GEOPHYSICAL ANALYSIS AND MODELLING OF THE SİMAV BASIN, WESTERN ANATOLIA

Year 2014, , 119 - 135, 01.06.2014

Ceyhan Ertan Toker

https://doi.org/10.19111/bmre.81669

Cited By: 2

Abstract

The various data processing techniques, to illuminate the parameters of the geologicalstructure which are applied in gravity and magnetic potential field methods. Also edgedetection procedures are in data processing techniques. In this study, 2D, 3D, inversionand asta technique is one of the new edge detection procedures were applied to clarifycorrelation between the Simav half graben’s deep position and geometry of the tectoniclineaments. The Asta is obtained using the tilt angle

Keywords

Simav, graben, fault, gravity, magnetic, asta, inversion, modelling

References

• Altınok, S., Karabacak, V.,Yalçıner, C.Ç., Bilgen, A.N., Altunel, E., Kıyak, N.G. 2012. Kütahya fay zonunun Holosen aktivitesi, Türkiye Jeoloji Bülteni, 55, 1.
• Ansari A. H., Alamdar, K. 2011. A new edge detection method based on the analytic signal of tilt angle (ASTA) for magnetic and gravity anomalies, IJST A2: 81-88, Iranian Journal of Science and Technology.
• Arısoy, M.Ö., Dikmen, Ü. 2011. Potensoft: MATLAB- based software for potential field data processing, modeling and mapping, Computer and Geoscience, 37, 7, s. 935 – 942.
• Arpat, E., Bingöl, E.,1969. Ege bölgesi graben sisteminin gelişimi üzerine düşünceler, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, 73, 1-9, Ankara.
• Bhaskara, D., Ramesh, N. 1991. A fortran-77 Computer program for three-Dimensional Analysis of gravity anomalies with variable density contrast, Computer and Geoscience, 17, 5, s. 655-667.
• Bekler, T., Demirci, A., Özden, S., Kalafat, D. 2011. Simav, Emet fay zonlarındaki optimum kaynak parametrelerinin analizi, 1. Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı, ODTÜ, ANKARA.
• Cooper, G.R.J., Cowan, D.R. 2004. Filtering using variable order vertical derivatives. Computer and Geoscience, 30, 455-459.
• Cordell, L., Henderson, R.G. 1968. Iterative three- dimensional solution of gravity anomaly data using a digital computer, Geophysics, 33, 596-601.
• Demirbaş, fi., Uslu A. 1984. Kütahya Simav Gravite Etüdü, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü Rapor No: 8136, Ankara (unpublished).
• Doğan, A., Emre, Ö. 2006. Ege graben sisteminin kuzey sınırı: Sındırgı Sincanlı Fay Zonu, 59th. Geological Congress of Turkey, Proceeding Books.
• Emre, Ö., Duman, T.Y., Duman, fi., Özalp, S. 2012. Türkiye diri fay haritası (yenilenmiş), Maden Tetkik ve Arama Yayınları, Ankara.
• Gessner, K., Gallardo, L.A., Markwitz, W., Ring, U., Thomson, S.N. 2013. What caused the denudation of the Menderes massif: Rewiev of the crustal evaluation, lithosphere structure, and dynamic topograpy in soutwest Turkey. Gondwana research, 24/1, 243-274
• Goncalves, W.J. 2006. Inversion gravimetrica 3d de la subcuenca de maturin Üniversidat Simon Bolivar proyekto de grado thesis. Van Hinsbergen, J.J. 2010. A key extensional metamorphic complex rewieved and restored: The Menderes massif of western Turkey, Earth Science Rewievs, 102, 60– 76.
• Hsu, S.K., Sibuet, J.C., Shyu, C.T., 1996. Depth to magnetic source using generalized analytic signal, Geophysics, 61, 373-386.
• Kılıç, A.R., Kaya, C., 2010. Simav jeotermal sahasının manyetotellurik yöntemle araştırılması, Yer Elektrik Çalıştayı, Kastamonu.
• Koralay, O. E., Candan, O., Akal, C., Dora, Ö., Chen, F., Satır, M., Oberhansli, R. 2011. Menderes masifindeki Pan-afrikan ve Triyas yaşlı metagranitoyitlerin jeolojisi ve jeokronolojisi, Batı Anadolu, Türkiye, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, 142, 69-121.
• Miller, H. G., Sing, V. 1994. Potential field tilt - A new concept for location of potential field sources: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 32, 213-217
• MTA, TÜBİTAK, C.Ü., A.Ü., 2012. 105G145 No’lu Tübitak, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, Sivas Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi, Ankara Üniversitesi İşbirliği Projesi, 2012. Kuzeybatı Anadolu Kabuk Yapısının Jeofizik Verilerle Araştırılması Projesi”, 2008- 2012, Ankara (unpublished).
• Nabighian, M.N. 1972. The analytic signal of two dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal crossection: it’s properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation, Geophysics, 37, 507-517.
• Pedersen, L. B. 1989, Retations between horizontal and vertical gradients of potential fields Geophysics, 54, 662-663.
• Roest, W. R., Verhoef, J., Pilkington, M. 1992. Magnetic Interpretation using the 3-D analytic Signal Geophysics, 1, 116-125, January 1992.
• Salem, A., Williams, S., Fairhead, D., Ravat, D. V., Smith, R. 2007. Tilt-depth method: A simple depth estimation method using first-order magnetic derivatives: The Leading Edge, December, 1502- 1505.
• Sarı, C. 2003. Gravite verilerinin tekil değer ayrıştırma yöntemi ile ters çözümü ve Gediz ve Büyük Menderes grabenlerinin tortul kalınlıklarının saptanması, DEÜ Mühendislik Fakültesi Fen ve Mühendislik Dergisi, 5, 1.
• Seyitoğlu, G. 1997. The Simav Graben: An example of young E-W trending structures in the late cenosoic extensional system of western Turkey. Turkish Journal of Earth Science, 6, 135-141, TÜBİTAK, Turkey.
• Verdusco, B., Fairhead, J.D., Green, C.M. 2004. New insigth in to magnetic derivatives for structural mapping, Leading Edge, 23 (2), 116-119.