Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Tragic Downfall of Antony in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra

Year 2019, , 746 - 758, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.33905/bseusbed.610180

Abstract

Although there have been lots of debates about the reason of downfall of the great Roman general Antony, there is exactly one forefront reason in his destruction, it is Cleopatra herself. Her subversive power over Antony together with her manipulative and seductive power leads to the gradual breakdown of the male protagonist Antony and his destruction at the end. Thus, to understand the full aspect of his downfall as one of the triumvirs of the great Roman Empire, we have to know exactly, who Cleopatra is and what role her characteristics played in Antony’s downfall as a woman. Shakespeare’s Cleopatra even today regarded by some as the source of beauty and by some as the source of manipulation but the common point for most people; it would not be possible to describe her within the limited definitions of woman in patriarchal society and one would need more than these, at least, for Cleopatra. Regarding the different approaches and criticisms about the downfall of the protagonist Antony, my aim in this article is to show how Cleopatra as an outstanding female model in ancient ages led to the downfall of the male protagonist of Shakespeare’s play the great Roman general Antony by using her special feminine characteristics such as her beauty, her tempting words and speeches and also her seductive wiles against patriarchal assumptions that leads her to being condemned as a femme fatale. In this perspective, in the play of Shakespeare Cleopatra’s character is worth being analyzed whether she plays a submissive or a subversive role in the collapse of Antony.

References

  • Alexander, Peter. “Shakespeare's Life and Art.” Shakespeare's Life and Art, New York University Press, 1961, p. 67.
  • Bamber, Linda. Comic Women, Tragic Men: a Study of Gender and Genre in Shakespeare. Stanford Univ. Press, 1982.
  • Beard, Mary. “SPQR: a History of Ancient Rome.” SPQR: a History of Ancient Rome, Profile Books, 2016, p. 163.
  • Cantarella, Eva. “Pandora's Daughters: the Role and Status of Women in Greek and Roman Antiquity.” Pandora's Daughters: the Role and Status of Women in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987, p. 122.
  • Das, P. (2012). Shakespeare's Representation of Women in his Tragedies. Prime University Journal,6(2), 37-56.
  • Decker, Marsha A. Language, Gender, and Power: Cleopatra VII of Egypt, Christine De Pizan, and Queen Elizabeth I of England. 2012.
  • Fitz, L. T. “Egyptian Queens and Male Reviewers: Sexist Attitudes in Antony and Cleopatra Criticism.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 3, 1977, p. 304., doi:10.2307/2869080.
  • Freud, Sigmund. “Beyond the Pleasure Principle.” Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Dover Publication, Inc., 2015, p. 14.
  • Kelso, Ruth, and Katharine M. Rogers. Doctrine for the Lady of the Renaissance. Univ. of Illinois Press, 1990.
  • Mack, M. (1973). Killing the king: Three studies in Shakespeares tragic structure. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Magoulias, Michael, ed. “Antony And Cleopatra (Vol. 27) – Introduction”. In: Shakespearean Criticism. Vol. 27. Gale Cengage, 1995.
  • Montrose, Louis Adrian. “‘Shaping Fantasies’: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture.” Representations, vol. 2, no. 1, 1983, pp. 61–94., doi:10.1525/rep.1983.2.1.99p0006e.
  • Muir, Kenneth. William Shakespeare, Antony and Cleopatra. Penguin, 1987.
  • Onyett, Nicola. "'Beauty, wisdom, modesty' admired Octavia: Nicola Onyett looks at the dramatic significance of 'Admired Octavia' in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra." The English Review 21.1 (2010): 36+. General OneFile. Web. 6 Sept. 2015.
  • Pope, Alexander. "Epistle II. To a Lady". 1743. N.p. University of Pennsylvania. Department of Linguistics. N.d. Web. 13 May 2014.
  • Randazzo, Gelsey, "Cleopatra: The Defiance of Feminine Virtue" (2012). English Senior Seminar Papers. Paper 8.
  • Shakespeare, W., Jones, E., & Weis, R. (2005). Antony and Cleopatra. London: Penguin.
  • Shakespeare, W., & Neill, M. (2000). The tragedy of Anthony and Cleopatra. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Starks, Lisa A. "Like the Lover's Pinch, Which Hurts and Is Desired: The Narrative of Male Masochism and Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra." Literature and Psychology, Proquest Psychology Journals, 1999. Web. 28 Sept. 2015.
  • Vignier, I. (2004). The Tragic in Antony and Cleopatra. Retrieved March 09, 2017, from http://www.literature- study- online.com/essays/antony-cleopatra.html

Shakespeare’in Antonius ve Kleopatrasında Antonius’un Trajik Çöküşü

Year 2019, , 746 - 758, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.33905/bseusbed.610180

Abstract

Büyük Romalı General Antonius’un çöküşü hakkında her ne kadar çeşitli tartışmalar olsa da öne çıkan ilk sebeplerden biri Kleopatra’nın kendisidir. Kleopatra’nın Antonius üzerindeki yıkıcı gücünün yanında manipülatif ve ayartıcı gücünün de etkisiyle erkek başkahraman Antonius’un yavaş yavaş çöküşüne ve sonunda yok oluşuna neden olmuştur.  Bu sebeple Büyük Roma İmparatorluğunun üç kurucu hükümdarından biri olarak Antonius’un çöküşünü tam olarak anlayabilmek için Kleoptra’nın tam olarak kim olduğunu ve Antonius üzerinde hangi karakteristik özeliklerinin etkili olduğunu bilmek gerekir. Sheakespear’in Kleopatrası bugün bile bazıları için güzellik kaynağı olarak görülürken bazıları için ise manipülasyon kaynağıdır. Fakat çoğu insan için ortak nokta ise onu ataerkil toplumdaki kadının sınırlı tanımıyla ifade edebilmenin mümkün olmadığı ve en azından Kleopatra için bu tanımlardan fazlasına gereksinim duyulmasıdır. Bu makalenin amacı Shakespeare’in oyunundaki başkahraman Büyük Roma İmparatoru Antonius’un çöküşü hakkındaki farklı yaklaşım ve eleştirileri dikkate alarak eski çağlarda sıra dışı kadın örneği olarak Kleopatra’nın kendine has kadınsı güzellik, ayartıcı söz, konuşmaları ve Ataerkil değerlere karşı sergilediği ayartıcı tavırlarıyla nasıl Antonius’un çöküşüne zemin hazırladığı ve nasıl entrikacı bir kadın olarak kınandığını göstermektir. Bu bakımdan Shakespeare’in oyununda Keopatra’nın Antonius’un çöküşünde yıkıcı ya da itaatkâr bir rol oynayıp oynamadığının incelenmesi araştırmaya değer bir konudur.

References

  • Alexander, Peter. “Shakespeare's Life and Art.” Shakespeare's Life and Art, New York University Press, 1961, p. 67.
  • Bamber, Linda. Comic Women, Tragic Men: a Study of Gender and Genre in Shakespeare. Stanford Univ. Press, 1982.
  • Beard, Mary. “SPQR: a History of Ancient Rome.” SPQR: a History of Ancient Rome, Profile Books, 2016, p. 163.
  • Cantarella, Eva. “Pandora's Daughters: the Role and Status of Women in Greek and Roman Antiquity.” Pandora's Daughters: the Role and Status of Women in Greek and Roman Antiquity, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1987, p. 122.
  • Das, P. (2012). Shakespeare's Representation of Women in his Tragedies. Prime University Journal,6(2), 37-56.
  • Decker, Marsha A. Language, Gender, and Power: Cleopatra VII of Egypt, Christine De Pizan, and Queen Elizabeth I of England. 2012.
  • Fitz, L. T. “Egyptian Queens and Male Reviewers: Sexist Attitudes in Antony and Cleopatra Criticism.” Shakespeare Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 3, 1977, p. 304., doi:10.2307/2869080.
  • Freud, Sigmund. “Beyond the Pleasure Principle.” Beyond the Pleasure Principle, Dover Publication, Inc., 2015, p. 14.
  • Kelso, Ruth, and Katharine M. Rogers. Doctrine for the Lady of the Renaissance. Univ. of Illinois Press, 1990.
  • Mack, M. (1973). Killing the king: Three studies in Shakespeares tragic structure. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  • Magoulias, Michael, ed. “Antony And Cleopatra (Vol. 27) – Introduction”. In: Shakespearean Criticism. Vol. 27. Gale Cengage, 1995.
  • Montrose, Louis Adrian. “‘Shaping Fantasies’: Figurations of Gender and Power in Elizabethan Culture.” Representations, vol. 2, no. 1, 1983, pp. 61–94., doi:10.1525/rep.1983.2.1.99p0006e.
  • Muir, Kenneth. William Shakespeare, Antony and Cleopatra. Penguin, 1987.
  • Onyett, Nicola. "'Beauty, wisdom, modesty' admired Octavia: Nicola Onyett looks at the dramatic significance of 'Admired Octavia' in Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra." The English Review 21.1 (2010): 36+. General OneFile. Web. 6 Sept. 2015.
  • Pope, Alexander. "Epistle II. To a Lady". 1743. N.p. University of Pennsylvania. Department of Linguistics. N.d. Web. 13 May 2014.
  • Randazzo, Gelsey, "Cleopatra: The Defiance of Feminine Virtue" (2012). English Senior Seminar Papers. Paper 8.
  • Shakespeare, W., Jones, E., & Weis, R. (2005). Antony and Cleopatra. London: Penguin.
  • Shakespeare, W., & Neill, M. (2000). The tragedy of Anthony and Cleopatra. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Starks, Lisa A. "Like the Lover's Pinch, Which Hurts and Is Desired: The Narrative of Male Masochism and Shakespeare's Antony and Cleopatra." Literature and Psychology, Proquest Psychology Journals, 1999. Web. 28 Sept. 2015.
  • Vignier, I. (2004). The Tragic in Antony and Cleopatra. Retrieved March 09, 2017, from http://www.literature- study- online.com/essays/antony-cleopatra.html
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Creative Arts and Writing
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Abdullah Kodal 0000-0002-8730-1791

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Submission Date August 24, 2019
Acceptance Date December 5, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Kodal, A. (2019). Tragic Downfall of Antony in Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra. Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4(2), 746-758. https://doi.org/10.33905/bseusbed.610180