GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SYSTEMS BASED USING LOGISTIC REGRESSION LANDSLIDE SUSCEPTIBILITY ASSESSMENT OF THE ÇUBUK-KALECİK (ANKARA) BETWEEN ŞABANÖZÜ (ÇANKIRI) REGION

Year 2017, Volume: 155 Issue: 155, 175 - 186, 03.12.2017

Hasan Elmacı Senem Tekin , Nail Ünsal

https://doi.org/10.19111/bulletinofmre.306692

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Landslides occur frequently in particular is in certain parts in our country as well as in the world, is
caused from time to time to return to natural disasters and signifi cant social and economic losses.
In this study, landslide susceptibility analysis Çubuk-Kalecik (Ankara) between Şabanözü (Çankırı)
were performed totally 2360 km2
area. According to the inventory map that represents about
5,16 % of the spatial distribution of landslide at study area, landslide movement is generally seen
as the type of the existing rotational slip. According to the Turkish Landslide Inventory database
prepared by MTA, 876 landslides covering 122 km2
were identifi ed in the study area. A total of
twelve independent variables for the landslide conditioning factors were used in the susceptibility
assessments, being as lithological maps, landform classifi cation, digital elevation model, slope,
profi le, plan, and tangent curvatures, roughness index, slope / aspect ratio, stream power index,
topographic position index. Landslide susceptibility assessment was carried out using multivariate
logistic regression method, one of statistical methods. The mapping unit 25 *25 m pixels are used
for statistical assessment. The obtained probability values of landslide susceptibility maps are very
low and very high was evaluated in fi ve grades in the range. Performance evaluation of susceptibility
maps were performed with using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and prediction success rate
curves. The area under the ROC curves were found to be in 0,794. Susceptibility map, high and very
susceptible regions correspond to 27 % of the study area. 78 % of the landslides are in medium, high
and very susceptible regions.The accomplished landslide susceptibility map with relatively high
performance could be used during the medium scale planning strategies.

Keywords

Çankırı, Geographic Information System (GIS), Landslide Susceptibility, Logistic regression.

References

• Ayalew, L, Yamagishi, H, 2005. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan. Geomorphology 65: 15-31.
• Chung, C. F. And Fabbri A. G., 2003. Validation of Spatial Prediction Models for Landslide Hazard Mapping. Natural Hazards 30: 451–472.
• Çan T, Duman TY, Olgun Ş, Çörekçioğlu Ş, Karakaya-Gülmez F, Elmacı H, Hamzaçebi S, Emre Ö 2013, Türkiye Heyelan Veri Tabani, TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi 2013, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Çan, T., Duman, T.Y., 2008. General evaluation of historical landslide inventory of Turkey. Proceedings in Symposium of Paleoenvironmental Reconstruction and Material Circulation by Water System. Abstracts book, pp.6-8. Hakozaki Campus Kyushu Univ., Fukuoka Japan.
• Çan, T., Duman, T.Y., Olgun, Ş., Çörekçioğlu, Ş., Karakaya-Gülmez, F, Elmacı, H., Olgun, Ş., Hamzaçebi, S. Emre, Ö., 2013. Türkiye Heyelan Veri Tabanı. TMMOB Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Kongresi 2013, 11-13 November 2013, Proceedings, Interactive CD, No: 217, 6 p., Ankara.
• Dönmez, M and Akçay, A.E., 2010. Türkiye Jeoloji Haritaları, 1:100.000 Ölçekli Çankırı-H30 Paftası ve Açıklaması, MTA Jeoloji Etütleri Dairesi, No: 138, Ankara.
• Duman TY, Can T, Gökçeoğlu C, Nefeslioğlu HA, Sönmez H., 2006b. Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Çekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environ Geol 51(2): 241-256.
• Duman, T. Y., Çan, T., Gökçeoğlu, C., Nefeslioğlu, H. A., Sönmez, H., 2006a. Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Çekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey. Environmental Geology, 51, 241-256,.
• Duman, T.Y., Çan, T., Emre, Ö., 2011. Türkiye Heyelan Envanteri Haritası - 1/1,500,000 Ölçekli, MTA Özel Yayınlar Serisi-27, Ankara, 23.
• Duman, T.Y., Olgun, Ş., Çan, T., Nefeslioğlu, H.A., Hamzaçebi, S., Durmaz, S., Elmacı, H., Çörekçioğlu, Ş., 2009. ''Türkiye Heyelan Envanteri Haritası-1/500.000 ölçekli Sinop Paftası,'' MTA Özel Yayınlar Serisi-14, 27 s. Ankara.
• Emre, Ö., Duman, T.Y., Özalp, S., Elmacı, H., Olgun, Ş., Şaroğlu, F., 2013. 1/1.250.000 Ölçekli Türkiye Diri Fay Haritası, MTA Genel Müdürlüğü, Özel Yayınlar Serisi, Ankara, Türkiye.
• Ergünay, O., 1999. A Perspective of Disaster in Turkey: Issues and Prospects, Urban Settlements and Natural Disasters, Proceedings of UIA Region II Workshop, Chamber of Architects of Turkey.
• Gökçe, O., Özden, Ş. and Demir, A., 2008. Türkiye’de Afetlerin Mekansal ve İstatistiksel Dağılımı Afet Bilgi Envanteri, p 117, T.C. Bayındırlık ve İskan Bakanlığı Afet İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü Afet Etüt ve Hasar Tespit Daire Başkanlığı. Ankara.
• Heckmann, T, Gegg, K, Gegg, A, Becht, M, 2014. Sample size matters: investigating the effect of sample size on a logistic regression susceptibility model for debris flows. Nat Hazard Earth Sys 14:259-278.
• Hosmer D, Stanley Lemeshow S, Sturdivant R, 2013. Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Kadirioğlu, FT., Kartal, RF., Kılıç, T., Kalafat, D., Duman, TY., Eroğlu Azak, T., Özalp, S., Emre, Ö. (2016). An Improved Earthquake Catalogue (M ≥ 4.0) for Turkey and Its Near Vicinity (1900-2012). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Published online 19 December 2016 DOI 10.1007/s10518-016-0064-8 Metz CE. 1978. Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med. 8, 283-298.
• Metz CE. 2006. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. J Am Coll Radiol. 3,413-422.
• Nefeslioglu HA, Duman TY, Durmaz S., 2008. Landslide susceptibility mapping for a part of tectonic Kelkit Valley (Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey). Geomorphology 94(3-4): 401-418.
• Riley, S. J, S. D., DeGloria and R. Elliot, 1999. A terrain ruggedness index that quantifies topographic heterogeneity. Intermountain Journal of Sciences, 5(1-4).
• Süzen, M. L. Doyuran, V., 2004. Data driven bivariate landslide susceptibility assessment using geographical information systems: a method and application to Asarsuyu catchment, Turkey. Engineering Geology, 71, 303-321.
• Tekin, S., 2014. Kadirli-Aslantaş (Osmaniye) Dolaylarının Cbs Tabanlı Heyelan Duyarlılık Değerlendirilmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 93., Adana.
• Tekin, S., Çan, T., 2016. Heyelanlı Örneklem Seçimindeki Farklı Yaklaşımların Heyelan Duyarlılık Haritalarının Başarı Tahmin Davranışları Üzerine Etkisi, 413-423 S. VI. Uzaktan Algılama ve Coğrafi Bilgi Sistemleri Sempozyumu, Adana, Türkiye.
• Weiss, A. 2001. Topographic Position and Landforms Analysis, Poster presentation, ESRI User Conference, San Diego, CA.
• Wilson, J. P. and Gallant, J. C., 2000. Terrain analysis: principles and applications. John Wiley and Sons: New York.
• Yesilnacar, E, Topal, T, 2005, Landslide susceptibility mapping: A comparison of logistic regression and neural networks methods in a medium scale study, Hendek region (Turkey). Eng Geol 79:251-266.