Analysis of Factors that Influence the Outcomes of Labor Induction with Intravenous Synthetic Oxytocin Infusion in Term Pregnancy with Favourable Bishop Score

Volume: 40 Number: 2 September 28, 2015
Mahmut Kokanalı , Demet Kokanalı , Ali Güzel , Hasan Topçu , Sabri Cavkaytar , Melike Doğanay
EN TR

Analysis of Factors that Influence the Outcomes of Labor Induction with Intravenous Synthetic Oxytocin Infusion in Term Pregnancy with Favourable Bishop Score

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the factors that influence the success of labor induction with synthetic intravenous oxytocin infusion in term pregnancies with favourable Bishop score. Material and Methods: 150 pregnant women with completed 37 weeks of gestation and Bishop score>6 who had single and cephalic presentation of pregnancy and were decided to underwent labor induction with intravenous oxytocin infusion were included in the study. Labor induction was considered unsuccessful if a vaginal delivery did not occur within 24 hours after the onset of loxytocin infusion or a cesarean section was performed during oxytocin infusion due to foetal distress, cephalopelvic disproportion or failure to progress in labor. Multivariable regression were used to identify odds of induction success. Results: Out of 150 women, induction of labor was unsuccessful in 23 (15.3%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that nulliparity, shorter gestation period, persistent occiput posterior presentation and greater birth weight were independent risk factors for the induction failure. ROC curve analysis stated that gestation period of <270 days predict induction failure with a sensitivity of 60.9% and a spesificity of 92.9% while value of >3445-gram-birth weight has a sensitivity of 82.6% and a spesificity of 71.7% for the prediction of failure. Conclusion: Nulliparity, shorter gestation period, persistent occiput posterior presentation and greater birth weight increase the failure risk of labor induction with intravenous synthetic oxytocin infusion

Keywords

term pregnancy, bishop score, oxytocin, labor induction

References

  1. ACOG Practice Bulletin no 107. Induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114:386-97.
  2. Ashton DM. Elective delivery at less than 39 weeks. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2010;22:506-10.
  3. Guerra GV, Cecatti JG, Souza JP, Faşndes A, Morais SS, Gülmezoglu AM, et al. World Health Organisation 2005 Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health Research Group. Factors and outcomes associated with the induction of labour in Latin America. BJOG. 2009;116:1762-72.
  4. Seitchik J, Amico J, Robinson AG, Castillo M. Oxytocin augmentation of dysfunctional labor. 4. Oxytocin pharmacokinetics. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1984;150:225.
  5. Alfirevic Z, Kelly AJ, Dowswell T. Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;7:CD003246.
  6. Smith JG, Merrill DC. Oxytocin for Induction of Labor. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2006;49:594- 608.
  7. Doyran GD, Özdemir İ, Somunkıran A, Gül ÖK,
  8. Demirci F, Yücel O. İndüksiyon öncesi transperineal ultrasonografik servikal uzunluk ve Bishop skorunun indüksiyon-doğum süresine etkisi Zeynep Kamil Tıp Bülteni. 2005;3:99-104.
  9. Rane SM, Guirgis RR, Higgins B, Nicolaides KH. Models for the prediction of successful induction of labor based on pre-induction sonographic measurement of cervical length. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2005;17:315-22.
  10. Crane JM. Factors predicting labor induction success: a critical analysis. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2006;49:573-84.
MLA
Kokanalı, Mahmut, et al. “Analysis of Factors That Influence the Outcomes of Labor Induction With Intravenous Synthetic Oxytocin Infusion in Term Pregnancy With Favourable Bishop Score”. Cukurova Medical Journal, vol. 40, no. 2, Sept. 2015, pp. 317-25, doi:10.17826/cutf.15884.