Prekonsepsiyonel Dönem ve Bebeğin Cinsiyetini Öğrenmeye Yönelik Geleneksel Uygulamalar Bölgeler Arasında Farklılık Gösteriyor mu?

Abstract

Geleneksel inançlar ve uygulamalar gebelik öncesi dönemle başlar ve başta kadınlar olmak üzere tüm aile bireylerini etkiler. Kültürel inanışlar ve geleneksel uygulamalar doğru tespit edilmezse sağlık hizmeti sunumunda bazı sorunlar ortaya çıkabilir. Bu çalışma, kadınların gebelik öncesi dönemde gebe kalmak ve bebeğin cinsiyetini belirlemek için kullandıkları geleneksel inanç ve uygulamalardaki bölgesel farklılıkları belirlemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Çalışma kesitsel ve tanımlayıcı olup, 15.11.2022-15.12.2022 tarihleri arasında Türkiye'nin yedi bölgesinde yaşayan 695 kadından oluşmaktadır. Anket, annelerin sosyo-demografik ve obstetrik özellikleri ile gebe kalma ve cinsiyet belirleme için kullanılan yöntemlerle ilgili toplam 51 sorudan oluşmuştur. Gebe kalmak için herhangi bir geleneksel yöntem kullanımı ile eğitim durumu, çalışma durumu, gelir durumu, evlilik yılı, gebelik sayısı, çocuk sayısı ve düşük sayısı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Cinsiyet belirlemek için herhangi bir geleneksel yöntem kullanımı ile eğitim durumu, çalışma durumu, gelir durumu, evlilik yılı, gebelik sayısı ve çocuk sayısı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmuştur (p<0.05). Çalışma, ikamet edilen bölgenin kadınların geleneksel gebe kalma ve cinsiyet belirleme yöntemini etkilediğini göstermiştir.

Keywords

• Prekonsepsiyonel Dönem
• Cinsiyet Seçimi
• Geleneksel Uygulamalar

Thanks

Çalışmamıza katılan tüm kadınlara teşekkür ederiz.

Traditional Practices Used by Women in the Preconception Period to Conceive and Determine the Sex of the Baby: An Investigation of Regional Differences in Turkey

Abstract

Traditional beliefs and practices begin with the pre-pregnancy period and affect all family members, especially women. If cultural beliefs and traditional practices are not properly identified, some problems may arise in health service delivery. This study was conducted to determine the regional differences in traditional beliefs and practices that women use to conceive and determine the sex of the baby in the preconception period. The study was cross-sectional and descriptive and consisted of 695 women living in seven regions of Turkey between 15.11.2022-15.12.2022. The questionnaire consisted of a total of 51 questions about the socio-demographic and obstetric characteristics of the mothers and the methods used for conception and sex determination. A significant correlation was found between the use of any traditional method for conception and educational status, employment status, income status, years of marriage, number of pregnancies, number of children and number of miscarriages (p<0.05). A significant relationship was found between the use of any traditional method to determine gender and educational status, employment status, income status, years of marriage, number of pregnancies and number of children (p<0.05). The study showed that the region of residence influenced women's traditional method of conception and sex determination.

Keywords

• Preconceptional Period
• Gender Selection
• Traditional Practices

References

1. 1. Acar, Z, Gümüşay, M, Şahin, N, Traditional practices of married women for conception, Journal of General Health Sciences, 2021, 3(3), 215-227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51123/jgehes.2021.31 Cilt: 3 Sayı:3 Yıl: 2021 E-ISSN: 2687.
2. 2. Basgol, S, Beji, N.K, The use of complementary and alternative medicine practices by women with assisted reproductive treatments, Turkiye Klinikleri J Obstet Womens Health Dis Nurs-Special Topics, 2016, 2(3), 70-6. https://www.turkiyeklinikleri.com/article/en-uremeye-yardimci-tedavi-uygulamalari-yapilankadinlarin-tamamlayici-ve-alternatif-tip-uygulamalarini-usma-durumlari-77125.html.
3. 3. Celasin, N, Sevinç Akın, Y, Akın, B, Traditional baby care practices: Are they different in the East and the West? Gevher Nesıbe Journal Of Medical & Health Sciences, 2022, 7(17); 39-49 Doi Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.46648/gnj.378.
4. 4. Sis Celik, A, Kara, N, Complementary and Supportive Care Practices of Infertile Women, Anatolian Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 2018, 21(3), 178–188. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ataunihem/issue/39680/427845.
5. 5. World Health Organization 2013, WHO Traditional Medicine Strategy: 2014-2023. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/92455/1/9789241506090_eng.pdf, ISBN 978 92 4 150609 0, Printed in Hong Kong SAR: China; 2013.
6. 6. Çakırer Çalbayram, N, Gönenç, İ.M, Topuz, N, Traditional Beliefs and practices of women from preconceptional period to postpartum period, HSP, 2019,6(2): 237-46. DOI: 10.17681/hsp.431298
7. 7. Çakırer, N, Çalışkan Işık, Z, Traditional beliefs and practices regarding pregnancy, birth and puerperium in Ağıllı Village of Nevşehir Province, TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 2010, 9: 343-8.
8. 8. Edirne, T, Arica, S.G, Gucuk, S, Yildizhan, R, Kolusari, A, Adali, E, Can, M, Use of complementary and alternative medicines by a sample of turkish women for infertility enhancement: A descriptive study, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2010, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-10-11/TABLES/1.

9. 9. Engin, R, Pasinlioğlu, T, Traditional beliefs and practices of infertile women about infertility in Erzurum and its region, Ataturk Univ. Journal of the School of Nursing. 2002, 5(1):1-10.
10. 10. Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Lang, A.G, Buchner, A, G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 2007, 39(2), 175–191.
11. 11. James, P.B, Leigh, L.T, Bah, A.J, Kanu, J.S, Kangbai, J.B, Sevalie, S, Prevalence and correlates of herbal medicine use among women seeking care for infertility in Freetown, Sierra Leone, Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2018, 1-11.https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9493807
12. 12. Ghazeeri, G.S, Awwad, J.T, Alameddine, M, Younes, Z.M, Naja, F, Prevalence and determinants of complementary and alternative medicine use among infertile patients in Lebanon: a cross sectional study, BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2012, 12(1), 129.https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-12-129.
13. 13. Kayıhan, S, Güzlek, S.C, Özdemir, G, Tortumlupoğlu, G, İpsalalı, E, Women's knowledge and practice of traditional practices related to fertility and getting pregnant, preventing pregnancy, terminating pregnancy and facilitating childbirth in Çanakkale, Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2006, 20(4), 217–224. http://search/publish/detail/65792.
14. 14. Kılıç, M, Apay, S.E, Beji, N.K, Infertility and culture, Istanbul University Florence Nightingale School of Nursing Journal, 2011, 19(2), 109-115.https://fnjn.org/Content/files/sayilar/168/2.pdf.
15. 15. Koçyiğit, O.T, Infertility and its socio-cultural effects, International Journal of Human Sciences, 2012, 1(1), 27-37.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuinsanbilim/issue/9239/115645.
16. 16. Koyun, A, Çamuroğlu, C, Korkmaz, G, Menteşe, N, Ocak, F, Traditional beliefs and practices of women on pregnancy, birth and newborn care, Education-Culture and Research Journal, 2010, 22(22), 57–64. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/197935
17. 17. Özcan, H, Kızılkaya, N, Complementary and alternative medicine applications in ınfertility, Okmeydanı Medical Journal, 2016, 32(1), 36–44. https://doi.org/10.5222/otd.2016.1031
18. 18. Özkan, F.S, Karaca, A, Sarak, K, Complementary and alternative medicine used by infertile women in Turkey, African Journal of Reproductive Health, 2018, 22(2), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.29063/ajrh2018/v22i2.4.
19. 19. Sahin, E, Sahin, N.H, Cultural practices before and during pregnancy: example of Turkey, New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Advances in Pure and Applied Sciences, 2018, 10, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.18844/GJPAAS.V0I10.3749
20. 20. Sevig, Ü, Tanriverdi, G, Intercultural Nursing. In Intercultural Nursing (p. 24). Istanbul: Akademi Publishing, 2014.
21. 21. Sivri, B, Traditional practices of mothers with 12-month-old babies regarding mother-infant care, (Master's Thesis). Kayseri: Erciyes University,2012.
22. 22. Şimşek, Ş, traditional methods Known to conceive by women living in Melekli Town of Iğdır, [Master Thesis]. Hacettepe Universty Institute of Health Sciences, Ankara, 2013.
23. 23. Erbil, N, Sağlam, G, Traditional beliefs, practices and some socio-demographic characteristics related to determining and predicting the sex of the baby during pregnancy. International Journal of Human Sciences, 2010;7(1):347-59.
24. 24. Tanriverdi, G, Gulyenli, N, Traditional Practices during Pregnancy in Turkey: A Systematic Review, Akgöl, J. (Ed.) in Health with Different Dimensions (p.35-47), Rating Academy Publications, Çanakkale, 2020.
25. 25. Yalçın, H, Traditional practices related to pregnancy, birth, puerperium and infant care (Karaman example), Journal of Child Health and Diseases, 2012, 55(1):19-31. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/288749703_Traditional_practice_related_to_pregnancy_the_natal_and_postnatal_period_and_baby_care_Karaman_sample
26. 26. Gül, N.Z.Ö, Evaluation of Birth Customs in the Context of Gaziantep and Germany in the Process of Cultural Change, In T.C. Ministry of Culture, Turks Working Abroad and Cultural Change, VI. International Turkish Folk Culture Congress, Ankara, 2002.
27. 27. Uysal, G, Beydag, K.D, Düzkaya, D.S, traditional practices of baby care with 0-12 month old baby, Acıbadem University Journal of Health Sciences, 2019, 2: 211-217. https://doi.org/10.31067/0.2019.143
28. 28. İnci, R, Aslan, S, Çınar, E, Çeçen, S, In Batman mothers aged 15-49 years living with infants in the postpartum period culturally specific approaches to care. Batman University Journal of Life Sciences, 2019, 9(2): 225-235.