Mide ve Kolon Kanseri Hücre Hatlarında Matriks Proteinlerinin Varlığında Cape’nin Etkisinin Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2024, , 254 - 259, 28.06.2024

Nurcan Umur , Funda Kosova , Mehmet İbrahim Tuğlu

https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1383372

Öz

Amaç: Çağımızın en önemli hastalıklarından biri olan kanser, vücut hücrelerinin kontrolsüz çoğalması ve yayılmasıyla oluşan ciddi bir sağlık sorunudur. Aynı zamanda kronik inflamasyon ve hastanın bağışıklık sisteminin zayıflaması ile karakterize ve ölüme en sık neden olan hastalıklardan biridir. Kanser hücre davranışlarını anlamak için kanser mikroçevresini oluşturan spesifik bileşenlerin bilinmesi, bu bileşenlerin hangi mekanizmaları kullanarak iletişim kurduklarının anlaşılması önemlidir.Bizde yaptığımız çalışmada bir antikanser ajan olarak Cape'nin terapötik dozunun etkisini mide ve kolon kanseri hücre hatlarında matriks proteini olan laminin ve kollajen 1 varlığında anjiogenez ve apoptoz ile ilişkili markerler açısından karşılaştırmalı değerlendirmeyi amaçladık.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Mide kanseri hücre hattı NCI-N87 ve kolon kanseri hücre hattı Colo 205 kullanılarak matriks protein varlığında Kafeik asit fenetil ester (CAPE) ilavesinden sonra DNA sentezi yapıp Real Time PCR ile 260 nm absorbansda okundu.
Bulgular: Mide kanserinde matriks proteinlerinin varlığında ve CAPE ilavesinde apoptozisin, Kolon kanserinde ise angiogenezisin daha fazla arttığı görüldü.
Sonuç: Yaptığımız çalışmada ana sorumlunun laminin matriks proteini olduğunu ve CAPE ilavesiyle angiogenez ve apoptosizin daha fazla tetiklendiğini gözlemledik. Bu çalışmayı hayvan deneyleri ile desteklemeyi planlamaktayız. Bu çalışmadan da çıkan sonuçlara göre mide ve kolon kanseri hastaları için CAPE’nin tedavi edici bir bileşik olabileceğini düşünmekteyiz.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kanser hücre kültürü, Anjiogenesis, Apoptozis, Matriks proteinleri, CAPE

Investıgatıon Of Cape's Effect On The Presence Of Matrıx Proteıns In Gastric And Colon Cancer Cell Lınes

Öz

Objective: The formation and progression of cancer depend on the abilities of body cells such as uncontrolled proliferation, migration, invasion, metastasis, angiogenesis, and escape from apoptosis, as well as its microenvironment. Therefore, in order to understand cancer cell behaviors, it is important to know the specific components that make up the cancer microenvironment and to understand the mechanisms by which these components communicate. In this study, we aimed to compare the effect of therapeutic dose of CAPE as an anticancer agent in gastric and colon cancer cell lines in terms of markers associated with angiogenesis and apoptosis in the presence of matrix proteins.
Materials and Methods: After the addition of CAPE to gastric cancer cell line (NCI-N87) and colon cancer cell line (Colo 205) in the presence of matrix proteins, we measured the expressions of angiogenesis and apoptosis-related markers by Real Time PCR at 260 nm absorbance.
Results: It was observed that apoptosis increased more in the presence of matrix proteins and CAPE addition in gastric cancer, and angiogenesis increased more in colon cancer.
Conclusion: In our study, we observed that the laminin matrix protein was the main culprit and that angiogenesis and apoptosis were triggered more by the addition of Kafeik asit (3,4-dihidroksisinnamik asit) fenetil ester (CAPE). We plan to support this study with animal experiments to show that CAPE can be a therapeutic compound for gastric and colon cancer patients.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Cancer cell culture, Angiogenesis, Apoptosis, Matrix proteins, CAPE

Kaynakça

• 1. Bashraheel SS, Domling A, Goda S K, Update on targeted cancer therapies, single or in combination, and their fine tuning for precision medicine, Biomedicine&Pharmacotherapy, 2020, 125,110009.
• 2. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A, Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2018, 68,394-424.
• 3. Elena VR, Jacob EK, Corban GR, Niranjan BP, Amir PT, Aleksander SP. Anti-angiogenic peptides for cancer therapeutics, Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2011,12(8),1101-16.
• 4. Iordache S, Saftoiu A, Georgescu CV, Ramboiu S, Gheonea DI, et al, Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and microvessel density-two useful tools for the assessment of prognosis and survival in gastric cancer patients, J Gastrointes Liver Dis, 2010,19:135-39.
• 5. Gupta MK, Qin RY. Mechanism and its regulation of tumor-induced angiogenesis, World J Gastroentrol, 2003,6, 144-1155.
• 6. Dönmez G, Sullu Y, Sancar B, Yıldız L, Aydın O, et al, Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) expression in urothelial carcinomas, Pathol Res Prac, 2009,205:854-857.
• 7. Zhou J, Bai C, Wang Y, Li X, Cheng Y, Chen S. Endostar combined with chemotherapy for treatment of metastatic colorectal and gastric cancer: a pilot study, Chin Med J, 2011, 124:4299- 303.
• 8. Li P, Nijhavan DI, Srinivasula SM, Ahmad M, Alnemri ES, Wang X. Cytochrome c and dATP-dependent formation of Apaf-1/caspase-9 complex initiates an apoptotic protease cascade, Cell, 1997, 91:79-89.
• 9. Choen GM, Caspases the executioners of apoptozis, Biochem J, 1997, 326:1-16.
• 10. Kidd VJ, Lahti JM, Teitz T, Proteolytic regulation of apoptosis, Semin Cell Dev Biol, 2000, 11:191-201.
• 11. Adam JC, Watt FM, Regulation of development and differentiation by the extracellular matrix, Development, 1993, 117(4):1183-98.
• 12. Provenzano PP, Inman DR, Eliceiri KW et al., Collagen density promotes mammary tumor initiation and progression, BMC Medicine, 2008, 6:11.
• 13. Sorokin L, Girg W, Gopfert T, Hallmann R and Deutzmann R, Expression of novel 400-kDa laminin chains by mouse and bovine endothelial cells, Eur J Biochem, 1994, 15; 223(2):603-10.
• 14. Hirata E, Sahai E, Tumor Microenvironment and Differential Responses to Therapy Cold, Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2017; Jul 5;7(7):a026781.
• 15. Aldemir O, Memmedov H, Propolisin Bileşenlerinden Olan Kafeik Asit Fenil Esterin Antiinflamatuvar Etkileri, Arıcılık Araştırma Dergisi, 2019, 11(2):43-47.
• 16. Kosova F, Kurt FO, Olmez E, Tuğlu I, Arı Z, Effects of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on matrix molecules and angiogenetic and anti-angiogenetic factors in gastric cancer cells cultured on different substrates, Biotech Histochem, 2016, 91(1),38-47.
• 17. Parkin DM, Pisani P, Ferlay J, Statistics are given for global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality for males and females in 23 regions of the world, CA Cancer J Clin, 1999, 49:33-64.
• 18. Ribeiro UJ, Safatle Ribeiro AV, Zilberstein B. Does the intraoperative peritoneal lavage cytology add prognostic information in patients with potentially curative gastric resection? J Gastrointest Surg, 2006; 10:170-177.
• 19. Daniela L, Raica M, Sporea I et al., Tumor angiogenesis in gastric cancer, Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology, 2006, 47(1):5-13.
• 20. A.Latif MM, Windle HJ, Homasany BS, Sabra K, Kelleher D, Caffeic acid phenethyl ester modulates Helicobacter pylori-induced nuclear factor-kappa B and activator protein-1 expression in gastric epithelial cells, Br J Pharmacol, 2005, 146:1139-1147.
• 21. Shi Y, Mechanisms of caspase activation and inhibition during apoptosis, Molecular cell, 2002,9:459-470.
• 22. Liao HF, Chen YY, Liu JJ, et al., İnhibitory effect of caffeic acid phenethyl ester on angiogenesis, tumor invasion and metastasis, J Agric Food Chem, 2003, 51(27), 7907-12.
• 23. Basini G, Baioni L, Bussolati S, et al., Antiangiogenic properties of an unusual benzo [k, l] xanthene lignan derived from CAPE (Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester), Invest New Drugs, 2012, Feb;30(1),186-90.
• 24. Onori P, DeMorrow S, Gaudio E, et al., Caffeic acid phenethyl ester decreases cholangiocarcinoma growth by inhibition of NF-kappa B and induction of apoptosis., Int. J. Cancer, 2009, 125: 565-76.
• 25. Budisan L, Gulei D, Jurj A, et al., Int J Mol Sci, 2019, 20(5),1199.
• 26. Murtaza G. Sajjad A. Mehmood Z, Shah SH, Siddiqi AR, Possible molecular targets for therapeutic applications of caffeic acid 99 phenethyl ester in inflammation and cancer, Journal of food and drug analysis, 2015, 23:11-18.
• 27. Wu J, Omene C, Karkoszka J, Bosland M, Eckard J, Klein CB, Frenkel K, Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), derived from a honeybee product propolis, exhibits a diversity of anti-tumor effects in pre-clinical models of human breast cancer, Cancer Lett 2011, Sep 1;308(1):43-53.
• 28. Lee KW, Kang NJ, Kim JH, Lee KM, Lee DE Hur HJ, Lee HJ, Caffeic acid phenethyl ester inhibits invasion and expression of matrix metalloproteinase in SK-Hep1 human hepatocellular carcinoma cells by targeting nuclear factor kappa B, Genes Nutr, 2008, 2:319–22.
• 29. Kudugunti SK, Vad MN, Ekogbo E, Moridani MY, Efficacy of caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) in skin B16-F0 melanoma tumor bearing C57BL/6 mice, Invest New Drugs, 2011, 29:52-62.
• 30. Chung TW, Kim SJ, Choi HJ et al. CAPE suppresses VEGFR-2 activation, and tumor neovascularization and growth. J Mol Med, 2013; 91:271-82.
• 31. Rzepecka-Stojko A, Kabala-Dzik A., Mozdzierz A., et al. Caffeic Acid phenethyl ester and ethanol extract of propolis induce the complementary cytotoxic effect on triple-negative breast cancer cell lines, Molecules, 2015, 20: 9242-62.
• 32. Cho MS, Park WS, Jung WK, et al., Caffeic acid phenethyl ester promotes antiinflammatory effects by inhibiting MAPK and NF-κB signaling in activated HMC-1 human mast cells, Pharm Biol, 2014, 52(7), 926-32.
• 33. Anjaly K, Tiku AB. Radio-Modulatory Potential of Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester: A Therapeutic Perspective, Anti-Cancer Agents in Medicinal Chemistry, 2018, 18: 468-75.
• 34. Chang H, Wang Y, Yin X, Liu X, Xuan H, Ethanol extract of propolis and its constituent caffeic acid phenethyl ester inhibit breast cancer cells proliferation in inflammatory microenvironment by inhibiting TLR4 signal pathway and inducing apoptosis and autophagy, BMC Complement Altern Med, 2017,Sep 26;17(1):471.
• 35. Wu J, Omene C, Karkoszka J, Bosland M, Eckard J, Klein CB, Frenkel K, Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE), derived from a honeybee product propolis, exhibits a diversity of anti-tumor effects in pre-clinical models of human breast cancer, Cancer Lett, 2011, 308:43-53.
• 36. Hamil KJ, Kligys K, Hopkinson SB, Jones JCR, Laminin deposition in the extracellular matrix: a complex picture emerges, J Cell Sci 2009, 122, 4409-17.
• 37. Benton G, Crooke E, George J, Laminin-1 induces E-cadherin expression in 3-dimensional cultured breast cancer cells by inhibiting DNA methyltransferase 1 and reversing promoter methylation status, FASEB J, 2009, 23, 3884-95.
• 38. Patarroyo M, Tryggvasonb K, Virtanenc I, Laminin isoforms in tumor invasion, angiogenesis and metastasis, Seminars in Cancer Bıology, 2002, Vol.12:197-207.
• 39. Sodek LK, Brown TJ, Ringuette JM, Collagen I but not matrigel matrices, provide an MMP-dependent barrier to ovarian cancer cell penetration, BMC Cancer, 2008, 8: 223.
• 40. Cross VL, Zheng Y, Choi NW, et al., Dense type I collagen matrices that support cellular remodeling and microfabrication for studies of tumor angiogenesis and vasculogenesis in vitro, Biomaterials, 2010,3,8596-8607