Research Article

One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English as An International Language*

Volume: 14 Number: 3 July 31, 2025
EN

One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English as An International Language*

Abstract

The global spread of English in recent years has made the native speaker ideology, dominant in ELT for years, questionable. Recent studies on English textbooks point to a shift from the inner circle bias towards a more pluralistic approach, embracing the different uses and users of English and the variety of associated cultural elements. This study aims to analyse two textbooks commonly used in Turkey to teach English, Language Hub Elementary and English File Fourth Edition Elementary. The textbooks are evaluated in line with the concept of English as an International Language (EIL) drawing on Kachru's framework, the Three Concentric Circles of the English Language. The results reveal that these two recently published books do not represent the diversity of English uses, users, and local cultures from the outer circle counties. Compared to English File Fourth Edition Elementary, Language Hub Elementary shows a more pluralistic approach, presenting a sheer number of characters and a variety of accents and cultural elements from the expanding circle. On the other hand, a marked bias towards inner circle characters, their standard English, and the elements of Anglo-Saxon culture has been identified in English File Fourth Edition Elementary. The aspects specific to Turkish culture are unavailable in Language Hub Elementary and are quite limited in English File Fourth Edition Elementary. The study’s findings offer important implications for material designers and ELT scholars.

Keywords

References

  1. Asakereh, A., Yousofi, N., & Weisi, H. (2019). Critical content analysis of English textbooks used in the Iranian education system: Focusing on ELF features. Issues in Educational Research, 29(4), 1016-1038.
  2. Bayyurt, Y., & Sifakis, N. (2015). Developing an ELF-aware pedagogy: Insights from a self-education programme. In P. Vettorel (Ed.), New frontiers in teaching and learning English (pp. 55–76). New Castle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  3. Bose, P., & Gao, X. (2022). Cultural representations in Indian English language teaching textbooks. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082102
  4. Braine, G. (2010). Nonnative speaker English teachers: Research, pedagogy, and professional growth. New York, NY: Routledge.
  5. Brown, J. D. (2012). EIL curriculum development. In L. Alsagoff, S. L. Mckay, G. Hu, & W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (pp. 147–167). New York, NY: Routledge.
  6. Canagarajah, S. (2006). The place of World Englishes in composition: Pluralization continued. College Composition and Communication, 57(4), 586-619.
  7. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. X. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp.196-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Crawford, J. (1990). How authentic is the language in our classrooms? Prospect, 6(1), 47- 54.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Other Fields of Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

July 28, 2025

Publication Date

July 31, 2025

Submission Date

April 10, 2023

Acceptance Date

March 11, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 14 Number: 3

APA
Çam, E., & Salı, P. (2025). One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English as An International Language*. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 14(3), 627-649. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1280686
AMA
1.Çam E, Salı P. One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English as An International Language*. BUEFAD. 2025;14(3):627-649. doi:10.14686/buefad.1280686
Chicago
Çam, Esra, and Pınar Salı. 2025. “One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English As An International Language*”. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education 14 (3): 627-49. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1280686.
EndNote
Çam E, Salı P (July 1, 2025) One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English as An International Language*. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education 14 3 627–649.
IEEE
[1]E. Çam and P. Salı, “One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English as An International Language*”, BUEFAD, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 627–649, July 2025, doi: 10.14686/buefad.1280686.
ISNAD
Çam, Esra - Salı, Pınar. “One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English As An International Language*”. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education 14/3 (July 1, 2025): 627-649. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1280686.
JAMA
1.Çam E, Salı P. One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English as An International Language*. BUEFAD. 2025;14:627–649.
MLA
Çam, Esra, and Pınar Salı. “One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English As An International Language*”. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, vol. 14, no. 3, July 2025, pp. 627-49, doi:10.14686/buefad.1280686.
Vancouver
1.Esra Çam, Pınar Salı. One Size Does Not Fit All: A Comparative Analysis of English Language Textbooks in Terms of The Notion of English as An International Language*. BUEFAD. 2025 Jul. 1;14(3):627-49. doi:10.14686/buefad.1280686

All the articles published in the journal are open access and distributed under the conditions of CommonsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License 

88x31.png


Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education