The Relation Between Language Learning Strategies and Achievement of English Language Learners

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 4, 375 - 390, 28.12.2022

Ali Ceylan

https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.1131841

Öz

This study aims to determine the students’ strategy preferences and to explore the relationship between the language learning strategies of the students and their academic achievement in language skills. The research was conducted with the participation of 405 (F=162, M=243) preparatory program students of a school of foreign languages at a state university in Turkey. In accordance with the purpose of the study, the Turkish version of the Strategy Inventory of Language Learning for English Language Learners Student Form (SILL-ELL Student Form) adapted by Ardeshava and Tretter (2013) was used to gather data. As a result, students use metacognitive and social strategies, among indirect strategies, more than other strategy categories. Further, it was found that students use strategies moderately and there is female superiority in using language learning strategies. In addition, some sub-categories of language learning strategies have an impact on achievement in skills and some measures of the language achievement test.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Language Learning, Skills, Strategy, Achievement

İngilizce Öğrenenlerin Dil Öğrenme Stratejileri ile Başarıları Arasındaki İlişki

Öz

Bu çalışma, öğrencilerin dil öğrenme strateji tercihlerini belirlemeyi ve öğrencilerin dil öğrenme stratejileri ile dil becerilerindeki akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişkiyi araştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Araştırma, Türkiye'de bir devlet üniversitesine bağlı bir yabancı dil yüksekokulunun hazırlık programına kayıtlı 405 (K=162, E=243) öğrenci ile gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın amacına uygun olarak, veri toplamak için Ardeshava ve Tretter (2013) tarafından uyarlanan İngilizce Öğrenenler için Dil Öğrenme Strateji Envanteri Öğrenci Formu'nun (DÖSE-İÖ Öğrenci Formu) Türkçe versiyonu kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak, öğrenciler dolaylı stratejiler arasında üstbilişsel ve sosyal stratejileri diğer strateji kategorilerine göre daha fazla kullanmaktadırlar. Ayrıca öğrencilerin stratejileri orta düzeyde kullandıkları tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, dil öğrenme stratejilerinin bazı alt kategorilerinin becerilerdeki başarı ve dil başarı testinin bazı ölçütleri üzerinde etkisi vardır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Dil Öğrenimi, Beceri, Strateji, Başarı

Kaynakça

• Ardasheva, Y. (2011). English language learners in focus: Predictors of English proficiency and academic achievement. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A, 72, (06)
• Ardasheva, Y., & Tretter, T. R. (2013). Strategy Inventory for Language Learning–ELL Student Form: Testing for Factorial Validity. The Modern Language Journal, 474-489.
• Bialystok, E. (1981). The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. Modem Language Journal, 65: 24-35. Cesur, M. O. (2011). Can language learning strategies predict Turkish university prep class students’ achievement in reading comprehension? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 15, 1920–1924.
• Cohen, A. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. Essex, U.K.: Longman.
• Dam, L. (1995). Learner Autonomy from Theory to Classroom Practice. Dublin: Authentik.
• Dreyer, C., & Oxford, R. L. (1996). Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficiency among Afrikaans speakers in South Africa. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language learning strategies around the world (Tech. Rep. No 13, pp. 62–74). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center.
• Erdoğan, T. (2018). The Investigation of Self-regulation and Language Learning Strategies. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1477-1485.
• Erdoğan, T., & Özdemir, E. (2018). An Investigation Of Learning Approaches And Language Learning Strategies: Are They Related? European Journal of Education Studies, Issue 11.
• Faerch, C. and Kasper, G. (1983). Strategies in Interlanguage Communication. London: Longman.
• Gürsoy, E., & Eken, E. (2018). Identifying Children’s Language Learning Strategies: Turkish Example. Porta Linguarum, 43-56.
• Han, T. (2015). Foreign Language Learning Strategies in the Context of STEM Education. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 79-102.
• Hu, G., Gu, Y. P., Zhang, J. L., & Bai, R. (2009). English language learning strategies in Singapore primary school. (Final Research Report for Project No. CPR 3/03GYQ).
• Kato, F., (1996). Results of an Australian study of strategy use in learning Japanese Kanji characters. Unpublished manuscript, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
• Lan, R., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 41, 339–379.
• Mullins, P. (1992). Successful English Language Learning Strategies of Students Enrolled in the Faculty of Arts, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. San Diego, CA, USA: United States International University.
• Nacera, A. (2010). Languages learning strategies and vocabulary size. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 4021-4025.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know? USA: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
• Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language Learning Styles and Strategies: An Overview. In R. L. Oxford, Learning Styles & Strategies (pp. 1-25). Oxford: GALA.
• Oxford, R. L. (2011). Research timeline: Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching, 44, 167–180.
• Oxford, R. L. (2013). Individual differences. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of second language acquisition (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
• Oxford, R. L., & Cohen, A. D. (1992). Language Learning Strategies: Crucial Issues of Concept and Classification. Applied Language Learning, Vol. 3, Nos. 1&2, pp. 1-35.
• Oxford, R., & Ehrman, M. (1995). Adults' language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System, 23, 359-386.
• Oxford, R.L., Judd, C., & Giesen, J., 1998: Relationships among learning strategies, learning styles, EFL proficiency, and academic performance among secondary school students in Turkey. Unpublished manuscript, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.
• Purpura, J., (1997). An analysis of the relationships between test takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance. Language Learning, 42 (2), 289-325.
• Rubin, J. (1975). What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 41–51.
• Rubin, J. (1981). Study of cognitive processes in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 118–131.
• Sucu, H.Ö. (2009). Contributions of metacognitive learning strategies to the development of reading comprehension in foreign language teaching and metacognitive strategy instruction (Nevsehir University sample). (Unpublished Master’s Dissertation). Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
• Wenden, A. (2002). Learner development in language learning. Applied Linguistics, 23: 32-55.
• Williams, M., & Burden, R. (1997). Psychology for Language Teachers: A Social Constructivist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.