EN
TR
A TYPOLOGICAL SUGGESTION CONCERNING HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN LYCIAN SARCOPHAGI
Abstract
The typological studies of Lycian tombs began in the eighteenth century. Although these pioneer typologies were not satisfactory, studies continued in subsequent years. Akurgal divided them into three groups and put all the Lycian sarcophagi in the second group in his typology. But he does not distinguish the differences between these sarcophagi. In addition, the second group is also termed: ‘The Monuments of Tombs in the Tradition of Native Anatolia’‘. This terminology contradicts the characteristics of these sarcophagi, as Lycian sarcophagi reflect not only native Anatolian traditions; but also influences from Greek, Persian and Roman art. In the 1970’s, Borchhardt created a new typology that was more detailed. Subsequently Atila, İdil and İskan-Yılmaz attempted new typologies. This study is a continuation from these typologies. In this typology study, before all else the attempt was made to understand the sarcophagi in Lycia during the problematic Hellenistic and Roman periods. From my previous studies elsewhere in Lycia, these sarcophagi can be divided into 5 distinct types.
Keywords
References
- Aktan – Aktan 2000 H. Aktan – O. Aktan, Olympos ve Khimaira, Doğu Likya'nın Dünü ve Bugünü. Ankara 2000.
- Akurgal 1961 E. Akurgal, Die Kunst Anatoliens von Homer bis Alexander. Berlin 1961.
- Atilla 1981 İ. A. Atilla, “Likya Lahitleri”. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Dergisi 8/9 (1981) 21-28.
- Bean 1997 G. Bean, Eskiçağda Lykia Bölgesi. Çev.: H. Kökten. İstanbul 1997.
- Benndorf – Niemann 1975 O. Benndorf – G. Niemann, Das Heroon von Gjölbashi. Wien 1889.
- Borchhardt – Neumann 1997 J. Borchhardt – G. Neumann, “Die Grabstifung des xudara in der westlichen von Limyra”. ÖJh 66 (1997) 63–74.
- Borchhardt 1975 J. Borchhardt, “Myra Ein Lykische Metropole in Antiker und Byzantiner Zeit“. IstForsch 30 (1975) 254-286.
- Bulut – Gülşen S. Bulut – F. Gülşen, “Patara-Bodrum Gömütü”. Adalya II (1998) 189-203.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
-
Authors
Publication Date
June 1, 2014
Submission Date
-
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2014 Volume: 2
APA
Özer, E. (2014). A TYPOLOGICAL SUGGESTION CONCERNING HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN LYCIAN SARCOPHAGI. Cedrus, 2, 75-87. https://doi.org/10.13113/CEDRUS.201406455
AMA
1.Özer E. A TYPOLOGICAL SUGGESTION CONCERNING HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN LYCIAN SARCOPHAGI. Cedrus. 2014;2:75-87. doi:10.13113/CEDRUS.201406455
Chicago
Özer, Elif. 2014. “A TYPOLOGICAL SUGGESTION CONCERNING HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN LYCIAN SARCOPHAGI”. Cedrus 2 (June): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.13113/CEDRUS.201406455.
EndNote
Özer E (June 1, 2014) A TYPOLOGICAL SUGGESTION CONCERNING HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN LYCIAN SARCOPHAGI. Cedrus 2 75–87.
IEEE
[1]E. Özer, “A TYPOLOGICAL SUGGESTION CONCERNING HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN LYCIAN SARCOPHAGI”, Cedrus, vol. 2, pp. 75–87, June 2014, doi: 10.13113/CEDRUS.201406455.
ISNAD
Özer, Elif. “A TYPOLOGICAL SUGGESTION CONCERNING HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN LYCIAN SARCOPHAGI”. Cedrus 2 (June 1, 2014): 75-87. https://doi.org/10.13113/CEDRUS.201406455.
JAMA
1.Özer E. A TYPOLOGICAL SUGGESTION CONCERNING HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN LYCIAN SARCOPHAGI. Cedrus. 2014;2:75–87.
MLA
Özer, Elif. “A TYPOLOGICAL SUGGESTION CONCERNING HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN LYCIAN SARCOPHAGI”. Cedrus, vol. 2, June 2014, pp. 75-87, doi:10.13113/CEDRUS.201406455.
Vancouver
1.Elif Özer. A TYPOLOGICAL SUGGESTION CONCERNING HELLENISTIC AND ROMAN LYCIAN SARCOPHAGI. Cedrus. 2014 Jun. 1;2:75-87. doi:10.13113/CEDRUS.201406455