Volume: 3 Issue: 2

The Bulletin of Biomathematics (BBM) aims to be a leading international forum for the publication of high-quality research and comprehensive review articles that deepen the understanding of biological, ecological, and medical systems through mathematical, statistical, and computational approaches. The journal prioritizes the development of novel mathematical models, innovative theoretical insights, and analytical techniques that address real-world challenges in the life sciences. BBM encourages work that connects abstract theory with practical application, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration.

BBM invites original research articles and comprehensive reviews in a broad range of areas, including but not limited to: population dynamics, epidemiology, immunology, neuroscience, systems biology, bioinformatics, and ecological modeling. The journal places special emphasis on differential equations, stochastic processes, nonlinear dynamics, data-driven modeling, and machine learning methods applied to biological systems. Submissions that integrate experimental data with mathematical frameworks or present comparative studies of modeling strategies are especially welcome. In addition to original research, BBM also publishes review articles that synthesize current trends, identify open problems, and highlight emerging directions in biomathematics.

Research Areas (Categories / Classification) - Web of Science Category
Life Sciences & Biomedicine: Mathematical & Computational Biology, Environmental Sciences & Ecology
Physical Sciences: Mathematics
Social Sciences: Biomedical Social Sciences
Technology: Science & Technology Other Topics

Author Guidelines

New Submissions

Solicited and contributed manuscripts should be submitted to the Bulletin of Biomathematics via the journal's online submission system. You need to make registration prior to submitting a new manuscript (please click here to register and do not forget to define yourself as an "Author" in doing so). You may then click on the "New Submission" link on your User Home.

IMPORTANT: If you already have an account, please click here to login. It is likely that you will have created an account if you have reviewed or authored for the Journal in the past. On the submission page, enter data and answer questions as prompted. Click on the “Next” button on each screen to save your work and advance to the next screen. The names and contact details of at least four internationally recognized experts who can review your manuscript should be entered in the "Comments for the Editor" box.

You will be prompted to upload your files: Click on the “Browse” button and locate the file on your computer. Select the description of the file in the drop-down next to the Browse button. When you have selected all files you wish to upload, click the “Upload” button. Review your submission before sending to the Editors. Click the “Submit” button when you are done reviewing. Authors are responsible for verifying all files have been uploaded correctly.

You may stop a submission at any phase and save it to submit later. Acknowledgment of receipt of the manuscript by the Bulletin of Biomathematics Online Submission System will be sent to the corresponding author, including an assigned manuscript number that should be included in all subsequent correspondence. You can also log-on to the submission web page of Bulletin of Biomathematics any time to check the status of your manuscript. You will receive an e-mail once a decision has been made on your manuscript.

Each manuscript must be accompanied by a statement that it has not been published elsewhere and that it has not been submitted simultaneously for publication elsewhere.

Preparation of Manuscripts

Manuscripts can be prepared using LaTeX (.tex) format. The preferred first submission format (for reviewing purposes only) is Portable Document File (.pdf). After acceptance, the papers should be converted to the LaTeX (.tex) template which can be found in the following link:

Bulletin of Biomathematics LaTeX template (.tex)

The link above directs users to the Overleaf interface, where the LaTeX template for the journal can be accessed. To download the template, click on the Menu icon in the upper-left corner of the interface. From there, you can download the source files and easily make any necessary modifications.

CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) Authors Statements

The Bulletin of Biomathematics adopts the CRediT (Contributor Roles Taxonomy) to provide transparency and proper recognition of each author’s specific contributions to the published work. Authors are encouraged to clearly indicate their roles using the standardized CRediT categories, such as Conceptualization, Methodology, Data Curation, Writing – Original Draft, Supervision, and others.

The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all listed author contributions are accurate, complete, and agreed upon by all co-authors. Authors may be credited with multiple roles, and use of CRediT does not alter the journal’s established authorship criteria.

CRediT contribution statements must be submitted during the manuscript submission process and will appear in the published article above the Acknowledgments section, as illustrated in the journal’s formatting guidelines.

Possible CRediT Statements:

Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal Analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data Curation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition.

Sample CRediT Author Statement:

First Author: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software. Second Author: Data curation, Writing-Original draft preparation. Third Author: Visualization, Investigation. Fifth Author: Supervision. Sixth Author: Software, Validation, Writing-Reviewing and Editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

English Editing

Manuscripts must be written in English, and either British or American spelling is acceptable, provided usage is consistent throughout the manuscript. While the journal does not require submissions to be written in “perfect” English, the language must be clear and unambiguous. The meaning of the text should be easily understood by reviewers and readers without confusion caused by language issues.

Manuscripts that, in the opinion of the Editor, contain unclear or incomprehensible English will be returned to the authors with a request for language revision before further consideration. Authors are encouraged to seek professional editing assistance if necessary to ensure clarity and readability.

Initial Submission Guidelines

Manuscript Style

For the first submission, authors should upload a single PDF file of the complete manuscript. The manuscript should be prepared using a standard font, preferably Times New Roman, 12-point, with single line spacing throughout.

Manuscripts should normally not exceed 30 single-spaced pages, including all text, figures, tables, and references. All illustrations, figures, and tables must be placed within the text at appropriate locations, rather than at the end of the manuscript.

During the submission process, you must enter:

• Full title of the manuscript,
• Names and affiliations of all authors,
• Complete contact details for all authors, including email addresses and ORCID IDs,
• Funding information, including the name(s) of any sponsor(s) and relevant grant number(s), if applicable,
• An abstract of no more than 250 words summarizing the main findings and contributions of the article,
• 3 to 5 keywords that best describe the subject matter and focus of the manuscript,

• Authors should provide three to five relevant Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC 2020) codes to categorize the mathematical content of their manuscript. These should be listed after the keywords section. The full list of MSC 2020 codes can be accessed at: https://mathscinet.ams.org/msnhtml/msc2020.pdf.

Abstract Guidelines

An abstract is a concise summary of the entire paper—not just the conclusions—and should be written in a way that is understandable to a multidisciplinary scientific audience. The abstract should not exceed 250 words and should effectively convey the significance and scope of the work without referencing the rest of the manuscript. A well-prepared abstract should include the following elements:

• A brief introduction that outlines the purpose and necessity of the study, accessible to scientists from any field.
• Relevant background information to contextualize the problem.
• A concise summary of the main results.
• The implications or significance of the findings.
• A broader perspective that highlights the relevance of the results beyond the immediate scope of the work.

Citations to other published works should not be included in the abstract. Authors should ensure that the abstract clearly communicates the importance and novelty of the research in a self-contained manner.

Reference and Citation Guidelines

References in the text should be cited using numbers in square brackets, e.g., [1], [2], in the order of their first appearance. Each reference is assigned a unique number, which should be reused consistently throughout the manuscript whenever that reference is cited again.

The reference list at the end of the manuscript must be ordered numerically, matching the order of citation in the text. All references should be complete, accurate, and presented in a consistent format.

Please ensure the following:

i. Every reference cited in the text must appear in the reference list, and vice versa
ii. Do not abbreviate journal titles—use the full journal names
iii. For online resources, include the full URL and the date of access

References should be listed in the following style:

Journal article
Author, A.A., & Author, B. Title of article. Title of Journal, Vol(Issue), pages, (Year).
Sharma, N., Chauhan, P., & Shakya, M. Analysis for a 3D structure of a protein through molecular modelling and simulation. Bulletin of Biomathematics, 3(1), 21-36, (2025).

Book
Author, A. Title of Book. Publisher: Place of Publication, (Year).
Zhang, J. Molecular Dynamics Analyses of Prion Protein Structures: The Resistance to Prion Diseases Down Under (Vol. 10). Springer: Singapore, (2018).

Book Chapter
Author, A. Title of chapter. In Title of Book (pages). Publisher: Place of publication, (Year).
Sharma, N. and Shakya, M. Molecular dynamics simulations of a protein in water and in vacuum to study the solvent effect. In Harmony Search and Nature Inspired Optimization Algorithms (pp. 49-56). Springer Nature: Singapore, (2019).

Internet document
Author, A. Title of document [online]. Source, (Year). Available from: URL [Accessed (date)].
Holland, M. Guide to citing Internet sources [online]. Poole, Bournemouth University, (2004). Available from: http://www.bournemouth.ac.uk/library/using/guide_to_citing_internet_sourc.html [Accessed 4 November 2004].

Thesis
Author, A. Title of thesis. Type of thesis (degree). Name of University, (Year).
Agutter, A.J. The linguistic significance of current British slang (Ph.D. Thesis). Edinburgh University, (1995).

Illustrations

All illustrations—including line drawings, photographs, halftones, and photomicrographs—should be provided as clean originals or high-quality digital files. Digital submissions are strongly recommended to ensure optimal reproduction in the published article.

Please follow these guidelines when preparing illustrations:

Minimum resolution of 300 dpi
Sized appropriately to fit within the journal page dimensions
Saved in EPS (Encapsulated PostScript) format only
Illustrations should be embedded within the main text at appropriate locations
Additionally, all figures should be submitted as separate files if requested during the submission process

Tables

Tables should be embedded within the text at appropriate points, rather than placed at the end of the manuscript. Each table must include a concise, descriptive title positioned above the table.

A clear legend or explanatory notes should be provided below the table, along with any footnotes, which must be properly identified using superscript symbols or letters. All tables should be clearly formatted, easy to read, and referenced in the main text.

Revised Manuscript Submission

Revised manuscripts must be submitted through the Bulletin of Biomathematics online submission system to ensure proper linkage with the original submission. Along with the revised manuscript, authors are required to provide a point-by-point response addressing all comments and questions raised by the reviewers and the editors. This response should clearly indicate the specific revisions made in the manuscript in response to each reviewer’s and editor's remarks. Providing a thorough and detailed revision explanation facilitates an efficient re-evaluation process.

To upload your revised manuscript, please go to your author page and click on the related manuscript title. Navigate to the "Review" link on the top left and scroll down the page. Click on the "Choose File" button under the "Editor Decision" title, choose the revised article (in pdf format) that you want to submit, and click on the "Upload" button to upload the author version. Make sure that the file uploaded starts with your responses to the comments of the reviewer(s). IMPORTANT: Eventually, one single PDF document including (i) your responses to the comments of the reviewer(s) and (ii) the revised manuscript on which the changes made are highlighted must be uploaded to the system. Any nonconformity may result in the rejection of your paper.

To ensure timely online publication and facilitate the production process, authors are required to upload the complete source files (e.g., LaTeX files) along with their revised manuscripts. If needed, source files can be compressed into a single archive (e.g., ZIP) before uploading. Providing the source files helps avoid delays in making the article freely available online.

Page Proofs

Page proofs will be sent to the corresponding author via the official Bulletin of Biomathematics email address. Authors are responsible for carefully reviewing the proofs and returning any corrections within 48 hours of receipt to avoid publication delays.

Author Roles and Responsibilities

When determining authorship credit, all individuals who have made a significant intellectual contribution to the work should be listed as co-authors. Contributors who have provided support in a lesser capacity should be acknowledged separately but not included as authors. An author is someone who has substantially contributed to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the research. This includes, but is not limited to, contributions such as:

Development of background theory,
Design of experiments,
Creation of device prototypes,
Data analysis and interpretation,
Writing the article or reviewing and/or revising the text and/or figures.

Authors are expected to reach a mutual agreement regarding authorship and the order of author names prior to submission. In cases where an agreement cannot be reached, it is the responsibility of the institution(s) where the research was conducted to investigate and resolve the dispute. The Bulletin of Biomathematics will not arbitrate authorship disagreements. In the event of an unresolved conflict, the journal reserves the right to withdraw the manuscript from the review process until a resolution has been reached and confirmed by all parties involved.

Responsibility of the Corresponding Author

The corresponding author plays a key role in the submission and publication process and is responsible for the following:

i. Ensuring that all listed authors have reviewed and approved the submitted version of the manuscript, as well as all subsequent revisions,
ii. Confirming that all authors agree to the manuscript’s submission and are prepared to take appropriate responsibility for the content,
iii. Verifying that all authors have approved the final version of the article accepted for publication,
iv. Ensuring that the manuscript is not under consideration by any other journal at the time of submission,
v. Providing accurate and complete contact details for all co-authors at the time of submission.

Ethical Principles and Publication Policy

The publication policy of the Bulletin of Biomathematics (BBM) Journal is founded on the principles of impartiality, respect, and the advancement of knowledge. All editorial and review processes conducted in accordance with this policy play a critical role in maintaining and enhancing the quality of submissions from authors and their affiliated institutions.

BBM is committed to upholding the highest standards of ethics and integrity in scholarly publishing. Ethical conduct is expected from all parties involved in the publication process, including authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher. BBM adheres to the Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines as outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), and it has adopted the International Ethical Publishing Principles established by the COPE, the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), and the Open Access Scholarly Publishers Association (OASPA). This includes clear responsibilities for editors in their relationships with authors, reviewers, and readers, as well as procedures for handling complaints, conflicts of interest, and ethical concerns.

All participants in the editorial and peer review process are expected to act with transparency, fairness, and accountability and to fully conform to these ethical standards to ensure the quality and credibility of published work.

A. Ethical Principles

A.1 Authorship and Contributorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made substantial contributions to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study. All individuals who have significantly contributed must be listed as co-authors. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all contributors are appropriately acknowledged according to the extent of their contributions, and for reviewing, approving, and accepting the final version of the manuscript for publication.

Contributorship refers to the broader process of supporting the development of a scientific article. Contributions can take various forms, including but not limited to co-authoring the manuscript or assisting in data collection activities, such as conducting surveys. All forms of meaningful contribution should be appropriately recognized.

All contributions must align with the categories outlined in the "Authors' Contributions" section of the journal's website: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/bulletinbiomath/writing-rules

A.2 Conflicts of Interest

BBM Journal is committed to transparency and integrity in publishing. All authors, reviewers, and editors must disclose any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the research, review, or editorial process.

Authors must declare any financial, institutional, or personal interests related to their manuscript. If none exist, they should state: "The authors declare no conflicts of interest."
Reviewers must disclose any conflicts that may affect their impartiality and decline to review when appropriate.
Editors must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where a conflict exists and ensure reassignment to an unbiased editor.

Failure to disclose conflicts may result in editorial action, including rejection or retraction. BBM Journal follows the ethical standards set by COPE.

A.3 Data Availability, Repositories, Reproducibility, and Exceptions

BBM Journal promotes transparency, integrity, and reproducibility in scientific research. To support these values, the following policy applies:

Data Availability: Authors are encouraged to make the data underlying their research publicly available, unless legal, ethical, or privacy restrictions apply. A clear "Data Availability Statement" should be included in the manuscript, indicating where and how the data can be accessed.
Data Repositories: Where possible, data should be deposited in a recognized public repository with appropriate citations or DOIs.
Reproducibility: Authors should provide sufficient methodological detail, including software, code, and statistical approaches, to allow others to replicate or verify the findings. Where applicable, code should also be shared via open repositories such as GitHub or GitLab.
Exceptions: If data cannot be shared due to confidentiality or other valid limitations, authors must clearly state the reasons in the manuscript.

By encouraging open data practices, BBM Journal aims to enhance trust in published results and support the broader scientific community.

A.4 Duplicate / Multiple Submissions

BBM Journal strictly prohibits duplicate or multiple submissions. Authors must ensure that:

The manuscript submitted to BBM Journal is original and has not been published previously, either in full or in part, in any language.
The manuscript is not under review at another journal or publication outlet simultaneously.
Submitting the same or substantially similar content to more than one journal at the same time is considered unethical and may result in immediate rejection or withdrawal of the manuscript.

If a submitted manuscript is found to be a duplicate or concurrently submitted elsewhere, BBM Journal reserves the right to take appropriate action, including notifying authors’ institutions or relevant authorities.

Exceptions, such as preprints or conference proceedings, must be clearly disclosed at the time of submission.

A.5 Correction, Retraction, and Expression of Concern

BBM Journal is committed to maintaining the integrity and accuracy of the scholarly record. When issues are identified after publication, the following measures may be taken:

Corrections: Minor errors that do not affect the overall findings or conclusions of the article (e.g., typographical mistakes, author name corrections, or minor data inaccuracies) will be addressed through a formal correction notice linked to the original article.

Retractions: Articles may be retracted if they are found to contain significant errors, ethical violations (such as plagiarism or data fabrication), or if the results are no longer reliable. Retraction notices will clearly state the reason and will remain permanently linked to the original article.

Expressions of Concern: In cases where there is inconclusive evidence of misconduct or unresolved issues that may affect the integrity of the article, BBM may publish an expression of concern while the matter is under investigation.

All such notices will follow COPE guidelines and will be issued transparently to inform readers and protect the scientific record.

Ethical Standards for Editors

Editors of the BBM are responsible for making independent and impartial decisions regarding the acceptance or rejection of submitted manuscripts. These decisions are based solely on the academic merit and intellectual content of the work, without consideration of the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political views. Editors are expected to follow the journal’s editorial policies and comply with applicable legal and ethical standards, including those related to libel, copyright, and plagiarism. In evaluating submissions, editors may consult with other editors or qualified reviewers as appropriate. As guardians of the research record, editors play a critical role in upholding the integrity of scholarly communication. They should not only encourage authors to adhere to the highest standards of research and publication ethics, but also lead by example in their editorial conduct. Through their policies and practices, editors are in a position to promote responsible research behavior and foster a culture of academic integrity.

To maximize their impact within the research community, editors of the BBM are expected to adhere to universal standards and best editorial practices. Key editorial responsibilities include:

Accountability: Editors are accountable for all content published in the journal and should take full responsibility for their editorial decisions.
Fairness and Objectivity: Decisions must be made fairly and impartially, without influence from commercial interests or personal biases, and based solely on scholarly merit.
Rigorous Peer Review: Editors must ensure a thorough, transparent, and unbiased peer-review process, providing guidance to both authors and reviewers on expectations.
Integrity and Transparency: Editorial policies should promote honest reporting, maximum transparency, and ethical conduct throughout the publishing process.
Corrections and Retractions: Editors should actively safeguard the integrity of the scholarly record by issuing corrections, retractions, or expressions of concern when necessary.
Misconduct Oversight: Editors are responsible for investigating and addressing suspected or confirmed instances of research, reviewer, or editorial misconduct.
Ethical Oversight: Submissions involving research on humans or animals must be assessed to ensure compliance with ethical standards and appropriate approvals.
Conflict of Interest Management: Editors must have clear policies for managing and disclosing editorial conflicts of interest.

Reference: Kleinert S. & Wager E. (2011). Responsible research publication: international standards for editors. A position statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010. Chapter 51 In: Mayer T. & Steneck N. (eds). Promoting Research Integrity in a Global Environment. Imperial College Press / World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (pp 317-28). (ISBN 978-981-4340-97-7).

Ethical Standards for Authors

Publication represents the final stage of the research process and carries with it a significant responsibility for all researchers. Scholarly publications are intended to serve as a detailed, transparent, and permanent record of research findings. As such, they form the foundation for future research and practical applications, influencing not only the scientific community but also, indirectly, society at large. Researchers have a duty to ensure that their publications are honest, clear, accurate, complete, and balanced. They must avoid misleading, selective, or ambiguous reporting that could distort scientific understanding or misrepresent results. Upholding these principles is essential for maintaining the credibility and integrity of the scientific record. Journal editors also share in this responsibility and are expected to enforce editorial and ethical standards. Their role in safeguarding the integrity of the research literature is outlined in companion editorial guidelines.

Researchers are expected to present their results clearly, honestly, and accurately, without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate manipulation of data.
Methods should be described with sufficient clarity and detail to allow independent verification and reproducibility of the findings.
Submitted work must be original, free from plagiarism, and not under consideration or published elsewhere.
All authors share collective responsibility for the content of submitted and published work.
Authorship should fairly and accurately reflect each individual’s contribution to the research and its dissemination.
Authors must fully disclose funding sources and any potential conflicts of interest that could influence the research or its interpretation.
If an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, they are obligated to promptly inform the Editor-in-Chief and cooperate to publish a correction, erratum, or retraction as appropriate.

Reference: Wager, E. & Kleinert, S. (2011) Responsible research publication: international standards for authors. A position statement developed at the 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity, Singapore, July 22-24, 2010. Chapter 50 in: Mayer T & Steneck N (eds) Promoting Research Integrity in a Global Environment. Imperial College Press / World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (pp 309-16). (ISBN 978-981-4340-97-7).

Ethical Standards for Peer Reviewers

Peer review plays a fundamental role in maintaining the quality and integrity of the scholarly record. It is built on mutual trust, ethical conduct, and responsible behavior by all participants. Peer reviewers are central to this process, providing critical evaluations that assist editors in making informed decisions and, through constructive feedback, help authors improve the quality of their manuscripts.

Reviewers should adhere to the following core principles:

Conduct reviews in a timely, objective, and constructive manner,
Treat manuscripts as confidential documents and not share or use the content for personal advantage,
Declare any conflicts of interest that could affect the impartiality of their review,
Evaluate the manuscript solely on scientific merit, without bias based on nationality, institutional affiliation, gender, or other personal characteristics of the authors,
Provide clear, reasoned, and respectful feedback, including suggestions for improvement where appropriate,
Refrain from engaging in plagiarism or using unpublished material in any way.

Peer reviewers are expected to uphold the highest standards of professionalism, contributing meaningfully to the advancement of science and the editorial integrity of the BBM.

Reference: Homes, I. (2013). COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers, March 2013, v1.

B. Publication Policy

BBM Journal publishes high-quality, original research articles and reviews that contribute to scientific knowledge and practice. Manuscripts are accepted based on the following criteria:

Originality: The work must be original and not published or under review elsewhere.
Scientific Merit: Submissions must present sound methodology, valid results, and meaningful contributions to the field.
Relevance: The content must align with the journal’s scope and interests.
Ethical Standards: All research must comply with ethical guidelines and declarations (e.g., COPE, institutional ethics).
Peer Review: All articles undergo a single-blind peer review process to ensure quality and objectivity.

BBM is committed to transparency, academic integrity, and open access, making published research freely available to the global scientific community.

B.1 Language

All articles submitted to BBM must be written in English to ensure clear communication and accessibility to the international scientific community.

B.2 Changes in Authorship

Any changes to authorship—whether involving the addition, removal, or reordering of authors—during the publication process must be approved by all authors listed on the manuscript. All authors must confirm in writing that they consent to the change and that each listed author has made a genuine intellectual contribution to the work. To request a change, all authors must complete and sign the Bulletin of Biomathematics Author Changes Form, which must be submitted to the editorial office. The corresponding author must also provide a clear explanation of the reason for the change, in accordance with the journal’s authorship guidelines.

The Bulletin of Biomathematics reserves the right to decline authorship change requests if there is insufficient justification or reason to question the contribution of any newly added author.

B.3 Deceased Authors

If an author has passed away prior to the submission of a manuscript, the journal requires written consent from a legal representative or familial proxy of the deceased author to proceed with the peer review and potential publication of the work. Deceased individuals may still be listed as co-authors, provided they made a significant intellectual contribution to the research, in accordance with the journal’s authorship criteria. Their contribution should be acknowledged respectfully, and a note may be added to indicate their passing.

B.4 Complaints and Appeals

BBM Journal is committed to fair and transparent handling of all complaints and appeals related to editorial decisions, peer review, or publication processes.

Complaints: Authors, reviewers, or readers who have concerns about the journal’s procedures or conduct can submit a formal complaint in writing to the editorial office. Complaints will be acknowledged promptly and investigated thoroughly and confidentially.

Appeals: Authors who disagree with editorial decisions (e.g., rejection of manuscripts) may submit a written appeal outlining the reasons and providing additional information or clarification. Appeals will be reviewed by senior editors or an independent committee, and a final decision will be communicated.

BBM Journal aims to resolve complaints and appeals fairly, professionally, and within a reasonable timeframe, ensuring respect for all parties involved.

Price Policy

Bulletin of Biomathematics journal does not have an

* Article Submission Fee,
* Editorial Processing Charge,
* Article Processing Charge (APC),

as part of the submission process to contribute to review and publishing costs.