TheEffect of Traditional and Cluster-Setting Post-Activation Potential Protocol on Vertical Jump and Anaerobic Performance in Wrestlers

Abstract

The aim of the study is to examine the effects of the Post Activation Potential (PAP) protocol, which was created with theTraditional Set (TS) method and the Cluster Set (CS) method, on vertical jump and anaerobic performance in wrestlers. A total of 17 male volunteer wrestlers with 5.00±0.86 years of sports history participated in the study. Athletes were randomly divided into TS and CS groups. The research consisted of 3 sessions with 24 hour intervals. In the first session, the 1 TM loads of the athletes were determined, and in the second session, the pre-test Counter Movement Jump (CMJ) test was applied to the athletes. In the last session, the athletes in theTS group performed 85% (1-TM) 2x8 repetitive squats (210 seconds rest between sets), while the athletes in the CS group performed 85% (1-TM) 8x2 repetitions squats (30 seconds rest between sets), and the both the group applied the post-test CMJ test after resting for 2 minutes. Paired Sample t test was used to determine the within group difference, and the Independent Sample t-test was used to determine the difference between groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the CS and TS methods. While no significant difference was found in the TS method in group comparisons, a significant difference was found in the vertical jump, average and relative anaerobic power parameters of the athletes who performed the CS method (p<0.05). While the CS method improved vertical jump by 11.65%, average anaerobic power by 6.18% and relative anaerobic power by 6.58%, no proportional improvement was found in the TS method. Although there is no difference between CS and TS, it can be said that the strength training applied to the wrestlers with the CS method improves the vertical jump and anaerobic power outputs at a higher level than the strength training applied with the TS method.

Keywords

• Post Activation Potential
• Traditional Set
• Anaerobic Performance
• Wrestling

Güreşçilerde Geleneksel ve Cluster Setleme Aktivasyon Sonrası Potansiyel Protokolünün Dikey Sıçrama ve Anaerobik Performans Üzerine Etkisi

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı, güreşçilerde Geleneksel Setleme (GS) yöntemi ve Cluster Setleme (CS) yöntemi ile oluşturulmuş Post Aktivasyon Potansiyeli (PAP) protokolünün dikey sıçrama ve anaerobik performans üzerine etkisini incelemektir. Araştırmaya branşında 5,00±0,86 yıllık spor geçmişine sahip toplam 17 gönüllü erkek güreşçi katılmıştır. Sporcular tesadüfi yöntemle GS ve CS grup olarak ikiye ayrılmıştır. Araştırma 24 saat aralıkla 3 oturumdan oluşmuştur. İlk oturumda sporcuların 1 TM yükleri belirlenmiş, ikinci oturumda sporculara ön test Counter Movement Jump (CMJ) testi uygulanmıştır. Son oturumda GS grubundaki sporcular %85 (1-TM) 2x8 tekrar squat hareketini (set arası 210 sn dinlenmeler), CS grubundaki sporcular ise %85 (1-TM) 8x2 tekrar squat hareketini (set arası 30 sn dinlenmeler) uyguladıktan sonra her iki grup 2 dk dinlenme sonrası son test CMJ testi uygulamıştır. Gruplar normal dağılım gösterdiği için grup içi ön test-son test farklılığını belirlemek amacıyla Eşleştirilmiş Örneklem t test, gruplar arası CS-GS farklılığını belirlemek için de Bağımsız Örneklemler t testi kullanılmıştır. CS ve GS yöntemlerinde gruplar arası anlamlı bir farklılık bulunamamıştır. Grup içi karşılaştırmalarda da GS yöntemde anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmazken, CS yöntemi uygulayan sporcuların dikey sıçrama, ortalama ve nispi anaerobik güç parametrelerinde anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmuştur (p<0,05). CS yöntemi dikey sıçramayı %11,65, ortalama anaerobik gücü %6,18 ve nispi anaerobik gücü %6,58 oranında geliştirirken GS yönteminde oransal olarak gelişim bulunamamıştır. CS ve GS arasında fark olmamasına rağmen güreşçilere CS yöntemiyle uygulanan olan kuvvet antrenmanlarının, GS yöntemiyle uygulanan kuvvet antrenmanlarına göre dikey sıçrama ve anaerobik güç çıktılarını daha yüksek düzeyde geliştirdiği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Post Aktivasyon Potansiyeli
• Cluster Set
• Geleneksel Set
• Anaerobik Performans
• Güreş

References

1. Alp, M., Çatıkkaş, F., ve Kurt, C. (2018). Acute effects of static and dynamic stretching exercises on lower extremity isokinetic strength in taekwondo athletes. Isokinetics and Exercise Science 26(4), 307-311. https://doi.org/10.3233/IES-182159
2. Aydos, L., Taş, M., Akyüz, M., ve Uzun, A. (2009). Genç elit güreşçilerde kuvvetle bazı antropometrik parametrelerin ilişkisinin incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(4), 1-10
3. Baker, D. (2001). A series of Studies on the training of high-intensity muscle power in rugby league football players. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 15(2), 198-209.
4. Boullosa, D. A., Abreu, L., Beltrame, L. G., & Behm, D. G. (2013). The acute effect of different half squat set configurations on jump potentiation. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 27(8), 2059-2066. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e31827ddf15
5. Bompa, T.O. (2017). Dönemleme, antrenman kuramı ve yöntemleri, (Çev. Tanju Bağırgan). Ankara: Spor Yayın Evi ve Kitapevi.
6. Brzycki, M. (1993). Strength testing—predicting a one-rep max from reps-to-fatigue. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 64(1), 88-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1993.10606684
7. Chiu, L. Z., Fry, A. C., Weiss, L. W., Schilling, B. K., Brown, L. E., & Smith, S. L. (2003). Postactivation potentiation response in athletic and recreationally trained individuals, Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 17(4), 671-677. https://doi.org/10.1519/1533-4287
8. García-Ramos, A., Padial, P., Haff, G. G., Argüelles-Cienfuegos, J., García-Ramos, M., Conde-Pipó, J., & Feriche, B. (2015). Effect of different interrepetition rest periods on barbell velocity loss during the ballistic bench press exercise. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 29(9), 2388-2396.

9. Girman, J.C., Jones, M.T., Matthews, T.D., & Wood, R.J. (2014). Acute effects of a cluster-set protocol on hormonal, metabolic and performance measures in resistance-trained males. European journal of sport science, 14(2), 151-159. 10.1https://doi.org/080/17461391.2013.775351
10. Gorostiaga, E.M., Navarro-Amézqueta, I., Calbet, J. A., Hellsten, Y., Cusso, R., Guerrero, M., ... & Izquierdo, M. (2012). Energy metabolism during repeated sets of leg press exercise leading to failure or not. Plos One, 7(7), 1-9. Article e40621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040621
11. Haff, G. G., Whitley, A., McCoy, L. B., O'Bryant, H. S., Kilgore, J. L., Haff, E. E., Pierce, K. C., & Stone, M. H. (2003). Effects of different set configurations on barbell velocity and displacement during a clean pull. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 17(1), 95-103.
12. Haff, G. G., Hobbs, R. T., Haff, E. E., Sands, W. A., Pierce, K. C., & Stone, M. H. (2008). Cluster training: A novel method for introducing training program variation. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 30(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.1519/SSC.0b013e31816383e1
13. Hardee, J. P., Triplett, N. T., Utter, A. C., Zwetsloot, K. A., & Mcbride, J. M. (2012). Effect of interrepetition rest on power output in the power clean. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 26(4), 883-889. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182474370
14. Hansen, K. T., Cronin, J. B., & Newton, M. J. (2011). The effect of cluster loading on force, velocity, and power during ballistic jump squat training. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 6(4), 455-468. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.6.4.455
15. Hanson, E. D., Leigh, S., & Mynark, R. G. (2007). Acute effects of heavy-and light-load squat exercise on the kinetic measures of vertical jumping. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research 21(4), 1012-1017. https://doi.org/10.1519/r-20716.1
16. Iacono, A. D., Beato, M., & Halperin, I. (2019). The effects of cluster-set and traditional-set postactivation potentiation protocols on vertical jump performance. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 15(4), 464-469. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2019-0186
17. Iglesias-Soler, E., Mayo, X., Río-Rodríguez, D., Carballeira, E., Fariñas, J., & Fernández-Del-Olmo, M. (2016). Inter-repetition rest training and traditional set configuration produce similar strength gains without cortical adaptations. Journal of Sports Sciences, 34(15), 1473-1484. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2015.1119299
18. Lawton, T. W., Cronin, J. B., & Lindsell, R. P. (2006). Effect of interrepetition rest intervals on weight training repetition power output. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 20(1), 172-176. https://doi.org/10.1519/R-13893.1
19. Le Suer, D. A., McCormick, J. H., Mayhew, J. L., Wasserstein, R. L., & Arnold, M. D. (1997). The accuracy of prediction equations for estimating 1-RM performance in the bench press, squat, and deadlift. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 11(4), 211-213. https://doi.org/10.1519/00124278-199711000-00001
20. Lima, J. B., Marin, D., Barquilha, G., Da Silva, L., Puggina, E., Pithon-Curi, T., & Hirabara, S. (2011). Acute effects of drop jump potentiation protocol on sprint and counter movement vertical jump performance. Human Movement 12(4), 324-330. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10038-011-0036-4 Moreno, S. D., Brown, L. E., Coburn, J. W., & Judelson, D. A. (2014). Effect of cluster sets on plyometric jump power. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(9), 2424–2428. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000000585
21. Morales-Artacho, A. J., Padial, P., García-Ramos, A., Pérez-Castilla, A., & Feriche, B. (2018). Influence of a cluster set configuration on the adaptations to short-term power training. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 32(4), 930-937. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001925
22. Tufano, J. J., Conlon, J. A., Nimphius, S., Brown, L. E., Seitz, L. B., Williamson, B. D., & Haff, G. G. (2016). Maintenance of velocity and power with cluster sets during high-volume back squats. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 11(7), 885-892. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2015-0602
23. Tillin, N., & Bishop, D. (2009). Factors modulating post-activation potentiation and ıts effect on performance of subsequent explosive activities, sports medicine, 39(2), 147-166. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-200939020-00004