Saklıgöl (Denizli) Population Size of Pelophylax bedriagae (Levantine frog) Species

Year 2017, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 12 - 15, 29.12.2017

Hatice Yangın Didem Çapar Ömer Dilbe Eyup Başkale

https://doi.org/10.31594/commagene.392042

Abstract

In this study, information is given about P. bedriagae’s population size and the
changes that threaten the future of its population in the habitat that inhabits
in Saklıgöl of Yukarıdağdere, Honaz. In this
context, the population size of P.
bedriagae was estimated as 544 (CI= 95%; 353-899) individuals. The average recapture probability
and the average survival rate were calculated as 0.62 and 0.32 respectively. Generally, populations of wild organisms are
under the risk due to anthropogenic habitat destruction. Frogs that are
extremely sensitive against changes that may occur in the habitat are good
indicators in the analysis of many biological problems and the identification
of problems that may occur in wetlands.

Keywords

Capture-mark-recapture method, population size

Saklıgöl’de (Denizli) Pelophylax bedriagae (Levanten kurbağa) Türünün Populasyon Büyüklüğü

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Saklıgöl’de (Yukarıdağdere Köyü,
Honaz, Denizli) yaşayan P. bedriagae’nin populasyon büyüklüğü ve populasyonun geleceğini
tehdit eden etkenler hakkında bilgi verilmiştir. Bu kapsamda, P. bedriagae türünün Saklıgöl populasyonunun büyüklüğü 544
birey (% 95’lik Güven Aralığı= 353-899) olarak hesaplanmıştır. Yapılan bu
çalışmada ortalama yakalanma olasılığı 0,62 ve ortalama hayatta kalma oranı 0,32
olarak hesaplanmıştır. İnsan kaynaklı habitat tahribatları nedeniyle doğal populasyonlar
genellikle risk altına girmektedir. Habitatta meydana gelebilecek
değişikliklere karşı son derece hassas olan kurbağalar, sulak alanlarda meydana
gelebilecek sorunların belirlenmesinde ve birçok biyolojik problemin çözümlenmesinde
iyi bir indikatör canlılardır.

Keywords

Yakala-markala-tekrar yakala yöntemi, populasyon büyüklüğü

References

• Alford, R. A., Richards, S. J. 1999: Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied ecology. Annual Reviews of Ecology and Systematics, 30: 133–165.
• AmphibiaWeb, 2017: http://amphibiaweb.org/, erişim tarihi 20.11.2017
• Ayaz, D., Tok, C. V., Mermer, A., Tosunoğlu, M., Afsar, M., Çiçek, K. 2007: Population size of the marsh frog (Rana ridibunda Pallas, 1771) in Lake Yayla (Denizli, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 31: 255-260.
• Baran, İ., Balık, S., Kumlutaş, Y., Tok, C. V., Olgun, K., Durmuş, H., Türkozan, O., Ilgaz, Ç., İret, F. 2001: Rana holtzi (Toros Kurbağası)’nin Biyolojik ve Ekolojik Yönden Araştırılması ve Koruma Stratejisinin Saptanması. 4th Ulusal Ekoloji ve Çevre Kongresi, Bodrum, Turkey, 213-218.
• Baran, İ., Atatür, M. K. 1998: Turkish Herpetofauna (Amphibians and Reptiles), T.C. Çevre Bakanlığı, Ankara.
• Barinaga, M. 1990: Where have all the froggies gone? Science, 247: 1033–1034.
• Başkale E., Kaya, U. 2012: Decline of Levantine Frog Pelophylax bedriagae Camerano, 1882 in the western Aegean Region of Turkey: Changes in Population size and implication for conservation. Zoology in the Middle East, 57: 69-76.
• Başkale, E., Yıldırım, E., Çevik, İ. E., Kaya, U. 2013: Population size and age structure of metamorphic and pedomorphic forms of Ommatotriton ophryticus (Berthold, 1846) in Northwestern Black Sea Region of Turkey. Journal of Herpetology, 47: 270–276.
• Beebee, T. J. C., Griffiths, R. A. 2005: The amphibian decline crisis: A watershed for conservation biology? Biological Conservation, 25: 271-285.
• Blaustein, A. R., Wake, D. B. 1990: Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5: 203–204.
• Buckland, S. T., Goudie, I. B. J., Borchers, D. L. 2000: Wildlife population assessment: Past developments and future directions. Biometrics, 56: 1-12.
• Budak, A., Göçmen, B. 2005: Herpetoloji, Ege Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Yayınları, No : 194, Bornova, İzmir.
• Burnham, K. P., Anderson, D. R., White, G. C., Brownie, C., Pollock., K. H. 1987: Design and analysis methods for fish survival experiments based on release-recapture, No: 5, Maryland. USA American Fisheries Society Monograph Bethesda, 437.
• Cooch, E., White, G. C. 2004: Program MARK A Gentle Introduction. 5th Ed. Available from: http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book/, 545 pp.
• Çapar, D., Başkale, E. 2016: Population size of endemic Rana tavasensis in its terra typica, Turkey. Turkish Journal Zoology, 40: 729-733.
• Çiçek, K., Mermer, A., Tok, C. V. 2011: Population dynamics of Rana macrocnemis Boulenger, 1885 at Uludağ, Western Turkey. Zoology in the Middle East, 53: 41-60
• Donnelly, M. A., Guyer, C. 1994: Mark-recapture. In: Heyer, W. R., Donnelly, M. A., McDiarmid, R. W., Hayek, L.C., Foster, M.S., (Eds), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard methods for Amphibians. Smithsonian Institution Press. Washington D.C., pp. 183–200.
• Duellman, W. E., Trueb, L. 1994: Biology of Amphibians, London. The John Hopkins Press Ltd.
• Evans, M., Yaber, C., Hero, J. M. 1996: Factors influencing choice of breeding site by Bufo marinus in its natural habitat. Copeia, 904–912.
• Gardner, T. 2001: Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon in conservation biology. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation, 24 (2): 25–44.
• Gascon, C. 1991: Population- and community-level analyses of species occurrences of central amazonian rainforest tadpoles. Ecology, 72: 1731–46.
• Houlahan, J. E., Findlay, C. S., Schmidt, B. R., Meyer, A. H., Kuzmin, S. L. 2001: Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature, 404: 752–755.
• İsmail, İ. B., Çiçek, K. (2017): Population size, Age Structure and Life cycle of Levant water frog, Pelophylax bedriagae (Camerano, 1882) (Amphibia: Anura: Ranidae) in Lake Sülüklü (Manisa). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 34(2): 169-177. doi:10.12714/egejfas.2017.34.2.08
• IUCN, The IUCN Red list of threatened species, 2017: www.iucnredlist.org, 19.11.2017
• Kaya, U., Erişmiş, U. C. 2001: Marsh frogs, Rana ridibunda in Lake Akören -26 August National Park (Afyon): A preliminary study of population size and a taxonomical evaluation. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 25: 31-34.
• Kaya, U., Çevik, İ. E., Erişmiş, U. C. 2005: Population status of the Taurus frog Rana holtzi Werner (1898), in its terra typica: Is there a decline? Turkish Journal of Zoology, 29: 317-319.
• Kaya, U., Başkale, E., Çevik, İ. E., Kumlutaş, Y., Olgun, K. 2010: Population sizes of taurus frog, Rana holtzi, in two different localities, Karagöl and Eğrigöl: new estimations, decline, and awarning for their conservation. Russian Journal of Herpetology, 17(4): 247-250.
• La Marca, E. Lips, K. R., Lötters, S., Puschendorf, R., Ibáñez, R. 2005: Catastrophic population declines and extinctions in Neotropical harlequin frogs (Bufonidae: Atelopus). Biotropica, 37: 190–201.
• Lebreton, J. D., Burnham, K. P., Clobert, J., Anderson, D. R. 1992: Modeling survival and testing biological hypotheses using marked animals: A unified approach with case studies. Ecological Monographs, 62: 1-118.
• Marsh, D. M., Trenham, P. C. 2001: Metapopulation dynamics and amphibian conservation. Conservation Biology, 15: 40-49.
• Mermer, A., Ayaz, D. ve Çiçek, K. 2008: Abundance of Syntopic Newts, Triturus karelinii (Strauch, 1870) and Triturus vittatus (Gray, 1835), in Uludağ National Park (Bursa, Turkey). Turkish Journal of Zoology, 32: 59-64.
• Otis, D. L., Burnham, K. P., White, G. C., Anderson, D. R. 1978: Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations. Wildlife Monographs, 62.
• Öz, M., Kaska, Y., Kumlutaş, Y., Kaya, U., Avci, A., Üzüm, N., Yeniyurt, C., Akarsu, F., Kasparek, M. 2009. Pelophylax caralitanus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2009: e.T135806A4203649. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2009.RLTS. T135806A4203649.en. Downloaded on 23 December 2017.
• Pellet, J., Helfer, V., Yannic, G. 2007: Estimating population size in the European tree frog (Hyla arborea) using individual recognition and chorus counts. Amphibia-Reptilia, 28: 287-294.
• Pollock, K. H. 1974: The assumption of equal catchability of animals in tag-recapture experiments. Ph.D. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
• Pollock, K. H., Nichols, J. D., Brownie, C., Hines, J. E. 1990: Statistical Inference for Capture-Recapture Experiments. Wildlife Monograpgh, 107: 1-97.
• Ron, S. R., Duellman, W. E., Coloma, L. A., Bustamante, M. R. 2003: Population Decline of the Jambato Toad Atelopus ignescens (Anura: Bufonidae) in the Andes of Ecuador. Journal of Herpetology, 37(1): 116-126.
• Sarıkaya, B., Yıldız, M. Z., Sezen, G. 2017: The Herpetofauna of Adana Province (Turkey). Commagene Journal of Biology, 1: 1-11 . Sayım, F., Başkale, E., Tarkhnishvili, D., Kaya, U. 2009: Some water chemistry parameters of breeding habitats of the Caucasian salamander, Mertensiella caucasica in the Western Lesser Caucasus. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 332: 464-69.
• Spieler, M., Linsenmair, K. E. 1997: Choice of optimal oviposition sites by Hoplobatrachus occipitalis (Anura: Ranidae) in an unpredictable and patchy environment. Oecologia, 109: 184–99.
• Stuart, S., Chanson, J. S., Cox, N. A., Young, B. E., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Fishman, D. L., Waller, R. W. 2004: Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science, 306: 1783-1786.
• Wake, D. 1991: Declining Amphibian Populations. Science, 253: 860.
• Welsh, H. H., Ollivier, L. M. 1998: Stream amphibians as indicators of ecosystem stress: a case study from California's redwoods. Ecological Applications, 8(4): 1118-32.
• Werner, E. E., Glennemeier, K. S. 1999: Influence of forest canopy cover on the breeding pond distributions of several amphibian species. Copeia, 1999: 1–12.
• White, G. C., Burnham, K.P. 1999: Program MARK: Survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study, 46:120-138.
• Wyman, R. L. 1990: What’s happening to the amphibians? Conservation Biology, 4: 350–352.
• Yıldız, M. Z., Göçmen, B. 2012: Population dynamics, reproduction, and life history traits of Taurus Frog, Rana holtzi Werner, 1898 (Anura: Ranidae) in Karagöl (Ulukışla, Niğde), Turkey. Herpetologica Romanica, 6: 1-40.