Examining Digital Literacy Competences and Learning Habits of Open and Distance Learners

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to examine digital literacy competences and learning habits of learners enrolled in the open and distance education system of Anadolu University in Turkey. Data were gathered from 20.172 open and distance learners through a survey which included four parts: demographic information, abilities to use digital technologies, learning habits, preferences in using digital technologies for learning purposes. Principal Component Factor Analysis was applied in order to group and classify the attitudes and statements of the learners in their personal learning preferences, problem solving skills, project work skills, and abilities to use digital tools for learning purposes. Their personal learning preferences produced five factors: visual, auditory, dependent, collaborative, and reading-writing learning styles. According to the results of the study, learners believe that they have problem solving and project working skills to deal with educational difficulties. However, they seem to have only basic competences of digital literacy and the skills to use information and communication technologies at a basic level. They need training on how to use digital tools more efficiently for learning purposes. Further research is needed to explore how to increase the use of digital tools for the purpose of effective learning and also how to design learning environments to improve digital literacy of open and distance learners

Keywords

• Open and distance learning, Digital literacy, Learning preferences, Learning styles, Problem solving, Project skills

References

1. Altunisik, R., Coskun, R., & Bayraktaroglu, S. (2012). Sosyal bilimlerde araştirma yontemleri [Research methods in social sciences]. Sakarya: Sakarya Kitabevi.
2. Claxton, G., Powell, G. & Chambers, M. (2004). Building 101 ways to learning power. Bristol, UK: TLO.
3. Covello, S. (2010). A review of digital literacy assessment instruments. Syracuse University School of Education/IDD & E, IDE-712: Analysis for Human Performance Technology Decisions. Retrieved on 22 Jan 2013 from http://www.apescience.com/id/fulltext/ research-on-digital-literacy-assessment-instruments
4. Daniel, J. S. (1996) Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. London: Kogan Page.
5. Fleming, N.D. & Mills, C. (1992). VARK: A guide to learning styles. Retrieved on 10 July 2013 from http://www.vark- learn.com/english/page.asp?p=categories
6. FutureLab. (2010). Digital literacy across the curriculum handbook. Retrieved on 22 January 2013 from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/sites/default/files/Digital_Literacy_handbook _0.pdf
7. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
8. Goodfellow, R. (2011). Literacy, literacies, and the digital in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 16(1), 131-144.

9. Grasha, A.F. & Riechmann, S.W. (1996). Student learning style scales. Retrieved on 19 July 2013 from http://academic.cuesta.edu/wholehealth/disted/about_styles.htm
10. Hadfield M., Jopling M., Royle K. & Southern L. (2009). Evaluation of the Training and Development Agency for Schools’ funding for ICT in ITT Projects. London: TDA.
11. Hair, J.F, Anderson, R.E, Tatham, R.L., & Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
12. Hunt, L., Eagle, L., & Kitchen, P.J. (2004). Balancing marketing education and information
13. technology: Matching needs or needing a better match? Journal of Marketing
14. Education, 26(1), 75-88.
15. Kay, D., McGonigle, B., Patterson, W., & Tabbiner, B. (2009). Next generation user skills report. Sero Consulting. Retrieved on 6 May 2010 from http://www.digital2020.org.uk/skills/ strands/nextgen
16. Kerrigan, J.P. (2012). Digital literacies in transition. University of Greenwich. Retrieved on 22 January 2013 from http://www2.gre.ac.uk/research/centres/ecentre/projects/dl-in- transition.
17. Martin, A. (2008). Digital literacy and the digital society. In C. Lankshear and M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices (pp. 151-177). New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
18. McLoughlin, C. (2011). What ICT-related skills and capabilities should be considered central to the definition of digital literacy? In T. Bastiaens and M. Ebner (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2011 (pp. 471-475). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
19. Ozata, Z. & Ozdamar-Keskin, N. (2014). Students preferences and opinions on design of a mobile marketing education application. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 189-205.
20. Ozdamar-Keskin, N., Yamamoto, G.T., Traxler, J., Demiray, U., & Royle, K. (2012, November). Multiplatform M-learning system for more qualified courses. Paper presented at the 5th International Future Learning Conference on Innovation in Learning for the Future 2012: e-Learning. Istanbul, Turkey.
21. Rivoltella, P.C. (2008). From media education to digital literacy: A paradigm change? In P.C. Rivoltella (Ed.), Digital literacy: Tools and methodologies for information society (pp.217- 230). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.
22. Royle, K. & Hadfield, M. (2012). from ‘posh pen and pad’ to participatory pedagogies: One story of a netbook ımplementation project with 108 pupils in two primary schools. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 4(1), 1-17.
23. Shariman, T.P.N.T., Razak, N.A., & Noor, N.F.M. (2012). Digital literacy competence for academic needs: An analysis of Malaysian students in three universities. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1489-1496.
24. Sharkey, J. & Brandt, D. S. (2008). Integrating technology literacy and information literacy. In P. C. Rivoltella (Ed.), Digital literacy: Tools and methodologies for information society (pp. 85-97). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
25. Simsek, A. (2004). Ogrenme bicimi [Learning style]. In Y. Kuzgun and D. Deryakulu (Eds.), Egitimde bireysel farkliliklar (pp.97-138). Ankara: Nobel.
26. Simsek, E. & Simsek, A. (2013). New literacies of digital citizenship. Contemporary Educational Technology, 4(2), 126-137.
27. Correspondence: Nilgun Ozdamar-Keskin, Assistant Professor, Department of Distance
28. Education, Open Education Faculty, Anadolu University, Yunus Emre Campus, Eskisehir, Turkey