Subjective and Objective Assessment of Mathematics Anxiety Levels among College Students

Abstract

The study investigated the relationship between college students’ subjective and objective assessment of mathematics anxiety levels. Students rated their general and current mathematics anxiety levels, mathematical ability levels, and confidence in doing mathematics. The Revised Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale was used as an objective measure of their mathematics anxiety levels. Participants were 559 students, 406 (72.6%) women and 151 (27.0%) men. Results showed that perceived general mathematics anxiety had a mean of 49.69 (SD = 29.87, Median = 50.00). Current mathematics anxiety had a mean of 47.74 (SD = 33.53, Median = 50.00). Positive correlations between the subjective and objective measures were found which indicates that students’ subjective judgments and ratings form the objective measure are in the same direction. Correlations varied from low to medium, which indicates the validity of the objective measure and the possibility that in the absence of an objective measure, subjective assessment might be a useful indicator.

Keywords

• Mathematics anxiety,college students,objective assessment,subjective assessment

Subjective and Objective Assessment of Mathematics Anxiety Levels among College Students

Abstract

The study investigated the relationship between college students’ subjective and objective assessment of mathematics anxiety levels. Students rated their general and current mathematics anxiety levels, mathematical ability levels, and confidence in doing mathematics. The Revised Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale was used as an objective measure of their mathematics anxiety levels. Participants were 559 students, 406 (72.6%) women and 151 (27.0%) men. Results showed that perceived general mathematics anxiety had a mean of 49.69 (SD = 29.87, Median = 50.00). Current mathematics anxiety had a mean of 47.74 (SD = 33.53, Median = 50.00). Positive correlations between the subjective and objective measures were found which indicates that students’ subjective judgments and ratings form the objective measure are in the same direction. Correlations varied from low to medium, which indicates the validity of the objective measure and the possibility that in the absence of an objective measure, subjective assessment might be a useful indicator. 

Keywords

• Mathematics anxiety,college students,objective assessment,subjective assessment

References

1. Aiken, L. R. (1970a). Nonintellectual variables and mathematics achievement: Directions for research.. Journal of School Psychology, 8, 28-36.
2. Aiken, L. R. (1970b). Attitudes toward mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 40, 551-596.
3. Alexander, L., & Martray, C. (1989). The development of an abbreviated version of the Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 22, 143-150.
4. Atkinson, R. T. (1988). An exploration of the factors relating to the system of mathematics anxiety. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Oklahoma State University.
5. Baloglu, M. (2002). Construct and concurrent validity and internal consistency, split-half, and parallel-model reliability of the revised Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.
6. Committee on Undergraduate Program in Mathematics. (1989). Reshaping College Mathematics. MAA Notes No. 2. Washington, DC.: Mathematical Association of America.
7. Dreger, R. M., & Aiken, L. R. (1957). The identification of number anxiety in a college population. Journal of Educational Psychology, 48, 344-351.
8. Dutton, W. H., & Blum, M. P. (1968). The measurement of attitudes towards a arithmetic with a Likert-type test. Elementary School Journal, 2, 259-263.

9. Fennema, E., & Sherman, J. A. (1976). Fennema-Sherman Mathematics Attitude Scale: Instruments designed to measure attitudes toward the learning of mathematics by females and males. JAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 6, 31.
10. Gough, M. F. (1954). Mathemaphobia: causes and treatments. Clearing House, 28, 290-294.
11. Hembree, R. (1990). The nature, effects, and relief of mathematics anxiety. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 33-46.
12. Moore, B., Alexander, L., Redfield, D., & Martray, C. (1988). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale Abbreviated: A validity study. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
13. National Research Council (1991). Moving beyond myths: Revitalizing undergraduate mathematics committee on mathematical and social sciences in the year 2000. Washington DC.: National Academy Press.
14. Oropesa, L. M. (1993). Mathematics anxiety and course content: In search of a discrete correlation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, the University of Miami.
15. Richardson, F. C., & Suinn, R. M. (1972). The Mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale: Psychometric data. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 19, 551-554.
16. Sandman, R. S. (1980). The mathematics attitude inventory: Instrument and user’s manual. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 11, 148-149.
17. Skiba, A. (1990). Reviewing an old subject: Math anxiety. Mathematics Teacher, 84, 3.
18. SPSS, Inc. (1998). SPSS Base 10.0 Applications Guide. Chicago: SPSS Inc.
19. Suinn, R. M., & Edwards, R. (1982). The measurement of mathematics anxiety. The mathematics Anxiety Rating Scale for Adolescents-MARS-A. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38, 576-577.
20. Wigfield, A., & Meece, J. L. (1988). Math anxiety in elementary and secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 210-216.