Siberkondri Ciddiyet Ölçeğinin Türk Öğrenciler için Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği

Abstract

Çalışmada, Siberkondri Ciddiyet Ölçeğinin Türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirliğini yaparak Türk toplumuna kazandırmak amaçlanmıştır. Bu çalışma, Atatürk Üniversitesinde Nisan – Haziran 2017 tarihleri arasında metodolojik olarak yapıldı. Akıllı telefon kullanan ve çalışmaya katılmayı kabul eden 411 öğrenci çalışmaya dahil edildi. Siberkondri Ciddiyet Ölçeğinin çeviri-geri çeviri yöntemi ile dil geçerliliği analiz edildi ve uzman görüşleri ile kapsam geçerliliği yapıldı. Açıklayıcı faktör analizinde KMO değeri 0.91 ve Barlett testi sonucu χ2=5026.785; p<0.000 bulundu. Ölçeğin faktör analizi sonucunda beş faktörlü bir yapıda ve faktör yüklerinin uygun aralıkta olduğu belirlendi. Çalışmada ölçeğin iç tutarlılık katsayısı 0.91 olarak bulundu. Ölçeğin Türk diline uygun bir ölçme aracı olduğu saptandı.

Keywords

• Siberkondri,Geçerlilik,Öğrenci,Üniversite,Güvenirlik

The Reliability and Validity of The Cyberchondria Severity Scale for the Turkish Students

Abstract

It is aimed to conduct the Turkish validity and reliability study of Cyberchondria Severity Scale and to adapt it into the Turkish society. This study was conducted methodologically between April – June 2017 in Ataturk University. 411 students who used smartphones and agreed to participate in the study were included in the study. In the validity-reliability analysis, language, scope, construct validity, and reliability analyses were used. In explanatory factor analysis, it was found that KMO value was 0.91 and Barlett’s test result was χ2=5026.785; p<0.000. As a result of the factor analysis, it was determined that the scale had a five-factor structure and the factor loads were in the appropriate range. It was found that the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.91. It was found that Cyberchondria Severity Scale has been an appropriate measurement tool for Turkish Language.

Keywords

• Cyberchondria,Reliability,Student,University,Validity

References

1. Akgül, A. (2005). Tıbbi Araştırmalarda İstatistiksel Analiz Teknikleri SPSS Uygulamaları. 3. Baskı. Ankara, Emek Ofset, 440-445.
2. Bajcar, B., Babiak, J., & Olchowska-Kotala, A. (2019). Cyberchondria and its measurement. The Polish adaptation and psychometric properties of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale CSS-PL. Polish Psychiatry, 53(1), 49-60.
3. Barke, A., Bleichhardt, G., Rief, W., & Doering, B.K. (2016). The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): German validation and development of a short form. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 23(5), 595-605.
4. Barsky, A.J., Ettner, S. L., Horsky, J., & Bates, D.W. (2001). Resource utilization of patients with hypochondriacal health anxiety and somatization. Medical Care, 39(7), 705-715.
5. Batigun, A.D., Gor, N., Komurcu, B., & Erturk, I.S. (2018). Cyberchondria Scale (CS): Development, validity and reliability study. Dusunen Adam-Journal of Psychiatry and Neurological Sciences, 31(2), 148-162.
6. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Veri Analizi El Kitabı. 8. Baskı. Ankara, Pegem Ak Yayıncılık, 167-182.
7. da Silva, F.G., Andrade, R., Silva, I., & Cardoso, A. (2016). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale for Brazilian Portuguese. Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 38(2), 90-95.
8. Doherty-Torstrick, E.R., Walton, K.E., & Fallon, B.A. (2016). Cyberchondria: parsing health anxiety from online behavior. Psychosomatics, 57(4), 390-400.

9. Eysenbach, G., Gray, J. M., Bonati, M., Arunachalam, S., Diepgen, T.L., Impicciatore, P., & Pandolfini, C. (1998). Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling, and filtering of information Hallmarks for quality of information Quality on the internet Assuring quality and relevance of internet information in the real world. BMJ, 317(7171), 1496-1502.
10. Fergus, T.A. (2013). Cyberchondria and intolerance of uncertainty: examining when individuals experience health anxiety in response to Internet searches for medical information. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(10), 735-739.
11. Fergus, T.A. (2014). The cyberchondria severity scale (CSS): an examination of structure and relations with health anxiety in a community sample. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28(6), 504–510.
12. Lemire, M., Sicotte, C., & Paré, G. (2008). Internet use and the logics of personal empowerment in health. Health Policy, 88(1), 130-140.
13. Leykin, Y., Muñoz, R.F., & Contreras, O. (2012). Are consumers of Internet health information “cyberchondriacs”? Characteristics of 24,965 users of a depression screening site. Depression and Anxiety, 29(1), 71-77.
14. Loos, A. (2013). Cyberchondria: too much information for the health anxious patient?. Journal of Consumer Health on the Internet, 17(4), 439-445.
15. Mathes, B.M., Norr, A.M., Allan, N.P., Albanese, B.J., & Schmidt, N.B. (2018). Cyberchondria: Overlap with health anxiety and unique relations with impairment, quality of life, and service utilization. Psychiatry Research, 261, 204-211.
16. McElroy, E. & Shevlin, M. (2014). The development and initial validation of the cyberchondria severity scale (CSS). Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 28(2), 259-265.
17. McManus, F., Leung, C., Muse, K., & Williams, J.M.G. (2014). Understanding “cyberchondria”: an interpretive phenomenological analysis of the purpose, methods and impact of seeking health information online for those with health anxiety. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 7, e21.
18. McMullan, M. (2006). Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient–health professional relationship. Patient Education and Counseling, 63(1), 24-28.
19. Muse, K., McManus, F., Leung, C., Meghreblian, B., & Williams, J.M.G. (2012). Cyberchondriasis: fact or fiction? A preliminary examination of the relationship between health anxiety and searching for health information on the Internet. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 26(1), 189-196.
20. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Gunter, B., Withey, R., & Russell, C. (2003). The British and their use of the web for health information and advice: a survey. Aslib Proceedings, 55(5/6), 261-276.
21. Norr, A.M., Allan, N.P., Boffa, J.W., Raines, A.M., & Schmidt, N.B. (2015). Validation of the Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS): replication and extension with bifactor modeling. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 31, 58-64.
22. Norr, A.M., Capron, D.W., & Schmidt, N.B. (2014). Medical information seeking: impact on risk for anxiety psychopathology. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 45(3), 402-407.
23. Ryan, A. & Wilson, S. (2008). Internet healthcare: do self-diagnosis sites do more harm than good?. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety, 7(3), 227-229.
24. Starcevic, V. & Berle, D. (2013). Cyberchondria: towards a better understanding of excessive health-related Internet use. Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics, 13(2), 205-213.
25. Stone, J. & Sharpe, M. (2003). Internet resources for psychiatry and neuropsychiatry. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 74(1), 10-12.
26. Şencan, H. (2005). Sosyal ve Davranışsal Ölçümlerde Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik. 1. Baskı. Ankara, Seçkin Yayıncılık.
27. Tatli, Z., Tatli, O., & Kokoc, M. (2019). Development and validity of cyberchondria tendency scale. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 11(1), 001-009.
28. Uzun, S.U. & Zencir, M. (2018). Reliability and validity study of the Turkish version of cyberchondria severity scale. Current Psychology, 1-7.
29. White, R.W. & Horvitz, E. (2013). Captions and biases in diagnostic search. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 7(4), 23.