Research Article

Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene/Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer

Volume: 21 Number: 4 December 29, 2025
EN

Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene/Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer

Abstract

The friction and wear characteristics of engineered thermoplastics, namely unfilled polyoxymethylene (POM) and 10% graphite-filled polyoxymethylene (POM+10%Gr), sliding on steel under dry conditions were investigated using a pin-on-disc tribometer. The influence of applied load and sliding speed on the tribological properties of POM and POM+10%Gr on a steel counterface under dry sliding conditions was examined. Experimental results showed that the coefficient of friction (COF) of the POM and POM+10%Gr polymers decreased with increasing applied load. In addition, the wear rate (WR) values of the POM and POM+10%Gr polymers decreased with the increase in applied load. However, for all polymers, the specific wear rate values exhibited an increase with the rise in sliding speed. The best polymer material is found which is POM+10%Gr with respect to friction and wear behavior in this study. The worn surfaces of the engineering thermoplastics were investigated by optical microscope. Optical micrographs indicated that adhesive wear was the predominant wear process under dry sliding circumstances.

Keywords

References

  1. [1]. Chun-Guang, L, Wen-Xian, L, Xia-Yu, W. 2003. Studies on POM/graphite/Ekonol composites. Bulletin of Materials Science; 26(6): 575–578.
  2. [2]. Lucas, MK, Gil, G, Roberts, J, Mitjan, K, Nazanin, E. 2023. Mechanical properties and tribological performance of polyoxymethylene/short cellulose fiber composites. Polymer Testing; 128: 108234
  3. [3]. Ramanjaneyulu, G, Rajendran R. 2017. Study of wear behaviour of POM/graphite and POM/MoS2 composites. SAE Technical Paper; 2017-28-1988.
  4. [4]. Hao, Z, Yue, W, Mei, L, Hang, W, Huawei, Z, Yang, C, Shengtai, Z. 2022. Comparative study on the mechanical, tribological, and thermal properties of POM composites filled with different PTFE. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials; 35(9): 1319-1341.
  5. [5]. Ben Difallah, B, Kharrat, M, Dammak, M, Monteil, G. 2012. Mechanical and tribological response of ABS polymer matrix filled with graphite powder. Materials and Design; 34: 782-787.
  6. [6]. Jitendra, NP, Jayashree, B, Raj, KP. 2019. Optimization of graphite contents in PAEK composites for best combination of performance properties. Composites Part B; 174: 106951.
  7. [7]. Zhou, S, Chiang, S, Xu, J, Du, H, Li, B, Xu, C, Feiyu, K. 2012. Modeling the in-plane thermal conductivity of a graphite/polymer composite sheet with a very high content of natural flake graphite. Carbon; 50: 5052–5061.
  8. [8]. Bijwe, J, Kumar, K, Panda, JN, Parida, T, Trivedi, P. 2016. Design and development of high performance tribo-composites based on synergism in two solid lubricants. Composites Part B: Engineering; 94: 399–410.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Composite and Hybrid Materials

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 29, 2025

Submission Date

January 6, 2025

Acceptance Date

June 10, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 21 Number: 4

APA
Ünal, H., Yetgin, S. H., & Köse, S. (2025). Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene/Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, 21(4), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1614044
AMA
1.Ünal H, Yetgin SH, Köse S. Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene/Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer. CBUJOS. 2025;21(4):43-50. doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.1614044
Chicago
Ünal, Hüseyin, Salih Hakan Yetgin, and Sinan Köse. 2025. “Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer”. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 21 (4): 43-50. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1614044.
EndNote
Ünal H, Yetgin SH, Köse S (December 1, 2025) Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene/Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 21 4 43–50.
IEEE
[1]H. Ünal, S. H. Yetgin, and S. Köse, “Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene/Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer”, CBUJOS, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 43–50, Dec. 2025, doi: 10.18466/cbayarfbe.1614044.
ISNAD
Ünal, Hüseyin - Yetgin, Salih Hakan - Köse, Sinan. “Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer”. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 21/4 (December 1, 2025): 43-50. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.1614044.
JAMA
1.Ünal H, Yetgin SH, Köse S. Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene/Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer. CBUJOS. 2025;21:43–50.
MLA
Ünal, Hüseyin, et al. “Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer”. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, vol. 21, no. 4, Dec. 2025, pp. 43-50, doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.1614044.
Vancouver
1.Hüseyin Ünal, Salih Hakan Yetgin, Sinan Köse. Comparison of Tribological Performance of Polyoxymethylene/Graphite Composite and Pure Polyoxymethylene Polymer. CBUJOS. 2025 Dec. 1;21(4):43-50. doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.1614044