Atık Mukavva, Alçı, Pomza, Perlit, Vermikülit ve Zeolit ile Yapılan Kompozitlerin Yangın Direncinin Araştırılması

Year 2016, Volume: 31 Issue: 1, 1 - 10, 15.06.2016

Hanifi Binici

https://doi.org/10.21605/cukurovaummfd.317714

Cited By: 6

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, atık mukavva, alçı, pomza, perlit, vermikülit ve zeolit ile yapılan kompozitlerin yangın direnci ASTM E 160-50’ye göre belirlenmiştir. Numunelerin birim hacim ağırlıkları, su emme oranları ile ısı iletim katsayısı ve ultra ses geçirgenlik katsayısı bulunmuştur. Atık mukavva, alçı, pomza, perlit, vermikülit ve zeolit ile yapılan kompozitlerin ısı iletim ve ultra ses geçirgenlik katsayısı oldukça düşük bulunmuştur. Test sonuçlarına göre en uzun yanma süresi üçlü karışımlardan elde edilmiştir. En kısa sürede yanan örnekler ise ikili karışımlardan özellikle alçı ve perlit katkılı olan örneklerdir. Sonuç olarak, atık mukavvanın alçı, pomza, perlit, vermikülit ve zeolitin ikili ve üçlü karışımlarıyla elde edilen kompozitlerin yangına yeterli direnç gösterdiği ve yanmayı geciktirdiği anlaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Yangın, Atık mukavva, Alçı, Pomza, Perlit, Vermikülit, Zeolit

The Investigation of Fire Resistance of Composites Made with Waste Cardboard, Gypsum, Pumice, Perlite, Vermiculite and Zeolite

Abstract

In this paper, fire resistance of the composite made with waste cardboard, gypsum, pumice, perlite, vermiculite and zeolite was determined according to ASTM E 160-50. Unit weight, water absorption rate, ultra sonic penetration, heat conductivity and permeability coefficient of the samples was found. Thermal conductivity, ultra-sound transmission coefficient of composites made with zeolite, waste cardboard, plaster, pumice, perlite and vermiculite is very low. According to the test results the longest burn time were obtained from the triple mixes. Fire resistance of gypsum and perlite binary mixtures was lowest. As a result, it was found that the ternary and binary mixture made with waste cardboard, gypsum, pumice, perlite, vermiculite and the zeolite showed enough resistance to fire and by delaying burning.

Keywords

Fire, Waste cardboard, Gypsum, Pumice, Perlite, Vermiculite, Zeolite

References

• 1. Kanan N.O., 2014. Energy Efficiency Building Design and Fire Safety7th National Symposium on Roof and Facade 3-4 April 2014, Yildiz Technical University, 1515-1527, Besiktas- Istanbul .
• 2. Whitmore TC, Burslem D., 1997. Large-scale Disturbances in Tropical Rainforests. In: Newbery DM, Prins HHT, Brown ND (eds) Population and community dynamics in the tropics. Blackwell, Oxford, 13, 123-132.
• 3. Jacques G, Jean C, Jean-Claude M., 1997. Alternative Fire Resistance Strategies in Savanna Trees, Oecologia 110, 576-583.
• 4. Oymael S., Relatıonshıp of Water-Humidity and Fıre Effects on Stability, Material Selection and Buildıng Design, www.imo.org.tr.
• 5. Bayraktar K.G.,2011. Tesisatlarda ısı, ses ve yangın yalıtımı, 4. Ulusal tesisat mühendisliği kongresi ve sergisi, 665-676.
• 6. Temiz H, Kose M.M, Binici H.,2006. Effects of Fire on Precast Members: A Case Study, Engineering Failure Analysis 13, 1191-1201.
• 7. Liliana B. M, Exequiel S. R, Maria W, Analı´a V., 2006. Thermal Degradation and Fire Resistance of Unsaturated Polyester, Modified Acrylic Resins and their Composites with Natural Fibres, Polymer Degradation and Stability 91, 255-261.
• 8. Basdemir H, Demirel F., 2010. A Literature Review of Passive Fire Safety Precautions in Buildings, Journal of Polytechnic, 13, 101-109,
• 9. Saınrat A., 2004. Fire Safety of Buildings Covered by the Construction Product Directive 89/106/EEC(CPD), EU MEDA Programme, Support to the Quality Infrastructure in Turkey, Bayındırlık ve Iskan Bakanlıgı, 05- 09.07.2004.
• 10. Eric M., 2011. Yapılarda Mimari Planlama ve Yapı Elemanları Açısından Yangın Sorunları, Yapı Dergisi, 79, 41-43.
• 11. Gurdal E, Acun S., 2005. Isı Yalıtım Malzemeleri ve Yangın, İzolasyon Dünyası, 4, 48-52.
• 12. Binici H, Kucukonder A, Eken M, Sevinc A.H, Tufenk N., 2013. Waste Paper and Cardboard Production Use of Insulation Material, Çukurova University Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, 28, 21- 29.
• 13. Binici H, Aksogan O, Kaplan H, Gorur E.B, Bodur M.N., 2008. Performance of Ground Blast Furnace Slag (GBS) and Ground Basaltic Pumice (GBP) Concrete Against Seawater Attack, Construction and Building Materials 22, 1515–1526.
• 14. Erdem T.K., Meral C., Tokyay M., Erdogan T.Y., 2007. Use of Perlite as a Pozzolanic Addition in Producing Blended Cements, Cement and Concrete Composites, 29, 13-21. 15. Erdoğan B., 2005.Doğal ve Modifiye Doğal Zeolitlerde Etilen Adsorpsiyonu ve Bazı Uygulamalar, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Fizik Anabilim Dalı, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, AnadoluÜniversitesi.
• 16. Gülen J, Zorbay F, Arslan S., 2012. Zeolites and Usage Areas, Karaelmas Science and Engineering Journal, 2, 63-68.
• 17. Ozkırım I, Yorukogullari E., 2005. Characterisation ofBet Isotherm from Manisa, Gördes Natural Zeolite (clinoptilolite), D.P.U. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 9, 65-70.
• 18. Binici H, Temiz H, Sevinç AH, Eken M, Kucukonder A, Ergul T, 2013.Linear Absorption Coefficients of Mortar Samples Made with the Eggshell, Kahramanmaras Sütçü Imam University Journal of Engineering Sciences; 16, 11-17.
• 19. ASTM C 597(1994) Standart Test Method for Pulse Velocity Through Concrete, Annual Book of ASTM Standard.
• 20. EN 13501-2 Fire Classification of Construction Products and Building Elements-Part 2: Classification Using Data from Fire Resistance Tests, Excluding Ventilation Service, European Committe for Standardization, 2003.
• 21. Wang M, Wang X, Li L, Ji H., 2014.Fire Performance Od Playwood, BioResources, 9, 4934-4945.