Attitudes toward Honor and Violence against Women for Honor in the Context of the Concept of Privacy: A Study of Students in the Faculty of Health Sciences

Abstract

 

Keywords

• .

Attitudes toward Honor and Violence against Women for Honor in the Context of the Concept of Privacy: A Study of Students in the Faculty of Health Sciences

Abstract

The study was conducted to examine the attitudes of students of health sciences towards violence against women for honor within the context of the concept of privacy and to determine how the attitudes of midwifery students towards honor differ from those of other students. The research design chosen for this study is that of a survey. The subjects of the research consisted of students of health sciences (N=952), and the sample amounted to 473 students who were selected from this population by stratified random sampling method (departments and classes were taken as stratum criterion). A Student Information Form, the Attitudes towards Honor Scale (AHS), and the Attitudes towards Violence against Women for Protecting Honor Scale (AVWPHS) were used in the data collection. By considering that gender is an important confounding factor in attitudes towards honor, data were presented by dividing subjects into three groups: an all-female group from the midwifery department (MS, n=97), female students in other departments (FSOD, n=227), and male students in other departments (MSOD, n=148). It was observed that there was no difference between MS and FSOD scores for both AHS and AVWPHS. However, MSOD scores were statistically significantly higher than MS and FSOD scores. Although the attitudes of midwifery students in this respect are similar to those of female students in other departments of the faculty, they are different from the attitudes of male students. 

Keywords

• Privacy,honor,violence

References

1. Adana, F., Arslantaş, H., Ergin, F., Biçer, N., Kıranşal, N., & Şahin, S. (2011). Views of male university students about social gender roles; An example from east of Turkey. Journal of Family Violence, 26(7), 519–526.
2. TC Başbakanlık İnsan Hakları Başkanlığı. (2007). Töre ve namus cinayetleri raporu [The custom and honor killings report]. Retrieved from http://www.kamer.org.tr/eng/content_images/tore_namus_cinayetleri_raporu_ 02_07_2008.pdf.
3. Bilgili, N., & Vural, G. (2011). Kadina yönelik şiddetin en ağır biçimi: Namus cinayetleri [The heaviest way of violence against women: Honor killings]. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 14(1), 66–72.
4. Caffaro, F., Ferraris, F., & Schmidt, S. (2014). Gender differences in the perception of honour killing in individualist versus collectivistic cultures: Comparison between Italy and Turkey. Sex Roles, 71(9–10), 296–318.
5. Can, Y. (2013). Kadına yönelik şiddetin toplumsal cinsiyet temelleri: Niğde örneği [Gendered bases of violence against woman: Niğde case]. Zeitschrift für die Welt der Türken/Journal of World of Turks, 5(1), 203–216.
6. Diker, E. (2015). The understanding of woman and privacy in newspaper advertisements. Gumushane University E-Journal of Faculty of Communication, 3(1), 95–110.
7. Doğan, R. (2014). The profiles of victims, perpetrators, and unfounded beliefs in honor killings in Turkey. Homicide Studies, 23, 1–28.
8. Eisner, M., & Ghuneim, L. (2013). Honor killing attitudes amongst adolescents in Amman, Jordan. Aggressive Behavior, 39(5), 405–417.

9. Fettahoğlu, S. (2016). The semantic of private, unrelated, virtue andpudicity concepts and their usage in Koran. International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 11(5), 269–284.
10. Gursoy, E., McCool, W. F., Sahinoglu, S., & Yavuz Genc, Y. (2014). Views of women’s sexuality and violence against women in Turkey: A cross-sectional investigation among university students. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 15, 1–10.
11. Güner, S., Yurdakul, M., & Yetim, N. (2015). Türkiye’de ebelik mesleğinin sorunlarına akademik bakışı yansıtan nitel bir çalışma [A qualitative study on the academic approach to the professionalization of midwifery in Turkey]. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 5(1), 80–87.
12. Gürsoy, E., & Özkan, H. A. (2014). Türkiye’de üniversite öğrencilerinin kadına ilişkin “namus” algısı [Turkish youth’s perception of sexuality / “honor” in relation to women]. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing, 5(3), 149–159.
13. Işık, R., & Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. (2009). Namusa ve namus adına kadına uygulanan şiddete ilişkin tutumlar ölçeklerinin öğrenci örneklemiyle geliştirilmesi [The development of attitudes toward honor scale and attitudes toward violence against women for protecting honor scale with a student sample]. Turkish Psychological Articles, 12(24), 16–24.
14. İnci, Ü. H. (2013). Basında yer alan namus cinayetlerinin sosyolojik analizi [A sociological analysis of honor killings reported by the mass media]. Journal of History Culture and Art Research, 2(3), 282–296.
15. Kim, Y. H., & Cohen, D. (2010). Information, perspective, and judgments about the self in face and dignity cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(4), 537–550.
16. Kulczycki, A., & Windle, S. (2011). Honor killings in the Middle East and North Africa: A systematic review of the literature. Violence Against Women, 17(11), 1442–1464.
17. Leung, A. K.Y., & Cohen, D. (2011). Within-and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 507–526.
18. Natan, M. B., Khater, M., Ighbariyea, R., & Herbet, H. (2016). Readiness of nursing students to screen women for domestic violence. Nurse Education Today, 44, 98–102.
19. Özdamar, K. (2013). Paket programlar ile istatiksel veri analizi II (9th ed.) [Package programs and statistical data analysis II]. Eskişehir, Turkey: Nisan Kitabevi.
20. Öztürk, M., & Demirdağ, A. G. (2013). Namusunu kanla temizleyenler: Mardin Cezaevi’nde namus davası nedeniyle yatan mahkûmlar üzerine bir araştırma [The ones who restored his honour with blood: A sociological research on the prisoners convicted of honour issue in Mardin jailhouse]. Journal of Social Policy Studies, 7(30), 16–35.
21. Payton, J. (2014). “Honor,” collectivity, and agnation: Emerging risk factors in “honor”-based violence. Journal of Interpersonel Violence, 29(16), 2863–2883.
22. Sakallı Uğurlu, N., & Glick, P. (2003). Ambivalent sexism and attitudes toward women who engage in premarital sex in Turkey. Journal of Sex Research, 40(3), 296–302.
23. Sakallı Uğurlu, N., & Ulu, S. (2003). Evlilikte kadına yönelik şiddete ilişkin tutumlar: Çelişik duygulu cinsiyetçilik, yaş, eğitim ve gelir düzeyinin etkileri [Attitudes toward violence against women in marriage: The effects of ambivalent sexism, age, education and income levels]. Turkish Psychological Articles, 6, 53–65.
24. Sakallı, N., Karakurt, G., & Uğurlu, O. (2001). Evlilik öncesi yaşanan cinsel ilişkiye ve kadınlarin evlilik öncesi cinsel ilişkide bulunmasına karşı tutumlar [Attitudes toward sexual relationship and females’ sexual experiences before marriage]. Istanbul University Studies in Psychology, 22, 15–29.
25. Sever, A., & Yurdakul, G. (2001). Culture of honor, culture of change a feminist analysis of honor killings in rural Turkey. Violence Against Women, 7(9), 964–998.
26. Şen, S., Egelioğlu, N., Kavlak, O., & Sevil, Ü. (2012). Sağlık profesyonellerinin gebelikte şiddet konusundaki farkındalıklarının belirlenmesi [Determination of awareness of health professionals about violence during pregnancy]. International Journal of Human Sciences, 9(1), 20–33.
27. Tataroğlu, M. (2013). Privacy İmpact Analysis (PIA) in preventing privacy issues. Management and Economics, 20(1), 263–289.
28. Türk Dil Kurumu. (2010). Büyük Türkçe sözlük [Great Turkish dictionary]. Ankara, Turkey: Author.
29. Uğurlu, N. S., & Akbaş, G. (2013). Namus kültürlerinde “namus” ve “namus adına kadına şiddet”: Sosyal psikolojik açıklamalar [“Honor” and “honor violence against women” in honor cultures: Social psychological explanations]. Turkish Psychological Articles, 16(32), 92–94.
30. Vefikuluçay, A. G. D., Zeyneloğlu, A. G. S., Eroğlu, K., & Taşkin, L. (2007). Kafkas Üniversitesi son sınıf öğrencilerinin toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin bakış açıları [Perception of and views on gender roles of senior students enrolled at Kafkas University]. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing, 14(2), 26–38.
31. Yıldırım, G., Koçkanat, P., & Duran, Ö. (2014). Ulusal ebelik kodlari ve meslek değerleri [National codes of midwifery and professional values]. Sürekli Tıp Eğitim Dergisi, 23(4), 148–154.
32. Yılmaz, D. V., Zeyneloğlu, S., Kocaöz, S., Kısa, S., Taşkın, L., & Eroğlu, K. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin toplumsal cinsiyet rollerine ilişkin görüşleri [Views on gender roles of university students]. International Journal of Human Sciences, 6(1), 775–792.
33. Zeyneloğlu, S., Kısa, S., & Yılmaz, D., (2013). Turkish nursing students’ knowledge and perceptions regarding virginity. Nurse Education Today, 33(2), 110–115.
34. Zorlu, T., & Keskin, K. (2017). The phenomenon of privacy in the culture-dwelling interaction: A comparative analysis over traditional Urfa and Akçaabat ortamahalle houses. Online Journal of Art and Design, 5(2), 72–89.