EN
Compare Between the Results of the Casting Simulation and the Results of Experimental Production with Calculating the Interface Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Casting-Mold
Abstract
Sanitary tapware that can drain hot and cold water from the plumbing systems in the desired proportions by mixing are called faucet. The production of faucets used today is conducted by using a low-pressure casting method. The raw material of the body, which is the main part of faucets, is generally brass alloy (CuZn39Pb1Al-C). The material of faucet molds produced using the casting method is the copper-beryllium alloy (CuCoNiBe). In this research, K type thermocouples were placed into the mold in such a way that there was a distance of 3 mm to the casting surface, and temperature changes during the production were achieved by the measurement and recording device. 1283,1263,1243,1223,1203,1183,1163 K values of casting temperatures that were identified as critical in Ansys Fluent program and interfacial heat transfer coefficient of the combinations created by casting temperatures of 413,473,533,593,653 K were calculated numerically. Casting simulation was created in Magma program by using calculated IHTC values, and they were analysed by making a comparison between experimental and simulation temperature curves. The match of the defects was controlled by comparing the defect results of simulation in which convergence within temperature curves were provided and the defects of scrap parts in experimental production.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
TÜBİTAK - TEYDEB 1501
Project Number
3170587
Thanks
Our research was supported by Technology and Innovation Funding Programs Directorate (TEYDEB) of The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) within 1501 coded Industrial R&D Projects Grant Programme with the project number of 3170587. In addition, we owe a debt of gratitude to E.C.A. Valfsel Armatur Sanayi A.S., one of the biggest faucet manufacturer companies of our country, and Gökhan Topgüner as R&D manager and Sinan Aydın as mold designer and Mehmet Tunç as mold designer.
References
- [1]. Michels, HT. 2009. Copper-Base Alloys, Casting Source Directory, Metal Casting Design & Purchasing; 31-34.
- [2]. Susac, F, Ohura, K, Banu, A, Makinouchi, M. 2015. Determination of heat transfer coefficient and air gap in aluminum casting by numerical and experimental approaches. Manufacturing Process Simulation Team, VCAD System Research; 69-70.
- [3]. Arunkumar, S, Sreenivas-Rao, KV, Prasanna-Kumar, TS. 2008. Spatial variation of heat flux at the metal-mold interface due to mold filling effects in gravity die-casting. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer; 51: 2676-2685.
- [4]. Taha, MA, El-Mahallawy, NA, El-Mestekawi, MT, Hassan, AA. 2013. Estimation of air gap and heat transfer coefficient at different faces of al and Al–Si castings solidifying in permanent mould. Materials Science and Technology; 17(9): 1093-1101.
- [5]. Pathak, N, Kumar, A, Yadav, A, Pradip, D. 2009. Effects of mould filling on evolution of the solid-liquid interface during solidification. Applied Thermal Engineering; 29: 3669-3678.
- [6]. Lan, P, Li, L, Tie, Z, Tang, H, Zhan, J. 2019. Combined study on mold taper and corner radius in bloom continuous casting by fem simulation and trial experiment. Metals and Materials International; 25(6): 1603-1615.
- [7]. Rafique, MMA, Iqbal, J. 2009. Modeling and simulation of the phenomena during investment casting. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer; 52: 2132-2139.
- [8]. Xuan-xuan, Y, Ling, C, Yi-jie, H. 2012. Numerical simulation of casting filling process based on Fluent. Energy Procedia; 17: 1864-1871.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Engineering
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
June 24, 2020
Submission Date
April 15, 2020
Acceptance Date
June 23, 2020
Published in Issue
Year 2020 Volume: 16 Number: 2
APA
Nişancı, M. C., & Yurddaş, A. (2020). Compare Between the Results of the Casting Simulation and the Results of Experimental Production with Calculating the Interface Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Casting-Mold. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, 16(2), 169-181. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.720791
AMA
1.Nişancı MC, Yurddaş A. Compare Between the Results of the Casting Simulation and the Results of Experimental Production with Calculating the Interface Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Casting-Mold. CBUJOS. 2020;16(2):169-181. doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.720791
Chicago
Nişancı, Murat Can, and Ali Yurddaş. 2020. “Compare Between the Results of the Casting Simulation and the Results of Experimental Production With Calculating the Interface Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Casting-Mold”. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 16 (2): 169-81. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.720791.
EndNote
Nişancı MC, Yurddaş A (June 1, 2020) Compare Between the Results of the Casting Simulation and the Results of Experimental Production with Calculating the Interface Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Casting-Mold. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 16 2 169–181.
IEEE
[1]M. C. Nişancı and A. Yurddaş, “Compare Between the Results of the Casting Simulation and the Results of Experimental Production with Calculating the Interface Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Casting-Mold”, CBUJOS, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 169–181, June 2020, doi: 10.18466/cbayarfbe.720791.
ISNAD
Nişancı, Murat Can - Yurddaş, Ali. “Compare Between the Results of the Casting Simulation and the Results of Experimental Production With Calculating the Interface Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Casting-Mold”. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science 16/2 (June 1, 2020): 169-181. https://doi.org/10.18466/cbayarfbe.720791.
JAMA
1.Nişancı MC, Yurddaş A. Compare Between the Results of the Casting Simulation and the Results of Experimental Production with Calculating the Interface Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Casting-Mold. CBUJOS. 2020;16:169–181.
MLA
Nişancı, Murat Can, and Ali Yurddaş. “Compare Between the Results of the Casting Simulation and the Results of Experimental Production With Calculating the Interface Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Casting-Mold”. Celal Bayar University Journal of Science, vol. 16, no. 2, June 2020, pp. 169-81, doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.720791.
Vancouver
1.Murat Can Nişancı, Ali Yurddaş. Compare Between the Results of the Casting Simulation and the Results of Experimental Production with Calculating the Interface Heat Transfer Coefficient of the Casting-Mold. CBUJOS. 2020 Jun. 1;16(2):169-81. doi:10.18466/cbayarfbe.720791