BibTex RIS Cite

Çocukluk Sosyolojisinin Özgün Sahası: Çocuklarla Nitel Araştırma

Year 2019, Volume: 4 Issue: 7, 149 - 162, 01.06.2019

Abstract

Bu çalışma çocuklarla nitel araştırmanın imkânını çocukluk sosyolojisi alanındaki farklı çocuk perspektiflerini ele almak suretiyle soruşturmakta ve çocuklarla nitel araştırmayı çocuk/çocukluk sosyolojisi sahasının inşası için en önemli araçlardan biri olarak ele almaktadır. Bu çerçevede çalışmada evvela çocukluk sosyolojisi içindeki farklı çocuk perspektifleri ele alınmakta, daha sonra çocuklarla araştırma yapma konusunda ana akım tutumlara ve metodolojik tercihlere alternatif oluşturma iddiasını temsil eden çocuklarla nitel araştırmanın imkânı tartışmaya açılmakta ve son olarak da çocuklarla nitel araştırmada kullanılan bazı teknikler ortaya konmaktadır

References

  • Akbaş, E., ve Atasü-Topçuoğlu, R. (2009). Modern çocukluk paradigmasının oluşumu: eleştirel bir değerlendirme. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 20(1).
  • Ari´es, P. (2014). Enfant et la vie familiale sous l’ancien r ´egime (L’). Points.
  • Christensen, P. (2004). Children’s participation in ethnographic research: issues of power and representation. Children and Society, 18, 165-176.
  • Darbyshire, P. MacDougall, C. ve Schiller, W. (2005). Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more? Qualitative Research, 5(4):417-436.
  • Demir Gürdal, A. (2013). Sosyolojinin ihmal edilen kategorisi çocuklar üzerinden çocukluk sosyolojisine ve sosyolojiye bakmak. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 15(4), 1-26.
  • Docherty, S., ve Sandelowski, M. (1999). Focus on qualitative methods: Interviewing children. Research in Nursing & Health, 22(2), 177-185.
  • Freeman, M. ve Mathison, S. (2009). Researching children’s experiences. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Greene, S. ve Hill, M. (2005). Researching children’s experience: methods and methodological issues. S. Greene ve D. Hogan (Yay. Haz.). Researching children’s experience methods and approaches içinde. Sage.
  • Harden, J., Scott, S., Backett-Milburn, K., ve Jackson, S. (2000). Can’t talk, won’t talk?: methodological issues in researching children. Sociological Research Online, 5(2), 1-12.
  • Hogan D., Etz, K., ve Tudge, J. (1999). Reconsidering the role of children in research. F. M. Berado ve C. Shehan (Yay. Haz.). Through the eyes of the child: Revisioning children as active agents of family life içinde. Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
  • James, A. (1993). Childhood identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • James, A., Jenks, C. ve Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Londra: Polity.
  • Kirk, S. (2006). Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(7), 1250-1260.
  • Lloyd-Smith, M. ve Tarr, J. (2002) Researching children’s perspectives: a sociological dimension. A. Lewis ve G. Lindsay (Yay. Haz.). Researching children’s perspectives içinde. Birmingham: Open University Press.
  • Matthews, G. B. (1994). The philosophy of childhood. Harvard University Press.
  • Mauthner, M. (1997). Methodological aspects of collecting data from children: Lessons from three research projects. Children & Society, 11(1), 16-28.
  • Moore, R.C. (1986). Children’s domain: play and space in child development. London: Croom Helm.
  • Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3): 321–41.
  • Save the Children (1996). Towards a children’s agenda: new challenges for social development. Londra: Save the Children, UK.
  • Thomas, N. ve O’kane, C. (1998). The ethics of participatory research with children. Children & Society, 12(5), 336-348.

Çocukluk Sosyolojisinin Özgün Sahası: Çocuklarla Nitel Araştırma

Year 2019, Volume: 4 Issue: 7, 149 - 162, 01.06.2019

Abstract

This study inquiries the possibility of qualitative research with children via examining different child perspectives in the field of sociology of children, and takes qualitative research with children as one of the most important means of constructing the field of sociology of children/childhood. In this sense, the study first examines different child perspectives within the sociology of childhood, then discusses the possibility of qualitative research with children which represents the alternative to the mainstream attitudes and methodological preferences in the field of research with children, and finally puts forth some of the techniques used in qualitative research with children

References

  • Akbaş, E., ve Atasü-Topçuoğlu, R. (2009). Modern çocukluk paradigmasının oluşumu: eleştirel bir değerlendirme. Toplum ve Sosyal Hizmet, 20(1).
  • Ari´es, P. (2014). Enfant et la vie familiale sous l’ancien r ´egime (L’). Points.
  • Christensen, P. (2004). Children’s participation in ethnographic research: issues of power and representation. Children and Society, 18, 165-176.
  • Darbyshire, P. MacDougall, C. ve Schiller, W. (2005). Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more? Qualitative Research, 5(4):417-436.
  • Demir Gürdal, A. (2013). Sosyolojinin ihmal edilen kategorisi çocuklar üzerinden çocukluk sosyolojisine ve sosyolojiye bakmak. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 15(4), 1-26.
  • Docherty, S., ve Sandelowski, M. (1999). Focus on qualitative methods: Interviewing children. Research in Nursing & Health, 22(2), 177-185.
  • Freeman, M. ve Mathison, S. (2009). Researching children’s experiences. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Greene, S. ve Hill, M. (2005). Researching children’s experience: methods and methodological issues. S. Greene ve D. Hogan (Yay. Haz.). Researching children’s experience methods and approaches içinde. Sage.
  • Harden, J., Scott, S., Backett-Milburn, K., ve Jackson, S. (2000). Can’t talk, won’t talk?: methodological issues in researching children. Sociological Research Online, 5(2), 1-12.
  • Hogan D., Etz, K., ve Tudge, J. (1999). Reconsidering the role of children in research. F. M. Berado ve C. Shehan (Yay. Haz.). Through the eyes of the child: Revisioning children as active agents of family life içinde. Stanford, CT: JAI Press.
  • James, A. (1993). Childhood identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • James, A., Jenks, C. ve Prout, A. (1998). Theorizing childhood. Londra: Polity.
  • Kirk, S. (2006). Methodological and ethical issues in conducting qualitative research with children and young people: A literature review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44(7), 1250-1260.
  • Lloyd-Smith, M. ve Tarr, J. (2002) Researching children’s perspectives: a sociological dimension. A. Lewis ve G. Lindsay (Yay. Haz.). Researching children’s perspectives içinde. Birmingham: Open University Press.
  • Matthews, G. B. (1994). The philosophy of childhood. Harvard University Press.
  • Mauthner, M. (1997). Methodological aspects of collecting data from children: Lessons from three research projects. Children & Society, 11(1), 16-28.
  • Moore, R.C. (1986). Children’s domain: play and space in child development. London: Croom Helm.
  • Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: the same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3): 321–41.
  • Save the Children (1996). Towards a children’s agenda: new challenges for social development. Londra: Save the Children, UK.
  • Thomas, N. ve O’kane, C. (1998). The ethics of participatory research with children. Children & Society, 12(5), 336-348.
There are 20 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Emrah Akbaş This is me

Gamze Erükçü Akbaş This is me

Publication Date June 1, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 4 Issue: 7

Cite

APA Akbaş, E., & Akbaş, G. E. (2019). Çocukluk Sosyolojisinin Özgün Sahası: Çocuklarla Nitel Araştırma. Çocuk Ve Medeniyet, 4(7), 149-162.