Gig Ekonomisi Bağlamında İş İlişkisinin Değişen Yüzü: Uber Örneği

Year 2022, Volume: 1 Issue: 72, 167 - 206, 20.01.2022

Ömer Ünal , Hasan Ejder Temiz

https://doi.org/10.54752/ct.1060793

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Gig ekonomisi, bireylerin, kısa süreli işler bulmak ve gerçekleştirmek için uygulamalara ve/veya internet sitelerine erişim sağlayarak tamamladığı ve genellikle üç tarafın bulunduğu bir iş ilişkisini ifade etmektedir. Gig ekonomisi, hem işin niteliğinden dolayı, hem de işin gerçekleştirildiği mekân kısıtı nedeniyle talep üzerine çalışma ve çevrimiçi çalışma olarak iki alt başlık altında sınıflandırılmaktadır. Gig ekonomisinde meydana gelen iş ilişkisinin eşit sonuçlar doğurmadığı bilinmektedir. Platformların kendilerini arz ile talebi buluşturan aracı, işçileri bağımsız yükleniciler olarak sınıflandırması pek çok sorunun ortaya çıkmasında başlıca nedeni oluşturmaktadır. Üstelik gig ekonomisinin hızlı ve düzenlenmeden büyümesi konunun incelenmesini gerekli kılmaktadır. Bu doğrultuda, çalışmada öncelikli olarak, gig ekonomisi kavramı açıklanmış, kavrama yönelik gerçekleştirilen tartışmalara ve iş ilişkilerinde yarattığı dönüşüme yer verilmiştir. İkinci olarak, gig ekonomisi güvencesiz istihdam bağlamında değerlendirilmiştir. Ardından, gig ekonomisi içerisinde yer alan ve kişisel yolcu taşımacılığı alanında hizmet veren Uber incelenmiştir. Uber’in çalışma hayatı bağlamında olumlu ve olumsuz yönleri ortaya konulmaya çalışılmış, iş ilişkileri, sürücülerin sınıflandırma sorununa yönelik hukuksal mücadeleleri, sendikalaşma girişimleri ve grev uygulamaları detaylı biçimde değerlendirilmiştir.

Keywords

Gig Ekonomisi, Uber, güvencesizlik, Algoritma, Teknoloji

References

• Airbnb. (2021). What are Airbnb Service Fees?, https://www.airbnb.co.uk/help/article/1857/what-are-airbnb-service-fees (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2021).
• Aloisi A. (2016). Commoditized Workers. Case Study Research on Labour Law Issues Arising from a Set of ‘On-Demand/Gig Economy’ Platforms. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal, 37 (3), 663–690.
• Anwar, M. A. ve Graham, M. (2020). Between a rock and a hard place: Freedom, flexibility, precarity and vulnerability in the gig economy in Africa. Competition & Change. Doi: 10.1177/1024529420914473
• Anwar, M. A., ve Graham, M. (2020). Hidden Transcripts of the Gig Economy: Labour Agency and the New Art of Resistance Among African Gig Workers. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52 (7), 1269-1291.
• Arın, T. (2013). Kriz, Devlet, İktisat ve Sosyal Güvenlik Politikaları. İstanbul: İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
• Aykaç, A. (2018). Dayanışma Ekonomileri. İstanbul: Metis.
• Bajwa, U. vd., (2018). Towards an Understanding of Workers’ Experiences in the Global Gig Economy. Global Migration & Health Initiative, Toronto.
• Ballotpedia. (2021). California Proposition 22, App-Based Drivers as Contractors and Labor Policies Initiative (2020)
• https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_22,_App-Based_Drivers_as_Contractors_and_Labor_Policies_Initiative_(2020) (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2021).
• Benach, J, Vives, A, Amable, M, Vanroelen, C, Tarafa, G, Muntaner, C. (2014). Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annu Rev Public Health, 35 (1), 229–253.
• Berry, M. (2021). How many Uber Drivers are there?, https://therideshareguy.com/how-many-uber-drivers-are-there/ (Erişim Tarihi: 4.03.2021).
• Bussewitz, C. (2019). Montreal drivers join global Uber strike over 'poverty wages', https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/citing-poverty-wages-rideshare-drivers-strike-ahead-of-uber-ipo (Erişim Tarihi: 31.03.2021).
• Burawoy, M. (2015). Üretim Siyaseti: Kapitalizm Ve Sosyalizmde Fabrika Rejimleri. İstanbul: NotaBene Yayınları.
• Carter, S.M. (2018). Over half of Americans delay or don’t get health care because they can’t afford it—these 3 treatments get put off most, https://www.cnbc.com/2018/11/29/over-half-of-americans-delay-health-care-becasue-they-cant-afford-it.html (Erişim Tarihi: 10.01.2021).
• Casetext, (2021). O'Connor v. Uber Techs., Inc.
• https://casetext.com/case/oconnor-v-uber-techs-inc-32 (Erişim Tarihi: 12.02.2021).
• Chen, M. (2020) Yeni Bir İşçi Dünyası: Gig Ekonomisiyle Yüzleşmek, Der: Panitch, L., Albo, G. Socialist Register 2020: Pazar Distopyasının Ötesinde. (Çev. Ersin Vedat Güler, 121-140), İstanbul: Notabene Yayınları.
• Close, K. (2016). Uber Drivers Plan to Strike During Super Bowl 50, https://time.com/4207739/uber-drivers-strike-super-bowl/ (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021).
• Conger, K. vd., (2019) Uber Drivers’ Day of Strikes Circles the Globe Before the Company’s I.P.O., https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/08/technology/uber-strike.html, (Erişim Tarihi: 31.03.2021).
• Collier, R. B., Dubal, V. B., & Carter, C. (2017). Labor Platforms and Gig Work: The Failure to Regulate.
• Cornelissen, J., ve Cholakova, M. (2019). Profits Uber everything? The Gig Economy and the Morality of Category Work. Strategic Organization, 1- 10.
• Court of Appeals. (2018). O’CONNOR V. UBER,
• https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2018/09/25/14-16078.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 11.02.2021).
• Cranford, C. Vosko L, F. ve Zukewich N. (2003). Precarious Employment In The Canadian Labour Market: A Statistical Portrait, Just Labour, 3, 6–22.
• De Stefano, V. M. (2016a). The Rise of the ‘Just-in-Time Workforce’: On-Demand Work, Crowd Work and Labour Protection in the ‘Gig-Economy’. Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37 (3), 471-504.
• De Stefano, V. M. (2016b). Introduction: Crowdsourcing, The Gig-Economy, Comparative Labor Law and Policy Journal, 37(3), 461-470.
• De Stefano, V. M. (2018). The Gig Economy And Labour Regulation: An İnternational And Comparative Approach. Law J. Soc. & Lab. Rel., 4, 68-78.
• Deon, L., (2020). Regulating the Scope of Employment in the Gig Economy: Towards Enhanced Rights at Work in the Age of Uber. LSE Law Review, 5, 190–208.
• Dunn, M. (2018). Making Gigs Work: Career Strategies, Job Quality and Migration İn The Gig Economy. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Kuzey Karolina Üniversitesi
• Dokko, J. vd.,(2015). Workers and the Online Gig Economy. The Hamilton Project, 1-8.
• Donovan, S. A. vd.,(2016): What Does The Gig Economy Mean For Workers. Congressional Research Service (CRS Report R44365). Washington.
• Economist. (2018). Mumbai unions force Uber and Ola into a corner, https://www.economist.com/business/2018/11/03/mumbai-unions-force-uber-and-ola-into-a-corner (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021).
• European Commission (2016) A European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy. Brussels: European Commission.
• European Parliament (2017) European Parliament Resolution of 15 June 2017 on a European Agenda for the Collaborative Economy (2017/2003(INI)). Brussels: European Parliament. Available http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0271_EN.html?redirect (Erişim Tarihi 03.02.2021)
• European Parliament. (2020), The Platform Economy And Precarious Work. Luxembourg: European Parliament. Erişim Adresi https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2020/652734/IPOL_STU(2020)652734_EN.pdf (Erişim Tarihi 03.12.2020)
• Eurofound. (2018), Digital Age: Platform Work: Types and Implications for Work and Employment–Literature Review, Eurofound-Working Paper, Erişim Adresi https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/wpef18004.pdf (Erişim Tarihi 23.12.2020)
• Erdut, T. (1998). Yeni Teknolojilerin İş İlişkileri Üzerine Etkileri, Ankara: Türk Ağır Sanayii ve Hizmet Sektörü Kamu İşverenleri Sendikası
• Erdut, T. (2005). İşgücü Piyasasında Enformelleşme ve Kadın İşgücü. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 3(6), 11-49.
• Erdut, T. (2021). Dijitalleşme ve İşgücü Piyasası. Karatahta İş Yazıları Dergisi, 19, 25-59.
• Erdut, Z. (2004). Liberal Ekonomi Politikaları ve Sosyal Politika. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 2, 11-37.
• Erdut, Z. (2007). Enformel İstihdamın Ekonomik, Sosyal ve Siyasal Etkileri. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 4 (12), 53-82.
• ETUC. (2021). National rulings on platform work show need for EU action, https://www.etuc.org/en/pressrelease/national-rulings-platform-work-show-need-eu-action (Erişim Tarihi: 10.03.2021).
• Flanagan, F. (2019). Theorising the Gig Economy and Home-Based Service Work. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(1), 57-78.
• Fishman, S. (2019). Working For Yourself (11. Baskı). Berkeley, California: Nolo
• Friedman, G. (2014). Workers Without Employers: Shadow Corporations and the Rise of the Gig Economy. Review of Keynesian Economics, 2 (2), 171-188.
• Gandini A (2018) Labour Process Theory and the Gig Economy. Human Relations, 72 (6), 1039–1056.
• GMB. (2021). Historic workers' rights win: Supreme Court rules in Uber drivers' favour, https://www.gmb.org.uk/news/uber-workers-rights-historic-gmb-supreme-court-drivers-legal-battle (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021).
• Goodfellow, J. (2016). San Francisco may grind to a halt over Super Bowl weekend if planned Uber strike goes ahead, https://www.thedrum.com/news/2016/02/06/san-francisco-may-grind-halt-over-super-bowl-weekend-if-planned-uber-strike-goes/(Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021).
• Graham, M. ve Woodcock, J. (2018), ‘Towards a Fairer Platform Economy: Introducing the Fairwork Foundation’, Alternate Routes: A Journal of Critical Social Research, 29, 242–253.
• Graham, M. vd.,(2017), Digital Labour and Development: Impacts of Global Digital Labour Platforms and the Gig Economy on Worker Livelihoods, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23 (2), 135–162.
• Greer, I. (2016). Welfare Reform, Precarity and the Re-Commodification Of Labour. Work, Employment And Society, 30 (1), 162-173.
• Griswold, A. (2014). Uber Just Caved on a Big Policy Change After Its Drivers Threatened to Strike, https://slate.com/business/2014/09/uber-drivers-strike-they-protested-cheap-uberx-fares-uber-backed-down.html (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021).
• Harris, S. D., ve Krueger, A. B. (2015). A Proposal for Modernizing Labor Laws for Twenty-First-Century Work: The "Independent Worker" Hamilton Project Washington.
• Harvey, D. (2015). Neoliberalizm Kısa Tarihi (Çev. A. Onacak). (2. Baskı). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• Harvey, D. (2019). Postmodernliğin Durumu Kültürel Değişimin Kökenleri (S. Savran, Çev.). (8. baskı). İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
• Heiland, H. (2021) Controlling Space, Controlling Labour? Contested Space in Food Delivery Gig Work. New Technology, Work and Employment. 1-15.
• Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the Global Digital Economy: The Cybertariat Comes Of Age. NYU Press.
• Huws U., vd., (2017) Work in the European gig economy: research results from the UK, Sweden, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Switzerland and Italy, Brussels and Hatfield, European Foundation for Progressive Studies, UNI Europa and University of Hertfordshire.
• HyreCar. (2021). Can You Drive For Both Uber and Lyft?, https://www.hyrecar.com/blog/drive-for-both-uber-and-lyft/ (Erişim Tarihi: 18.02.2021).
• ILO, (2020). World Employment and Social Outlook Trends 2020, Geneva: ILO.
• ILO, (2021). ILO Gözlem: COVID-19 ve Çalışma Yaşamı, 7. Baskısı. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---europe/---ro-geneva/---ilo-ankara/documents/briefingnote/wcms_769693.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 18.02.2021)
• Internet World Stats. (2021). World Internet Usage And Populatıon Statıstıcs, https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 10.2.2021).
• Internet World Stats. (2021a). Internet Users Statistics for Africa, https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats1.htm (Erişim Tarihi: 11.2.2021).
• Isaac, M. ve Scheiber, N. (2016). Uber Settles Cases With Concessions, but Drivers Stay Freelancers, https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/22/technology/uber-settles-cases-with-concessions-but-drivers-stay-freelancers.html (Erişim Tarihi: 11.02.2021).
• Isaac M. ve Scheiber N. (2016a). Uber to Pay at Least $84m in Settlement, https://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2016/04/21/uber-settles-cases-with-concessions-but-drivers-stay-freelancers/aiPzORifJk3YVCkSqjDybL/story.html (Erişim Tarihi: 11.02.2021).
• ITF; International Transport Workers' Federation, (2021). Indian Federation of App-based Transport Workers launched in Mumbai, https://www.itfglobal.org/en/news/indian-federation-app-based-transport-workers-launched-in-mumbai (Erişim Tarihi: 31.03.2021).
• ITU; International Telecommunication Union (2021). ICT Prices, https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/statistics/2020/PercentIndividualsUsingInternet.xlsx (Erişim Tarihi: 10.2.2021).
• ITUC. (2019). 2019 ITUC GLOBAL RIGHTS INDEX The World’s Worst Countries For Workers. [URL: https://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/2019-06-ituc-global-rights-index-2019-report-en-2.pdf]
• Jessop, B. (2005). Hegemonya, Post-Fordizm ve Küreselleşme Ekseninde Kapitalist Devlet (Çev: B. Yarar ve A. Özkazanç), İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları
• Johnston H. ve Land-Kazlauskas C. (2018) Organizing On-Demand: Representation, Voice, and Collective Bargaining in the Gig Economy, Geneva, International Labour Office
• Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious Work, Insecure Workers: Employment Relations In Transition. American Sociological Review, 74(1), 1-22.
• Kalleberg, A. L. ve Dunn, M. (2016). Good Job, Bad Jobs in the Gig Economy. Perspectives on Work, 10-14.
• Kässi, O., ve Lehdonvirta, V. (2018). Online labour index: Measuring the Online Gig Economy for Policy and research. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 137, 241-248.
• Katta, S vd., (2020). (Dis) Embeddedness and (De) Commodification: COVID-19, Uber, and the Unravelling Logics of the Gig Economy. Dialogues in Human Geography, 10 (2), 203-207
• Khreiche, M. (2018). Milieus In The Gig Economy (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Virginia Tech Üniversitesi, Politeknik Enstitüsü.
• Kollewe, J. (2019). Uber drivers strike over pay and conditions, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/may/08/uber-drivers-strike-over-pay-and-conditions, (Erişim Tarihi: 31.03.2021).
• Koray, M. (2018). Sosyal Politika, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi Yayınları.
• Larsson, A., ve Sabolova, D. (2019). Gig Patients. The Digital Transformation of Labor, 174-184.
• Lehdonvirta V, vd.,(2019). The Global Platform Economy: A New Offshoring Institution Enabling Emerging-Economy Microproviders. Journal of Management 45(2): 567–599.
• Legislative Analyst's Office, (2020), Proposition 22, https://lao.ca.gov/ballot/2020/Prop22-110320.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 10.02.2021).
• Lobel, O. (2017). The Gig Economy & The Future of Employment and Labor Law. University of San Francisco Law Review, Forthcoming.
• Lyons, H. (2021). Belgian union wants a Brussels taxi app to solve Uber issue https://www.brusselstimes.com/news/belgium-all-news/157932/belgium-union-wants-a-brussels-taxi-app-to-solve-uber-issue-criticises-sven-gatz-pascal-smet-vervoort/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.03.2021)
• Mahnkopt, B. (2020) Digital Kapitalizm Çağında İşin Geleceği, Der: Panitch, L., Albo, G. Socialist Register 2020: Pazar Distopyasının Ötesinde. (Çev. Eren Buğlalılar, 105-120), İstanbul: Notabene Yayınları.
• Manriquez, M. (2019). Work-games in the gig-economy: a case study of Uber drivers in the city of Monterrey, Mexico. In Work and Labor in the Digital Age. Emerald Publishing Limited.
• Minchin, J. (2020).Ola and Uber face new regulations in India, https://www.intelligenttransport.com/transport-news/112231/ola-and-uber-face-new-regulations-in-india/ (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021).
• MTurk. (2021). Pricing, https://www.mturk.com/pricing (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2021).
• Munck, R. (2013). The Precariat: A View from the South. Third World Quarterly 34 (5):747– 762.
• Munck, R.(2002). Labour and Globalisation: The New Great Transformation Zed Books.
• Muntaner, C. (2018). Digital Platforms, Gig Economy, Precarious Employment, and the İnvisible Hand Of Social Class. International Journal of Health Services, 48 (4), 597-600.
• O'Brien, S.A. (2020) Prop. 22: After $200 million California brawl, Uber and Lyft’s gig worker fight is far from over, https://www.mercurynews.com/2020/11/16/prop-22-after-200-million-california-brawl-uber-and-lyfts-gig-worker-fight-is-far-from-over/(Erişim Tarihi: 10.02.2021).
• Öngen, T. (2004): Sermayenin Yeni Hegemonya Stratejileri, I. Ulusal Sosyal Politika Kongresi, 22- 24 Ocak, Ankara, s. 246- 253.
• Özuğurlu, M. (2008). Anadolu'da Küresel Fabrikanın Doğuşu: Yeni İşçilik Örüntülerinin Sosyolojisi. İstanbul: Kalkedon Yayınları.
• Özveri, M. (2013). Türkiye’de Toplu İş Sözleşmesi Yetki Sistemi ve Sendikasızlaştırma (1963-2009), Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Sosyal Politika Araştırma ve Uygulama Merkezi, Ankara: Legal Yayıncılık.
• Pershan, C. (2016). Uber Protest Less Disruptive Than Imagined With Just 200 Of 1,500 Expected Drivers, https://sfist.com/2016/02/02/uber_drivers_disrupt_uber_with_prot/ (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021).
• Purcell, C., & Brook, P. (2020). At Least I’m My Own Boss! Explaining Consent, Coercion and Resistance in Platform Work. Work, Employment and Society, 1-16.
• Ravenelle, A. J. (2019). Hustle and Gig: Struggling and Surviving in the Sharing Economy. California: Univ of California Press.
• Risak, M. (2017). Fair Working Conditions For Platform Workers. Friederich Ebert Stiftung.
• Rodgers, G. (1989) Precarious Work in Western Europe: The State of the Debate. In: Rodgers G and Rodgers J (eds.) Precarious Jobs in Labour Market Regulation: The Growth of Atypical Employment in Western Europe. Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies; Free University of Brussels.
• Schor, J. (2016). Debating the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 4(3), 1-15. Erişim Adresi: https://greattransition.org/images/Schor-Debating-Sharing-Economy.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 20.11.2020)
• Scheiber, N. (2017). How Uber Uses Psychological Tricks to Push Its Drivers’ Buttons, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/04/02/technology/uber-drivers-psychological-tricks.html. (Erişim Tarihi: 10.02.2021).
• Schmidt, F.A. (2017). Digital Labour Markets İn The Platform Economy: Mapping The Political Challenges of Crowd Work and Gig Work. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
• Schwab, K. (2016), The Fourth Industrial Revolution, World Economic Forum. Geneva.
• Schwellnus, C., vd., (2018), Gig Economy Platforms: Boon Or Bane ?, OECD Economics Department Working Paper, Sen, S. (2019). Ola, Uber drivers threaten fresh strike for better earnings, https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/mumbai/ola-uber-drivers-threaten-fresh-strike-for-better-earnings/articleshow/67506814.cms (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021).
• Shah, A. (2018). Uber, Ola drivers strike in India, demanding higher fares, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-uber-ola-strike-idUSKCN1MW1WZ (Erişim Tarihi: 30.03.2021).
• Siddiqui, F. (2020). Uber and Lyft must make their drivers in California full employees, judge rules, https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2020/08/10/uber-lyft-ab5/(Erişim Tarihi: 10.02.2021).
• Supreme Court. (2021), Uber BV and others (Appellants) v Aslam and others (Respondents). Erişim Adresi: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2019-0029-judgment.pdf (Erişim Tarihi 25.02.2021)
• Stanford J. (2017) The Resurgence of Gig Work: Historical and Theoretical Perspectives, The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28 (3), 382-401.
• Stewart, A., & Stanford, J. (2017). Regulating work in the gig economy: What are the options?. The Economic and Labour Relations Review, 28(3), 420-437.
• TakeLesson. (2021). Are there any fees associated with your service?, https://support.takelessons.com/hc/en-us/articles/202972603-Are-there-any-fees-associated-with-your-service- (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2021).
• Tassinari, A., ve Maccarrone, V. (2020). Riders on the Storm: workplace solidarity among gig Economy couriers in Italy and the UK. Work, Employment and Society, 34(1), 35 54.
• Temiz, H. E. (2004) Eğreti İstihdam: İşgücü Piyasasında Güvencesizliğin ve İstikrarsızlığın Yeni Yapılanması, Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 2, 55-80.
• The Brussels Times. (2017). Uberpop: the Uber taxi service is taken to court in Brussels, https://www.brusselstimes.com/brussels/45581/uberpop-the-uber-taxi-service-is-taken-to-court-in-brussels/ (Erişim Tarihi: 10.03.2021).
• The French Court of Cassation. (2020). UBER, www.courdecassation.fr/IMG/20200304_arret_uber_communique_eng.pdf (Erişim Tarihi: 28.03.2021).
• Todolí-Signes, A. (2017). The ‘Gig Economy’: Employee, Self-Employed or the Need For A Special Employment Regulation?. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23 (2), 193-205. Uber. (2021). Payments and Earnings, https://www.uber.com/gh/en/drive/basics/tracking-your-earnings/ (Erişim Tarihi: 15.02.2021).
• Uber. (2021a). Use Uber in cities around the World https://www.uber.com/global/en/cities/ (Erişim Tarihi: 1.03.2021).
• Uber. (2021b). Company Info, https://www.uber.com/en-GB/newsroom/company-info/ (Erişim Tarihi: 1.03.2021).
• Vadekkethil, A. C. (2020). French Court of Cassation Rules that Uber Drivers are Employees, https://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/french-court-of-cassation-rules-that-uber-drivers-are-employees/ (Erişim Tarihi: 27.03.2021).
• Vallas, S. P. (2019). Platform Capitalism: What’s At Stake For Workers?. New Labor Forum 28 (1), 48-59.
• Vallas, S., ve Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273-294.
• Yahoo Finance. (2021). Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/UBER. (Erişim Tarihi: 1.03.2021)
• Webster J. (2016) Microworkers of the Gig Economy: Separate and Precarious, New Labor Forum, 25 (3), 56-64.
• Wong, J.C. (2016). Uber reaches $100m settlement in fight with drivers, who will stay contractors https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/apr/21/uber-driver-settlement-labor-dispute-california-massachusetts (Erişim Tarihi: 12.02.2021).
• Wordspy. (2021) Of Gigs and Gags, https://wordspy.com/blog/category/etymology/ (Erişim Tarihi: 9.12.2020).
• Woodcock, J., ve Graham, M. (2020). The Gig Economy. London: Polity Press. Wood, A. J., vd., (2019a). Networked but Commodified: The (Dis) Embeddedness of Digital Labour in the Gig Economy. Sociology, 53 (5), 931-950.
• Wood, A. vd., (2019b). Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy. Work, Employment and Society, 33 (1), 56-75.
• Wu, Q., vd., (2019). Labor Control in the Gig Economy: Evidence from Uber in China. Journal of Industrial Relations, 61(4), 574-596.
• Zabçı, F. Ç. (2002). Dünya Bankası'nın Küresel Pazar İçin Yeni Stratejisi: Yönetişim. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 57 (3), 151-179.
• Zwick, A. (2018). Welcome to the Gig Economy: Neoliberal Industrial Relations and the Case of Uber. GeoJournal, 83 (4), 679-691.