İngilizce iletişim çalışmalarında genişletilmiş gerçeklik araştırma eğilimlerinin bibliyometrik bir analizi: Genişletilmiş gerçeklik teknolojilerine gelişen rağbetin haritalanması

Abstract

İletişim teknolojilerinin gelişimiyle birlikte, genişletilmiş gerçeklik teknolojisi ve uygulamaları, etkileşimli dijital deneyimlere katkı sağlama potansiyelleri nedeniyle giderek daha çok tercih edilmektedir. Genişletilmiş gerçekliğin entegrasyonu, nesneler hakkında bilgi sağlamanın yanı sıra sanal bir katman aracılığıyla zenginleştirilmiş ve çeşitli etkileşimleri içeren bir deneyim sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, İngilizce dilinde gerçekleştirilmiş iletişim çalışmalarında 1992 ile 2023 yılları arasında genişletilmiş gerçeklik (extended reality) teknolojisi konusunda Web of Science Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) ve Arts & Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) dizinlerinde yayımlanmış çalışmaların nicel ve sistematik bir incelemesini sunmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında, WOS veri tabanında endekslenen dergilerde karma gerçeklik, artırılmış gerçeklik, sanal gerçeklik ve genişletilmiş gerçeklik kavramları ile ilgili çalışmalar taranmıştır. Yayım tipi, dili, açık erişim kategorisi ve konu filtreleri ile ulaşılan 209 yayın bibliyometrik analiz kapsamına dahil edilmiştir. Bibliyometrik araçlar, genişletilmiş gerçeklik ve iletişim çalışmalarındaki eğilimleri belirlemek amacıyla temel araştırma konuları ve kümeleri, alanlar arası dağılım, ülkeler bazında üretkenlik ve iş birliği, anahtar kelime ve alıntı ağı ve eşdizim ağlarını belirlemek için kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, genişletilmiş gerçeklik araştırmalarının iletişim çalışmalarındaki evrimini anlamaya katkıda bulunmuş ve gelecekteki araştırma çabaları için temel oluşturmuştur.

Keywords

• Genişletilmiş gerçeklik
• sanal gerçeklik
• artırılmış gerçeklik
• iletişim çalışmaları
• bibliyometrik analiz

A bibliometric analysis of extended reality research trends in communication studies written in English: Mapping the increasing adoption of extended reality technologies

Abstract

With the development of communication technologies, extended reality technologies and applications are increasingly favoured because of their potential to contribute to interactive digital experiences. In addition to providing information about objects, the integration of extended reality offers an enriched experience through a virtual layer that includes various interactions. This paper offers a quantitative and systematic review of studies published in the Web of Science Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED), Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI), Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), and Arts & Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) on extended reality technology in communication studies in English between 1992 and 2023. Within the scope of this research, studies on the concepts of mixed reality, augmented reality, virtual reality, and extended reality in journals indexed in the Web of Science (WOS) database were searched. A total of 209 publications were included in the scope of the bibliometric analysis with filters for publication type, language, open access category, and subject. Bibliometric tools were employed to identify trends in extended reality and communication studies, including primary research topics and clusters, interdisciplinary distribution, productivity, and collaboration at the country level, keyword and citation networks, and co-occurrence networks. These findings contribute to the understanding of the evolution of extended reality research in communication studies and lay a foundation for further research.

Keywords

• Extended reality
• virtual reality
• augmented reality
• communication studies
• bibliometric analysis

References

1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Di Costa, F. (2020). The role of geographical proximity in knowledge diffusion, measured by citations to scientific literature. Journal of Informetrics, 14, 101010. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. JOI.2020.101010. google scholar
2. Aria, M. & Cuccurullo, C. (2017) bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), pp 959-975, Elsevier. google scholar
3. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273-289. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001. google scholar
4. Altınpulluk, H. (2018). Determining the trends of using augmented reality in education between 2006-2016. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1089-1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9806-3 google scholar
5. Artut, S. (2019). Developing interactions in augmented materiality: an enhancement method based on rgbd segmentation. Electronic Journal of New Media, 3(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.17932/iau.ejnm.25480200.2019.1/1.45-56. google scholar
6. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: teleoperators & virtual environments, 6(4), 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355. google scholar
7. Azuma, R., Baillot, Y., Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & MacIntyre, B. (2001). Recent advances in augmented reality. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 21(6), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459 google scholar
8. Bacovsky, P. (2020). Gaming alone: videogaming and sociopolitical attitudes. New Media & Society, 23(5), 11331156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820910418. google scholar

9. Baek, T.H., Yoo, C., & Yoon, S. (2018). Augment yourself through virtual mirror: the impact of self-viewing and narcissism on consumer responses. International Journal of Advertising. 37. 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02 650487.2016.1244887. google scholar
10. Belo, N., McKenney, S., Voogt, J., & Bradley, B. (2016). Teacher knowledge for using technology to foster early literacy: a literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 372-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2016.02.053. google scholar
11. Biocca, F. (1992). Communication within virtual reality: Creating a space for research. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 5-22. https://doi.Org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00810.x. google scholar
12. Bigne, E., Ruiz, C., & Curras-Perez, R. (2024). Furnishing your home? The impact of voice assistant avatars in virtual reality shopping: A neurophysiological study. Computers in Human Behavior, 153, 1-11. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108104. google scholar
13. Bonus, J. A., Peebles, A., Mares, M.-L., & Sarmiento, I. G. (2018). Look on the bright side (of media effects): Pokemon Go as a catalyst for positive life experiences. Media Psychology, 21(2), 263-287. https://doi.org/10. 1080/15213269.2017.1305280. google scholar
14. Bollmer, G. (2017). Empathy machines. Media International Australia, 165(1), 63-76. google scholar
15. Caudell, T.P. & Mizell, D.W. (1992). Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kauai, HI, USA, pp. 659-669 vol.2, https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.1992.183317. google scholar
16. Chang, H., Wang, C., Lee, M., Wu, H., Liang, J., Lee, S., ... & Tsai, C. (2015). A review of features of technology-supported learning environments based on participants’ perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 223-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.042. google scholar
17. Chung, J., Kim, H., Cheon, J., & Lee, I. (2020). Improving smartphone position and attitude for geospatial augmented reality applications. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLIII-B4-2020, 559-565. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xliii-b4-2020-559-2020. google scholar
18. Coates, G. (1992). Program from invisible Site—a virtual sho, a multimedia performance work presented by George Coates performance works, San Francisco, CA, March. google scholar
19. Cobo, M., Lopez-Herrera, A.G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62. 1382 - 1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525. google scholar
20. Craig, A. B. (2013). Understanding augmented reality: Concepts and applications (1st ed.). Morgan Kaufmann. google scholar
21. Cranmer, E., Jung, T., tom Dieck, M. C., & Miller, A. (2016). Understanding the acceptance of augmented reality at an organisational level: the case of Geevor Tin Mine Museum. Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism, 637-650. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28231-2_46. google scholar
22. Cummings, J. J., & Bailenson, J.N. (2015). How immersive is enough? A meta-analysis of the effect of immersive technology on user presence. Media Psychology, 19(2), 272-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2015.10 15740. google scholar
23. De Bellis, N. (2009). Bibliometrics and citation analysis: from the science citation index to cybermetrics. Scarecrow Press. google scholar
24. Dechant, M., Trimpl, S., Wolff, C., Mühlberger, A., & Shiban, Y. (2017). Potential of virtual reality as a diagnostic tool for social anxiety: a pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 128-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2017.07.005. google scholar
25. De La Pena, N., Weil, P., Llobera, J., Spanlang, B., Friedman, D., Sanchez-Vives, M.V., & Slater, M. (2010). Immersive journalism: immersive virtual reality for the first-person experience of news. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19 (4): 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres_a_00005. google scholar
26. Dickinson, P., Gerling, K., Wilson, L., & Parke, A. (2020). Virtual reality as a platform for research in gambling behaviour. Computers in Human Behavior, 107, 106293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106293. google scholar
27. Dirgantoro, B. (2021). Learning history through augmented reality. Journal of Games, Game Art, and Gamification, 6(1), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.21512/jggag.v6i1.7316. google scholar
28. Drigas, A., Kokkalia, G., & Lytras, M. (2015). Ict and collaborative co-learning in preschool children who face memory difficulties. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 645-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.019. google scholar
29. Eastin, M.S., & Griffiths, R.P. (2006). Beyond the shooter game: Examining presence and hostile outcomes among male game players. Communication Research, 33(6), 448-466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206293249. google scholar
30. Farshid, M., Paschen, J., Eriksson, T., & Kietzmann, J. (2018). Go boldly!: Explore augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and mixed reality (MR) for business. Business Horizons, 61(5), 657-663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bushor.2018.05.009. google scholar
31. Ferreira, S., Marmeleira, J., del Pozo-Cruz, J., Bernardino, A., Leite, N., Brandao, M., & Raimundo, A. (2022). Acute effects of augmented reality exergames versus cycle ergometer on reaction time, visual attention, and verbal fluency in community older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(22), 14667. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192214667 google scholar
32. Flavian, C., Ibanez-Sanchez, S., & Orus, C. (2019). The impact of Virtual, augmented and mixed reality technologies on the customer experience. Journal of Business Research, 100, 547-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jbusres.2018.10.050. google scholar
33. Fox, J., Arena, D., & Bailenson, J.N. (2009). Virtual reality: A survival guide for the social scientist. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 21(3), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105.21.3.95. google scholar
34. Gervautz, M. & Schmalstieg, D. (2012). Anywhere Interfaces Using Handheld Augmented Reality. Computer, 45(7): 26-31. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.72. google scholar
35. Gibson, James J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Houghton Mifflin. google scholar
36. Gillath, O., McCall, C. & Shaver, P., & Blascovich, J. (2008). What can virtual reality teach us about prosocial tendencies in real and virtual environments?. Media Psychology, 11. 259-282. https://doi. org/10.1080/15213260801906489. google scholar
37. Glegg, S.M.N., Holsti, L., Stanton, S., Hanna, S., Velikonja, D., Ansley, B., ... & Brum, C. (2016). Evaluating change in virtual reality adoption for brain injury rehabilitation following knowledge translation. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 12(3), 217-226. https://doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2015.1111944. google scholar
38. Green, M.C., & Donahue, J.K. (2012). Simulated worlds: Transportation into narratives. In K. D. Markman, W. M. P. Klein, & J. A. Suhr (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 241-254). Psychology Press. google scholar
39. Greenbaum, P. (1992) The lawnmower man. Film and Video, 9(3): 58-62. google scholar
40. Hamari, J., Shernoff, D., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: an empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045. google scholar
41. Hawk, B., Rieder, D.M., & Oviedo, O. (Ed.). (2008). small tech: The culture of digital tools (NED-New edition, Vol. 22). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
42. Herz, M., & Rauschnabel, P. A. (2019). Understanding the diffusion of virtual reality glasses: the role of media, fashion and technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 138, 228-242. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.09.008. google scholar
43. Hily, A., Dupont, L., Arbelaez-Garces, G., Camargo, M., & Dinet, J. (2023). Evaluation and validation process of extended reality applications developed in an industrial context: A systematic review. SN Computer Science, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-023-02089-1. google scholar
44. Hoyer, W. D., Kroschke, M., Schmitt, B., Kraume, K., & Shankar, V. (2020). Transforming the customer experience through new technologies. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 51(1), 57-71. google scholar
45. Huang, H. and Chang, Y. (2023). Effects of virtual reality on creative performance and emotions: a study of brainwaves. Computers in Human Behavior, 146, 107815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107815. google scholar
46. Huang, T.-L. and Liu, H.F. (2014). Formation of augmented-reality interactive technology’s persuasive effects from the perspective of experiential value. Internet Research, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 82-109. https://doi. org/10.1108/IntR-07-2012-0133. google scholar
47. Hsu, T.C. (2017). Learning English with augmented reality: do learning styles matter? Computers & Education, 106, 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.007. google scholar
48. Jung, T., Chung, N., & Leue, M.C. (2015). The determinants of recommendations to use augmented reality technologies: the case of a Korean theme park. Tourism Management, 49, 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tourman.2015.02.013. google scholar
49. Kerawalla, L., Luckin, R., Seljeflot, S., & Woolard, A. (2006). “Making it real”: exploring the potential of augmented reality for teaching primary school science. Virtual Reality, 10(3-4), 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10055-006-0036-4. google scholar
50. Kerrebroeck, H., Brengman, M., & Willems, K. (2017). Escaping the crowd: an experimental study on the impact of a virtual reality experience in a shopping mall. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 437-450. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.07.019. google scholar
51. Kirner, T. G., Reis, F. M. V., & Kirner, C. (2012, June). Development of an interactive book with augmented reality for teaching and learning geometric shapes. In 7th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI 2012) (pp. 1-6). IEEE. google scholar
52. Krueger, M.W. (1991). Artificial reality 2. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley. google scholar
53. Kyguoliene, A. & Braziulyte, R. (2022). Application of augmented reality in product packaging: Challenges and development opportunities. Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 88(1), 85-100. https://doi. org/10.2478/mosr-2022-0014. google scholar
54. Lanier, J. (1989, Fall). Whole earth review, 64, 108-119. https://archive.org/details/wholeearthreview00unse_19. google scholar
55. Lanier, J. & Biocca, F. (1992). An insider’s view of the future of virtual reality. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 150-172. https://doi.Org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00816.x. google scholar
56. Laws, A. (2017). Can immersive journalism enhance empathy?. Digital Journalism. 8. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.108 0/21670811.2017.1389286. google scholar
57. Lee, K.M. (2004). Presence, explicated. Communication Theory, 14(1), 27-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00302.x. google scholar
58. Li, H., Daugherty, T., & Biocca, F. (2002). Impact of 3-D advertising on product knowledge, brand attitude, and purchase intention: The mediating role of presence. Journal of advertising, 31(3), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1 080/00913367.2002.10673675. google scholar
59. Liao, T. (2016). Mobile versus headworn augmented reality: how visions of the future shape, contest, and stabilize an emerging technology. New Media & Society, 20(2), 796-814. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816672019. google scholar
60. Liao, T. & Humphreys, L. (2014). Layar-ed places: using mobile augmented reality to tactically reengage, reproduce, and reappropriate public space. New Media & Society, 17(9), 1418-1435. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444814527734. google scholar
61. Liu, J. & Wu-Ouyang, B. (2022). A “soul” emerges when ai, ar, and anime converge: a case study on users of the new anime-stylized hologram social robot “hupo”. New Media & Society, https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221106030. google scholar
62. Lee, H. G., Chung, S., & Lee, W. H. (2013). Presence in virtual golf simulators: The effects of presence on perceived enjoyment, perceived value, and behavioral intention. New Media & Society, 15(6), 930-946. https://doi. org/10.1177/1461444812464033. google scholar
63. Lombart, C., Millan, E., Normand, J., Verhulst, A., Labbe-Pinlon, B., & Moreau, G. (2020). Effects of physical, non-immersive virtual, and immersive virtual store environments on consumers’ perceptions and purchase behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106374. google scholar
64. Macintyre, B., Bolter, J., Moreno, E. & Hannigan, B. (2001, October, 29-30). Augmented reality as a new media experience. Conference: 4th international symposium on augmented reality (ISAR 2001), New York, USA 197206. https://10.1109/ISAR.2001.970538. google scholar
65. Mann, S. & Wyckoff, C. (1991). Extended reality. MIT 4-405. Retrived from http://wearcam.org/xr.txt google scholar
66. Matsangidou, M., Otkhmezuri, B., Ang, C. S., Avraamides, M. N., Riva, G., Gaggioli, A., ... & Karekla, M. (2020). “now i can see me” designing a multi-user virtual reality remote psychotherapy for body weight and shape concerns. Human-Computer Interaction, 37(4), 314-340. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2020.1788945. google scholar
67. McLean, G. & Wilson, A. (2019). Shopping in the digital world: examining customer engagement through augmented reality mobile applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 210-224. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.002. google scholar
68. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: Extensions of man. New York: Mentor. google scholar
69. Melchior, C. & Oliveira, M. (2021). Health-related fake news on social media platforms: a systematic literature review. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1500-1522. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211038762. google scholar
70. Merediz-Sola, I. & Bariviera, A.F. (2019). A bibliometric analysis of bitcoin scientific production. Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), 294-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2019.06.008. google scholar
71. Milgram, P. & Kishino, F. (1994). A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, 77(12), 1321-1329. https://doi.org/10.1.1.102.4646. google scholar
72. Milgram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., & Kishino, F. (1995, December). Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and telepresence technologies (Vol. 2351, pp. 282-292). Spie. google scholar
73. Montag, M., Bertel, S., Koning, B., & Zander, S. (2021). Exploration vs. limitation - an investigation of instructional design techniques for spatial ability training on mobile devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106678. google scholar
74. Munoz-Montoya, F., Juan, M.C., Mendez-Lopez, M., & Fidalgo, C. (2018). Augmented reality based on SLAM to assess spatial short-term memory. IEEE Access, 7, 2453-2466. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2886627. google scholar
75. Munoz-Saavedra, L., Miro-Amarante, L., & Domı'nguez-Morales, M.J. (2020). Augmented and virtual reality evolution and future tendency. Applied Sciences, 10(1), 322. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10010322. google scholar
76. Negu{, A., Matu, S., Sava, F., & David, D. (2016). Task difficulty of virtual reality-based assessment tools compared to classical paper-and-pencil or computerized measures: a meta-analytic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 414-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.029. google scholar
77. Pavlenko, O., Shcherbak, I., Hura, V., Lihus, V., Maidaniuk, I., & Skoryk, T. (2022). Development of music education in virtual and extended reality. Brain Broad Research in Artificial Intelligence and Neuroscience, 13(3), 308-319. https://doi.org/10.18662/brain/13.3/369. google scholar
78. Querioz, A. C. M., Bailenson, J. N., Blair, K. P., Schwartz, D. L., Thille, C. T., & Wagner, A. D. (2024). Extended realities and the future of knowledge work: opportunities and challenges. Proceedings of the 31st IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces abstracts and workshops (VRW). https://vhil.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/ sbiybj29011/files/media/file/ queiroz_et_al_ieee_vr_2024.pdf. google scholar
79. Ratcliffe, J., Soave, F., Bryan-Kinns, N., Tokarchuk, L., & Farkhatdinov, I. (2021). Extended reality (xr) remote research: A survey of drawbacks and opportunities. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445170. google scholar
80. Rauschnabel, P.A., Rossmann, A., & tom Dieck, M.C. (2017). An adoption framework for mobile augmented reality games: the case of Pokemon Go. Computers in Human Behavior, 76, 276-286. https://doi.org/10J 016/j. chb.2017.07.030. google scholar
81. Rauschnabel, P. A. (2018a). Virtually enhancing the real world with holograms: an exploration of expected gratifications of using augmented reality smart glasses. Psychology & Marketing, 35(8), 557-572. https://doi. org/10.1002/mar.21106. google scholar
82. Rauschnabel, P.A. (2018b). A conceptual uses & gratification framework on the use of augmented reality smart glasses. Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality - Empowering Human, Place and Business (pp. 211-227). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64027-3_15. google scholar
83. Rauschnabel, P. A., Felix, R., Hinsch, C., Shahab, H., & Alt, F. (2022). What is XR? Towards a framework for augmented and virtual reality. Computers in Human Behavior, 133, 107289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. chb.2022.107289. google scholar
84. Riva, G., Mantovani, F., Capideville, C. S., Preziosa, A., Morganti, F., Villani, D., ... & Alcaniz, M. (2007). Affective interactions using virtual reality: the link between presence and emotions. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2006.9993. google scholar
85. Regian, J.W. (1992). Virtual reality: An instructional medium for visual-spatial tasks. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 136-49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00815.x. google scholar
86. Ronzhyn, A., Cardenal, A., & Rubio, A. (2022). Defining affordances in social media research: a literature review. New Media & Society, 25(11), 3165-3188. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221135187. google scholar
87. Rosanensi, M. (2020). Improving e-commerce effectiveness using augmented reality. MATRIK : Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika Dan Rekayasa Komputer, 19(2), 214-222. https://doi.org/10.30812/matrik.v19i2.659. google scholar
88. Serrano, B., Botella, C., Banos, R., & Alcanı'z, M. (2013). Using virtual reality and mood-induction procedures to test products with consumers of ceramic tiles. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 648-653. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.024. google scholar
89. Shaikh, A. & Karjaluoto, H. (2015). Making the most of information technology & systems usage: a literature review, framework and future research agenda. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 541-566. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.059. google scholar
90. Shin, D. (2017). How does immersion work in augmented reality games? A user-centric view of immersion and engagement. Information, Communication & Society. 22. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1411519. google scholar
91. Shin, D. & Biocca, F. (2018). Exploring immersive experience in journalism. New Media & Society, 20(8), 2800-2823. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817733133. google scholar
92. Siltanen, S. (2012). Theory and applications of marker-based augmented reality [Licentiate thesis]. Aalto University. VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. google scholar
93. Sırakaya, M. & Çakmak, E.K. (2018). The Effect of Augmented Reality Use on Achievement, Misconception and Course Engagement. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(3), 297-314. https://doi.org/10.30935/ cet.444119. google scholar
94. Slater, M., Gonzalez-Liencres, C., Haggard, P., Vinkers, C., Gregory-Clarke, R., Jelley, S., ... & Watson, Z. (2020). The ethics of realism in virtual and augmented reality. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/ frvir.2020.00001. google scholar
95. Snodgrass, J.G., Dengah, H.J.F., Lacy, M.G., & Fagan, J. (2013, April). A formal anthropological view of motivation models of problematic MMO play: Achievement, social, and immersion factors in the context of culture. Transcultural Psychiatry, 50(2), 235-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363461513487666. google scholar
96. Steele, P., Burleigh, C., Kroposki, M., Magabo, M., & Bailey, L. (2020, June 19). Ethical considerations in designing virtual and augmented reality products—Virtual and augmented reality design with students in mind: designers’ perceptions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(2), 219-238. https://doi. org/10.1177/0047239520933858. google scholar
97. Steuer, J. (1992) defining virtual reality dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication, 42, 7393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x. google scholar
98. Suh, A., & Prophet, J. (2018). The state of immersive technology research: a literature analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.04.019 google scholar
99. Suparjoh, S., Shahbodin, F., & Mohd, C. (2020). Technology-assisted intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder using augmented reality. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE), 8(5), 2156-2162. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.c6512.018520. google scholar
100. Tamborini, R., Ron, Eastin, M.S., Skalski, P., Lachlan, K., Fediuk, A.T., & Brady, R. (2004). Violent virtual video games and hostile thoughts. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. 48. 335-357. google scholar
101. Tan, Y., Xu, W., Li, S., & Chen, K. (2022). Augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) for education and training in the AEC Industry: A aystematic review of research and applications. Buildings, 12(10), 1529. https://doi. org/10.3390/buildings12101529. google scholar
102. Tham, J., Duin, A. H., Gee, L., Ernst, N., Abdelqader, B., & McGrath, M. (2018). Understanding virtual reality: Presence, embodiment, and professional practice. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 61(2), 178-195. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2018.2804238. google scholar
103. Tariq, A., Saez, D., & Khan, S. (2021). Social media use and family connectedness: a systematic review of quantitative literature. New Media & Society, 24(3), 815-832. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211016885. google scholar
104. Tom Dieck, M.C., Jung, T.H., & Rauschnabel, P.A. (2018). Determining visitor engagement through augmented reality at science festivals: an experience economy perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.043. google scholar
105. Vallaster, C., Kraus, S., Lindahl, J.M.M., & Nielsen, A. (2019). Ethics and entrepreneurship: A bibliometric study and literature review. Journal of Business Research, 99, 226-237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.050. google scholar
106. Van Damme, K., All, A., Marez, L., & Leuven, S. (2019). 360° Video journalism: Experimental study on the effect of immersion on news experience and distant suffering. Journalism Studies. 20. 1-24. https://doi. org/10.1080/1461670X.2018.1561208. google scholar
107. Vella, K., Johnson, D., Cheng, V.W.S., Davenport, T., Mitchell, J., Klarkowski, M., & Phillips, C. (2019). A sense of belonging: Pokemon GO and social connectedness. Games and Culture, 14(6), 583-603. https://doi. org/10.1177/155541201771997. google scholar
108. Wagler, A. & Hanus, M.D. (2018). Comparing virtual reality tourism to real-life experience: Effects of presence and engagement on attitude and enjoyment. Communication Research Reports, 35(5), 456-464. https://doi.org/1 0.1080/08824096.2018.1525350. google scholar
109. Wang, X., Kim, M.J., Love, P.E., & Kang, S.C. (2013). Augmented reality in built environment: Classification and implications for future research. Automation in Construction. 32. 1-13. https://doi.Org/10.1016/j. autcon.2012.11.021. google scholar
110. Wang, M., Callaghan, V., Bernhardt, J., White, K., & Pena-Rios, A. (2018). Augmented reality in education and training: pedagogical approaches and illustrative case studies. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 9(5), 1391-1402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-017-0547-8. google scholar
111. Wojciechowski, R., Walczak, K., White, M., & Cellary, W. (2004, April). Building virtual and augmented reality museum exhibitions. Conference: Proceeding of the Ninth International Conference on 3D Web Technology, Web3D, Monterey, California, USA, https://doi.org/10.1145/985040.985060. google scholar
112. Wojciechowski, R. & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners’ attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570-585. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.014. google scholar
113. Wrzesien, M., Botella, C., Bretön-Löpez, J., Gonzalez, E., Burkhardt, J., Alcaniz, M., ... & Perez-Ara, M. (2015). Treating small animal phobias using a projective-augmented reality system: a single-case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 343-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.065. google scholar
114. Yim, M.Y.C., Chu, S.C., & Sauer, P.L. (2017). Is augmented reality technology an effective tool for e-commerce? An interactivity and vividness perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 39, 89-103. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001 google scholar
115. Zachary, W., Ryder, J., Hicinbothom, J., & Bracken, K. (1997, October). The use of executable cognitive models in simulation-based intelligent embedded training. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 1118-1122). Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications. google scholar
116. Ziker, C., Truman, B., & Dodds, H. (2021). Cross reality (XR): challenges and opportunities across the spectrum. Innovative Learning Environments in STEM Higher Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Looking Forward, 55-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58948-6_4. google scholar