Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review

Oğuzhan Altunay; Ece Zehir Topkaya

Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly becoming embedded in academic research and writing practices in graduate education. This integrative review aims to synthesize empirical studies examining how ELT/English-major graduate students use GenAI to support academic research processes and research reporting. Following Cooper’s (1982) integrative review framework, a systematic search was conducted for studies published between 2022 and 2025. After applying ELT-context inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 empirical studies were retained for analysis. Using thematic synthesis, the findings were organized around three main themes: (1) GenAI-supported research reporting (2) AI literacy and ethical concerns, and (3) instructional support and training for GenAI integration. Across the reviewed studies, GenAI tools were most used during the research reporting stage, particularly for planning and drafting research texts, paraphrasing sources, and supporting idea development. While gains in efficiency, clarity, and confidence in research reporting were often reported by the students, the studies also revealed common concerns related to the threat of plagiarism, inaccurate references, and dependence on GenAI. Evidence of structured integration remains limited, with few studies detailing course-embedded training for AI-enhanced research skills. Overall, the findings highlight the need for structured, research-cycle-aligned, and ethics-informed training models to support GenAI use in graduate-level research education.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Ethical Statement

This study is an integrative review of existing literature and does not involve human or animal participants; therefore, ethical committee approval was not required.

Thanks

The author would like to thank their supervisor for their insightful guidance and support during the preparation of this study.

References

References
Alasadi, E. A., & Baiz, C. R. (2023). Generative AI in education and research: Opportunities, concerns, and solutions. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(8), 2965–2971. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00323
Aliakbari, M., Maadikhah, M. M., & Barzan, P. (2025). Comparing the effectiveness of AI chatbots and traditional teaching in academic writing instruction. Research in English Language Education Journal, 4(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.48210/relej.2025.18722.1126
Alqahtani, T., Badreldin, H. A., Alrashed, M., Alshaya, A. I., Alghamdi, S. S., bin Saleh, K., Alowais, S. A., Alshaya, O. A., Rahman, I., Al Yami, M. S., & Albekairy, A. M. (2023). The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural language processing, and large language models in higher education and research. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 19, 1236–1242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.05.016
Andersen, J. P., Degn, L., Fishberg, R., Graversen, E. K., Horbach, S. P. J. M., Schmidt, E. K., Schneider, J. W., & Sørensen, M. P. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in the research process: A survey of researchers’ practices and perceptions. Technology in Society, 81, 102813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102813
Asmawati, Dewi, U., & Daulay, S. H. (2025). The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in writing a thesis by EFL postgraduate students. IDEAS: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(2), 3974–3985. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.7307
Bail, C. A. (2024). Can generative AI improve social science? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(21), e2314021121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2314021121
Barros, A., Prasad, A., & Śliwa, M. (2023). Generative artificial intelligence and academia: Implications for research, teaching, and service. Management Learning, 54(5), 597–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505076231201445

Bayraktar Çepni, S., Keleş, N., & Aydın Yazıcı, E. (2025). Exploring postgraduate students’ perspectives on the use of digital tools and artificial intelligence in English language teaching and research: Trends, challenges, and future prospects. International Journal of Education, Technology and Science, 5(1), 76–92. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14906298
Berg, C. (2023). The case for generative AI in scholarly practice. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4407587
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Conde, J., Reviriego, P., Salvachúa, J., Martínez, G., Hernández, J. A., & Lombardi, F. (2024). Understanding the impact of artificial intelligence in academic writing: Metadata to the rescue. Computer, 57(1), 105–109. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2023.3327330
Cooper, H. M. (1982). Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews. Review of Educational Research, 52(2), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/1170314
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04569.x
European Commission. (2025). A European strategy for artificial intelligence in science: Paving the way for the resource for AI science in Europe (RAISE). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0724
Gabay, R. A. E., Funa, A. A., & Ricafort, J. D. (2026). Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for academic writing in higher education: A scoping review of applications, challenges, and implications. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 14(1), 200–232. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.5682
Gabriel, S. (2024). Generative AI in writing workshops: A path to AI literacy. Proceedings of the International Conference on AI Research, 4, 126–132. https://doi.org/10.34190/icair.4.1.3022
Haman, M., & Školník, M. (2024). Using ChatGPT to conduct a literature review. Accountability in Research, 31(8), 1244–1246. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2185514
Hanafi, A., Ahmed, M., Al-Mansi, M., & Al-Sharif, O. (2025). Generative AI in academia: A comprehensive review of applications and implications for the research process. International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences – October 6 University, 2(1), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.21608/ijeasou.2025.349520.1041
Jauhiainen, J., & Toppari, A. (2025). Generative artificial intelligence and agents in research and teaching. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.16701
Karaman, G., Aksoy, H., Demircioğlu, M., & Kayhan, Y. (2024). Exploring the utilisation of AI tools from ELT graduate students’ perspectives. In Y. Özkan, M. Kara, A. Dinçer, D. Sucak, B. Balcı Harmandar, E. Deniz, & A. Demiryürek (Eds.), English studies: A multifaceted lens (pp. 124–139). BlackSwan Publishing House.
Khodabakhshzadeh, H., Naji, T., & Mohsenzadeh, H. (2024). AI-powered tools and their utilization among Iranian PhD students in ELT: Opportunities, challenges, and implications. Journal of New Advances in English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 149–170. https://doi.org/10.22034/Jeltal.2024.6.2.7
Kitamura, F. C. (2023). ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment. Radiology, 307(2), e230171. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.230171
Kong, S.-C., Lee, J. C.-K., & Tsang, O. (2024). A pedagogical design for self-regulated learning in academic writing using text-based generative artificial intelligence tools: 6-P pedagogy of plan, prompt, preview, produce, peer-review, portfolio tracking. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 19, 030. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2024.19030
Krajka, J., & Olszak, I. (2024). “AI, will you help?” How learners use artificial intelligence when writing. XLinguae, 17(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.18355/XL.2024.17.01.03
Kurniati, E. Y., & Fithriani, R. (2022). Post-graduate students’ perceptions of QuillBot utilization in English academic writing class. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(3), 437–451. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i3.852
Li, V. W. K., & Lin, L. H. F. (2026). Doctoral students’ use of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academic writing: Their engagement with AI-powered writing tools. Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie, 35, 114–143. https://doi.org/10.31468/dwr.1165
Lin, H. F., & Morrison, B. J. (2021). Challenges in academic writing: Perspectives of engineering faculty and L2 postgraduate research students. English for Specific Purposes, 63, 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2021.03.004
Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., & Darwis, A. (2023). Exploring artificial intelligence in academic essays: Higher education students’ perspectives. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, Article 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296
Nikolopoulou, K. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in higher education: Exploring ways of harnessing pedagogical practices with the assistance of ChatGPT. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022489
Pardede, P. (2018). Conceptualizing ELT research: Research process in quantitative and qualitative study [Unpublished manuscript]. Universitas Kristen Indonesia. http://www.uki.ac.id/
Peres, R., Schreier, M., Schweidel, D., & Sorescu, A. (2023). On ChatGPT and beyond: How generative artificial intelligence may affect research, teaching, and practice. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 40(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2023.02.001
Pham, N. Q. N. (2024). The perspectives of post-graduates majoring in English regarding the usage of QuillBot to enhance paraphrasing skills. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 1(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.24113
Pham, V. P. H., & Nguyen, N. H. (2025). An exploratory study of the ChatGPT use of Vietnamese graduate students in a research writing course. In V. P. H. Pham, A. Lian, & S. R. Barros (Eds.), Implementing AI tools for language teaching and learning (pp. 199–224). IGI Global.
Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Salvador-Ullauri, L., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2024). Collaborative working and critical thinking: Adoption of generative artificial intelligence tools in higher education. Sustainability, 16(13), 5367. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135367
Sala-Bubaré, A., Corcelles-Seuba, M., Miralda-Banda, A., & Garcia-Morante, M. (2025). Using artificial intelligence as an epistemic tool for academic writing: An intervention with postgraduate students. Praxis & Saber, 16(47), e18971. https://doi.org/10.19053/uptc.22160159.v16.n47.2025.18971
Şire Kaya, E., Hüyüklü, O., & Özdenvar, E. (2024). A study on the ethical concerns of post-graduate EFL learners regarding AI utilisation in academic writing. In Y. Özkan, M. Kara, A. Dinçer, D. Sucak, B. Balcı Harmandar, E. Deniz, & A. Demiryürek (Eds.), English studies: A multifaceted lens (pp. 67–93). BlackSwan Publishing House.
Torraco, R. J. (2005). Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 356–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278283
Tran, H. N., Le, T. T. N., & Tran, V. B. U. (2025). AI tools in learning academic writing: Benefits and challenges for MA students in the English language studies at the Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25215
Tran, T. T. P., Dang, T. N., & Nguyen, V. L. P. (2025). Master students’ perceptions of how ChatGPT influenced critical thinking in academic writing at the Industrial University of Ho Chi Minh City. International Journal of AI in Language Education, 2(2), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijaile.25222
van Dis, E. A. M., Bollen, J., Zuidema, W., van Rooij, R., & Bockting, C. L. (2023). ChatGPT: Five priorities for research. Nature, 614, 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7
van Niekerk, J., Delport, P. M. J., & Sutherland, I. (2025). Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100342
Wang, L., & Ren, B. (2024). Enhancing academic writing in a linguistics course with generative AI: An empirical study in a higher education institution in Hong Kong. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1329. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121329
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x
Winberg, C., Engel-Hills, P., & Winberg, S. L. (2024). “Am I in control of my own writing?”: Training postgraduate candidates in the responsible use of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing. African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.51415/ajims.v6i1.1512
Yilmaz, R., & Karaoglan Yilmaz, F. G. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Language Studies (Other)

Journal Section

Review Article

Authors

Oğuzhan Altunay ^*
0000-0002-6311-9813
Türkiye

Ece Zehir Topkaya
0000-0001-5364-7551
Türkiye

Publication Date

July 27, 2026

Submission Date

March 18, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 6, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 2 Number: 2

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA82XY93ZM

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Altunay, O., & Zehir Topkaya, E. (2026). Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review. Contemporary English Language Studies, 2(2), 16-34. https://izlik.org/JA82XY93ZM

AMA

1.Altunay O, Zehir Topkaya E. Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review. CELS. 2026;2(2):16-34. https://izlik.org/JA82XY93ZM

Chicago

Altunay, Oğuzhan, and Ece Zehir Topkaya. 2026. “Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review”. Contemporary English Language Studies 2 (2): 16-34. https://izlik.org/JA82XY93ZM.

EndNote

Altunay O, Zehir Topkaya E (July 1, 2026) Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review. Contemporary English Language Studies 2 2 16–34.

IEEE

[1]O. Altunay and E. Zehir Topkaya, “Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review”, CELS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 16–34, July 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA82XY93ZM

ISNAD

Altunay, Oğuzhan - Zehir Topkaya, Ece. “Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review”. Contemporary English Language Studies 2/2 (July 1, 2026): 16-34. https://izlik.org/JA82XY93ZM.

JAMA

1.Altunay O, Zehir Topkaya E. Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review. CELS. 2026;2:16–34.

MLA

Altunay, Oğuzhan, and Ece Zehir Topkaya. “Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review”. Contemporary English Language Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, July 2026, pp. 16-34, https://izlik.org/JA82XY93ZM.

Vancouver

1.Oğuzhan Altunay, Ece Zehir Topkaya. Generative AI in ELT Graduate-Level Research Education: An Integrative Review. CELS [Internet]. 2026 Jul. 1;2(2):16-34. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA82XY93ZM