Taramalı Elektron Mikroskobu (SEM) Tekniği Kullanılarak Bazı Kelebekler (Lepidoptera: Rhopalocera)’in Antennal Sensillum Dağılımının İncelenmesi

Abstract

Beş erkek kelebeğin; Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus) (Danaidae), Pontia daplidice moorie (Rober) (Pieridae), Junonia lemonias (Linnaeus) (Nymphalidae), Chilades pandava Horsfield (Lycaenidae) ve Papilio demoleus demoleus Linnaeus (Papilionidae) antenleri bileşen bölümleri (Scape, Pedicel ve Flagellum)’ne dağılmış sensilla tipini ve sayısını gözlemlemek için taramalı elektron mikroskobu altında incelenmiştir. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, Papilio demoleus demoleus Linnaeus anteninde böhm, trichodea, squamiformia, chaetica, basiconica, auricillica ve clavate olmak üzere yedi farklı sensilla bulunmuştur. Öte yandan, Pontia daplidice moorie (Rober) ve Junonia lemonias (Linnaeus) antenleri üzerinde yukarıda bahsedilen ilk beş sensilla (böhm, trichodea, squamiformia, chaetica ve basiconica)’nın bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ancak yukarıda belirtilen tüm yedi sensilla kategorisinden Chilades pandava (Horsfield)'nın dört sensilla oysa Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus)'un altı sensilla taşıdıkları ortaya konulmuştur. Anten üzerindeki tüm sensillerin yapısı ve konumu ayrıntılı bir biçimde incelenerek bu çalışmada gösterilmiştir.

Keywords

• antenna
• sensillum
• trichodea
• squamiformia
• chaetica
• coeloconica
• basiconica

Antennal Sensillum Distribution of Some Butterflies Using Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Technique (Rhopalocera: Lepidoptera)

Abstract

Antennae of five male butterflies namely Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus) (Danaidae), Pontia daplidice moorie (Rober) (Pieridae), Junonia lemonias (Linnaeus) (Nymphalidae), Chilades pandava Horsfield (Lycaenidae) and Papilio demoleus demoleus Linnaeus (Papilionidae) have been studied under scanning electron microscope for observing the type and number of sensilla dispersed on their component segments i.e. Scape, Pedicel and Flagellum. The antenna of Papilio demoleus demoleus Linnaeus shows the presence of seven sensilla i.e. Böhm, trichodea, squamiformia, chaetica, basiconica, auricillica and clavate. On the other hand, Pontia daplidice moorie (Rober) and Junonia lemonias (Linnaeus) show the presence of only five first mentioned sensilla. However, Chilades pandava Horsfield possesses four sensilla whereas Danaus chrysippus (Linnaeus) carries six sensilla, all from the seven sensilla category indicated above. Structure and location of all the sensilla on the antennal surface has been studied and illustrated in detail.

Keywords

• antenna
• sensillum
• trichodea
• squamiformia
• chaetica
• coeloconica

Thanks

I would like to thank Dergipark for this opportunity to submit my research paper.

References

1. Derby C. D., Steullet P., 2001. Why do animals have so many receptors? The role of multiple chemosensors in animal perception. Biological Bulletin, 200: 211-215.
2. Faucheux M. J., 1990a. External structure of sensilla on the male and female flagellum of Noctua pronuba L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annales de la Société Entomologique de France, 26: 173-184.
3. Frank D. L., Leskey T. C., Bergh J. C., 2010. Morphological characterization of antennal sensilla of the dogwood borer (Lepidoptera: Sesiidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 103 (6): 993-1002.
4. Faucheux M. J., Kristensen N. P., Shen-Horn Y., 2006. The antennae of neopseustid moths: morphology and phylogenetic implications with special reference to the sensilla (Insecta, Lepidoptera, Neopseustidae). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 245 (2): 131-142.
5. Gao Y., Luo L. Z., Hammond A., 2007. Antennal morphology, structure and sensilla distribution in Microplitis pallidipes (Hymenoptera: Braconidae). Micron, 38: 684-693. Nasra M. H., 2008. Effect of flufenoxuron on the antennal sensilla of Spodoptera littoralis (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Egyptian Academic Journal of biological Sciences, 1 (2): 13-25.
6. Onagbola E. O., Meyer W. L., Boina D. R., Stelinski L. L., 2008. Morphological characterization of the antennal sensilla of the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama (Hemiptera: Psyllidae), with reference to their probable functions. Micron, 39: 1184-1191.
7. Pajni H.R., Rose H.S. and Walia V.K., 2006. Butterflies of North-West India. Part-1.115 (Published by Atma Ram and Sons, Chandigarh).
8. Schneider D., 1964. Insect antennae. Annual Review of Entomology, 9: 103–122. doi: 10.1146/ annurev.en.09.010164.000535.

9. Skiri H.T., Stranden M., Sandoz J.C., Menzeli R., Mustaparta H., 2005. Associative learning of plant odorants activating the same or different receptor neurones in the moth Heliothis virescens. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 208: 787–796. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01431.
10. Victor R. C., Jorge V.C., Juan C.T., Mario C.L. and Rodolfo O.O., 1999. Morphology and distribution of the sense organs on the antennae of Copitarsia consueta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Florida Entomologist, 82 (4): 546-555.
11. Victor R. C., Guadalupe N., Jorge V., Federico C., Julico C.R., 2003. The antennal sensilla of Zamagiria dixolophella Dyar (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 96 (5): 672-678.
12. Victor R. C., Jorge V.C., 2008. Morphological characteristics of antennal sensilla in Talponia batesi (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 101 (1): 181-188.
13. Zacharuk R.Y., 1980. Ultrastructure and function of insect chemosensilla. Annual Review of Entomology, 25: 27–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.25.010180.000331.