Pyoderma Gangrenosum Tanılı Hastaların Klinik Özelliklerinin, Komorbiditelerinin ve Tedavi Yanıtlarının Retrospektif Olarak İncelenmesi

Year 2024, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 481 - 486, 30.09.2024

Tubanur Çetinarslan , Abdullah Kutay Masat , Mustafa Turhan Şahin , Aylin Türel Ermertcan

https://doi.org/10.34087/cbusbed.1515660

Abstract

Giriş ve Amaç: Pyoderma gangrenozum [PG], hızlı ilerleyen, düzensiz eritematöz kenarlı ağrılı deri ülserleri ile seyreden nadir bir nötrofilik dermatozdur. PG'nin nedeni tam olarak anlaşılamamıştır, ancak genellikle otoinflamatuar bir bozukluk olarak kabul edilir. Klinik bulguların yanı sıra histopatolojik inceleme tanı koymada yardımcı olabilir.
Gereç ve Yöntemler: 2012-2024 yılları arasında kliniğimize başvuran ve klinik ve histopatolojik olarak PG tanısı alan hastalar çalışmamıza dahil edildi. Çalışmamızda hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, lezyon yerleşim yeri, tetikleyici faktör, ek hastalıkları, aldıkları tedavi ve tedaviye yanıtları incelendi.
Bulgular: Çalışmaya toplam 25 PG tanılı hasta dahil edildi. 25 hastanın 17’si kadın, 8’i erkek idi. Olguların tamamında histopatolojik inceleme ile PG tanısı desteklendi. 17 hastada tetikleyici faktör bulunamazken, en çok suçlanan tetikleyici faktör cerrahi işlemler idi ve bunu sırasıyla travma ve egzoz yanığı takip etmekteydi. Hastalara PG tedavisinde en sık sistemik metilprednizolon verilirken [18 hasta], bunu sırasıyla topikal steroid [9 hasta], intravenöz immunglobulin [İVİG] [8 hasta], siklosporin [5 hasta], intralezyonel triamsinolon asetonid [3 hasta], topikal takrolimus [2 hasta], mikofenolat mofetil [1 hasta] ve topikal kalsipotriol [1 hasta] takip etmekteydi. Hastaların 13’ünde sistemik steroidler ile diğer tedaviler kombine kullanılırken, 11’i monoterapi ile tedavi edildi. Çalışmamızdaki olguların 3’ü sadece sistemik steroidlere, 5’i hem sistemik steroidlere hem siklosporine dirençliydi ve bu 8 hastada İVİG tedavisi ile yanıt alındı.
Sonuç: PG tedavisinde sistemik steroidler ve siklosporinin kanıt düzeyi 1b olup birinci basamak tedavide yer almaktadırlar. PG’da birinci basamak tedavi seçenekleri olan sistemik steroidler ve siklosporine dirençli olgularda, İVİG kanıt düzeyi 3a olmasına rağmen, iyi bir seçenek olarak görünmektedir.

Anahtar kelimeler: pyoderma gangrenosum, intravenöz immunglobulin, İVİG, nötrofilik dermatoz, ülser, inflamatuar bağırsak hastalığı

Keywords

pyoderma gangrenosum, intravenöz immunglobulin, İVİG, nötrofilik dermatoz, ülser, inflamatuar bağırsak hastalığı

Retrospective evaluation of clinical characteristics, comorbidities and treatment responses of patients with pyoderma gangrenosum

Abstract

Aim; Pyoderma gangrenosum [PG] is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by rapidly progressive, painful skin ulcers with irregular erythematous margins. The etiology of PG is not fully understood, but it is generally considered as an autoinflammatory disorder. In addition to clinical findings, histopathological examination may help in the diagnosis.
Method; Patients diagnosed clinically and histopathologically with PG were included. The patients' age, gender, lesion location, triggering factor, comorbidities, treatment methods and response rate to treatment were recorded.
Results; A total of 25 patients diagnosed with PG were included [17 female, 8 male]. The diagnosis of PG was supported by histopathological examination in all cases. There was no history of triggering factor in 17 patients. On the other hand, the most common triggering factor was surgical procedures, followed by trauma and burn. Systemic methylprednisolone was most frequently used therapeutic agent [18 patients], and followed by topical steroid [9 patients], intravenous immunoglobulin [IVIG] [8 patients], cyclosporine [5 patients], intralesional triamcinolone acetonide [3 patients], topical tacrolimus [2 patients], mycophenolate mofetil [1 patient] and topical calcipotriol [1 patient]. Systemic steroids and other treatment modalities were used in combination in 13 patients, while 11 were treated with monotherapy. In our study, 3 cases were resistant to systemic steroids, and 5 were resistant to both systemic steroids and cyclosporine, and these 8 patients responded to IVIG treatment.
Conclusion; In the treatment of PG, systemic steroids and cyclosporine have a level of evidence of 1b and are included in the first-line treatment. The level of evidence for IVIG in PG, is 3a. In cases resistant to systemic steroids and cyclosporine, which are first-line treatment options in pyoderma gangrenosum, IVIG treatment is an effective therapeutic agent. In cases resistant to systemic steroids and cyclosporine, which are first-line treatment options in PG, IVIG seems to be a good option, although the evidence level is 3a.

Keywords: pyoderma gangrenosum, intravenous immunoglobulin, IVIG, neutrophilic dermatosis, ulcer, inflammatory bowel disease

Keywords

pyoderma gangrenosum, intravenous immunoglobulin, IVIG, neutrophilic dermatosis, ulcer, inflammatory bowel disease

References

• 1. Burian EA, Karlsmark T, Fogh K, Bech R. [2021], [Pyoderma gangrenosum]. Ugeskr Laeger. Jun 14;183[24]:V12200949. Danish. PMID: 34120685.
• 2. Bhat RM, Nandakishore B, Sequeira FF, Sukumar D, Kamath GH, Martis J, et al. [2011]. Pyoderma Gangrenosum: An Indian perspective. Clinical and Experimental Dermatololgy.;36:242–7.
• 3. Alavi A, French LE, Davis MD, Brassard A, Kirsner RS. [2017]. Pyoderma Gangrenosum: An Update on Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. Jun;18[3]:355-372. doi: 10.1007/s40257-017-0251-7.
• 4. Maverakis E, Marzano AV, Le ST, Callen JP, Brüggen MC, Guenova E, Dissemond J, Shinkai K, Langan SM [2020]. Pyoderma gangrenosum. Nat Rev Dis Primers. Oct 8;6[1]:81. doi: 10.1038/s41572-020-0213-x.
• 5. Al Ghazal P, Herberger K, Schaller J, Strölin A, Hoff N, Goerge T, et al [2013]. Associated factors and comorbidities in patients with pyoderma gangrenosum in Germany: a retrospective multicentric analysis in 259 patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis 8: 136.
• 6. Schøsler L, Fogh K, Bech R [2021]. Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A Retrospective Study of Clinical Charac-teristics, Comorbidities, Response to Treatment and Mortality Related to Prednisone Dose. Acta Derm Venereol. Apr 15;101[4]:adv00431. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3776.
• 7. Jockenhöfer F, Klode J, Kröger K, Roesch A, Al Ghazal P, Dissemond J [2016]. Patients with pyoderma gangrenosum – analyses of the German DRG data from 2012. Int Wound J ; 13:951–956.
• 8. Barbe M, Batra A, Golding S, Hammond O, Higgins JC, O'Connor A, Vlahovic TC [2021]. Pyoderma Gangrenosum: A Literature Review. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. Oct;38[4]:577-588. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2021.06.002.
• 9. Coutinho AE, Chapman KE [2011]. The anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects of glucocorticoids, recent developments and mechanistic insights. Mol Cell Endocrinol; 335[1]:2–13.
• 10. Kolios AGA, Gübeli A, Meier B, et al [2017]. Clinical disease patterns in a regional Swiss cohort of 34 pyoderma gangrenosum patients. Dermatology; 233[4]:268–76.
• 11. Wollina U [2002]. Clinical management of pyoderma gangrenosum. Am J Clin Dermatol; 3[3]:149–58.
• 12. Tapia C, Nessel TA, Zito PM. Cyclosporine [updated 2021 Nov15]. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island [FL]: StatPearls Publishing;2022 Jan. https:// www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ books/ NBK48 2450/.Accessed 16 May 2022.
• 13. Reichrath J, Bens G, Bonowitz A, Tilgen W [2005]. Treatment recommendations for pyoderma gangrenosum: an evidence-based review of the literature based on more than 350 patients. J Am Acad Dermatol; 53: 273–283.
• 14. Ahronowitz I, Harp J, Shinkai K [2012]. Etiology and management of pyoderma gangrenosum: A comprehensive review. Am J Clin Dermatol; 13: 191–211.
• 15. Patel F, Fitzmaurice S, Duong C, He Y, Fergus J, Raychaudhuri S [2015]. Effective strategies for the management of pyoderma gangrenosum: a comprehensive review. Acta Derm Venereol; 95: 525–531.
• 16. Maronese CA, Pimentel MA, Li MM, Genovese G, Ortega-Loayza AG, Marzano AV [2022]. Pyoderma Gangrenosum: An Updated Literature Review on Established and Emerging Pharmacological Treatments. Am J Clin Dermatol. Sep;23[5]:615-634. doi: 10.1007/s40257-022-00699-8.
• 17. Strunck JL, Cutler B, Latour E, Seminario-Vidal L, Ortega-Loayza AG [2022]. Wound care dressings for pyoderma gangrenosum. J Am Acad Dermatol; 86[2]:458–60.
• 18. Dissemond J, Marzano AV, Hampton PJ, Ortega-Loayza AG [2023]. Pyoderma Gangrenosum: Treatment Options. Drugs. Sep;83[14]:1255-1267.
• 19. Scarpone R, Meier K, Ghoreschi K, Worm M [2020]. Intravenous immunoglobulins in a series of 32 rare and recalcitrant immune dermatoses. Acta Derm Venereol;100:adv00298.
• 20. Cummins DL, Anhalt GJ, Monahan T, Meyerle JH [2007]. Treatment of pyoderma gangrenosum with intravenous immunoglobulin. Br J Dermatol;157[6]:1235–9.
• 21. Kreuter A, Reich-Schupke S, Stücker M, Altmeyer P, Gambichler T [2008]. Intravenous immunoglobulin for pyoderma gangrenosum. Br J Dermatol;158[4]:856–7.
• 22. Song H, Lahood N, Mostaghimi A [2018]. Intravenous immunoglobulin as adjunct therapy for refractory pyoderma gangrenosum: systematic review of cases and case series. Br J Dermatol ;178[2]:363–8.
• 23. Haag CK, Ortega-Loayza AG, Latour E, Keller JJ, Fett NM [2020]. Clinical factors influencing the response to intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in cases of treatment-resistant pyoderma gangrenosum. J Dermatolog Treat;31[7]:723–6.
• 24. de Zwaan SE, Iland HJ, Damian DL [2009]. Treatment of refractory pyoderma gangrenosum with intravenous immunoglobulin. Australas J Dermato ;50[1]:56–9.
• 25. Nguyen JK, Holmes Z, Kelly RI [2023]. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for refractory pyoderma gangrenosum. Australas J Dermatol. May;64[2]:221-228. doi: 10.1111/ajd.14024. Epub 2023 Mar 24.