Research Article

Comparison of personality characteristics of nursing students with tattoo-piercing situations

Volume: 43 Number: Ek 1 December 29, 2018
EN TR

Comparison of personality characteristics of nursing students with tattoo-piercing situations

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to perform a comparison of the personality characteristics of nursing students and their status regarding tattoos and piercings.

Materials and Methods: The sample of this descriptive study consisted of the students of the nursing departments of one private and one public university in the year 2016-2017 (n=718). Data for the study was collected using an Information Form and the Hacettepe Personality Inventory via face to face interviews. 

Results: 8.9% of the students were found to have tattoos, and 11% were found to have piercings. When the mean scores taken by the participants from the Hacettepe Personality Inventory were compared according to their status regarding having tattoos and piercings, a statistically significant difference to the advantage of those without tattoos was found in the social adaptation dimension. No differences in the Hacettepe Personality Inventory mean scores of the students were found according to their status regarding having piercings.

Conclusion: A majority of the students were found to not have tattoos and piercings. No significant difference could be found between the tattoo/piercing statuses of the students and their personality characteristics. These results are thought to be related to the cultural values the students were raised with and the dynamics of the society they live in.


Keywords

personality,tattoo,piercing

References

  1. 1. Morgül T. İnsan davranışları ve kişilik tipleri. York Universty, Turkey Headquater. Bitirme Tezi, 2013;27-65.
  2. 2. Özsoy E, Sakarya E. Kişilik Kavramının Örgütler Açısından Önemi: Bir Literatür Taraması 1 Kişilik Kavramının Örgütler Açısından Önemi: Bir Literatür Taraması. İşletme Bilimi Dergisi 2013;1(2):1-12.
  3. 3. Kaatz M, Elsner P, Bauer A. Body-modifying concepts and dermatologic problems: tattooing and piercing. Clinics in Dermatology.2008;26,35-44.
  4. 4. Andsoy II, Şahin AO. Ele alınmayan bir konu: dövme ve vücut piercing uygulamalarında enfeksiyon kontrolünde hemşirenin rolü. Medical Journal of Bakırköy 2014; 10(4):133-8.
  5. 5. Kosut M. Tattoo Narratives: The intersection of the body, self‐identity and society. Journal Visual Sociology. 2000;15,79-100.
  6. 6. Laumann AE, Derick AJ. Tattoos and body piercings in the United States: a national data set. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006; 55: 413-421.
  7. 7. Armstrong ML, Roberts AE, Owen DC, Koch JR. Toward building a composite of college student influences with body art. Issues Compr Pediatr Nurs 2004; 27: 277-295.
  8. 8. Şenol K, Çetinoğlu YK, Arı B, Başak S, Murat N, Turgut E et al. Üniversite öğrencilerinin dövme ve “piercing” konusunda bilgi, tutum ve davranışları. Turk j Dermatol 2014; 3:141-6.
  9. 9. Umar DÇ, Öğce F, Koçak YÇ, Akmeşe ZB. Üniversite öğrencilerinin “piercıng”e yönelik bilgi ve tutumları. Balikesir Sağlık Bil Derg 2013; 2 (3): 153-9.
  10. 10. Abdioğlu H, Kılıç R, Çalış N. Öğrencilerin ders başarısı üzerinde kişilik özelliklerinin etkisi: Üniversite öğrencilerine yönelik bir araştırma. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2015;8(1): 83-109.
MLA
Köse, Selmin, et al. “Comparison of Personality Characteristics of Nursing Students With Tattoo-Piercing Situations”. Cukurova Medical Journal, vol. 43, no. Ek 1, Dec. 2018, pp. 158-66, doi:10.17826/cumj.412676.