engine

o-TİPİ ORC-BINARY JEOTERMAL GÜÇ SANTRALI OPTİMİZASYONU: EATWOS ANALİZİ

AHP–TOPSIS hybrid decision-making analysis: Simav integrated system case study