CUMHURİYETİN 100. YILINDA TARIMSAL İNOVASYONDA TÜRKİYE

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, içinde bulunduğumuz yüzyılın tarımsal üretimin sürdürülebilirliği açısından önceki yüzyıllara göre çözülmesi oldukça güç sorunlar ortaya koyduğuna dikkat çekilerek, çoklu riskler olarak tanımlayabileceğimiz bu sorunların üstesinden gelmek için geleneksel üretim yöntemlerinin artık yeterli olmadığı, dolayısıyla tarımsal araştırmaların ve tarım teknolojilerinin ortaya koyduğu bilimsel bilginin kullanıldığı bir tarımsal üretim planlaması yapılması gerektiği vurgulanmaktadır. Çalışmanın birinci kısmında kavramsal çerçevenin temel bileşenleri olarak tarım sektörünün karşılaştığı çoklu riskler ve tarımda sürdürülebilirlik kavramı ve inovasyon üzerinde durulmaktadır. Çalışmanın ikinci kısmında, dünyada gıda arzı güvenliğinin sağlanması ve açlıkla mücadelede Birleşmiş Milletler’in Gıda ve Tarım Örgütü, FAO’nun (Food and Agricultural Organization) ve diğer uluslararası kurumların önderlik ettiği Ar-Ge pilot proje uygulamaları incelenmektedir. Çalışmanın üçüncü kısmında, Cumhuriyetin 100. Yılında tarımsal inovasyonda Türkiye’nin durumu ele alınmakta ve tarım teknolojileri ve tarımsal inovasyonda dünya lideri olan Hollanda’nın bu alanındaki ilerlemeleri ve politika stratejileri ortaya konmaktadır. Sonuç bölümünde de iklim değişikliklerine karşı sürdürülebilir bir tarımsal üretim ve gıda arzı güvenliğini sağlayabilmek için Türkiye’nin kendi tarım teknolojisi yatırımları nasıl geliştirilebilir konusunda fırsatlar ve tehditler ortaya konulmaktadır.

Keywords

• Tarımsal inovasyon
• Cumhuriyetin 100. yılı
• Türkiye'de tarımsal inovasyon
• tarımda sürdürülebilirlik

TURKEY IN AGRICULTURAL INNOVATION IN THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE REPUBLIC

Abstract

This study pointed out that the current era presents problems that are quite difficult to solve compared to previous centuries in terms of the sustainability of agricultural production. Traditional production methods are no longer sufficient to overcome these problems, which we can define as multiple risks, and therefore the scientific knowledge revealed by agricultural research and agricultural technologies is used. It is emphasized that agricultural production planning should be done. The first part of the study focuses on the multiple risks faced by the agricultural sector and the concept of sustainability and innovation in agriculture as the basic components of the conceptual framework. In the second part of the study, R&D pilot project applications led by the FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations) and other international institutions in ensuring the security of food supply in the world and combating hunger are examined. In the third part of the study, Türkiye's situation in agricultural innovation on the 100th anniversary of the Republic is discussed and the advances in agricultural technologies and policy strategies of the Netherlands, as world leader country in agricultural technology and innovation are examined. The conclusion part presents some strengths and weaknesses of Türkiye on agricultural innovation process and discuss how Türkiye improve its own key agricultural technology investments in order to ensure sustainable agricultural production and food supply security against climate changes.

Keywords

• Agricultural innovation,
• 100th Anniversary of the Turkish Republic
• Agricultural innovation in Turkey
• Sustainability in agriculture

References

1. Bonilla-Findji, O., Ouedraogo, M., Partey, S.T., Dayamba, S.D., Bayala, J. ve Zougmoré, R. (2017). West Africa climate smart villages AR4D sites: 2016 inventory. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/d507d509-b385-492b-9caf-f5aa18b8d1e4/content
2. Campbell, B.M., Hansen, J., Rioux, J., Stirling, C.M., Twomlow, S. ve Wollenberg, E. (2018). Urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts. Sustainability, (34), 13-20.
3. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. (2023). Dutch agricultural exports worth nearly 124 billion euros in 2023. https://www.cbs.nl/en-gb/news/2024/10/dutch-agricultural-exports-worth-nearly-124-billion-euros-in-2023
4. Chhetri, N., Chaudhary, P., Tiwari, P.R. ve Yadaw, R.B. (2012). Institutional and technological innovation: Understanding agricultural adaptation to climate change in Nepal. Applied Geography, (33), 142-150.
5. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business School Press.
6. Consultative Groupe for International Agricultural Research. (2023). What is climate-smart agriculture?. https://ccafs.cgiar.org/climate-smart-agriculture
7. Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. ve Braczyk, H. J. (2004). Regional innovation systems: The role of governance in a globalized world (2nd ed.). Routledge.
8. Demirtaş, M., Demirtaş, R. ve Cevher, C. (2016). Türkiye’de tarımsal araştırmalarda gıda, tarım ve hayvancılık bakanlığının yeri ve önemi, XII. Tarım Ekonomisi Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, 849-858.

9. Devaux, A., Torero, M., Donovan, J. ve Horton, D. (2018). Agricultural innovation and inclusive value-chain development: A review. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 99-123.
10. European Alliance on Agricultural Knowledge for Development. (2020). Agrinatura, https://agrinatura-eu.eu/
11. FAO. (2023). The state of food security and nutrition in the World 2023: Urbanization, agrifood systems transformation and healthy diets across the rural–urban continuum. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/1f66b67b-1e45-45d1-b003-86162fd35dab/content
12. Food Security Information Network. (2021). Global network against food crisis: Global report on food crisis. https://www.fsinplatform.org/global-network-against-food-crises
13. Edquist, C. (1997). Systems of innovation: Technologies, institutions and organizations. Pinter Publishers.
14. Ghadim, A. K. A. ve Pannell, D. J. (1999). A conceptual framework of adoption of an agricultural innovation. Agricultural Economics, (21), 145-154.
15. Gromko, D. ve Abdurasalova, G. (2019). Climate change mitigation and food loss and waste reduction: Exploring the nusiness case. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/e5a9b312-9a3d-4537-b33a-4dba443983d2/content
16. Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlmann, S. ve Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, (74), 413-432.
17. High Level Panel of Experts. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 on food security and nutrition: Developing effective policy responses to address the hunger and malnutrition pandemic. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/8abcbe13-833e-4658-a339-4e3be593b66e/content
18. International Fund for Agricultural Development. (2020). Agribusiness capital fund-ABC in brief. https://www.ifad.org/documents/38714170/39135645/abcfund_brochure.pdf/edffaefe-b6d1-28d1-e0cd-0636d06a0f28?t=1608130217000
19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). AR6 synthesis report climate change 2023. Lisbon. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/sixth-assessment-report-cycle/
20. Kassa, M. D. ve Grace, J. M. (2020). Race against death or starvation? COVID-19 and its impact on African populations. Public Health Review, (41), 1-17.
21. Komarek, A. M., De Pinto, A. ve Smith, V. H. (2020). A review of types of risks in agriculture: What we know and what we need to know. Agricultural Systems, (178), 2-6.
22. Lundvall, B. A. (1988). Innovation as an interactive process: From user-producer interaction to the national system of innovation. G. Dosi vd. (Ed.), Technical change and economic theory içinde.
23. Lundvall, B.A., (1992). National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter.
24. Ministry of Foreign Trade and Affairs of New Zealand (2023). Innovations in Dutch agri-tech. https://www.mfat.govt.nz/en/trade/mfat-market-reports/innovations-in-dutch-agritech-august-2023
25. Mytelka, L. (2000). Local systems of innovation in a globalized world economy. Industry and Innovation, (7), 15-32.
26. Nelson, R. R. ve Winter, S.G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
27. Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford University Press.
28. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2015). The Dutch agricultural innovation system, agricultural productivity and sustainability in the Netherlands. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264238473-10-en
29. Özaydın, G. ve Çelik, Y. (2019). Tarım sektöründe arge ve inovasyon. Tarım Ekonomisi Dergisi, 25 (1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.24181/tarekoder.464556
30. Pretty, J. (2008). Agricultural sustainability: Concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, (363), 447-465.
31. Porter, M.E. ve Kramer, M.R. (2011). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalisme and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89(1), 62-77.
32. SCAR-AKIS. (2016). Agricultural knowledge and ınnovation systems towards the future: A foresight paper. European Commission.
33. Schmitt, J. (2014). Social innovation for business success: Shared value in the apparel industry. Springer Gabler.
34. Steiner, A., Aguilar, G., Bomba, K., Bonilla, J. P., Campbell, A., Echeverria, R., Gandhi, R., Hedegaard, C., Holdorf, D. ve Ishii, N. (2020). Actions to transform food systems under climate change. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/cc13c9f3-f6d7-4f1e-89ce-c9e5207191c5/content
35. Szilagyi, L., Schuetz, T., Thornton, P., Dinesh, D. ve Cramer, L. (2020). Lessons learned from 2016-2019 outcome case studies evaluations, ccafs info note. CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change. https://ccafs.cgiar.org/resources/publications/lessons-evaluation-ccafs-outcomes-improve-outcome-delivery
36. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. (2021). Sürdürülebilir gıda sistemleri ülke raporu. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/ABDGM/Belgeler/
37. Tarım Sigortaları Havuz İşletmesi. (2020). Faaliyet raporu 2020. https://www.tarsim.gov.tr/dergilik/dergiGoster.jsp?category=faaliyet-raporlari&name=2020
38. United Nations (2016). The millennium development goals report 2015. https://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/2015_MDG_Report/pdf/MDG%202015%20rev%20(July%201).pdf
39. United Nations; FAO; IFAD; UNICEF; WFP; WHO. (2018). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2018, Building Climate Resilience for Food Security and Nutrition. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f5019ab4-0f6a-47e8-85b9-15473c012d6a/content
40. United Nations; FAO. (2017). The future of food and agriculture trends and challenges, food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/2e90c833-8e84-46f2-a675-a2d7afa4e24/content
41. United Nations. (2015). Conference of the parties-COP21, https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
42. United Nations. (2015). Transformative actions plan (TAP). https://climateinitiativesplatform.org/index.php/Transformative_Actions_ProgramTAP)
43. United Nations (2000). World food program. https://www.wfp.org/
44. Wageningen University Agricultural Research Center. (WUR). https://www.wur.nl/en.htm
45. Van der Wurff, A. W. G., Fuchs, J. G., Raviv, M. ve Termorshuizen, A. J. (2016). Handbook for composting and compost use in organic horticulture, Bio Greenhouse COST Action FA 1105.
46. West African Initiate for Climate Smart Agriculture. (2019). The lab ınstrument analysis, the global ınnovation lab for climate finance. https://www.climatefinancelab.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/WAICSA-v16_18092019-_Final.pdf
47. World Food Program. (2023). The 2023-R4 rural resilience initiative factsheets. https://www.wfp.org/r4-rural-resilience-initiative