Öğretmen Adaylarının E-Öğrenme Stilleri, Akademik Başarıları ve Eğitim Teknolojisi Öz-Yeterlik Algıları Arasındaki İlişkilerin İncelenmesi

Year 2022, Volume: 51 Issue: 1, 148 - 164, 27.04.2022

Ebru Bakaç

https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.887697

Cited By: 3

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının e-öğrenme stilleri, akademik başarıları ve eğitim teknolojisi öz-yeterlik algıları arasındaki ilişkilerin modellenmesidir.Bu kapsamda araştırmanın modeli betimsel taramadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2019-2020 akademik yılı güz döneminde Türkiye’nin Batı Karadeniz Bölgesi’nde bulunan bir üniversitede öğrenim gören öğrenciler (n=262) oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak Şimşek ve Yazar (2016) tarafından geliştirilen “Eğitim Teknolojisi Standartları Öz-Yeterlik Ölçeği” ve Gülbahar ve Alper (2014) tarafından geliştirilen “E-öğrenme Stilleri Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Ayrıca öğretmen adaylarının başarı düzeylerini belirleyebilmek için dönem içi akademik not ortalamaları kullanılmıştır. Araştırma verilerinin analizinde çoklu regresyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda öğretmen adaylarının öğrenme stillerinin akademik başarıları üzerinde etkili olduğu saptanmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının görsel ve sezgisel öğrenme stillerinin eğitim teknolojisi öz-yeterlik inançlarının anlamlı bir yordayıcısı olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca öğretmen adaylarının sezgisel öğrenme stilleri ve eğitim teknolojisi standartları öz-yeterlik algılarının akademik başarılarının anlamlı bir yordayıcısı olduğu da görülmüştür.

Keywords

E-öğrenme stili, Eğitim teknolojisi öz-yeterlik algısı, Akademik başarı, Çoklu regresyon analizi, Öğretmen adayları.

Investigation of the Relationship between Teacher Candidates' E-Learning Styles, Academic Achievements and Educational Technology Self-Efficiency Perceptions

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to model the relationships between teacher candidates’ e- learning styles, academic achievements and educational technology self-efficacy. In this context, the model of there search is descriptive. The participants of the study were 262 students who were studying at a university in Western Black Sea region of Turkey in academic year 2014-2015 in fall semester. “Educational Technology Standards Self- Efficacy Scale” developed by Simsek and Yazar (2016) and “E-learning Styles Scale ”developed by Gulbahar and Alper (2014) were used as data collection tools. Also, it was used to academic grade score in the semester in order to determine the success levels of teacher candidates. Multiple regression analysis was used in the analysis of there search’s data. As a result of there search it was determined that the learning styles of teacher candidates have an effect on their academic success. It was found that teacher candidates' visual and intuitive learning styles were a significant predictor of educational technology self-efficacy beliefs. In addition it was found that teacher candidates ’intuitive learning styles and educational technology standards self-efficacy perceptions a significant predictor of academic success.

Keywords

E-learning style, Educational technology self-efficacy, Academic achievement, Multiple regression analysis, Teacher candidates.

References

• Akturk, A. O., & Ozturk, H. S. (2019). Teachers' tpack levels and students' self-efficacy as predictors of students' academic achievement. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 5(1), 283-294.
• Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P. & Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigating the effect of learning styles in a blended e-learning system: an extension of the technology acceptance model (TAM) Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,33(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2741.
• Alcaro A, Carta S, &Panksepp J. (2017). The affective core of the self: a neuro-archetypical perspective on the foundations of human (and animal) subjectivity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1424). doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01424.
• Alsan, E. U. (2009). The effect of learning style preferences on teacher candidates’ performance in general chemistry laboratory course. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3(1), 117-133.
• Atalay, T. D. (2019). Learning styles and teacher efficacy among prospective teachers based on diverse variables. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(3), 484-494.DOI: 10.11591/ijere.v8i3.19609.
• Cengizhan, S. (2007). The effects of project based and computer assıstedınstructıonaldesıgns on those students’ who have depended, independed and cooperatıvelearnıng styles, academıcachıevement and learnıngretentıon. The Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(3), 377-403.
• Chou, H.W. ve Wang, T.B. (2000). the influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in www home page design training. International Journal of Information Management, 20(6), 455-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(00)00040-2.
• Choi,I., Lee, S. J. & Kang, J. (2009). Implementing a case-based e-learning environment in a lecture-oriented anaesthesiology class: do learning styles matter in complex problem solving over time?.British Journal of Educational Technolog,40(5), 933-947. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00884.x.
• Dunn, R (1993). Learning styles of the multiculturally diverse. Emergency Librarian, 20(4), 24-32.
• Dunn, R.,and Dunn, K. (1993). Teaching Secondary School Students Through Their Individual Learning Styles: Practical Approaches For Grades 7-12. Boston. Mass: Allyn and Bacon.
• Demir, B., &Usta, E. (2011). The effects of advance organizers according learning styles in computer assisted instruction software on academic achievement. Journal of Human Sciences, 8(2).
• Eyyam, R. &Yaratan, H. S. (2014). Impact of use of technology in mathematıcs lessons on student achievement and attitudes. SocıalBehavıor and Personalıty, 42, 31-42.doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2014.42.0.S31.
• Fowler, J. F. (1993). Survey Research Methods. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
• Glassett, K., & Schrum, L. (2009). Teacher beliefs and student achievement in technology-rich classroom environments. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(2),138-153.
• Gulbahar, Y. (2005). Learning styles and technology. Education and Science,30(138).
• Gulbahar, Y. &Alper, A. (2014). Development of e-learning styles scale for electronic environments. Education and Science,39(171), 421-435.
• ISTE (2000). National educational technology standards for students: connecting curriculum and technology. Eugene, OR. International Society for Technology in Education. https://www.iste.org/standards.
• June, L., Chun-Sheng, Y. & Chang, L. (2003). Learning style, learning patterns and learning performance