An Overview of The Use of Humor in the Organization: Bibliometric Analysis Based on Web of Science Database

Year 2022, Volume: 20 Issue: 3, 223 - 244, 28.09.2022

Hilmiye Türesin Tetik

https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1097314

Abstract

This study, it is aimed to determine the historical development of the use of humor in organizations in the context of management discipline with the bibliometric analysis method and to guide those who work in this field in the future by creating a conceptual framework. For this purpose, articles published in the Web of Science database and scanned in different indexes on the use of humor in organizations until 2022 were analyzed by the bibliometric method. 306 articles focusing on the field of management were examined in the keywords, abstract, and title areas. To answer the questions created for the research, various productivity indicators were examined and citation analysis, co-citation, and co-word analysis were performed within the scope of bibliometric analysis. It has been found that the interest in the field of management for studies on the use of humor in organizations has increased in the last 15 years. The fact that the number of publications originating from Turkey is 4 can be considered as an indication that the field of humor use in organizations is open to development in our country. It has also been determined that social media, the leader's use of humor, entertainment at work, status, and content analysis are current issues in the field of "use of humor in organizations".

Keywords

Organizational Humor

Örgütlerde Mizah Kullanımına Genel Bir Bakış: Web of Science Veri Tabanına Dayalı Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Abstract

Bu çalışmada bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile yönetim disiplini bağlamında örgütlerde mizah kullanımının tarihsel gelişimini belirlemek ve gelecekte bu alanda çalışma yapanlara kavramsal bir çerçeve oluşturarak yol gösterici olmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Web of Science veri tabanında yayımlanmış ve farklı endekslerde taranan örgütlerde mizah kullanımıyla ilgili 2022 yılına kadar yayımlanan makaleler bibliyometrik yöntemle analiz edilmiştir. Anahtar kelime, özet ve başlık alanlarında yönetim alanına odaklanan 306 makale incelenmiştir. Araştırma amacı doğrultusunda oluşturulan soruları yanıtlamak amacıyla çeşitli üretkenlik göstergeleri incelenmiş ve bibliyometrik analiz kapsamında atıf analizi, ortak atıf ve ortak kelime analizi yapılmıştır. Sonuç olarak,örgütlerde mizah kullanımına ilişkin çalışmalara yönelik yönetim alanında ilginin son 15 yılda artış gösterdiği bulunmuştur. Türkiye kaynaklı yayın sayısının 4 olması, örgütlerde mizah kullanımına ilişkin alanın ülkemizde gelişmeye açık olduğunun bir göstergesi olarak değerlendirilebilir. Sosyal medya, liderin mizah kullanımı, iş yerinde eğlence, statü ve içerik analizi konularının “örgütlerde mizah kullanımı” alanında güncel konular olduğu da tespit edilmiştir.

Keywords

Örgütlerde Mizah, bibliyometrik Analiz, Web of Science, Örgütsel Davranış

References

• Alan, H., & Tiryaki Şen, H. (2016). Managers Blind: Humor. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 7(3), 152–156. https://doi.org/10.5505/phd.2016.55265
• Avolio, B. J., Howell, J. M., & Sosik, J. J. (1999). A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Bottom Line: Humor as a Moderator of Leadership Style Effects. The Academy of Management Journal, 42(2), 219–227. https://about.jstor.org/terms
• Aycan, Z. (2021). Yeni Nesil için Liderlik, Güç Kültüründen Güçlendirme Kültürüne Dönüşüm (1st ed.). Doğan Yayınları Yayıncılık.
• Block, J. H., & Fisch, C. (2020). Eight tips and questions for your bibliographic study in business and management research. In Management Review Quarterly (Vol. 70, Issue 3, pp. 307–312). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00188-4
• Collinson, D. L. (1988). Engineering humour: masculinity, joking and conflict in shop-floor relations. Organization Studies, 9(2), 181–199. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280112124
• Çakmak, V., & Baş, Ü. (2016). Mizah Tarzları ve Problem Çözme Becerileri: Aksaray Büro Çalışanları Üzerine Bir Uygulama. Akademia, 4(4), 116–134. https://doi.org/10.17680/akademia.42149
• Çelikten, M., & Çelikten, Y. (2018). Okul Yöneticilerinin Mizah ve Disiplin Anlayışı. OPUS-Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(Gençlik Araştırmaları Özel Sayısı), 453–467. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.392882
• Çetinkaya, F. F., & Şener, E. (2016). Yöneticilerin Mizah Tarzlarının Çalışanların Örgütsel Sinizm Algısına Etkisi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(3), 207–221. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2016.197
• Cooper, C. (2008). Elucidating the bonds of workplace humor: A relational process model. Human Relations, 61(8), 1087–1115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094861
• Erdem, R. (2007). Toplumsal Kültürün Örgüt Kültürüne Yansımaları. In R. Erdem & C. Ş. Çukur (Eds.), Kültürel Bağlamda Yönetsel-Örgütsel Davranış (1st ed., pp. 91–133). Türk Psikologlar Derneği Yayınları.
• Ergözen, Ö., & Uğurlu, Z. (2019). Hemşirelerin Mizah Tarzlarının İş Doyumları Üzerine Etkisi. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences, 11(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.5336/nurses.2018-64308
• Evans, J. B., Slaughter, J. E., Ellis, A. P. J., & Rivin, J. M. (2019). Gender and the evaluation of humor at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(8), 1077–1087. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000395
• Falagas, M. E., Pitsouni, E. I., Malietzis, G. A., & Pappas, G. (2008). Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. The FASEB Journal, 22(2), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.07-9492lsf
• Filiz, B., & Karaca, Y. (2021). Beden Eğitimi Öğretmenlerinin Eğitimde Mizahın Kullanımına Yönelik Tutumları. Ankara Universitesi Egitim Bilimleri Fakultesi Dergisi, 54(3), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.755654
• Gayadeen, S. M., & Phillips, S. W. (2016). Donut time: the use of humor across the police work environment. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 5(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-06-2015-0016
• Goswami, A., Nair, P., Beehr, T., & Grossenbacher, M. (2016). The relationship of leaders’ humor and employees’ work engagement mediated by positive emotions: Moderating effect of leaders’ transformational leadership style. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 37(8), 1083–1099. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-01-2015-0001
• Hastings, G., Stead, M., & Webb, J. (2004). Fear appeals in social marketing: Strategic and ethical reasons for concern. In Psychology and Marketing (Vol. 21, Issue 11, pp. 961–986). https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20043
• Hırlak, B., Taşlıyan, M., & Sezer, B. (2018). Mizah Anlayışı, Mesleki Stres ve Demografik Özellikler Bağlamında Algı Farklılıkları. KSÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(1), 155–180.
• Holmes, J. (2007). Humour and the construction of Māori leadership at work. Leadership, 3(1), 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715007073061
• Huo, Y., Lam, W., & Chen, Z. (2012). Am I the Only One This Supervisor is Laughing at? Effects of Aggressive Humor on Employee Strain and Addictive Behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 65(4), 859–885. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12004.
• Kahn, W. A. (1989). Toward a Sense of Organizational Humor: Implications for Organizational Diagnosis and Change. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 25(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886389251004
• Kim, T. Y., Lee, D. R., & Wong, N. Y. S. (2016). Supervisor Humor and Employee Outcomes: The Role of Social Distance and Affective Trust in Supervisor. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9406-9
• Kong, D. T., Cooper, C. D., & Sosik, J. J. (2019). The state of research on leader humor. Organizational Psychology Review, 9(1), 3–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386619846948
• Kumar, S., Sureka, R., & Colombage, S. (2020). Capital structure of SMEs: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Management Review Quarterly, 70(4), 535–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-019-00175-4
• Lang, J. C., & Lee, C. H. (2010). Workplace humor and organizational creativity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190903466855
• Lennox Terrion, J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2002). From “I” to “we”: The role of putdown humor and identity in the development of a temporary group. Human Relations, 55(1), 55–88.
• Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring Paradox: Toward a More Comprehensive Guide. The Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776. https://www.jstor.org/stable/259204
• Martin, R. A., & Lefcourt, H. M. (1983). Sense of Humor as a Moderator of the Relation Between Stressors and Moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(6), 1313–1324. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1313
• Martin, R. A., Puhlik-Doris, P., Larsen, G., Gray, J., & Weir, K. (2003). Individual differences in uses of humor and their relation to psychological well-being: Development of the Humor Styles Questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality, 37, 48–75. www.elsevier.com/locate/jrp
• Mesmer-Magnus, J., Glew, D. J., & Viswesvaran, C. (2012). A meta-analysis of positive humor in the workplace. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 27(2), 155–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683941211199554
• Moake, T. R., & Robert, C. (2021). Gender, formal organizational status and humor use: perceptions of social acceptance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-11-2020-0593
• Mousa, M. (2021). How workplace fun is experienced in the banking sector? A qualitative study. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 43(3), 687–703. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-04-2020-0156
• Oktuğ, B. Z. (2019). İşyerinde Mizah Yoluyla Başa Çıkmanın Etik Liderlik ile İşten Ayrılma Niyeti Arasındaki İlişkide Üstlendiği Rol. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.11616/basbed.v19i47045.520481
• Ozturk, O. (2021). Bibliometric review of resource dependence theory literature: an overview. Management Review Quarterly, 71(3), 525–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00192-8
• Öztürk, O., & Gürler, G. (2021). Bir Literatür İncelemesi Aracı Olarak Bibliyometrik Analiz (2nd ed.). Nobel Yayınevi.
• Pundt, A., & Herrmann, F. (2015). Affiliative and aggressive humour in leadership and their relationship to leader-member exchange. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88, 108–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12081
• Recepoğlu, E., & Özdemir, S. (2012). Okul Müdürlerinin Mizah Tarzları ile Öğretim Liderliği Davranışları Arasındaki İlişki. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(3), 23–42.
• Robert, C., Dunne, T. C., & Iun, J. (2016). The Impact of Leader Humor on Subordinate Job Satisfaction: The Crucial Role of Leader–Subordinate Relationship Quality. Group and Organization Management, 41(3), 375–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115598719
• Romero, E. J., & Cruthirds, K. W. (2006). The Use of Humor in the Workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 58–69.
• Scheel, T., & Gockel, C. (2017). Humor at Work in Teams, Leadership, Negotiations, Learning and Health. http://www.springer.com/series/10143
• Selçuk, G., Kana, F., Geçgel, H., & Aşçı, E. (2018). Türkçe Öğretmeni Adaylarının Eğitimde Mizah Kullanımına İlişkin Görüşleri. Tarih Okulu Dergisi, 11(XXXVI), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.14225/joh1401
• Sliter, M., Kale, A., & Yuan, Z. (2014). Is humor the best medicine? The buffering effect of coping humor on traumatic stressors in firefighters. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 257–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1868
• Sobral, F., & Islam, G. (2015). He who laughs best, leaves last: The influence of humor on the attitudes and behavior of interns. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 14(4), 500–518. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0368
• Tan, L., Wang, Y., & Lu, H. (2021). Why so Humorous? The Roles of Traditionality and Gender (Dis)Similarity in Leader Humor Behavior and Employee Job Performance. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 28(1), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051820964145
• Teker, N., Çelikten, M., & Halavuk, F. (2018). Eğitim yönetiminde mizah tarzı ve iş doyumu ilişkisi. Opus-Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(8), 521–546. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.39290210.2646opus.393634
• Wijewardena, N., Härtel, C. E. J., & Samaratunge, R. (2017). Using humor and boosting emotions: An affect-based study of managerial humor, employees’ emotions and psychological capital. Human Relations, 70(11), 1316–1341. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717691809
• Wood, R. E., Beckmann, N., & Pavlakis, F. (2001). Humor in organizations: no laughing matter. In Research companion to the dysfunctional workplace:management challenges and symptoms (pp. 216–231). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Yang, I., Horak, S., & Chi, S. C. S. (2021). Leader humor effectiveness—The divergent dynamics of leader humor over time in East Asia and North America. Thunderbird International Business Review, 63(3), 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22180