Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE AYAĞIN YÜKLENMEYE VERDİĞİ CEVABIN İNCELENMESİ ve CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 222 - 226, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.517423

Abstract

Amaç: Genç erişkin bireylerde ayağın yüke verdiği cevabı
incelemek ve cinsiyete göre farklılıkları tespit etmek amaçlarıyla planlandı.



Çalışma Planı: 51 birey (n=102 ayak; n=24 erkek, n=27 kadın)
araştırmaya dahil edildi. Katılımcıların vücut kütle indekslerini (kg/m2)
hesaplamak amacıyla boyu (m) ve kiloları (kg) kaydedildi. Ardından oturma ve
ayakta durma pozisyonunda ayağın metatarsal genişlikleri, navikular
yükseklikleri ve subtalar eklem açıları dijital kumpas vasıtasıyla ölçüldü.
Oturma ve ayakta durma sırasındaki değişim navikular yükseklik için yüzde,
metatarsal genişleme için yüzde ve subtalar açıdaki değişim için derece
cinsinden fark olarak kaydedildi ve bu değerler üzerinden istatistiksel analiz
yapıldı.



Bulgular: İstatistiksel analize göre grupların yaş
ortalamaları (p=0,75) ve vücut kütle indeksleri (p=0,13)  benzerdi. 
İkili karşılaştırmalara göre gruplar arasında ayağın yük altındaki
davranışında fark yoktu (p>0,05). Bir başka deyişle, metatarsal genişleme
yüzdesi (p=0,749), navikular düşme yüzdesi (p=0,891) ve subtalar açıdaki
değişimin (p=0,808) gruplara göre farklı olmadığı görüldü.



Sonuç: Çalışma, sağlıklı genç erişkin bireylerde ayağa
yük aktarımı sırasında meydana gelen ayak biyomekaniksel özelliklerindeki
fizyolojik değişimin cinsiyetler arasında farklılık oluşturmadığını
göstermiştir.

References

  • 1. McKeon, PO, Hertel, J, Bramble, D, Davis, I, The foot core system: a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function, British Association of Sport and Medicine, 2015, 49(5), 290-290.
  • 2. Zelik, KE, La Scaleia, V, Ivanenko, YP, Lacquaniti, F, Coordination of intrinsic and extrinsic foot muscles during walking, European journal of applied physiology, 2015, 115(4): 691-701.
  • 3. Jastifer, JR, Gustafson, PA, The subtalar joint: Biomechanics and functional representations in the literature, The Foot, 2014, 24 (4): 203-209.
  • 4. Kelikian, AS, Sarrafian, SK, Sarrafian's anatomy of the foot and ankle: descriptive, topographic, functional. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.2011.
  • 5. Rodgers, MM, Dynamic foot biomechanics, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1995, 21(6): 306-316.
  • 6. Hutchinson, ID, Baxter, JR, Gilbert, S, Hogan V, MaCalus, Ling, Jeff, Saunders, Stuart M, Wang, Hongsheng, Kennedy, John G, How do hindfoot fusions affect ankle biomechanics: a cadaver model, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2016, 474 (4): 1008-1016.
  • 7. Jarvis, HL, Nester, CJ, Bowden, PD Jones, RK, Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function. Journal of foot and ankle research, 2017, 10 (1): 7.
  • 8. Cowling, EJ, Steele, JR. Is lower limb muscle synchrony during landing affected by gender? Implications for variations in ACL injury rates, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology ,2001, 11(4): 263-268.
  • 9. Hosea, TM, Carey, CC, Harrer, MF, The gender issue: epidemiology of ankle injuries in athletes who participate in basketball, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 2000, 372: 45-49.
  • 10. Krauss, I, Grau, S, Mauch, M Maiwald, C, Horstmann, T, Sex-related differences in foot shape, Ergonomics, 2008; 51(11): 1693-1709.
  • 11. Kaya, H, Özçelik, O, Vücut Bileşimlerinin Değerlendirilmesinde Vücut Kitle İndeksi ve Biyoelektrik İmpedans Analiz Metodlarının Etkinliğinin Yaş ve Cinsiyete Göre Karşılaştırılması, Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Tıp Dergisi, 2009, 23(1): 1-5.
  • 12. Kernozek, TW, Torry, MR, Van Hoof, H, Cowley, H, Tanner, S, Gender differences in frontal and sagittal plane biomechanics during drop landings, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2005; 37 (6): 1003-1012.
  • 13. Öğce, F, Özyalçın, H, Özkan, S. Characteristics of Foot Ailments in Ege Region, Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 2010, 30(1): 97-106.
  • 14. De Cock, A, De Clercq, D, Willems, T, Witvrouw, E, Temporal characteristics of foot roll-over during barefoot jogging: reference data for young adults, Gait&Posture, 2005, 21(4): 432-439.
  • 15. Decker, MJ, Torry ,MR, Wyland, DJ, Sterett, WI, Steadman, JR, Gender differences in lower extremity kinematics, kinetics and energy absorption during landing, Clinical biomechanics, 2003, 18(7): 662-669.
  • 16. Wojtys, EM, Huston,, LJ, Schock, HJ, Boylan, JP, Ashton-Miller, JA, Gender differences in muscular protection of the knee in torsion in size-matched athletes, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2003, 85(5): 782-789.
  • 17. Song, J, Choe K, Neary, Zifchock, RA, Cameron, KL, Trepa, M, Hannan, MT, Hillstrom, H, Comprehensive biomechanical characterization of feet in USMA cadets: comparison across race, gender, arch flexibility, and foot types, Gait&Posture, 2018, 60: 175-180. 18. Koo, S, Chun, S, Lee, KM, Cho, BC, Koo, YJ, Kang, DW, Park, MS, Sex Differences in Pedobarographic Findings and Relationship between Radiographic and Pedobarographic Measurements in Young Healthy Adults, Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2018; 10(2, 216-224.
  • 19. Faria A, Gabriel, R, Moreira, H, Camacho, T, Brás, R, Ditroilo, M, The effect of sex and localised fatigue on triceps surae musculoarticular stiffness, European journal of sport science, 2018, 18(4): 483-490.
  • 20. Cote, KP, Brunet, ME, Gansneder, BM, Shultz, SJ, Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability, Journal of athletic training, 2005, 40: 41-46.
  • 21. Springett, KP, Whiting, MF, Marriott,C, Epidemiology of plantar forefoot corns and callus, and the influence of dominant side, The Foot ,2003,13 (1):5-9.
  • 22. Dawson, J, Thorogood, M, Marks, SA, Juszczak, E, Dodd, C, Lavis, G, Fitzpatrick, R, The prevalence of foot problems in older women: a cause for concern, Journal of Public Health, 2002,24(2):77- 84.
  • 23. Ayub, A, Yale, SH, Bibbo, C, Common foot disorders, Clinical Medicine & Research, 2005,3(2):116-9.
  • 24. Nyska, M, Liberson, A, McCabe, C, Linge, K, Klenerman, L, Plantar foot pressure distribution in patients with hallux valgus treated by distal soft tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy, Foot and ankle Surgery,1998;4(1):35-41.
  • 25. Cosman, F, Ruffing, J, Zion, M, Uhorchak, J, Ralston, S, Tendy, S, McGuigan, FEA , Lindsa, R, Nieves, J, Determinants of stress fracture risk in United States Military Academy cadets, Bone, 2013, 55: 359–366.
  • 26. Levy, JC, Mizel, MS, Wilson, LS, Fox, W, McHale, K, Taylor, DC, Temple, HT, Incidence of foot and ankle injuries in West Point cadets with pes planus compared to the general cadet population, Foot & ankle international, 2006; 27: 1060–1064.
Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 4, 222 - 226, 31.12.2019
https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.517423

Abstract

References

  • 1. McKeon, PO, Hertel, J, Bramble, D, Davis, I, The foot core system: a new paradigm for understanding intrinsic foot muscle function, British Association of Sport and Medicine, 2015, 49(5), 290-290.
  • 2. Zelik, KE, La Scaleia, V, Ivanenko, YP, Lacquaniti, F, Coordination of intrinsic and extrinsic foot muscles during walking, European journal of applied physiology, 2015, 115(4): 691-701.
  • 3. Jastifer, JR, Gustafson, PA, The subtalar joint: Biomechanics and functional representations in the literature, The Foot, 2014, 24 (4): 203-209.
  • 4. Kelikian, AS, Sarrafian, SK, Sarrafian's anatomy of the foot and ankle: descriptive, topographic, functional. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.2011.
  • 5. Rodgers, MM, Dynamic foot biomechanics, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1995, 21(6): 306-316.
  • 6. Hutchinson, ID, Baxter, JR, Gilbert, S, Hogan V, MaCalus, Ling, Jeff, Saunders, Stuart M, Wang, Hongsheng, Kennedy, John G, How do hindfoot fusions affect ankle biomechanics: a cadaver model, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2016, 474 (4): 1008-1016.
  • 7. Jarvis, HL, Nester, CJ, Bowden, PD Jones, RK, Challenging the foundations of the clinical model of foot function: further evidence that the root model assessments fail to appropriately classify foot function. Journal of foot and ankle research, 2017, 10 (1): 7.
  • 8. Cowling, EJ, Steele, JR. Is lower limb muscle synchrony during landing affected by gender? Implications for variations in ACL injury rates, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology ,2001, 11(4): 263-268.
  • 9. Hosea, TM, Carey, CC, Harrer, MF, The gender issue: epidemiology of ankle injuries in athletes who participate in basketball, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research®, 2000, 372: 45-49.
  • 10. Krauss, I, Grau, S, Mauch, M Maiwald, C, Horstmann, T, Sex-related differences in foot shape, Ergonomics, 2008; 51(11): 1693-1709.
  • 11. Kaya, H, Özçelik, O, Vücut Bileşimlerinin Değerlendirilmesinde Vücut Kitle İndeksi ve Biyoelektrik İmpedans Analiz Metodlarının Etkinliğinin Yaş ve Cinsiyete Göre Karşılaştırılması, Fırat Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Tıp Dergisi, 2009, 23(1): 1-5.
  • 12. Kernozek, TW, Torry, MR, Van Hoof, H, Cowley, H, Tanner, S, Gender differences in frontal and sagittal plane biomechanics during drop landings, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2005; 37 (6): 1003-1012.
  • 13. Öğce, F, Özyalçın, H, Özkan, S. Characteristics of Foot Ailments in Ege Region, Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Medical Sciences, 2010, 30(1): 97-106.
  • 14. De Cock, A, De Clercq, D, Willems, T, Witvrouw, E, Temporal characteristics of foot roll-over during barefoot jogging: reference data for young adults, Gait&Posture, 2005, 21(4): 432-439.
  • 15. Decker, MJ, Torry ,MR, Wyland, DJ, Sterett, WI, Steadman, JR, Gender differences in lower extremity kinematics, kinetics and energy absorption during landing, Clinical biomechanics, 2003, 18(7): 662-669.
  • 16. Wojtys, EM, Huston,, LJ, Schock, HJ, Boylan, JP, Ashton-Miller, JA, Gender differences in muscular protection of the knee in torsion in size-matched athletes, The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery, 2003, 85(5): 782-789.
  • 17. Song, J, Choe K, Neary, Zifchock, RA, Cameron, KL, Trepa, M, Hannan, MT, Hillstrom, H, Comprehensive biomechanical characterization of feet in USMA cadets: comparison across race, gender, arch flexibility, and foot types, Gait&Posture, 2018, 60: 175-180. 18. Koo, S, Chun, S, Lee, KM, Cho, BC, Koo, YJ, Kang, DW, Park, MS, Sex Differences in Pedobarographic Findings and Relationship between Radiographic and Pedobarographic Measurements in Young Healthy Adults, Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2018; 10(2, 216-224.
  • 19. Faria A, Gabriel, R, Moreira, H, Camacho, T, Brás, R, Ditroilo, M, The effect of sex and localised fatigue on triceps surae musculoarticular stiffness, European journal of sport science, 2018, 18(4): 483-490.
  • 20. Cote, KP, Brunet, ME, Gansneder, BM, Shultz, SJ, Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability, Journal of athletic training, 2005, 40: 41-46.
  • 21. Springett, KP, Whiting, MF, Marriott,C, Epidemiology of plantar forefoot corns and callus, and the influence of dominant side, The Foot ,2003,13 (1):5-9.
  • 22. Dawson, J, Thorogood, M, Marks, SA, Juszczak, E, Dodd, C, Lavis, G, Fitzpatrick, R, The prevalence of foot problems in older women: a cause for concern, Journal of Public Health, 2002,24(2):77- 84.
  • 23. Ayub, A, Yale, SH, Bibbo, C, Common foot disorders, Clinical Medicine & Research, 2005,3(2):116-9.
  • 24. Nyska, M, Liberson, A, McCabe, C, Linge, K, Klenerman, L, Plantar foot pressure distribution in patients with hallux valgus treated by distal soft tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy, Foot and ankle Surgery,1998;4(1):35-41.
  • 25. Cosman, F, Ruffing, J, Zion, M, Uhorchak, J, Ralston, S, Tendy, S, McGuigan, FEA , Lindsa, R, Nieves, J, Determinants of stress fracture risk in United States Military Academy cadets, Bone, 2013, 55: 359–366.
  • 26. Levy, JC, Mizel, MS, Wilson, LS, Fox, W, McHale, K, Taylor, DC, Temple, HT, Incidence of foot and ankle injuries in West Point cadets with pes planus compared to the general cadet population, Foot & ankle international, 2006; 27: 1060–1064.
There are 25 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Orthopaedics
Journal Section Araştırma Makalesi
Authors

Hilal Keklicek 0000-0003-3660-0940

Publication Date December 31, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 6 Issue: 4

Cite

APA Keklicek, H. (2019). GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE AYAĞIN YÜKLENMEYE VERDİĞİ CEVABIN İNCELENMESİ ve CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(4), 222-226. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.517423
AMA Keklicek H. GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE AYAĞIN YÜKLENMEYE VERDİĞİ CEVABIN İNCELENMESİ ve CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. CBU-SBED: Celal Bayar University-Health Sciences Institute Journal. December 2019;6(4):222-226. doi:10.34087/cbusbed.517423
Chicago Keklicek, Hilal. “GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE AYAĞIN YÜKLENMEYE VERDİĞİ CEVABIN İNCELENMESİ Ve CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 6, no. 4 (December 2019): 222-26. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.517423.
EndNote Keklicek H (December 1, 2019) GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE AYAĞIN YÜKLENMEYE VERDİĞİ CEVABIN İNCELENMESİ ve CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 6 4 222–226.
IEEE H. Keklicek, “GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE AYAĞIN YÜKLENMEYE VERDİĞİ CEVABIN İNCELENMESİ ve CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”, CBU-SBED: Celal Bayar University-Health Sciences Institute Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 222–226, 2019, doi: 10.34087/cbusbed.517423.
ISNAD Keklicek, Hilal. “GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE AYAĞIN YÜKLENMEYE VERDİĞİ CEVABIN İNCELENMESİ Ve CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 6/4 (December 2019), 222-226. https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.517423.
JAMA Keklicek H. GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE AYAĞIN YÜKLENMEYE VERDİĞİ CEVABIN İNCELENMESİ ve CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. CBU-SBED: Celal Bayar University-Health Sciences Institute Journal. 2019;6:222–226.
MLA Keklicek, Hilal. “GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE AYAĞIN YÜKLENMEYE VERDİĞİ CEVABIN İNCELENMESİ Ve CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI”. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 4, 2019, pp. 222-6, doi:10.34087/cbusbed.517423.
Vancouver Keklicek H. GENÇ ERİŞKİNLERDE AYAĞIN YÜKLENMEYE VERDİĞİ CEVABIN İNCELENMESİ ve CİNSİYETE GÖRE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI. CBU-SBED: Celal Bayar University-Health Sciences Institute Journal. 2019;6(4):222-6.